Small- x phenomenology K.Itakura KEK theory center 21 st Oct. RIKEN “Future directions of high-energy QCD”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Zi-Wei Lin (ECU) 28th WWND, Puerto Rico April 10, Update of Initial Conditions in A Multiple Phase Transport (AMPT) Model Zi-Wei Lin Department.
Advertisements

Initial and final state effects in charmonium production at RHIC and LHC. A.B.Kaidalov ITEP, Moscow Based on papers with L.Bravina, K.Tywoniuk, E.Zabrodin.
Gluon Saturation Yuri Kovchegov The Ohio State University.
Triumvirate of Running Couplings in Small-x Evolution Yuri Kovchegov The Ohio State University Based on work done in collaboration with Heribert Weigert,
1 D. Kharzeev Nuclear Theory BNL Alice Club, CERN TH, May 14, 2007 Non-linear evolution in QCD and hadron multiplicity predictions for the LHC.
An Introduction to Particle Production in High Energy Nuclear Collisions Jamal Jalilian-Marian Institute for Nuclear Theory University of Washington.
Exclusive vs. Diffractive VM production in nuclear DIS Cyrille Marquet Institut de Physique Théorique CEA/Saclay based on F. Dominguez, C.M. and B. Wu,
Peter SteinbergISMD2003 Experimental Status of Parton Saturation at RHIC Peter Steinberg Brookhaven National Laboratory ISMD2003, Krakow, Poland 5-11 September.
Looking for intrinsic charm at RHIC and LHC University of São Paulo University of Pelotas F.S. Navarra V.P. Gonçalves Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics.
Small-x Physics in DIS Small-x Physics in DIS Yuri Kovchegov The Ohio State University.
Color Glass Condensate and UHECR physics Kazunori Itakura KEK, Japan Trondheim Background photo: “deformation of a polyethylene folio” by Zdenka.
Cold nuclear matter effects on dilepton and photon production Zhong-Bo Kang Los Alamos National Laboratory Thermal Radiation Workshop RBRC, Brookhaven.
Lecture II. 3. Growth of the gluon distribution and unitarity violation.
Introduction to the Physics of Saturation Introduction to the Physics of Saturation Yuri Kovchegov The Ohio State University.
First correction to JIMWLK evolution from the classical EOMs N. Armesto 19th International Conference on Ultra-Relativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions.
9/17/20151 Probing the Dense Medium in Cold Nuclei -- Gluon Saturation at small-x Bowen Xiao (CCNU) Feng Yuan (LBNL)
New perspective of QCD at high energy New perspective of QCD at high energy - introduction to Color Glass Condensate - Kazunori Itakura Service de Physique.
As one evolves the gluon density, the density of gluons becomes large: Gluons are described by a stochastic ensemble of classical fields, and JKMMW argue.
Initial State and saturation Marzia Nardi INFN Torino (Italy) Quark Matter 2009, Knoxville Student Day.
The Color glass COndensate A classical effective theory of high energy QCD Raju Venugopalan Brookhaven National Laboratory ICPAQGP, Feb. 8th-12th, 2005.
J/ψ Production in pPb Collisions at the LHC Zhang, Hong-Fei Third Military Medical University.
Cronin Effect and High-p T Suppression in pA Collisions Yuri Kovchegov University of Washington Based on work done in collaboration with Based on work.
Small-x physics 3- Saturation phenomenology at hadron colliders
Overview of saturation Yoshitaka Hatta (Saclay) Low-x meeting, 2007, Helsinki.
Diffractive structure functions in e-A scattering Cyrille Marquet Columbia University based on C. Marquet, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) paper in preparation.
Forward particle production in d+Au collisions in the CGC framework Cyrille Marquet Institut de Physique Théorique, CEA/Saclay.
High energy hadronic/nuclear scatterings in QCD Kazunori Itakura IPNS, KEK “Towards precision QCD physics” March 10th, 2007.
