1 Faribault County Review Meeting 1 August 31, 2011 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oklahoma Strategic Highway Safety Plan – Vision, Mission and Goal presented to SHSP Leadership Group SHSP Working Group presented by Susan Herbel, Cambridge.
Advertisements

AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS.
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
County Road Safety Plans Experiences with Development and Implementation Richard (Rick) West, PE Otter Tail County Public Works Director/County Engineer.
57 th Traffic Conference. The National Problem — ,200 Fatalities 2.68M Injuries $230.6B / year $820 per person 3.3 Million Deaths Since 1928.
Safety at Signalized Intersections. Signalized Intersections FHWA Safety Focus Areas 2.
GAMPO. Randy Clayton Operations Manager, Strategic Highway Safety Plan Georgia Governor’s Office of Highway Safety.
Type Name Here Technical Program Services Eduardo C. Serafin, PE, AICP.
Hardin County Engineering Department September 12, 2006.
Carver County Crash Data Overview Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). 6/15/ Year Crashes Carver.
Meeting the AASHTO Safety Goal Daniel L. Carter, PE UNC Highway Safety Research Center AASHTO Safety Mgmt Subcommittee Meeting September 2, 2009.
Learning Outcomes Identify safety issues unique to local and rural areas. Identify common challenges to improving road safety. Explain why road agencies.
Early 2009 SD Crash Statistics Transportation Safety Conference “Working together to Save Lives” Office of Accident Records Chuck Fergen.
8th Annual Michigan Traffic Safety Summit Guidance for Implementation of AASHTO’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan Timothy R. Neuman, PE Vice President and.
1 MnDOT County Roadway Safety Plans Review Meeting 1 Metro June 21, 2012.
Annual Safety Meeting February 21, 2007 Ron Marshall, SD LTAP Local Rural Road Safety in SD - What does the data tell us?
The Safety Solution is Local and Personal !!! Business of Saving Lives The Safety Problem Is Global.
IDAHO’S CRASH PROBLEM & PROGRAMS. Mission - Zero traffic deaths on Idaho roads Fewer than 200 annual traffic deaths by 2012 Goals.
1 FLORIDA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION November 5, 2010.
City of Henderson Citizens Traffic Advisory Board NDOT SAFETY UPDATE.
October 17, 2012 Connie S. Sorrell Chief of Systems Operations.
1 Ramsey County Review Meeting 1 June 21, Metro* County Crash Data Overview 2 Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury.
1 Washington County Review Meeting 1 June 21, 2012.
October 24, 2015 The Vermont Highway Safety Alliance Vermont Highway Safety Alliance AARP Driver Safety Annual Meeting October 29, 2014 Presented by: Kevin.
Other Road Users  Motorists should always be on the look out for pedestrians and oncoming traffic Pedestrian Laws: Failure to yield Penalties Include:
Statewide Analysis Strategies Missouri’s Blueprint for Safer Roadways.
1 MnDOT County Roadway Safety Plans Review Meeting #1 - ATP 2 June 25, 2012.
Rural Transportation Planning Eunice Fitzpatrick Transportation Planner Kentucky River ADD Hazard, KY.
