Module 1: What is Argumentation? Bridging Math Practices-Module 1 Bridging Math Practices Math-Science Partnership Grant.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Common Core Mathematical Practices. People who are good in math… Make sense of problems.
Advertisements

Math Extension Activity JCPS Analytical and Applied Sciences.
Standards for Mathematical Practice
An Overview of the Common Core State Standards for Mathematical Practice for use with the Common Core Essential Elements The present publication was developed.
THE VISION OF THE COMMON CORE: EMBRACING THE CHALLENGE UCDMP SATURDAY SERIES SECONDARY SESSION 5 MAY 3, 2014.
Section 3 Systems of Professional Learning Module 1 Grades 6–12: Focus on Practice Standards.
Argumentation Day 1 June 23, 2014 What is it???. Standards of Mathematical Practice 1. Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. 2. Reason.
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics: ECE-5
Correlating Go Math & Standards for Mathematical Practices
Argumentation Day 1 June 23, 2014 What is it???. ARGUMENTATION PRE-WRITE (~15 MINS) When done, please make sure your name is on it and put into the Table.
M ATH C OMMITTEE Mathematical Shifts Mathematical Practices.
Math Instruction What’s in and What’s out What’s in and What’s out! Common Core Instruction.
The Use of Student Work as a Context for Promoting Student Understanding and Reasoning Yvonne Grant Portland MI Public Schools Michigan State University.
Phone: cell: Agenda Creating our Learning Community & Norms Setting Personal Goals and Identifying Themes Visualization through.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Selecting and Sequencing Students’ Solution Paths to Maximize Student Learning Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching.
Mathematical Practices.  Goals today: ◦ Become familiar with the Mathematical Practices and what they mean and look like in instruction ◦ Addition.
Vacaville USD December 5, AGENDA Problem Solving and Patterns Math Practice Standards and High Leverage Instructional Practices Number Talks –Computation.
Argumentation Day 4 Math Bridging Practices Monday August 18, 2014.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Kindergarten through Grade Twelve Standards for Mathematical.
Standards for Mathematical Practice #1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. I can: explain the meaning of a problem. choose the right.
Sunnyside School District
K–12 Session 4.2 Standards for Mathematical Practices Part 2: Student Dispositions & Teacher Actions Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core State Standards.
Argumentation Day 3 Math Bridging Practices June 25, 2014.
Vacaville USD October 30, AGENDA Problem Solving, Patterns, Expressions and Equations Math Practice Standards and High Leverage Instructional Practices.
Bridging Math Practices Welcome back! June 24, 2014 Please return to your original seats. Take your papers out of your folders. Get some coffee.
Sunnyside School District Math Training Module 6 Conceptual Lessons.
COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS MATHEMATICAL PRACTICES OBJECTIVE: APPLY BEST MATH PRACTICES TO SOLVE PROBLEMS TO BECOME A MATHEMATICALLY PROFICIENT STUDENT.
Vacaville USD October 28, AGENDA Problem Solving, Patterns, Expressions and Equations Math Practice Standards and High Leverage Instructional Practices.
Vacaville USD September 5, AGENDA Problem Solving and Patterns Math Practice Standards and Effective Questions Word Problems Ratios and Proportions.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
Presented by Heather Sparks, NBCT 2009 Oklahoma Teacher of the Year June 4, 2012.
What is Mathematical Argumentation? Madelyn Colonnese (UConn), Sarah Brown (Manchester PS) Megan Staples (UConn) Jillian Cavanna (Michigan State University)
#1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them How would you describe the problem in your own words? How would you describe what you are trying.
PUTTING THE COMMON CORE MATH STANDARDS INTO ACTION Sandy Christie Craig Bowman 2012.
Module 1: What is Argumentation? Bridging Math Practices-Session 1 Bridging Math Practices was funded by a grant from the CT State Department of Education.
Mathematical Practice Standards
Common Core State Standards
Module 5: Feedback to Support Argumentation
Homework: Maintenance sheet 1-12
Vacaville USD December 8, 2014
Module 5: Feedback to Advance Student Argumentation
Remember this is your last unit Test, Make it count!!!
Remember this is your last unit Test, Make it count!!!
Welcome to ….
Academic Talk in the Math Workshop WABE 2016
Common Core State Standards for Math
Module 2: Prompting Argumentation
Standards for Mathematical Practice
Module 2: Prompting Argumentation
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 5
Standards for Mathematical Practice
Understanding the Common Core Standards for Mathematical Practice
Principles to Actions: Establishing Goals and Tasks
Cumberland County Schools Mathematics Common Core
Standards for Mathematical Practice
Focus on Implementation- Classroom Discourse
Elementary Math: What Should It Look Like?
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Common Core State Standards Standards for Mathematical Practice
Cultivating Math Conversation Through Questioning
Standards for Mathematical Practice
Welcome to Day Three.
Community Mathematics Night
Standards for Mathematical Practice
#1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them
Math 8 “Year of Fundamentals” Pre-Algebra & Geometry
Reflecting on Practice: Worthwhile Tasks
Introduction to Envisions
Practice 1- Make Sense of Problems and Persevere in Solving Them
Standards for Mathematical Practice
Presentation transcript:

