Vincent Boudry LLR, École polytechnique (on behalf of the CALICE collaboration) Calor 2010 IHEP, Beijing May 14 th, 2010 Test beam studies for a Highly.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bulk Micromegas Our Micromegas detectors are fabricated using the Bulk technology The fabrication consists in the lamination of a steel woven mesh and.
Advertisements

Micromegas for a DHCAL LAPP, Annecy Catherine Adloff Jan Blaha Sébastien Cap Maximilien Chefdeville Alexandre Dalmaz Cyril Drancourt Ambroise Espagilière.
Andy White U.Texas at Arlington (for J.Yu, C.Han, J.Li, D.Jenkins, J.Smith, K.Parmer, A.Nozawa, V.Kaushik) 10/18/04 IEEE/NSS Digital Hadron Calorimetry.
November 5, 2004V.Ammosov ITEP-Moscow, Russian CBM meeting 1 IHEP possible participation in CBM TOF system Vladimir Ammosov Institute for High Energy Physics.
Second generation Front-end chip for H-Cal SiPM readout : SPIROC DESY Hamburg – le 13 février 2007 M. Bouchel, F. Dulucq, J. Fleury, C. de La Taille, G.
C. Combaret TILC april m2 GRPC Acquisition System C. Combaret, IPN Lyon For the EU DHCAL collaboration
Progress towards a technological prototype for a semi-digital hadron calorimeter based on glass RPCs Nick Lumb Paris, 8 October 2010.
Progress towards a technological prototype for a semi-digital hadron calorimeter based on glass RPCs Nick Lumb International Linear Collider Workshop Beijing,
RPC detection rate capability ≈ 1/ρ Float-Glass ( Ω-cm) RPC rate capability < Bakelite( Ω-cm) one. New kind of doped glass was developed.
Catherine Adloff16 June 2009 CALICE Technical Board 1 DHCAL-MICROMEGAS Yannis KARYOTAKIS For the LAPP group.
Resistive ….. I.Laktineh IPN-Lyon. Motivation Calorimeters are expected to play an important role in future experiments (ILC, CLIC…) based on PFA concepts.
Prototypes of high rate MRPC for CBM TOF Jingbo Wang Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China RPC-2010-Darmstadt, Germany.
CMS-GRPC status Imad Laktineh for the GRPC-CMS groups.
M. Chefdeville LAPP, Annecy, France. Introduction  Motivations for a Digital hadronic calorimeter Count hits instead of measuring energy deposits Reduce.
CALICE Digital Hadron Calorimeter: Calibration and Response to Pions and Positrons International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders LCWS 2013 November.
The DHCAL Data Analysis José Repond CALICE Meeting, Prague, September 10 – 12, 2007.
Vincent Boudry LLR, École polytechnique CALICE Collaboration meeting U. of Manchester 08/09/2008 Pre-results for the CERN PS tests of the eDHCAL.
Calibration of a Digital Hadron Calorimeter with Muons Burak Bilki d, John Butler b, Tim Cundiff a, Gary Drake a, William Haberichter a, Eric Hazen b,
Towards a 1m 3 Glass RPC HCAL prototype with multi-threshold readout M. Vander Donckt for the CALICE - SDHCAL group.
5-9 June 2006Erika Garutti - CALOR CALICE scintillator HCAL commissioning experience and test beam program Erika Garutti On behalf of the CALICE.
Semi Digital HCAL Data analysis results Robert Kieffer Institut de Physique Nucléaire de Lyon 10/02/
A Hadron Calorimeter with Resistive Plate Chambers José Repond Argonne National Laboratory CALOR 2006, Chicago, June 5 – 9, 2006.
MicroMegas for DHCAL Status and activities at LAPP Catherine Adloff Jan Blaha Sébastien Cap Maximilien Chefdeville Alexandre Dalmaz Cyril Drancourt Ambroise.
Marcello Abbrescia RPCs for CMS during Phase II RPC rate capability M. Abbrescia, The dynamic behaviour of Resistive Plate Chambers, NIM A 533 (2004) 7–10.