Recent advances in High-Energy QCD evolution equations Javier L. Albacete High Energy QCD: From RHIC to LHC. ECT, Trento, January 2007.
Status of the theory of saturation of partonic densities Cyrille Marquet Theory Division - CERN.
Mini review on saturation and recent developements Cyrille Marquet Service de Physique Théorique - CEA/Saclay ICHEP 2006, Moscow, Russia.
Seminários GFPAE – 02/ Diffractive heavy quark production at the LHC Mairon Melo Machado
2/10/20161 What can we learn with Drell-Yan in p(d)-nucleus collisions Feng Yuan Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory RBRC, Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Color Glass Condensate in High Energy QCD Kazunori Itakura SPhT, CEA/Saclay 32 nd ICHEP at Beijing China 16 Aug
STAR azimuthal correlations of forward di-pions in d+Au collisions in the Color Glass Condensate Cyrille Marquet Institut de Physique Théorique, CEA/Saclay.
Overview of low-x and diffraction at HERA Henri Kowalski DESY Rencontres de Moriond La Thuile, March 2006.
Physics Potential of an ep Collider at the VLHC  Why ep? When?  Physics Results from the first ep Collider – HERA  Future ep Physics Priorities  Perturbative.
Implications for LHC pA Run from RHIC Results CGC Glasma Initial Singularity Thermalized sQGP Hadron Gas sQGP Asymptotic.
Forward di-jet production in p+Pb collisions Centre de Physique Théorique Ecole Polytechnique & CNRS Cyrille Marquet A. van Hameren, P. Kotko, K. Kutak,
Lecture III. 5. The Balitsky-Kovchegov equation Properties of the BK equation The basic equation of the Color Glass Condensate - Rapid growth of the.
E+ eRHIC Raju Venugopalan RHIC-AGS Users Meeting, BNL, June 2nd, 2009.
Azimuthal correlations of forward di-hadrons in d+Au collisions at RHIC Cyrille Marquet Theory Division - CERN Based on :C.M., Nucl. Phys. A796 (2007)
Kazunori Itakura IPNS, KEK At the RBRC Alumni workshop 19 th June, 2006 Some topics about Color Glass Condensate.
Peter SteinbergISMD2003 Experimental Status of Parton Saturation at RHIC Peter Steinberg Brookhaven National Laboratory Forward RHIC October.
Suppression of high P T hadron spectra in p+A collisions Wei-Tian Deng In Collaboration with: Rong Xu & Xin-Nian Wang arXiv:
Running Coupling Corrections to Nonlinear Evolution for Diffractive Dissociation Yuri Kovchegov The Ohio State University.
Inclusive diffraction in DIS and the dipole picture Cyrille Marquet RIKEN BNL Research Center arXiv:
Quark Pair Production in the Color Glass Condensate Raju Venugopalan Brookhaven National Laboratory AGS users-Quarkonium workshop, June 6th, 2006.
1 Proton Structure Functions and HERA QCD Fit HERA+Experiments F 2 Charged Current+xF 3 HERA QCD Fit for the H1 and ZEUS Collaborations Andrew Mehta (Liverpool.
Cyrille Marquet RIKEN BNL Research Center
Introduction to pQCD and TMD physics
Centre de Physique Théorique
Open questions in QCD at high parton density: EIC vs LHeC
Computing gluon TMDs at small-x in the Color Glass Condensate
Multiple parton interactions in heavy-ion collisions
Forward correlations and the ridge - theory
Running coupling corrections to inclusive gluon production
Semi-inclusive DIS at Small-x
Color Glass Condensate : Theory and Phenomenology
DIS 2004 XII International Workshop
Forward particle production in the presence of saturation
Masanori HIRAI 2006, Nov 9, Tokyo-u
Computing gluon TMDs at small-x in the Color Glass Condensate
Electron ion collisions and the Color Glass Condensate
Single Diffractive Higgs Production at the LHC *
New d+Au RHIC data show evidence for parton saturation
A prediction of unintegrated parton distribution
The energy dependence of saturation scale at next-to-leading order
An Introduction to HERA Physics
Hadron Multiplicity from Color Glass Condensate at LHC
Y.Kitadono (Hiroshima ),
Presentation transcript:

Small- x phenomenology K.Itakura KEK theory center 21 st Oct. RIKEN “Future directions of high-energy QCD”

Plan Introduction of small-x physics and CGC Then then

“Phase diagram” of a proton/nucleus Higher energies  Higher resolutions  DGLAP : summation of ln Q 2 BFKL : summation of ln 1/x CGC : BFKL + nonlinear effects (strong classical fields ) Qs(x,A) : boundary btw saturated and NON-saturated regimes Structure/topology will not change with improved descriptions (beyond LO)  slope, straight /curve, etc

High density gluons are indeed seen in a proton Gluons must be multiplied by 20. HERA H1 + ZEUS combined results At small-x, dominant degrees of freedom are not valence quarks, but GLUONS. DGLAP

Geometric Scaling: existence of Qs DIS (ep, eA) cross sections scale with Q 2 /Qs 2 Stasto, Golec-Biernat, Kwiecinski Freund, Rummukainen, Weigert, Schafer Marquet, Schoeffel PRL 86 (2001) 596 PRL 90 (2003) Phys. Lett. B639 (2006) 471  *p total Q2/Qs2(x)Q2/Qs2(x)Q 2 /Q s 2 (x,A) Q2/Qs2(xP)Q2/Qs2(xP) Existence of saturation scale Qs Can determine x and A dependences of Qs Extends outside of the saturation regime k t < Q s 2 /  QCD (Iancu,Itakura,McLerran) epeADiffractive ep

Going up higher energies: evolution eqs. Evolution wrt x (or rapidity y = ln 1/x ) BFKL (LO : (  s ln 1/x) n, NLO:  s (  s ln 1/x) n ) BK (includes the nonlinear effects) K : gluon splitting g  gg  : unintegrated gluon distr. Known up to full NLO accuracy. [Balitsky, Chirilli 2008] But for practical purposes, we use BK with running coupling  “rcBK” LO Multiple gluon emissions Recombination of gluons Unitarity [Balitsky, Gardi et al., Kovchegov-Weigert]

Phenomenology in DIS at small-x Dipole formalism Phenomenology (“global” fit, x < 0.01 ) : How to parametrize dipole cross section? - use approximate solution to BK LO-BK  IIM [Iancu-KI-Munier 2004], Soyez (with heavy quarks) [2007] u, d, s + c, b parameters : Energy dependence and magnitude of Qs, radius of a proton (theory ambiguity) (non-perturbative effects) - use numerical solution to BK rcBK  AAMQS [Albacete-Armesto-Milhano-Quiroga-Salgado,2009,2011] parameters : characterizing initial conditions (MV, modified MV) Dipole scatt. amplitude  Solution to BK eq LC wf : known dipole cross section

Fit to HERA data: “IIM” model - Fit to the data with small x and moderate Q 2 x < 0.01 & < Q 2 <45 GeV 2 - Analytic solutions to BK built in: geometric scaling & its violation, saturation. - Only 3 parameters: proton radius R, x 0 (nonpert.) and for Q S 2 (x)=(x 0 /x) GeV 2 - Good agreement with the data x 0 = 0.26 x 10 -4,  = Also works well for vector meson (  ) production, diffractive F 2, F L [Forshaw et al, Goncalves, Machado ’04] Red line Red line : the CGC fit Blue line Blue line : BFKL w/o saturation [Iancu,KI,Munier ‘04]

Fit to HERA data: AAMQS 2011 Initial Conditions : modified GBW/MV models IR regularization for 1-loop running coupling freeze the coupling at  s fr =0.7  =1 : ordinary GBW) m uds =140MeVm c =1.27GeV, m b =4.2GeV  =1 : ordinary MV)  Modified GBW (Left)  =0.971 Qs 0 2 =0.241 (Right)  =0.959 Qs 0 2 =0.240 There are two more parameters (C,  0 ) or