Module 1: What is Argumentation? Bridging Math Practices-Module 1 Bridging Math Practices Math-Science Partnership Grant

Bridging Math Practices- Module1 Opening Activities: Getting to Know Our Group

Bridging Math Practices- Module1 Establishing Community Agreement 1: Think (2-3 min.) Think about 2 or 3 things that are necessary for a group to work well together and jot them down on a piece of paper. 2: Share (2-3min.) In small groups, share your thoughts with your group members and decide which you feel are important enough to propose to the whole group for inclusion into our community agreement. 3: Review Review and agree on proposals. Understand that we may make revisions and/or additions that might be necessary. 4: Write and Post (and Revisit) The reporter/recorder will write them on a sentence strip and post on the wall to make them visible and public. Guiding Question: What are some of the things that are important for a group to agree to in order for that group to work well together?

Bridging Math Practices- Module1 Argumentation Mathematical argumentation involves a host of different “thinking” activities: generating conjectures, testing examples, representing ideas, changing representation, trying to find a counterexample, looking for patterns, etc.

Bridging Math Practices- Module1 Standards of Mathematical Practice 1. Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. 2. Reason abstractly and quantitatively. 3. Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others. 4. Model with mathematics. 5. Use appropriate tools strategically. 6. Attend to precision. 7. Look for and make use of structure. 8. Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning.

Bridging Math Practices- Module1 CCCSM MP 3 – Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others. The practice begins, “Mathematically proficient students understand and use stated assumptions, definitions, and previously established results in constructing arguments …” How do mathematical practices relate to student reasoning?

Bridging Math Practices- Module1 Teachers Will Be Able To: ✓ Develop a deeper understanding of argumentation and its potential in the math classroom. ✓ Analyze mathematical arguments within the three components of an argument. Thinking is the hardest work there is, which is probably the reason why so few engage in it. - Henry Ford

Bridging Math Practices- Module1 Overarching Guiding Questions: What is a mathematical argument? What “counts” as an argument? What is the purpose(s) of argumentation in mathematics? In the math classroom? What does student argumentation look like at different levels of proficiency?

Bridging Math Practices- Module1 A Mathematical Argument A Mathematical Argument is… – A sequence of statements and reasons given with the aim of demonstrating that a claim is true or false A Mathematical Argument is not… – An explanation of what you did (steps) – A recounting of your problem solving process – Explaining why you personally think something is true for reasons that are not necessarily mathematical (e.g., popular consensus; external authority, intuition, etc. It’s true because John said it, and he’s always always right.)

Bridging Math Practices- Module1 Let’s take a look… Abbott & Costello: 7 x 13 = 28

Bridging Math Practices- Module1 When you add any two consecutive numbers, the answer is always odd. Is this statement true or false? Write a mathematical argument to support your claim. Your Turn...

Bridging Math Practices- Module1 When you add any two consecutive numbers, the answer is always odd. Share your arguments with your group. What similarities and differences do you notice? Your Turn...

Bridging Math Practices- Module1 Structure of an Argument WHAT? What is your response? What mathematical WORK related to the problem will support your response? What mathematical RULES will support your work and your response? WHY? / HOW? Why is this true? How do you know this is true? WHY? / HOW? Why is this true? How do you know this is true?

Bridging Math Practices- Module1 You have 4 sample student responses to the Consecutive Sums Task. For each student argument: (1)Discuss the student’s argument. (2)Determine if the argument shows the claim is true. Analyzing Student Arguments on the Consecutive Sums Task

Bridging Math Practices- Module1 When you add any two consecutive numbers, the answer is always odd. Micah’s Response 5 and 6 are consecutive numbers, and = 11 and 11 is an odd number. 12 and 13 are consecutive numbers, and = 25 and 25 is an odd number and 1241 are consecutive numbers, and = 2481 and 2481 is an odd number. That’s how I know that no matter what two consecutive numbers you add, the answer will always be an odd number.