European DHCAL development European DHCAL development CIEMAT,IPNL,LAL, LAPP,LLR, PROTVINO, SACLAY CIEMAT,IPNL,LAL, LAPP,LLR, PROTVINO, SACLAY Status :
The Prototype Simulation of SDHCAL Ran.Han Gerald.Grenier Muriel.Donckt IPNL.
CALICE calorimeters Power Issues Kieffer Robert IPN Lyon « Linear Collider Power Distribution and Pulsing workshop » May 2011, LAL
1 Short Status of TB Analyses in SDHCAL Imad Laktineh.
1 Analysis of Small RPC DHCAL Prototype Data (noise and cosmic ray) LCWA09, Albuquerque, New Mexico Friday, October 02, 2009 Qingmin Zhang HEP Division,
5 May 2006Paul Dauncey1 The ILC, CALICE and the ECAL Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
DHCAL Jan Blaha R&D is in framework of the CALICE collaboration CLIC08 Workshop CERN, 14 – 17 October 2008.
Khaled Belkadhi (LLR-Ecole Polytechnique)1 DHCAL Test Beam Results using Full Train Reconstruction Khaled Belkadhi.
14 jan 2010 CALICE/EUDET FEE status C. de LA TAILLE.
HARDROC: Readout Chip for CALICE/EUDET Digital Hadronic calorimeter Nathalie Seguin-Moreau.
Energy Reconstruction in the CALICE Fe-AHCal in Analog and Digital Mode Fe-AHCal testbeam CERN 2007 Coralie Neubüser CALICE Collaboration meeting Argonne,
SDHCAL. outline  SDHCAL concept, validation and construction  Test Beam and technological prototype performance  Perspectives and Conclusion  SDHCAL.
1 Micromegas for sampling calorimetry Chronology & people  Initiated by LAPP LC-group in 2006 (C. Adloff, M. Chefdeville, Y. Karyotakis, I. Koletsou)
CALICE/EUDET FEE status C. de LA TAILLE. 31 aug 2009 EUDET SC meeting Status of JRA3 Front End Electronics 2 ILC front-end ASICs : the ROC chips SPIROC.
1 Construction of technological semi-digital hadronic calorimeter using GRPC Imad Laktineh CIEMAT, Gent, IPNL, LAL, LAPP, LLN, LLR, LPC, Protvino, Tsinghua,
CALICE, Shinshu, March Update on Micromegas TB analysis Linear Collider group, LAPP, Annecy CALICE collaboration meeting 5-7 March 2012, Shinshu,
W-DHCAL Digitization T. Frisson, C. Grefe (CERN) CALICE Collaboration Meeting at Argonne.
Vincent Boudry LLR, École polytechnique CALICE Collaboration meeting U. of Manchester 08/09/2008 Pre-results for the CERN PS tests of the eDHCAL.
Manqi Ruan Status & plans for gaseous semi-digital HCAL in European.
DHCAL Acquisition with HaRDROC VFE Vincent Boudry LLR – École polytechnique.
European DHCAL Meeting 13/06/08
Test Beam Request for the Semi-Digital Hadronic Calorimeter
The European DHCAL status
The 1m2 Micromegas prototype for hadronic calorimetry
CEPC 数字强子量能器读出电子学预研进展
A proposal to equip the high eta muon stations with High Rate GRPC
R&D advances on Micromegas for a semi-DHCAL
DHCAL TECH PROTO READOUT PROPOSAL
A Digital Hadron Calorimeter Resistive Plate Chambers
Recent DHCAL Developments
Construction and Testing of a Digital Hadron Calorimeter Prototype
The Simulation Status of SDHCAL
GRPC activity for EuDHCAL in IHEP-Protvino
Status of GEM DHCAL Andy White RD51 Collaboration Meeting CERN
Semi-Digital Hadronic CALorimeter
Tao Hu, Jianbei Liu, Haijun Yang, Boxiang Yu For the CEPC-Calo Group
José Repond Argonne National Laboratory
Conceptual design of TOF and beam test results
02 / 02 / HGCAL - Calice Workshop
Pre-installation Tests of the LHCb Muon Chambers
Summer 09 Testbeams SDHCAL prototypes
AIMS 1- Build SDHCAL prototype of 1m3 as close as possible to the one
11th Pisa meeting on advanced detectors
Resistive Plate Chambers performance with Cosmic Rays
Status of CEPC HCAL Optimization Study in Simulation LIU Bing On behalf the CEPC Calorimeter working group.
Presentation transcript:

Vincent Boudry LLR, École polytechnique (on behalf of the CALICE collaboration) Calor 2010 IHEP, Beijing May 14 th, 2010 Test beam studies for a Highly Granular GRPC Semi-Digital HCAL

TB results – Calor 2010 — mai 2010, IHEP, Beijing2 Motivation Highly Granular GRPC Semi-Digital HCAL Particle Flow Based ● 1×1 cm² × 48 layers ● Imaging calorimety ● Tracking in calorimeter ● Energy loss recovery (see Henri's talk) Gaseous calorimetry ● Lower sensitivity to n ● Narrow showers (99% of 100 GeV π in 70×70cm²) ● Less fluctuations (wrt H containing con GRPC's ● Cheap ● Simple ● Reliable ● Large uniform surface (calibration of 70M ch.) See note LC-DET bits per cell ● Simplified electronics ● reduced cost ● less heat ● Improvement of energy rec. at High E.

TB results – Calor 2010 — mai 2010, IHEP, Beijing3 Motivation Check the elements for a Cubic meter project (I. Laktineh's talk) ▶ 40 layers of 1×1m² Check critical elements for the ILD detector ▶ Semi-Digital Energy reconstruction ◆ counting → ε and multiplicity per track ◆ 70 MCh → uniformity of detector ▶ ILC mode (bunch 5 Hz) → auto-trigger + local storage ◆ Noise should be controlled ◆ Rates IPNL (France): M. Bedjidian, C. Combaret, G. Grenier, N. Lumb, I. Laktineh, R. Kieffer, M. Vander Dockt LLR (France): K. Belkadhi, V. Boudry, D. Decotigny, M. Ruan CIEMAT (Spain): M-C. Fouz, J. Puerta Pelayo CP3 (Belgium): E. Cortina, S. Manai FST (Tunisia): K. Manai LAL-Omega (France): F. Dulucq, N. Seguin-Moreau, G. Martin-Chassard, Ch. de la Taille TSINGHUA (China):Y. Wang, W. Ding

TB results – Calor 2010 — mai 2010, IHEP, Beijing4 Glass Resistive Plate Chamber -HV 0V Cathode coating(~1 M  /  ) Glass plate (1.1mm) Chamber wall (1.2mm) Spacer Glass plate (0.7mm) Anode coating(~1 M  /  ) Insulation (Mylar) Pads (copper, 1 cm2) PCB ASIC (HARDROC1) (Absorber (2 cm)) Grid (Steel) Gas Avalanche mode: Typical induced charge of 0.1—10 pC/mip with rising time ~10 ns ± ± ± ± ± ±± ±± ± E

TB results – Calor 2010 — mai 2010, IHEP, Beijing5 Prototypes Chambers ▶ Gas: ◆ 93% TFE → 8 ionisation/mm ◆ 5% IsoButane (γ quencher) ◆ 2% SF6 (e quencher) ▶ Chambers: ◆ 33.55×8.35 cm² ● Float glass ▬ Graphite, Licron, Statguard ● Semi-conductive glass (Tsinghua U.) ▬ Licron, Statguard ◆ 1×1m² ● Float glass ● Colloidal Graphite coated (1-2 MΩ/  )

TB results – Calor 2010 — mai 2010, IHEP, Beijing6 Electronics: HarDROC v1 (Hadronic Rpc Detector Read Out Chip) AMS SiGe 0.35µm, 16 mm 2 64 channels Digital/analogue output 2 independent thresholds low consumption ▶ ~7 µW/ch with 0.5% Duty Cycle ▶ Power pulsing Digital memory ▶ 128 events ▶ ASIC ID (8b), BC ID (24b), hits Large gain range (6bits) ▶ Channel wise X-talks < 2% Threshold ≥ 10 fC OMEGA-LAL Check Ch. de la Taille presentationCh. de la Taille presentation for a global view

