Seeking Advice Regarding the 2010 TeraGrid User Survey SAB Meeting Tuesday July 21, 2009 Sergiu Sanielevici, GIG AD for User Support

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rhianna R. Andrews, MSW, Whitney L. Benakis MSW, Anissa T. Cox, MED Association University Center of Disabilities, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO.
Advertisements

Whiteboard Zoom Out OKED TLE Pilot Facilitator Training.
Welcome!. Project Insight Principles Student Focused Enhancing services to students to enrich the learning experience is at the core of the decisions.
Chapter 13 Survey Designs
Survey Designs EDUC 640- Dr. William M. Bauer
How to Assess Student Learning in Arts Partnerships Part II: Survey Research Revised April 2, 2012 Mary Campbell-Zopf, Ohio Arts Council
Power Point Slides by Ronald J. Shope in collaboration with John W. Creswell Chapter 13 Survey Designs.
Power Point Slides by Ronald J. Shope in collaboration with John W. Creswell Chapter 13 Survey Designs.
LibQUAL + Surveying the Library’s Users Supervisor’s Meeting March 17, 2004.
NorthSky Nonprofit Network Creating Customer Satisfaction Surveys Presented by Christine A. Ameen, Ed.D. Ameen Consulting & Associates
Chapter 12: Survey Designs
Old.libqual.org What will ARL do for you? What will you do? January 2005 Shrivenham, UK.
Coordinating the TeraGrid’s User Interface Areas Dave Hart, Amit Majumdar, Tony Rimovsky, Sergiu Sanielevici.
October 21, 2015 XSEDE Technology Insertion Service Identifying and Evaluating the Next Generation of Cyberinfrastructure Software for Science Tim Cockerill.
LibQUAL+™ Process Management: Using the Web as a Management Tool Amy Hoseth Massachusetts LSTA Orientation Meeting Boston, MA October 21, 2005 old.libqual.org.
ILEAD UTAH UTAH STATE LIBRARY. ILEAD UTAH addresses the need to expand the leadership abilities of librarians and increase ability to use participatory.
4th Quality Conference (4QC) Impact Assessment Study Rui Sousa, PhD Catholic University of Portugal Lisbon, 16 July 2007.
© 2003 SHRM SHRM Weekly Online Poll: June 24, 2003 Weekly Poll - Work/Life Balance Analyzing 400 responses of s sent, 1530 received (response.
Introduction to Human Subjects Protection Challenges in Patient- Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR) Toward Establishing a Stakeholder Community and Action.
Stages in Research Process Formulate Problem Determine Research Design Determine Data Collection Method Design Data Collection Forms Design Sample & Collect.
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
The Assessment of Blended Courses: Gathering and Using Faculty and Student Feedback to Maximize Program Effectiveness Orly Calderon, PsyD, Long Island.
Newton Public Schools Family-School Communication Survey Summary of Pilot Survey Results December 14 th, 2015.
© 2004 SHRM SHRM Weekly Online Survey: June 8, 2004 Computer Viruses and Employee Productivity Sample comprised of 369 randomly selected HR professionals.
TeraGrid’s Process for Meeting User Needs. Jay Boisseau, Texas Advanced Computing Center Dennis Gannon, Indiana University Ralph Roskies, University of.
User Services WG Update 12/11/2008 Sergiu Sanielevici, GIG Area Director for User Support Coordination
SurveyMonkey for National Partnerships Agreements (NPA) Educational Measurement and School Accountability Directorate (EMSAD)
Knowledge Management and Resource Stewardship
RGS-survey 2017 Thursday, May 11, 2017.
LibQUAL+® Survey Administration American Library Association
CCP: Monitoring and Evaluation
Grant Funding Workshop
Invitations Towards Success:
EVALUATING STUDENT TO STAFF FEEDBACK IN THE WARWICK LAW SCHOOL
How to Conduct Toileting Trials: A Webinar Course Evaluation
Hillingdon CCG CCG 360o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report.
Linking Communication Protocols
TRAINING NEED ANALYSIS
Partnership Forum 2017 Partner Institution Survey 2016 :
Familiarization with the Emergency Operations Plan
National PTA School of Excellence
No Place Like Home Pilot Tester Discussion and Consent Training
MEMBERSHIP DEVELOPMENT
The National Student Survey (NSS)
The National Student Survey (NSS)
LMS Launch Plan Helping organizations get their online training program off the ground seamlessly.
Parent and Family Partnership Surveys
TAP CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT CUSTOMER SERVICE SURVEY
The National Student Survey (NSS)
End of Year Performance Review Meetings and objective setting for 2018/19 This briefing pack is designed to be used by line managers to brief their teams.
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
IP Community Outreach (Suite of Patent Products)
The National Student Survey (NSS)
Survey Design & Use.
McBride E, Reid F. NHS Education for Scotland Introduction Results
The National Student Survey (NSS)
Course Evaluation Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations
National Student Survey 2019
Information about evaluations
Graduating Senior Survey Summary of Results
National PTA School of Excellence
4QC feedback and evaluation
Harrow CCG CCG 360o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report.
2018 Staff Survey Results.
The National Student Survey (NSS)
evaluationslides_4QC_3c_IPSG
Biology Journal Club (Online Journal Clubs) Fi Moorman and Karen New.
The National Student Survey (NSS)
What is the impact of students being required to develop different learning strategies part way through their studies, due to meeting modules which rely.
Building the Measuring Stick
Presentation transcript:

Seeking Advice Regarding the 2010 TeraGrid User Survey SAB Meeting Tuesday July 21, 2009 Sergiu Sanielevici, GIG AD for User Support

2010 User Survey Planned for March GIG and TGF seek your advice regarding: –What we should ask, e.g. satisfaction (past) vs. requirements (future) –Whom we should ask, e.g. active users? prospective users? past users? community at large? specific disciplines and demographics? –Who should craft the survey, administer it, and analyze the outcome e.g. TG staff? Independent polling organization? Academic team specializing in evaluating impact of technology on scientific research? –How we should ask : default is online form e.g. surveymonkey, but is some other approach preferable?

TG User Surveys in 2008 and 2009 Satisfaction survey with open-ended opportunities to offer comments and suggestions GIG subcontracted the development and administration to an independent pollster at U Colorado GIG provided the “layman’s formulation” of the questions; the pollster formulated the actual questionnaire and refined it by means of pilot face to face interviews with a subset of users GIG provided a list of ~2500 TG users, both SU-consuming and not. The pollster sent inviting them to complete the survey online. In 2009, $10 gift certificates are awarded to all respondents who completed the survey (answered all questions). In 2008, there was no material incentive offered. During the 3 weeks the survey was open in June 2009, we got 595 respondents vs. 349 respondents during a 3-week period in October 2008.

Should 2010 be different? You have the 2008 final report, the question/response tables for 2008 and 2009, as well as the June 2009 open-ended comments. How helpful do you think this process and its outcome would be for getting the user feedback we need in 2010, including the transition to XD and other strategic issues you are investigating? What alternatives, if any, do you suggest?