Hadron collisions (pp/pA): two formulae for single hadron spectra k t factorization k t factorization DHJ formalism DHJ formalism [Dumitru-Hayashigaki-Jalilian--Marian 2006] AA BB A B pTpT - proved for pp, pA at LO - good when both A and B are saturated (mid rapidity at very high energy) - used in various calculations e.g. multiplicity distribution, etc - “Large-x / small-x” reactions: valid at forward rapidity x 1 ~1, x 2 <<1 - f i/p (x) : pdf for valence partons in a projectile - D h/k (z) : frag. func. for outgoing hadron h from a parton k - N : un-integrated gluon distribution in a target A1 A2 i j k

How to treat nuclei? -Nucleons are described as disks or Gaussians. - Can be used for IC in AA collisions may use a simple parametrization by KLN, or numerical solution to rcBK

kt factorizationDHJ formalism Homogeneous disk“KT/KLN” Kharzeev, et al. “DHJ/rcBK” Albacete-Marquet 2010 MC model (randomly generated) “MC-KT/KLN” Drescher-Nara, Albacete- Dumitru-Nara “MC-DHJ/rcBK” Fujii-KI-Kitadono-Nara 2011 Towards better description of pA at forward rapidities Xsec formula vs nuclear modeling how to parametrize gluon distribution  KLN or rcBK In the DHJ formalism (looking at forward rapidity), target nucleus is generated randomly, and the gluon distribution is given by rcBK forward Less parameters

DHJ/rcBK Single hadron spectra at forward rapidity in RHIC [Albacete-Marquet 2010] quark gluon For f i (x,p t ), use CTEQ6 NLO pdf For D i (z,p t ), use DSS NLO FF For N F/A, use solution to rcBK with MV model (x 0,Q s0 ) as I.C. gluon scattering amplitude ppdAu Very good agreement with the data. But they fit pp and dAu independently.

MC-DHJ/rcBK To reduce ambiguity - construct a nucleus by randomly placing nucleons - use AAMQS parameters for proton IC optimized for DIS at small-x - quantum evolution is performed “locally” in b space (to avoid IR div. in b-dep BK) [Fujii,KI,Kitadono,Nara, arXiv: ] Large x partons f i (x,k t ) : CTEQ6M NLO Fragment into hadrons (DSS NLO) btbt AAMQS local rcBK evolution

MC-DHJ/rcBK : results modified MV model (  = ) “running coupling” version of MV model [Iancu-KI-Triantafylopoulos] : to be consistent with rcBK evolution - Set h works well even in pp, but not as good as Albacete-Marquet - rcMV is not “tuned” (similar param as MV) - However, both work quite well in dAu (IC dependence reduces at high rapidity) Best results from theoretical point of view, but still needs better (global) description including pp data (tuning of rcMV is necessary)

MC-DHJ/rcBK extrapolated to LHC Scale ambiguity Very forward region could be dominated by soft interaction, but still necessary to understand how much hard contribution exists.

Towards further improvements? Two formula (KT and DHJ) are derived in LO  not consistent with the use of rcBK Running-coupling corrections to LOKT [Horowitz-Kovchegov, 2011] so far, there is no phenomenological anaysis based on this. Next, we need running-coupling DHJ !! Some scale defined by k,q LO “rcKT”

Summary Theoretical description of high-energy hadron scattering based on CGC is now (almost) established up to leading log accuracy with running coupling corrections.  rcBK paradigm In particular, phenomenological analysis with rcBK has been making a progress enough to be compared with experimental data.  HERA DIS at small-x, RHIC dAu at forward rapidity Nontrivial steps (I didn’t mention):  multiparticle (dihadron) correlations  AA collisions (Better description of the dAu at forward rapidity provides useful information for IC of AA collisions.)