Lane Departures By: Deborah S. McAvoy, M.S., P.E., PTOE Tapan K. Datta, Ph.D., P.E.
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
1 September 28, 2011 Safety Strategies Workshop Brown County Faribault County Martin County Watonwan County.
University of Minnesota Intersection Decision Support Research - Results of Crash Analysis University of Minnesota Intersection Decision Support Research.
1 Update Update MnDOT’s County Roadway Safety Plans CTS Transportation Research Conference May 23, 2012 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
1 Watonwan County Review Meeting 1 August 31, 2011 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
Name Agency Date, Year Understanding Younger Drivers.
Caltrans External Advisory Liaison Committee October 2015.
Jurisdictionally Blind Safety Doug Bish OTCDC March 8th.
Director Malcolm Dougherty California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) October 28, 2015 Caltrans’ Highway Safety Improvement Program.
Polk County Crash Data Overview Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). 6/1/ Year Crashes Polk.
1 Marshall County Review Meeting 1 June 25, 2012.
1 Red Lake County Review Meeting 1 June 25, 2012.
ATP 2 Crash Data Overview Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). 6/1/ Year Crashes ATP 2 7,072.
2011 National Association of County Engineers Conference Mn/DOT County Roadway Safety Plans April 20, 2011 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan Development & Implementation Status 2004 Traffic Records Forum David M. Smith Senior Transportation Specialist, Office.
ATP 1 County Road Safety Plan 1 Brad Estochen MnDOT Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology
Rural Intersection Decision Support - Crash Analysis Rural Intersection Decision Support - Crash Analysis Presented at Pooled Fund Meeting April 19, 2004.
1 Polk County Review Meeting 1 June 25, ATP 2 County Crash Data Overview 06/25/2012 Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious.
1 St. Louis County Review Meeting 1 August 29, 2011 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
Older Road Users Emphasis Area Team
Performance Measures:
SCDOT Highway Safety Program
What’s UP with County Roads?
Paul Lopez, City of Avondale
Other Road Users Motorists should always be on the look out for pedestrians and oncoming traffic Pedestrian Laws: Failure to yield Penalties Include: •Up.
UDOT SafeMap hosted by Numetric
Intersection Crash Analysis in the State of Oregon
Florida Department of Transportation
OHIO CRASH TRENDS.
Name Unit Safety Officer
Customer Training Topic Ryder Fleet Risk Services
Monthly Training Topic NV Transport Inc. Safety & Loss Prevention
Moving Maryland Toward Zero Deaths
Driver Education Committee June 25, 2018
Minnesota Driver’s Manual – Chapter 3
D R I V E R S E D G E USA Curriculum Use mouse to advance slides.
NOW YOU HAVE DATA: WHAT DO YOU DO WITH IT?
Crash Severity for Lane Departures Crashes
Transportation Solutions to Connect Our Customers to Life’s Opportunities Trauma Net.
Ed Sullivan Safety Officer
Presentation transcript:

1 Faribault County Review Meeting 1 August 31, 2011 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services

8/31/20112 Faribault County - Crash Data Overview 5 Year Crashes Faribault County Year Crashes Faribault County State System 493 – 53% 16 – 47% State System 493 – 53% 16 – 47% CSAH/CR 177 – 19% 11 – 32% CSAH/CR 177 – 19% 11 – 32% Rural 100 – 56% 10 – 91% Rural 100 – 56% 10 – 91% Urban 77 – 42% 1 – 9% Urban 77 – 42% 1 – 9% All Way Stop 2 – 6% 0 – 0% All Way Stop 2 – 6% 0 – 0% Run off Road 51 – 74% 4 – 57% Run off Road 51 – 74% 4 – 57% On Curve 18 – 35% 2 – 50% On Curve 18 – 35% 2 – 50% Example All – % Severe – % Example All – % Severe – % Right Angle – 15 (58%), 0(0%) Rear End – 1 (4%), 0(0%) Right Angle – 15 (58%), 0(0%) Rear End – 1 (4%), 0(0%) Thru-Stop/Yield 25 – 76% 0 – 0% Thru-Stop/Yield 25 – 76% 0 – 0% Right Angle – 0 (0%), 0(0%) Rear End – 2 (100%), 0(0%) Not Applicable – 0 (0%), 0(0%) Right Angle – 0 (0%), 0(0%) Rear End – 2 (100%), 0(0%) Not Applicable – 0 (0%), 0(0%) Signalized 0 – 0% Signalized 0 – 0% Inters-Related 24 – 25% 1 – 12% Inters-Related 24 – 25% 1 – 12% Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Date of Analysis: August 3, 2011 Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). City, Twnshp, Other 235 –25% 5 – 15% City, Twnshp, Other 235 –25% 5 – 15% Inters-Related 33 – 43% 0 – 0% Inters-Related 33 – 43% 0 – 0% Not Inters-Related 37 – 48% 1 – 100% Not Inters-Related 37 – 48% 1 – 100% Run Off Road – 7 (19%), 0 (0%) Rear End – 8 (22%), 0 (0%) Other – 20 (54%), 1 (100%) Head On – 2 (5%), 0 (0%) Run Off Road – 7 (19%), 0 (0%) Rear End – 8 (22%), 0 (0%) Other – 20 (54%), 1 (100%) Head On – 2 (5%), 0 (0%) Animal 4 – 4% 2 – 20% Animal 4 – 4% 2 – 20% Not Inters-Related 69 – 72% 7 – 88% Not Inters-Related 69 – 72% 7 – 88% Head On, SS Opp 3 – 4% 1 – 14% Head On, SS Opp 3 – 4% 1 – 14% On Curve 0 – 0% On Curve 0 – 0% Unknown/Other 7 – 9% 0 – 0% Unknown/Other 7 – 9% 0 – 0% Unknown/Other 3 – 3% 0 – 0% Unknown/Other 3 – 3% 0 – 0% Other/Unknown 6 – 18% 0 – 0% Other/Unknown 6 – 18% 0 – 0% All Way Stop 0 – 0% All Way Stop 0 – 0% Right Angle – 3 (33%), 1 (100%) Run Off Road – 1 (11%), 0 (0%) Head On – 1 (11%), 0 (0%) Right Angle – 3 (33%), 1 (100%) Run Off Road – 1 (11%), 0 (0%) Head On – 1 (11%), 0 (0%) Thru-Stop/Yield 9 – 38% 1 – 100% Thru-Stop/Yield 9 – 38% 1 – 100% Run Off Road – 7 (47%), 0 (0%) Other – 6 (40%), 0 (0%) Head On – 2 (13%), 0 (0%) Run Off Road – 7 (47%), 0 (0%) Other – 6 (40%), 0 (0%) Head On – 2 (13%), 0 (0%) Signalized 0 – 0% Signalized 0 – 0% Other/Unknown 15 – 62% 0 – 0% Other/Unknown 15 – 62% 0 – 0% Not Animal 96 – 96% 8 – 80% Not Animal 96 – 96% 8 – 80% Unmappable 30 – 3% 2 – 6% Unmappable 30 – 3% 2 – 6% 2

