30th International Cosmic Ray Conference in Merida, Mexico Michael Smy UC Irvine Low Energy Event Reconstruction and Selection in Super-Kamiokande-III.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Neutrinos from kaon decay in MiniBooNE Kendall Mahn Columbia University MiniBooNE beamline overview Kaon flux predictions Kaon measurements in MiniBooNE.
Advertisements

Soudan 2 Peter Litchfield University of Minnesota For the Soudan 2 collaboration Argonne-Minnesota-Oxford-RAL-Tufts-Western Washington  Analysis of all.
11-September-2005 C2CR2005, Prague 1 Super-Kamiokande Atmospheric Neutrino Results Kimihiro Okumura ICRR Univ. of Tokyo ( 11-September-2005.
Super-Kamiokande Introduction Contained events and upward muons Updated results Oscillation analysis with a 3D flux Multi-ring events  0 /  ratio 3 decay.
G. Sullivan - Princeton - Mar 2002 What Have We Learned from Super-K? –Before Super-K –SK-I ( ) Atmospheric Solar –SNO & SK-I Active solar –SK.
Past Experience of reactor neutrino experiments Yifang Wang Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing Nov. 28, 2003.
Cosmic Induced Backgrounds D. Reyna Argonne National Lab.
Prospects for 7 Be Solar Neutrino Detection with KamLAND Stanford University Department of Physics Kazumi Ishii.
Performance of a Water Cherenkov Detector for e Appearance Shoei NAKAYAMA (ICRR, University of Tokyo) November 18-19, 2005 International Workshop on a.
Searching for Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations at MINOS Andy Blake Cambridge University April 2004.
A Search for Point Sources of High Energy Neutrinos with AMANDA-B10 Scott Young, for the AMANDA collaboration UC-Irvine PhD Thesis:
Results and Future of the KamLAND Experiment
21-25 January 2002 WIN 2002 Colin Okada, LBNL for the SNO Collaboration What Else Can SNO Do? Muons and Atmospheric Neutrinos Supernovae Anti-Neutrinos.
SN Physics Workshop September 17 th 2009 Michael Smy UC Irvine SN Relic Neutrinos in Large Water Cherenkov Detectors Chandra/Hubble View of E
30 Ge & Si Crystals Arranged in verticals stacks of 6 called “towers” Shielding composed of lead, poly, and a muon veto not described. 7.6 cm diameter.
New results from K2K Makoto Yoshida (IPNS, KEK) for the K2K collaboration NuFACT02, July 4, 2002 London, UK.
Super-Kamiokande – Neutrinos from MeV to TeV Mark Vagins University of California, Irvine EPS/HEP Lisbon July 22, 2005.
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
Shoei NAKAYAMA (ICRR) for Super-Kamiokande Collaboration December 9, RCCN International Workshop Effect of solar terms to  23 determination in.
Solar neutrino measurement at Super Kamiokande ICHEP'04 ICRR K.Ishihara for SK collaboration Super Kamiokande detector Result from SK-I Status of SK-II.
14/02/2007 Paolo Walter Cattaneo 1 1.Trigger analysis 2.Muon rate 3.Q distribution 4.Baseline 5.Pulse shape 6.Z measurement 7.Att measurement OUTLINE.
Recent results from the K2K experiment Yoshinari Hayato (KEK/IPNS) for the K2K collaboration Introduction Summary of the results in 2001 Overview of the.
Present and Future of Super-Kamiokande Experiment Chen Shaomin Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University.
Michael Smy UC Irvine Solar and Atmospheric Neutrinos 8 th International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Superbeams & Betabeams Irvine, California, August.
The Earth Matter Effect in the T2KK Experiment Ken-ichi Senda Grad. Univ. for Adv. Studies.
Dec. 13, 2001Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Neutrino and Anti-Neutrino Cross Sections and CP Phase Measurement Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK-IPNS) NuInt01,
Yasuhiro Kishimoto for KamLAND collaboration RCNS, Tohoku Univ. September 12, 2007 TAUP 2007 in Sendai.
Present and future detectors for Geo-neutrinos: Borexino and LENA Applied Antineutrino Physics Workshop APC, Paris, Dec L. Oberauer, TU München.
SNO and the new SNOLAB SNO: Heavy Water Phase Complete Status of SNOLAB Future experiments at SNOLAB: (Dark Matter, Double beta, Solar, geo-, supernova.
