Snapshots of 2015 Human Ethics from the Annual Chairs Committee Report.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ARE YOU PREPARED FOR CONTINUING COMPETENCY IN INDIANA?  INAPTA is dedicated to helping all PT’s and PTA’s understand what is now required of them prior.
Advertisements

Introducing Research Ethics & the UREC Professor Chris Newman, UREC Chair.
HREC applications: University of Adelaide Garrett Cullity, Convenor.
PDR Process Level B and C. UC PERFORMANCE & DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 2009 – Academic Staff Staff member preparation (Academic staff) Supervisor preparation.
Faculty Grievance Committee Training October 26, 2012.
Medicaid1 SANDHILLS CENTER PARTICIPATING PROVIDER VIOLATIONS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTIONS (Medicaid & State Funded)
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MANAGING AUTHORITIES AND THE PAYING AGENCIES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES Felix Lozano, Head of.
Academic Medical Organization of Southwestern Ontario (AMOSO)
Brunel University Briefing for External Examiners February 2013
Eligibility for Accommodations & Required Disability Documentation Revisions to Section Catalog.
Protected Areas Conservation Trust’s (PACT) Accreditation to the Adaptation Fund Board: The Process and experience. By: Kerry Belisle (PACT)
Due Process – ISSAIs and INTOSAI GOVs Roberto José Domínguez Moro Superior Audit Office of Mexico INTOSAI Working Group on Public Debt October, 2009.
1 School Year 2006–07 Accounting and Budgeting Committee Video Teleconference Kim Thompson OSPI - School Apportionment and Financial Services
School of Nursing Student Grade Appeal Procedure Prepared by cgalang Revised fkhoiny 4/2011.
UKPHR Public Health Register The Role of the Moderator – Assuring Quality Dr Cerilan Rogers UKPHR Moderator.
Snapshots of 2014 Human Ethics from the Annual Chairs Committee Report.
CPD means adding to your professional knowledge and keeping your skills up to date throughout your career Professional knowledge is based on formal qualifications.
Applying for Disability Jon Rodis Director, Winthrop Disability Commission Founder & Chair, Physicians Awareness Committee President, MA Chapter of the.
Network security policy: best practices
05/31/2012 Page 1 Financial Management: Timekeeping.
DEBRA A. SCHUCHERT DIRECTOR OF NETWORK OPERATIONS & COMPLIANCE CLAIMS BILLING & ADJUDICATION TRAINING
Tuesday 13 th October MIREC Documents Procedures MIREC-1 - Terms of Reference & Procedure for MIREC Review of Research Projects Involving Human.
New Grantee/Staff Institute: Lessons Learned Peer Panel WELCOME! California AmeriCorps Training Crown Plaza, LAX– July 22-23, 2015.
Engineers Applying for Ethics Approval Daniel Shapiro Computer Architecture Research Group (carg.site.uottawa.ca) Source.
Summary Changes to 2016 Course Offerings 18 Summary of changes to the Course Availability List (CAL) provided by the Office of Strategic Planning and Information.
Starting Student Chapters. Agenda Outreach Develop Student Chapter Startup Documents Coordinate with Student Chapter Sponsor Approval Coordinate with.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Co-operation Between the Ministry of Finance and the Court.
Quality Management Program (QMP) A Tool for Section/Division Member Leaders.
 The IRB application  The Review Process  Summary of Protocol  Appendixes  Informed Consent  Recruiting materials  Research Instruments  Other.
Introduce yourself Explain fire procedures etc.
 Part IV of the ECU Faculty Manual  To get to the Faculty Manual 1. Go to ECU Home and click on “Faculty & Staff.” 2. Scroll down to the “Policies”
Golden Plains Shire Good Governance. Good governance is about the processes for making and implementing decisions. Having good processes generally leads.
RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PROJECT: ETHICAL REQUIREMENTS May 30, 2012.
Aline Giordano & Sean Wellington Southampton Solent University.
Introduction This presentation is intended as an introduction to the audit process for employees of entities being audited by MACD. Please refer to the.
University of Sheffield UNIVERSITY RESEARCH ETHICS COMMITTEE.
External Examiners Induction Day Workshop: External Examiner Role in Curriculum Design.
Quality Assurance Dr Christopher Stevens
Presented by: Theresa Elliot-Cheslek AVP & CHRO Terry Ryan Asst. Attorney General, AGO Dealing with Faculty Personnel Issues Revised October 2015.
Due Process – ISSAIs and INTOSAI GOVs Roberto José Domínguez Moro Superior Audit Office of Mexico INTOSAI Working Group on Public Debt October, 2009.
Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Audit Program - The Audit Process.
Helen Johnson Head of Study Abroad, Office for Global Engagement Assessing and Managing Risk for Study Abroad.
Due Process – ISSAIs and INTOSAI GOVs Roberto José Domínguez Moro Superior Audit Office of Mexico INTOSAI Working Group on Public Debt June 14, 2010.
Institutional Review Board Procedures and Implications After the applied dissertation committee has approved the proposal and the IRB package, the student.
 The purpose of IRB is to ensure the rights of research subjects are protected  In accordance with the ethical standards of the U.S. Department of Health.
© 2016 University at Buffalo Click Training Safety Module University at Buffalo Office of the Vice President for Research and Economic Development Electronic.
V: Maryland’s High School Assessments (HSAs) & the Bridge Plan for Academic Validation Overview.
Effective Board Governance & role of the Audit Committee Presentation by Cluster Audit Committee – July / August 2012.
Fallon Health Mass Collaborative Provider Credentialing Symposium April 27, 2016.
Session objectives After completing this session you will:
Board of Directors Orientation
Procedures for seeking YSJU Research Ethics Approval
A LITTLE BIT ABOUT US EDUCATION E-REB
Procedures for Taught Degree students seeking YSJU Research Ethics Approval Does the research involve living human participants, their tissue or their.
Want to buy or sell a commercial business in Canberra?
Delegation Compliance Specialist
2016 Animal Ethics Online Reporting
Incorporation STATE AND CHAPTER.
HREC Operating Procedures for the Review of Low and Moderate to High Risk Projects
A LITTLE BIT ABOUT US EDUCATION E-REB
A Guide for Professional Staff
from the Annual Chairs Committee Report
Secretariat Support for External Examiners
Quality Assurance and Enhancement
UL Research Ethics & Research Integrity
Head of Policy & Engagement British Academy of Management
Changes to our Annual General Meeting date
Click Training Safety Module
Brunel University Briefing for External Examiners March 2014
Presentation transcript:

Snapshots of 2015 Human Ethics from the Annual Chairs Committee Report

14 Monitoring of research Any inquiry about a piece of research (approved by a Committee or low risk notification) triggers a review of the complete file for that research. See Human Ethics Chairs Committee Annual Report 2015 on the Human Ethics website for further detail 4.2 Ethics submissions online Submission of notification and applications moved online in October 2015 Audits of a sample of low risk notifications are done twice a year 15 Complaints/Reconsideration A formal request for reconsideration of a committee decision was made and a reconsideration panel reviewed the request. A participant in an HDEC approved study contacted the Research Ethics Office with questions about the research procedures and withdrawal from the study. The participant’s experience was discussed with the researcher and Head of Academic Unit in accordance with standard operating procedures for Health and Disability Ethics Committees.

16.2 Applications reviewed by Human Ethics Committees

19.2 Comparison of HEC Review, Low Risk Notification & research needing HDEC approval