8/31/ Year Crashes ATP 7 23, Year Crashes ATP 7 23, State System 10,038 – 43% 265 – 39% State System 10,038 – 43% 265 – 39% CSAH/CR 5,379 – 23% 265 – 40% CSAH/CR 5,379 – 23% 265 – 40% Rural 3,408 – 63% 221 – 83% Rural 3,408 – 63% 221 – 83% Urban 1,971 – 37% 44 – 17% Urban 1,971 – 37% 44 – 17% All Way Stop 73 – 7% 1 – 3% All Way Stop 73 – 7% 1 – 3% Run off Road 1,165 – 67% 98 – 68% Run off Road 1,165 – 67% 98 – 68% On Curve 419 – 24% 45 – 31% On Curve 419 – 24% 45 – 31% Example All – % Severe – % Example All – % Severe – % Right Angle – 219 (50%), 5 (36%) “Other” – 50 (11%), 3 (21%) Left Turn – 34 (8%), 3 (21%) Ran Off Road – 15 (3%), 2 (14%) Right Angle – 219 (50%), 5 (36%) “Other” – 50 (11%), 3 (21%) Left Turn – 34 (8%), 3 (21%) Ran Off Road – 15 (3%), 2 (14%) Thru-Stop 440 – 45% 14 – 48% Thru-Stop 440 – 45% 14 – 48% Right Angle – 95 (38%), 4 (50%) Head On – 11 (4%), 2 (25%) Rear End – 64 (25%), 1 (13%) “Not Applicable” – 4 (2%), 1 (12%) Right Angle – 95 (38%), 4 (50%) Head On – 11 (4%), 2 (25%) Rear End – 64 (25%), 1 (13%) “Not Applicable” – 4 (2%), 1 (12%) Signalized 252 – 26% 8 – 28% Signalized 252 – 26% 8 – 28% Inters-Related 774 – 29% 62 – 28% Inters-Related 774 – 29% 62 – 28% Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). Includes Steele County City, Twnshp, Other 8,104 – 34% 141 – 21% City, Twnshp, Other 8,104 – 34% 141 – 21% Inters-Related 985 – 50% 29 – 66% Inters-Related 985 – 50% 29 – 66% Not Inters-Related 684 – 35% 14 – 32% Not Inters-Related 684 – 35% 14 – 32% Run Off Road – 113 (17%), 4 (29%) “Other” – 88 (13%), 4 (29%) Head On – 54 (8%), 4 (29%) Rear End – 157 (23%), 1 (7%) Run Off Road – 113 (17%), 4 (29%) “Other” – 88 (13%), 4 (29%) Head On – 54 (8%), 4 (29%) Rear End – 157 (23%), 1 (7%) Animal 761 – 22% 3 – 1% Animal 761 – 22% 3 – 1% Not Inters-Related 1,734 – 66% 145 –67% Not Inters-Related 1,734 – 66% 145 –67% Head On, SS Opp. 86 – 5% 16 – 11% Head On, SS Opp. 86 – 5% 16 – 11% On Curve 16 – 19% 4 – 25% On Curve 16 – 19% 4 – 25% Unknown/Other 302 – 15% 1 – 2% Unknown/Other 302 – 15% 1 – 2% Unknown/Other 136 – 5% 11 – 5% Unknown/Other 136 – 5% 11 – 5% Other/Unknown 220 – 22% 6 – 21% Other/Unknown 220 – 22% 6 – 21% Right Angle – 111 (31%), 18 (60%) Run Off Road – 61 (17%), 6 (20%) SS Opp – 14 (4%), 2 (7%) Head On – 14 (4%), 2 (7%) Right Angle – 111 (31%), 18 (60%) Run Off Road – 61 (17%), 6 (20%) SS Opp – 14 (4%), 2 (7%) Head On – 14 (4%), 2 (7%) Thru-Stop 360 – 47% 30 – 48% Thru-Stop 360 – 47% 30 – 48% Run Off Road – 145 (38%), 12 (38%) “Other” – 57 (15%), 6 (19%) Right Angle – 45 (12%), 5 (16%) Head On – 21 (6%), 4 (13%) Run Off Road – 145 (38%), 12 (38%) “Other” – 57 (15%), 6 (19%) Right Angle – 45 (12%), 5 (16%) Head On – 21 (6%), 4 (13%) Other/Unknown 381 – 49% 32 – 52% Other/Unknown 381 – 49% 32 – 52% Not Animal 2,645 – 78% 218 – 99% Not Animal 2,645 – 78% 218 – 99% All Way Stop 19 – 2% 0 – 0% All Way Stop 19 – 2% 0 – 0% Signalized 13 – 2% 0 – 0% Signalized 13 – 2% 0 – 0% ATP 7 County Crash Data Overview 33

Faribault Crash Data Overview Rural Crashes 91% of the CSAH/CR severe crashes occurred in rural areas. Non-Intersection Related Crashes 88% (7) of CSAH/CR rural severe crashes are non-intersection related. 57% (4) of CSAH/CR severe rural, non-intersection related are run off road severe crashes, 50% (2) of which occurred on a curve. Intersection-Related Crashes 12% of CSAH/CR rural severe crashes are intersection-related. 100% occurred at thru-stop intersections (100% of these crashes were right angle) Urban Crashes 1% (1 crash) of the CSAH/CR severe crashes occurred in urban areas. 8/31/20114

