What are you waiting for? Service Virtualization in a Sea of Impatience Eric Albaugh // ADM Solutions Architect

Application Delivery is Accelerating What we expect: -Functionality now -Accessed through mobile devices Surge in # of releases per app per year per app per app per app 30x Application Releases

3 65 % Companies wait 2 days or more Voke Research

Stubs? Reality: 20-40% of developer’s time spent on coding stubs Restricted functionality No self-service for customization 4 “The core issue with stubbing was that the process was not repeatable or scalable.” Ovum Report on Service Virtualization, January 2015

The Solution 5

Existing Infrastructure Application Under Test Third Party The Service Virtualization Concept – Driving Issues Single sign on Mobile App JDBC SOAP MQ LDAP Mainframe Existing database Web service and Legacy application REST JMS Under construction Pay-per-transaction Lack of Data Controls Web browser Composite Application Application services Software components not ready yet Components/services with limited access Security and compliance restrict access Dependency on third party– costs Data too difficult to source

Existing Infrastructure Third Party Service Virtualization becomes a key answer Single sign on JDBC SOAP MQ LDAP Mainframe Existing database Web service and Legacy application REST JMS Under construction Pay-per-transaction Lack of Data Controls Virtualize for always available services Virtualize data scenarios Make available for Dev and Test Share services—lower infrastructure costs Application Under Test Mobile App Web browser Composite Application Application services Keep developing and testing moving forward with virtualized services DESIGN LEARN SIMULATE

HPE Service Virtualization – Designer and Runtime Easy to use SV Designer - Desktop IDE with ALM/QC Integrations - Modeling and Config. of Virtual Services - Embedded SV Runtime - Shared and Scalable SV Runtime - SV Web Based Management Interface - Accessible over programmable API - Integrated with ALM/QC repository Scalable SV Server

Continuous Landscape Dev TestStagingProd Continuous Integration Continuous Testing Continuous Delivery Continuous Deployment Continuous Assessment HP Codar

Service Virtualization Protocols TRANSPORT HTTP(S) Gateway HTTP(S) Proxy IBM WS MQ JMS JDBC IMS Connect CICS TS TIBCO Active Matrix/ EMS SAP NetWeaver XI/PI, ABAP Oracle AQ Microsoft MQ Web- Methods IS TCP/IP MESSAGE WS/SOAP XML* REST (XML, JSON, Bin) Cobol SQL RFC/IDOC Fix Length Text Binary Protocol supported *All XML-based protocols supported SV Protocol Extensibility SDK Available

Service Virtualization brings big ROI “ We can start testing earlier without waiting the end to end systems to be ready. Now we can do efficient resource management, predict schedule and launch apps in a timely manner.” Test and Release Manager, TTNET 50-90% Reduced wait time “ The effort for the creation of mocks/stubs is substantially reduced (factor 5) and you might need less test systems – that‘s the foundation a strong business case.” QA Director, EWE 5x Decreased effort to test

Main users of HP Service Virtualization Developer Quick and early access to dependent application components Expose unfinished components to QA and other projects Enable continuous unit testing within complex system Functional tester Quickly and easily set up working test environments Create and execute tests earlier in the delivery cycle Deliver test results faster in shorter iterations Model backend functional behavior Performance tester Test performance within application dependencies Model extreme performance characteristics Model performance behavior of 3 rd party systems

Open Discussion