WHY MONITOR? Compliance with applicable Federal requirements & performance goals are being achieved. Prevention of fraud & waste Early detection of inefficiencies.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Financial Monitoring Techniques
Advertisements

1 AUDIT AND AUDIT RESOLUTION Peg Rosenberry, Director of Grants Management Claire Moreno, Audit Liaison, Office of Grants Management 9/18/2009 AMERICORPS.
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
2 Session Objectives Increase participant understanding of effective financial monitoring based upon risk assessments of sub-grantees Increase participant.
Procedures for ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Effective July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2014 Monitoring For Results.
Contract Staff Training Contract Management 2007.
A-133 Compliance & Audit Readiness Presented By: Tracy Jackson and Susan Cook.
Audit Requirements  A-133 Gov't, Education and Non-Profit  Thresholds $500K or more expended during the FY - Single Audit required  Audit Report - due.
OMB Circular A-133 Audits of States, Local Governments and Non-Profit Organizations CReATE May 2013 Cathi Bass, Grants Compliance Manager Sponsored Research.
Subrecipient Monitoring CCIA Spring Conference Sheena Tran, Rancho Santiago CCD Tania Walden, Los Rios CCD Tracy Young, Coast CCD May 2013.
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 COST SHARING.
Fiscal Monitoring Fiscal Monitoring. Agenda I. Fiscal Monitoring I. Fiscal Monitoring II. Follow-up II. Follow-up III. Correction Action Plan III. Correction.
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) Program SSVF Grantee Uniform Monitoring.
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requires states to have a system in place for reviewing approved CDBG projects Each state’s.
“The mission of the Sub-recipient Monitoring Section is to monitor, assess, and assist Sub-recipients to successfully implement and complete Grant Program.
Audits A-133 Compliance and Audit Readiness By: Tracy Jackson Senior Grants Management Specialist (Audits)
Risk Analysis So how do we choose who gets monitored?  HQ gives each Field Office a monitoring goal they must meet.  Each year HUD reviews all of its.
MODULE 8 MONITORING INDIANA HPRP Training 1. Role of Independent Financial Monitors 2 IHCDA is retaining an independent accounting firm to monitor its.
IS Audit Function Knowledge
POST-AWARD FINANCIAL COMPLIANCE Presented by: Jerry Fife, Assistant Vice Chancellor for Research Finance, Vanderbilt University,
Performance Monitoring All All Contracts require basic monitoring once awarded. The Goal of contract monitoring is to ensure that the contract is satisfactorily.
Financial Monitoring of Subgrantees You need to know... The information in this session is based on CNCS and Federal laws, rules, and regulations; CNCS.
Effective Management and Compliance 1 ANA GRANTEE MEETING  FEBRUARY 5, 2015.
Elements of Clinical Trial Quality Assurance Regulatory Coordinator –SCTR SUCCESS Center QA Monitor – NIDA Clinical Trials Network Stephanie Gentilin,
Erica Cummings Grant Coordinator 1.  The New Mexico Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (DHSEM) is responsible for:  Monitoring.
Monitoring & Oversight Adult Education and Literacy (AEL) Programs Brenda B. Williams Project Manager Texas Workforce Commission Regulatory Integrity Division.
BTOP OVERSIGHT WASHINGTON D.C. MAY 2012 U.S. DOC Inspector General Recovery Act Oversight Task Force 1.
Monitoring Schedule David Chappell, or
Employment and Training Administration DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ETA Grant Management and Monitoring – Discretionary Grantees Southern California Training and.
Award Monitoring Update National Science Foundation Advisory Committee for Business and Operations October 22, 2003 Mary Santonastasso, Director, Division.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Part 13 Informal Complaint Process Filing and Investigating Informal Complaints 35 th Annual Airports.
The Audit as a Management Tool Vermont State Auditor’s Office – April 2009.
Webinar for FY 2011 i3 Grantees February 9, 2012 Fiscal Oversight of i3 Grants Erin McHughJames Evans, CPA, CGFM, CGMA Office of Innovation and Improvement.
Preston Alderman MSDE, Director of Audit.  As recipients of federal and state funds we are charged with ensuring that the funds are adequately accounted.
1 NCLB Title Program Monitoring NCLB Title Program Monitoring Regional Training SPRING 2006.
Procedures for ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Effective July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2014 Monitoring For Results Reviewed & Revised with COP April 2011.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
Results-based Monitoring for IDEA & ESEA Programs Office of Consolidated Planning & MonitoringOffice of Consolidated Planning & Monitoring Fall 2014Fall.
An Overview: The Role of the Audit Committee in Monitoring, Oversight, and Compliance Derry Harper, Inspector General and Director of Compliance.
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP O CTOBER 19 & 30, 2015 ANGELLE GOMEZ S UBAWARD R ISK A SSESSMENT / MONITORING.
South Hunterdon Regional School District Consolidated Monitoring Report (CMR) Presentation to the SHRSD Board of Education on October 26, 2015 Audit from.
FSC Caribbean Group of Securities Regulators 10th Annual Conference and Workshop November 6 -8, 2013.
A risk assessment is the process of identifying potential hazards an organization may face and analyzing methods of response if exposure occurs.
Recordkeeping Requirements
ORS Compliance Extramurally Sponsored Programs Internal Control Plan (ICP)
Sub-recipient Monitoring and Contractor Determination
Adult Education and Literacy Monitoring FY17
Hill County Health Department Performance Management Logic Models
Perkins Monitoring Update
SUBRECEPIENTS POST-AWARD PROCEDURES
NCJA’s National Forum on Financial Management Training
Program Orientation World Vision Employees
Congratulations - You Have a Grant! Now What?!
CDBG Reporting and Monitoring Requirements For Local Officials
Subaward Life Cycle 10/24/17.
A Framework for Control
The Importance of Subrecipient Monitoring
Adult Education and Literacy Monitoring FY17
Building the Foundation of Compliance
Building the Foundation of Compliance
Management Verifications & Sampling Methods
CoC Subrecipient Management
Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources July 18, 2018
Risk Management: why and how to protect your health center
Homeless Initiatives MaineHousing
The Elements of appropriate Internal Controls
Critical Audit Issues and How to Avoid Them
Internal Audit Who? What? When? How? Why? In brief . . .
CDBG Public Service Agency Funding Process
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Presentation transcript:

WHY MONITOR? Compliance with applicable Federal requirements & performance goals are being achieved. Prevention of fraud & waste Early detection of inefficiencies Ability to attain future funding

WHO TO MONITOR? All CDBG sub recipient should be monitored once per year Develop a Risk Assessment to determine the methods and frequency of monitoring sub recipients and programs? Assign a point value to each sub-factor “High” “Moderate” “Low” Risk Create a plan to match the capacity of your staff resources with the needs of sub recipient monitoring

RISK ASSESSMENT FACTORS Financial Management Overall Management Satisfaction (Citizen Complaints) Services (Complexity of Programs)

POTENTIAL RISK FACTORS Financial Rank sub recipient by the size of grant Look at timeliness of expenditures, and completions Program income for those that generate income Current Audit and single Audit if applicable with unresolved finding that relates to sponsored program activity Award size relative to sub recipient capabilities

POTENTIAL RISK FACTORS Management New sub recipient or new to this type of project New staff or vacancy in key positions Program complexity Submissions are not timely and/or accurate Has not had on site Monitoring for two years

POTENTIAL RISK FACTORS Satisfaction Citizen complaints Responsiveness to complaints History of non-compliance National objective not met

POTENTIAL RISK FACTORS Services National Citizen complaints No response to complaints Inadequate knowledge of CDBG rules and Regulations Unsatisfactory performance

WHEN TO MONITOR? During grant performance period Schedule an entrance conference with the program director and other personnel instrumental with financial and program administration of the award

CONDUCT THE MONITORING REVIEW Meet with involved staff to clarify information Interview beneficiaries as appropriate and/or review client files Beware of any confidentiality conflicts Confirm project goals have been met or exceeded Verify sub recipient is not debarred or suspended

MONITORING REPORT Monitoring report to sub recipient within 30 days Written report to sub recipient within 30 days of visit If any problems or concerns are identified ask for a timely response Findings – corrective action Concerns – recommended action Be specific about what is necessary to clear any negative findings or concerns.

MONITORING RESPONSE Allow Director and/or Board Chair to respond and supply information relevant to the monitoring. Give an opportunity to supply any missing information or clarify misunderstanding relative to review. If corrective action is called for, begin to discuss steps that will be taken or are underway.