Faribault Emphasis Areas 8/31/20115 Emphasis Area Statewide Percentage ATP 7Faribault County Interstate, US & TH CSAH & CR City, Twnshp & Other Interstate, US & TH CSAH & CR City, Twnshp & Other Total Fatal and Serious Injury Crashes8, Drivers Young drivers (under 21)24%16%(40)25%(62)28%(36)6%(1)33%(4)33%(2) Unlicensed drivers8%7%(17)8%(19)9%(12)0%(0)0%(0)50%(3) Older drivers (over 64)14%20%(51)12%(31)14%(18)19%(3)17%(2)0%(0) Aggressive driving and speeding-related20%21%(53)17%(42)23%(30)19%(3)8%(1)33%(2) Drug and alcohol-related26%20%(51)32%(79)30%(39)19%(3)25%(3)50%(3) Inattentive, distracted, asleep drivers20%28%(72)20%(49)18%(23)19%(3)8%(1)17%(1) Safety awareness Unbelted vehicle occupants25%23%(59)32%(81)34%(44)25%(4)42%(5)50%(3) Special Users Pedestrians crashes8%3%(7)6%(14)13%(17)0%(0)0%(0)0%(0) Bicycle crashes4%1%(2)0%(1)4%(5)0%(0)0%(0)0%(0) Vehicles Motorcycles crashes16%15%(37)17%(43)11%(14)13%(2)25%(3)17%(1) Heavy vehicle crashes10%23%(58)13%(32)5%(7)19%(3)17%(2)33%(2) Safety enhancements Highways Train-vehicle collisions0% (0)1%(3)1%(1)0%(0)8%(1)17%(1) Road departure crashes28%30%(76)47%(117)26%(33)56%(9)33%(4)33%(2) Consequences of leaving road Intersection crashes42%31%(79)33%(83)45%(58)13%(2)8%(1)67%(4) Head-On and Sideswipe (opposite) crashes15%21%(52)21%(52)17%(22)25%(4)25%(3)17%(1) Work zone crashes2% (6)2%(4)1%(1)13%(2)8%(1)0%(0) EMSEnhancing Emergency Capabilities Management Information and decision support systems More effective processes DPS Crash Data Records, 2006 to 2010 Top 5 Emphasis Areas by Jurisdiction Note: Numbers are not additive, as one crash may involve a young driver at an intersection. The numbers represent severe crashes (Fatal and A-type Injury crashes)

Faribault Segment Analysis 133 total segments Total Crashes – 253 Severe Crashes – 13 – on 13 segments  4 road departure, 3 right angle, 3 head on 63 segments with 0 crashes 8/31/20116

Faribault Intersection Analysis 158 intersections Total Crashes – 110 Severe Crashes – 2 – at 2 intersections  1 right angle, 1 head on 109 (69%) intersections with 0 crashes 8/31/20117

Safety Workshop Objective: Multidisciplinary discussion of a short list of safety strategies (Note: there is no discussion of specific crash locations.) Date: September 28 Location: Watonwan County Human Services, St. James, MN Agenda 8:30 – Coffee and Registration 9:00 – Introductions Presentations – Law Enforcement and Local Safety Advocates Background Information/Desired Outcomes Breakout Sessions – Prioritize Strategies 12:00 – 1:00 - Lunch Report Back/Final Presentation 2:45 – 3:00 - Wrap-up 8/31/20118

9 Faribault County’s Sample Invite

8/31/ Safety Workshop – County Assignments June Confirm groups and select group leaders Prioritize dates August Secure Location and Caterer – Group Coordinator people $12/person (“all in” including delivery, tax and tip) Send invites (example has been provided) September All Counties: RSVP Head Count to Roger Risser by September 21 Group Coordinator: Confirm final headcount by September 21 Group Coordinator: Carla Stueve (SRF) at Provide final headcount Audio-visual availability for the workshop