TB results – Calor 2010 — mai 2010, IHEP, Beijing7 8-layer, 800 µ thick PCB buried and blind vias x-talk <0.3 % 4 hardroc chips Readout FPGA  USB 8×32 pads detector FPGA Acquisition modes : With auto-triggering a) Train (ILC mode) start) b) External trigger : cosmic rays & test beam stop) Data output: digital and analogue Mini DHCAL

TB results – Calor 2010 — mai 2010, IHEP, Beijing8 DIF (Detector InterFace) 10-layer board (6 for signals) Designed for the future DAQ of the CALICE collaboration ASU (Assembly Single Unit) 8-layer board 500×33.3×1.2 mm 3 Connections between adjacent PCB Acquisition Software based on Labview & XDAQ USB readout USB HDMI The 1 m 2 electronics

TB results – Calor 2010 — mai 2010, IHEP, Beijing9 1 m 2 of equipped detector 9

TB results – Calor 2010 — mai 2010, IHEP, Beijing10 DAQ Schematic view DHCAL slab DIF DHCAL slab DIF DHCAL slab DIF DIF supervisor USB Event builderStorage UI manager Web browser Online monitor Main FSM DAQ software (Xdaq framework) LabView

TB results – Calor 2010 — mai 2010, IHEP, Beijing11 before after 2.5 fc Injected charge = 100 fc Gain correction Reduction:4

TB results – Calor 2010 — mai 2010, IHEP, Beijing12 Beam tests

TB results – Calor 2010 — mai 2010, IHEP, Beijing13 Time reconstruction Trigger First event Acquisition 1) Events are recorded in ASICs with corresponding time, channel ID & thresholds(auto-trigger) 1)Memory full → Reset of Board 2)Ext. Trigger from scintillators: → stop all boards & R/O Time to trigger (  s) ∆t (  s) Time reconstruction ● Hits belonging to the same event have |  t|<200 ns: selection criteria for tracks reconstruction ● Identical to ILC mode (trains of ~3000 BC with ∆t ~ 400 ns) Asic N° Time to trigger Hits in time Isolated hit (noise) Trigger event Time structure: unfolded from Ext. Trigger time backward

TB results – Calor 2010 — mai 2010, IHEP, Beijing14 Noise & signal All events t > -50ms 1800ms< t < -50ms Noise 0.01—0.5 Hz/cm² Current spill Previous spill

TB results – Calor 2010 — mai 2010, IHEP, Beijing15 Tracks Reconstruction Efficiency/Multiplicity determination: ▶ Tracking method: ◆ 3 RPC used as trackers ◆ Average position used to build a track ◆ Search hits in the studied ◆ layer around the expected ◆ impact ▶ Multiplicity ≡ Number of cells around track when the chamber responded (≥1) Layer1 Layer2Layer3 Layer4 Event Selection: ● Last Event ● or Train ● |∆t|<200 ● t>First Event in every chamber ● ≥1 hit per selection layer ● ∆X & ∆Y = ± 1 cm on all layers Single hit Double hit

TB results – Calor 2010 — mai 2010, IHEP, Beijing fC 450fC  DAC’s Thresholds: lower 165 fC / higher 450fC 7.2 — 8 kV 80 and 98%  Plateau: 7.2 — 8 kV → Efficiency between 80 and 98%  Lower multiplicity is preferred. Best ratioaround 7.4 kV → Best ratio multiplicity/efficiency: around 7.4 kV LICRON coated detector The LICRON coated detector shows best performances: → lowest multiplicity and very good efficiency Mini DHCAL: HV Scan

TB results – Calor 2010 — mai 2010, IHEP, Beijing17 moving as expected  Multiplicity moving as expected => lowering as threshold increases.  Efficiency decreasing down to 80% at 1.1 pC threshold.  Will be used to model the response Mini DHCAL: Threshold Scan