Bridging Math Practices- Module1 Example – Analyzing the Structure Micah’s Response 5 and 6 are consecutive numbers, and = 11 and 11 is an odd number. 12 and 13 are consecutive numbers, and = 25 and 25 is an odd number and 1241 are consecutive numbers, and = 2481 and 2481 is an odd number. That’s how I know that no matter what two consecutive numbers you add, the answer will always be an odd number. Evidence 3 examples that fit the criterion Warrant (implicit) because if it works for 3 of them, it will work for all Claim

Bridging Math Practices- Module1 When you add any two consecutive numbers, the answer is always odd. Roland’s Response The answer is always odd. A number + The next number = An odd number There’s always one left over when you put them together, so it’s odd.

Bridging Math Practices- Module1 When you add any two consecutive numbers, the answer is always odd. Angel’s Response Consecutive numbers go even, odd, even, odd, and so on. So if you take any two consecutive numbers, you will always get one even and one odd number. And we know that when you add any even number with any odd number the answer is always odd. That’s how I know that no matter what two consecutive numbers you add, the answer will always be an odd number.

Bridging Math Practices- Module1 Consecutive numbers are n and n+1. Add the two numbers: n + (n+1) = 2n + 1 You get 2n + 1 which is always an odd number, because an odd number leaves a remainder of 1 when divided by 2. (2 goes into 2n + 1 n times, with a remainder of 1) Kira’s Response When you add any two consecutive numbers, the answer is always odd.

Bridging Math Practices- Module1 Comments on the approaches Example based (Micah) May not be enough to PROVE a claim Narrative (Angel) Stated warrant may also require justification Pictorial (Roland) Can be strong evidence but insufficient warrant Symbolic (Kira) Can be strong evidence but insufficient warrant

Bridging Math Practices- Module1 Structure of an Argument WHAT? What is your response? What mathematical WORK related to the problem will support your response? What mathematical RULES will support your work and your response? WHY? / HOW? Why is this true? How do you know this is true? WHY? / HOW? Why is this true? How do you know this is true? CLAIM EVIDENCE WARRANT

Bridging Math Practices- Module1 Structure of an Argument CLAIM WHAT? Your answer, result, or solution What you believe to be true (or false) Your stance or position to be supported EVIDENCE WHY / HOW? Math work that can help support your claim Evidence can take the form of equations, graphs, tables, diagrams, computations, and even words WARRANT WHY / HOW? Math rules that can help support your claim Warrants are often general, applying to many situations; warrants can be definitions, previously proven theorems, or other established truths

Bridging Math Practices- Module1 Analyzing Student Arguments on the Consecutive Sums Task Work through one of the student work samples together with your group – Use the CLAIMS, WARRANTS, EVIDENCE vocabulary Think about the strengths and weaknesses of each argument. Mark on the student work samples handouts – Highlight and make notes about what people notice.

Bridging Math Practices- Module1 Reflection Questions How does your argument compare to the student samples? How would you modify your work to make a stronger argument?

Bridging Math Practices- Module1 Bridging to Practice

Bridging Math Practices- Module1 Bridging to Practice Protocol-Guided Student Work Sample Sorting Activity Materials: Protocol and Set of Student Work Samples Process: Individual sort Group discussion and group sort Full group discussion/debrief Purposes: protocols help organize professional conversations -help maintain focus on shared goals (for depth); provide time limits to ensure conversation covers required ground (for breadth and completeness) - encourage collaboration, active listening, and respectful dialogue that includes differences of opinions

Bridging Math Practices- Module1 Closure

Bridging Math Practices- Module1 Acknowledgements Bridging Math Practices Project was supported by a Math-Science Partnership Continuation Grant from the Connecticut State Department of Education, The initial Bridges project was a collaborative project among UConn, Manchester Public Schools, Mansfield Public Schools, and Hartford Public Schools UConn: Megan Staples (PI), Jillian Cavanna (Project Manager) Lead Teachers: Catherine Mazzotta (Manchester), Michelle McKnight (Manchester), Belinda Pérez (Hartford), and Teresa Rodriguez (Manchester) We appreciate greatly the CT State Department of Education for supporting this work and would like to thank all our participants, across cohorts, whose contributions to these materials are many.