ESET Timing Close Study Results Stefani Dawn, PhD Assistant Director of Assessment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Engaging Students in Online Discussion
Advertisements

1 The Path to the Ph.D. in IS: Part 3, Advanced coursework and dissertation research.
Revisiting the 70% Withdrawal Date and Incomplete Grades: Grading Procedures Policy 7.10 Committee Members  Jennifer Batten, Co-Chair - Physical Sciences.
MSDWT Teacher Evaluation Information. Primary Evaluators All teachers will be assigned one Administrator to be the Primary Evaluator. The primary evaluator.
ME 4054W Design Projects Spring Semester 2010 Course Logistics Prof. Brad Bohlmann January 19, 2010 U NIVERSITY OF M INNESOTA.
E-Student Evaluation of Teaching Report to Faculty Senate January 12, 2012 Gita N. Ramaswamy, Director Academic Programs, Assessment, and Accreditation.
1 The Path to the Ph.D. in IS: Part 4, The Dissertation.
Computer Science Department Middle States Assessment Computer Science has 4 programs (minor, bachelor’s, master’s and doctorate) and therefore 4 different.
Conversion of Faculty Evaluations to an On- Line Format Catherine Hackett Renner SUNY Geneseo Larry Piegza Gap Technologies, Inc. OnlineCourseEvaluations.com.
Writing Program Assessment Report Fall 2002 through Spring 2004 Laurence Musgrove Writing Program Director Department of English and Foreign Languages.
Linking Principal Preparation Experiences to Initial Licensure Elementary Experiences: Implementing Change in Practica Joy Stapleton, Kristen Cuthrell,
CERTI Professional Development What You Need to Know About Electronic Student Course Evaluations Steph Fitch, Chair, Ad Hoc Faculty Senate Committee.
Online Course Observation. Objectives: 1.Articulate the steps of an online faculty observation 2.Explain the elements of the GRCC Online Course Observation.
Final Report. Dev/Prototype Fall 2011 System Testing (Early) Spring 2012 Pilot Test w/ Selected Departments Spring 2012 Trainings for Academic Chairs.
Online and Classroom Observation Training. Learning Objectives: 1.Identify the behaviors that characterize the elements of effective teaching 2.Review.
By Richard Schutt For Colorado Christian University Management of Web Based Classes EDU543 Professor Andrew Roob.
Implementing Active Learning Strategies in a Large Class Setting Travis White, Pharm.D., Assistant Professor Kristy Lucas, Pharm.D., Professor Pharmacy.
11 Applying Blended Learning – Pat Hammett Courses: 1.IOE/MFG 461 – Quality Engineering/Statistical Analysis Fall Term (Enrollment: ~100 On Campus; 60.
NewTextbook Tools M-Pathways and Ctools. Background Fall 2006: Student concerns about rising textbook costs results in Provost’s Textbook Task Force.
TEACHING EFFECTIVENES AND ENHANCEMENT COMMITTEE ALISON ANTES JENNIFER STANSBURY KOENIG STEPHANIE KLATZKE CHRIS LAWRENCE LILI MA PHIL MCCARTNEY KENNETH.
 Integrate the Bacc Core category learning outcomes into the course.  Clarify for students how they will achieve and demonstrate the learning outcomes.
Grade Change & Incompletes Policy/ Procedure Auburn University Office of the Provost.
Graduate Degree Progress & Clearance Graduate School Office Amy Gillett and Amy Corr.
Course Management with Banner August 2009 Banner Key Elements of Banner – Course Management 1.Accessing (& Verifying) your class roster 2. ing students.
MSDWT Teacher Evaluation Information.  The primary evaluator will assign the final rating  The primary evaluator will take the lead on any Performance.
Stefani Dawn Assistant Director of Assessment Office of Academic Program, Assessment and Accreditation eSET.
What’s New in Exploring Canvas Elisabeth Greenwood Center for Distributed Learning.
One Shot? Make it Four!: Planning and Assessing a Multi-Session Information Literacy Experiment Maureen Williams Neumann University Aston, Pennsylvania.
eXPlorance Blue: The new electronic student course evaluation system
ECE791 Senior Design Experience Project Requirements and Timeline.
Assessment Committee. Communicate what we Think about Assessment. Learn to Integrate assessment into our teaching practice and Act on it toward continuous.
Limited Submissions NCURA Region III Spring Meeting.
ESET: Combined Versus Uncombined Reports Stefani Dawn, PhD Assistant Director of Assessment Academic Programs, Assessment and Accreditation.
The Use of Formative Evaluations in the Online Course Setting JENNIFER PETERSON, MS, RHIA, CTR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SCIENCES.
STUDENT SURVEY OF INSTRUCTION (SSI) INSTRUCTOR WORKSHOP SARAH GORDON, JAMES KNECHT & ANNETTE MOORE UNIVERSITY ASSESSMENT AND TESTING SESSION I: MONDAY,
Course Evaluations Accessing your Spring 2008 course evaluations on the Portal. Inside you will find the step by step directions on how to access your.
ACC 202 Academic professor/tutorialrank For more course Tutorials
Observation Training. Learning Objectives: 1.Review the elements of the observation process including: scheduling, pre-observation preparation, post-observation.
Data Pipeline Town Hall February 26, 2015 The goal of the webinar is to provide updates on the Data Pipeline and current and upcoming collections. These.
Office of Measurement Services (OMS) Student Evaluation of Teaching June 2003.
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Montgomery College Fall 2011 Orientation.
Jacksonville, FL March 2013 Welcome, Bienvenido, Bienvenu Teaching Certification Programs Key Questions for Design & Refinement Judith Longfield Georgia.
VCT 410 aid Learn/vct410aid.com FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
IT 210 Week 9 Final Project Currency Conversion To purchase this material link 210-Week-9-Final-Project-Currency-Conversion.
Outcomes Assessment Committee
Course Evaluation System (CES)
Message from ExecAGC Nick Antonakis – Chair Nikki Banks Ann Alexander
The Power and Potential of Formative Assessment
Grand Rapids Community College Faculty Evaluation System
MHA 618 Enthusiastic Study/snaptutorial.com
Time Line for Program Reviews
Key Dates for GEARS Spring 2018 All Faculty Selected Faculty
Working with Student Success Data
Public Hearing Proposed Changes to Tuition Rates
Course Evaluation Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations
Working with Student Success Data: Session 2 (Jan. 31, 2014)
Department of Curriculum & Instruction
for Instructors and Roster Contacts
Evaluation Information
Pilot Goals Focus Consistency Response
ECSE Advising 10 September /20/2019 Kenneth A. Connor.
Academic Freedom & Standards Committee
Time Line for Program Reviews
Region 8 Meeting Harvey Solomon, MD
Is it Working? Stop Assuming, Start Assessing!
Learning Community II Survey
Institutional Course Evaluation Solution
Spring Orientation Meeting Monday, February 26, 2019
Faculty Center for Instructors
Committee for Effective Teaching Chair: Joel Dittmer
Presentation transcript:

eSET Timing Close Study Results Stefani Dawn, PhD Assistant Director of Assessment

Background Requests have been made to modify the closing date of eSET. – close before finals – close after finals but before grades are released (with grades access blocked until evaluations are completed) – close at the end of grade week, with access to grades blocked until evaluations are completed

Data Collected Response rates for each of the three scenarios Median scores for each of the three scenarios Survey results Logistical considerations

Response Rates for 3 Different Close Timings TermAnsweredDeclined Total Response Rate Incomplete When Ended (Holds Were Placed on Viewing Grades) Fall % (n=101,042) 22% (n=32,872) 89% 12% (17,732) End of grade release week Winter % (89,363) 24% (32,403) 90% 11% (14,515) End of grade release week Spring % (71,069) 22% (27,253) 80% 19% (23,646) after finals before grades posted Fall % (88,702) 13% (19,449) 73% 27% (40,712) after finals before grades posted Winter % (n=62,930) 8% (n=10,933) 53% 47% (n=64,799) Before finals

Median Scores Term Median – Q1 “The course as a whole was:” Median – Q2 “The instructor’s contribution to a course was:” Fall Winter Spring Fall Winter

Survey Results Timing Preference by % – Faculty/staff (n = 31), Students (n=1669)

Survey Results Comments Summary There were 275 comments submitted: 254 were from students Students: – They are too busy studying and completing papers to complete evaluations before finals – The final is an important part of the course and want to experience the entire course before evaluating it

Survey Results Comments Summary Students: – In many cases, students had either not yet received feedback from faculty on major assignments, or instruction was still occurring before finals – They want to be able to provide thoughtful feedback, which requires time.

Survey Results Comments Summary Students: – They recognize that faculty are concerned about potential retaliation with evaluations after grades are posted, and suggested closing before grades were released or blocking the ability of students to see their grades before evaluations are complete. Likewise, students are very concerned about allowing faculty to see evaluation reports prior to grades being released.

Survey Results Comments Summary Faculty: – Concern about students seeing grades prior to evaluations and retaliatory evaluations as a result, or concerns about scores being lower after students have completed a tough final. – Concern about a low response rate.

Logistical Considerations When closing before finals – Instructor added questions period is reduced. – Reports will not be released until after grades are posted.

Faculty Senate Executive Committee Recommendation – Close after finals but before grades are officially posted on the web with grade access blocked. NOTE: If you post grades on Blackboard and do not want students to view it then the instructor must hide those. There are instructions on the APAA eSET website on how to do this.