Solar neutrino results from Super-Kamiokande Satoru Yamada for the Super-Kamiokande collaboration Institute of cosmic ray research, University of Tokyo.
Study of solar neutrino energy spectrum above 4.5 MeV in Super-Kamiokande-I 1, Solar Neutrino Oscillation 2, Super-Kamiokande detector 3, Data set for.
1 水质契仑科夫探测器中的中子识别 张海兵 清华大学 , 南京 First Study of Neutron Tagging with a Water Cherenkov Detector.
CEA DSM Irfu Reconstruction and analysis of ANTARES 5 line data Niccolò Cottini on behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration XX th Rencontres de Blois 21 / 05.
The AMANDA-II Telescope - Status and First Results - Ralf Wischnewski / DESY-Zeuthen for the AMANDA Collaboration TAUP2001, September.
Data Processing for the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory Aksel Hallin Queen’s, October 2006.
Results from RENO Soo-Bong Kim (KNRC, Seoul National University) “17 th Lomosonov Conference on Elementary Particle Physics” Moscow. Russia, Aug ,
NuFact02, July 2002, London Takaaki Kajita, ICRR, U.Tokyo For the K2K collab. and JHF-Kamioka WG.
N eutrino O scillation W orkshop Conca Specchiulla, September 11 th 2006 Michael Smy UC Irvine Low Energy Challenges in SK-III.
Neutrino Oscillations at Super-Kamiokande Soo-Bong Kim (Seoul National University)
JPS 2003 in Sendai Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation ~ Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment ~ 2. Event selection 3. mass.
Medium baseline neutrino oscillation searches Andrew Bazarko, Princeton University Les Houches, 20 June 2001 LSND: MeVdecay at rest MeVdecay in flight.
Jet Studies at CDF Anwar Ahmad Bhatti The Rockefeller University CDF Collaboration DIS03 St. Petersburg Russia April 24,2003 Inclusive Jet Cross Section.
T2K Status Report. The Accelerator Complex a Beamline Performance 3 First T2K run completed January to June x protons accumulated.
1 LTR 2004 Sudbury, December 2004 Helenia Menghetti, Marco Selvi Bologna University and INFN Large Volume Detector The Large Volume Detector (LVD)
Recent Results from RENO NUFACT2014 August. 25 to 30, 2014, Glasgow, Scotland, U.K. Hyunkwan Seo on behalf of the RENO Collaboration Seoul National University.
06/2006I.Larin PrimEx Collaboration meeting  0 analysis.
Solar Neutrino Results from SNO
Supernova Relic Neutrinos (SRN) are a diffuse neutrino signal from all past supernovae that has never been detected. Motivation SRN measurement enables.
APS/JPS Joint Meeting Kapalua, Maui, September 2005 Michael Smy UC Irvine Relic Neutrino Detection in Large Water Cherenkov Detectors.
Second Workshop on large TPC for low energy rare event detection, Paris, December 21 st, 2004.
5th June 2003, NuFact03 Kengo Nakamura1 Solar neutrino results, KamLAND & prospects Solar Neutrino History Solar.
Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.
Double Chooz Experiment Status Jelena Maricic, Drexel University (for the Double Chooz Collaboration) September, 27 th, SNAC11.
APS – DPF Meeting at Brown University Tuesday August 9 th 2011 Michael Smy, UC Irvine Low Energy Astronomy in Super-Kamiokande.
The XXII International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics in Santa Fe, New Mexico, June 13-19, 2006 The T2K 2KM Water Cherenkov Detector M.
ICARUS T600: low energy electrons
IBD Detection Efficiencies and Uncertainties
Muons in IceCube PRELIMINARY
P0D reconstruction/analysis update
L/E analysis of the atmospheric neutrino data from Super-Kamiokande
Neutrino astronomy Measuring the Sun’s Core
Results of dN/dt Elastic
Neutron backgrounds in KamLAND
STAR Geometry and Detectors
Status of Neutron flux Analysis in KIMS experiment
Daya Bay Neutrino Experiment
Unfolding performance Data - Monte Carlo comparison
Impact of neutrino interaction uncertainties in T2K
Davide Franco for the Borexino Collaboration Milano University & INFN
Some Nuclear Physics with Solar Neutrinos
Presentation transcript:

30th International Cosmic Ray Conference in Merida, Mexico Michael Smy UC Irvine Low Energy Event Reconstruction and Selection in Super-Kamiokande-III

SSM spectrum pp 7 Be pep 8B8B P( e  e ) Vacuum osc. dominant matter osc. dominant Expected P( e  e ) Why Study Low Energy Events? precision measurement of solar neutrino oscillation parameters with reactor neutrinos 0.1% GdCl 3need 0.1% GdCl 3 to tag neutrons in delayed coincidence MSW transition for solar neutrinos oscillations both require very low energy threshold & precise energy calibration Courtesy K. Bays, UC Irvine & M. Nakahata, ICRR oscillated/unoscillated 1.0 Reconstructed Total Positron Energy (MeV) expected spectrum from one year of SK data (15 reactors) with Gd (current best-fit oscillation parameters) e Gd  ’s with  E=8MeV after simple cuts (vertex correl., fiducial volume,...)

Positron Vertex Resolution from simulation of Gd delayed coincidences from 15 reactors around SK (8 MeV  cascade) vertex resolution o.k. above ~3MeV vertex resolution much better, if both e + and n are used Courtesy K. Bays, UC Irvine mean deviation from true vertex

New SK-III Low Energy Data turned on online vertex fits and SLE trigger 100% efficient at 5 MeV 2 nd reduction of data new LINAC calib. data at very low energy preliminary energy scale artificial radon injection solar neutrino elastic scattering peak observed Michael Smy, UC Irvine

SK-III Super Low Energy Trigger Courtesy Furuse-san, ICRR SLE LE Energy (MeV) Efficiency in future: record every hit! record every hit! no hardware threshold no hardware threshold threshold set by reconstruction threshold set by reconstruction

after pre-cut (electronic noise, Michel electrons) + blast shield (FRP) radioactive noise cut + spallation cut + mis-reconstruction cut + external event cut (SK-I: + 16 N cut) after pre-cut (electronic noise, Michel electrons) + blast shield (FRP) radioactive noise cut + spallation cut + mis-reconstruction cut after pre-cut (electronic noise, Michel electrons) + blast shield (FRP) radioactive noise cut + spallation cut after pre-cut (electronic noise, Michel electrons) + blast shield (FRP) radioactive noise cut Data Rate for each Reduction Step Agreement of SK-III and SK-I looks quite good! Courtesy Takeuchi-san, ICRR Energy (MeV) Number of events/day/22.5kt/0.5MeV Solid: SK-I (PRD ) Error bar: SK-III (Very Preliminary) after pre-cut (electronic noise, Michel electrons)

Data Reduction goodness: tests timing residuals of vertex fit for coincidence (0=poor, 1=good residuals) dirKS: tests azimuthal symmetry of Cherenkov cone (0=symmetric, 1=asymmetric) pattern likelihood cut:  2 test of Cherenkov angle solution external event d  : project event backwards to the inner detector boundary, calculate distance to that point d , cut d  6.5MeV) Michael Smy, UC Irvine

New Linear Accelerator Data just took LINAC data at six positions a new lowest electron energy: 4.4 MeV! new positions: z=+16m (edge of fiducial volume) study vertex reconstruction and cuts with this data in future, plan to lower beam momentum even more, if possible Michael Smy, UC Irvine

LINAC 4.4 MeV Data Michael Smy, UC Irvine

LINAC Goodness vs. dirKS (4.4MeV) Michael Smy, UC Irvine good bad good bad good bad good bad good bad good bad

LINAC Vertex Resolution (4.4 MeV) Michael Smy, UC Irvine w/o cut gdn cut gdn cut gdn cut gdn cut gdn cut gdn cut ~90cm ~100cm ~90cm ~100cm

LINAC Angular Resolution (4.4 MeV) Michael Smy, UC Irvine w/o cut gdn cut gdn cut gdn cut gdn cut gdn cut gdn cut ~35 0 good bad

Solar Peak (After Cuts) Signal event rates look consistent SK-III has already reached to the similar signal to noise ratio as SK-I in MeV in 22.5kt 2m Fid. Vol. (22.5kt) Courtesy Takeuchi-san, ICRR

meeting14 Vertex Distribution After Cuts SK-I SLE 1216daysSK-III SLE 97days Both SK-I & SK-III rate for R>10m is artificially reduced by external event cut There are more events near SK-III barrel & bottom. SK-III has lower event rates in the central & top region. Z R Courtesy Takeuchi-san, ICRR

Solar Peak MeV all SLE data (97 days livetime) d  >11m radius<13.4m height>-12.1m Michael Smy, UC Irvine

Solar Peak in Central/Top Region Central top region SK-III BG rate is smaller than SK-I in MeV in the central top region Signal rate looks consistent. Courtesy Takeuchi-san, ICRR

Rn Injection: Study Rn and Water Flow Michael Smy, UC Irvine mean position

Radon dirKS vs. Goodness (after cut) Michael Smy, UC Irvine good bad good bad

Conclusions now ~100% efficient triggering at 5 MeV new LINAC data at lower energy at lowest energy, background rate is smaller than SK-I in the central/top region of detector will attempt to expand this region in near future will lower hardware trigger threshold to zero might study reactor ’s and solar ’s at very low energy Michael Smy, UC Irvine

LINAC Efficiencies (4.4 MeV) Michael Smy, UC Irvine

LINAC Resolution (4.4MeV) Michael Smy, UC Irvine

Rotating Vertex Cut Michael Smy, UC Irvine goodness-dirKS cut no x’y’ vertex cut goodness-dirKS cut no x’y’ vertex cut no goodness-dirKS cut x’y’ vertex cut no goodness-dirKS cut x’y’ vertex cut

Compare to Low Energy Data Sample Michael Smy, UC Irvine same as for radon events Sample contains mostly Cherenkov events!