TB results – Calor 2010 — mai 2010, IHEP, Beijing18 Uniformity between chambers ✔ HV scan ✔ Threshold 220 DAQ value (165 fC) ✔ 6 GeV pions beam Reference setup: 4 Graphite RPCs (IHEP protvino) Triggered event data sample ✔ Uniform behaviour for the 4 RPCs ✔ 95% of efficiency reached at 7.4 kV ✔ Multiplicity of ~ 1.6 ±0.4 at 7.4 kV Number of cells in the RPC(>1) Erf + Pol1 fit

TB results – Calor 2010 — mai 2010, IHEP, Beijing19 Uniformity of response Full train reconstruction (→ ×10 in statistics) Global efficiency spread ( ⊃ statistics [25k evts] & defaults) ~ 3% Multiplicity spread in a chamber ~0.2 ( ⊃ borders & fish line) ▶ ≤3% between chambers Efficiency Multiplicity 1

TB results – Calor 2010 — mai 2010, IHEP, Beijing20 Systematic Effects Fish line between the two plates High rate areas (19 kHz/cm²) Beam profile Efficiency map RUN 179 Fish line replaced by ceramic balls to reduce contact surface for 1m² Borders

TB results – Calor 2010 — mai 2010, IHEP, Beijing21 Efficicency Stability 10 days Low number of inefficient cells Constant over time.

TB results – Calor 2010 — mai 2010, IHEP, Beijing22 Angle dependance HV = 7.4 kV Thr = 165 fC Graphite chambers No effect seen from angle ▶ Ease reconstruction of tracks in calorimeter ◆ in showers, barrel and endcap Multiplicity to be checked

TB results – Calor 2010 — mai 2010, IHEP, Beijing23 Noise evolution Noise mainly near Fish line (& borders) ▶ Should improve largely with large chamber equipped with balls (~1/100 cm²) ▶ Stability with time under studies 7.4 kV 165 fC in flat region

TB results – Calor 2010 — mai 2010, IHEP, Beijing24 Semi-conductivite glass [10 10 Ω/cm] provided by Tsinghua University: 2 chambers with 32×8 pads: ▶ thin: 1.1 mm at both side + Licron coating ▶ thick: 1.1mm on cathode mm at readout + Statguard coating Good efficiency at high event rate (>10kHz/cm²), Classical glass has significant efficiency rate > 0.1—1kHz/cm² Reference: classical float glass ~10 13 Ω/cm Semi conductive GRPC Semi-conductive glass Ω/cm Reference: classical float glass ~10 13 Ω/cm > 30kHz/cm² > 10kHz/cm²

TB results – Calor 2010 — mai 2010, IHEP, Beijing25 1 m 2 : beam profile

Some issues (solved) 26 Some noise in the HV connector regionElectric connections L. Thomas Flat kapton cable under development for next prototype

TB results – Calor 2010 — mai 2010, IHEP, Beijing27 M²: cosmic test bench Small set-up (mini-DHCAL) used as tracking device for the large chamber

TB results – Calor 2010 — mai 2010, IHEP, Beijing28 M²: Efficiency and Multiplicity (cosmics) Results without gain correction and at different T,P,H (to be controlled in next beam tests) Position scan 1 m Raw performances identical to small chambers

TB results – Calor 2010 — mai 2010, IHEP, Beijing29 Conclusions & perspectives A Semi-Digital GRPC Hadronic Calorimeter with embedded readout is a very promising candidate for future linear colliders experiments Main critical components checked on small chambers ▶ a High efficiency (95%) and low multiplicity (1.6) ▶ angular response, ▶ Uniformity of efficiency & multiplicity, ▶ Noise Semi-conductive glass RPC show promising performances Next: ▶ Two additional large RPCs being assembled ▶ Two scheduled beam tests: ◆ May'10: 2 weeks PS beam ◆ Sept'10: 11 days SPS beam

TB results – Calor 2010 — mai 2010, IHEP, Beijing30 Test with CO 2 gas Shallower raise as with Isobutane wrt to standard GRPC wider distribution from the thick semiconductive glass Isobutane ▶ inflammable ▶ Might be banned for large Detector