Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1383r0 November 2013 Wookbong Lee, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 System Level Simulation Parameters Date: 2013-11-11 Authors:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE Submission Sep 2013 Slide 1 Summary On HEW Channel Models Date: Authors:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /1387r0 Submission Nov Yan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 HEW channel modeling for system level simulation Date: Authors:
Preamble Considerations in Large Channel Delay Spread Scenarios
Doc.: IEEE /0116r1 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 1 Long-Term SINR Calibration for System Simulation Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0996r2 Aug 2013 Josiam, Taori, Tong - SamsungSlide 1 Outdoor Channel Model Candidates for HEW Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0543r0 Submission May 2015 TG ax Scenarios Proposed additions for frequency re-use Date: Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide.
Doc.: IEEE /0551r1 SubmissionSuhwook Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 OBSS Preamble Detection Evaluation Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0861r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury Impact of CCA adaptation on spatial reuse in dense residential scenario Date: Authors:
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
Doc.: IEEE /0116r0 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. Al.Slide 1 Long-Term SINR Calibration for System Simulation Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc. No. IEEE hew-r1 Submission July 2013 Klaus Doppler, NokiaSlide 1 Evaluation Criteria and Simulation Scenarios Date: July 16, 2013 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1153r0 Submission September 2013 Laurent Cariou (Orange)Slide 1 Simulation scenario proposal Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0627r0 May 2014 Josiam et.al., SamsungSlide 1 Outdoor Channel Models for System Level Simulations Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0536r0 May 2013 Wookbong Lee, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 HEW SG PHY Considerations For Outdoor Environment Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0486r1 Submission May 2013 Ron Porat, Broadcom HEW- Metrics, Targets, Simulation Scenarios Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0612r0 May 2014 Jiyong Pang, et. al. HuaweiSlide 1 Calibration Procedures towards Integrated System Level Simulation Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1081r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury HEW Simulation Methodology Date: Sep 16, 2013 Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0723r1 SubmissionSlide 1 HEW SG Evaluation Methodology Overview Date: Authors: Minyoung Park (Intel Corp.) July 2013.
Doc.: IEEE /0786r0 Submission July 2013 Wu TianyuSlide 1 Discussions on System Level Simulation Methodology Date: Authors:
Ross Jian Yu (Huawei Technologies) doc.: IEEE /0051r0 Submission Jan 2014 Slide 1 Wireless Office Scenario with Interference Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0799r2 Submission June 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Modifications to Simulation Scenarios and Calibration Process Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0307r0 Submission January 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom PHY Calibration Results Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1401r0 Nov Josiam, Kuo, Taori et.al., SamsungSlide 1 System Level Assessments for Outdoor HEW Deployments Date: YYYY-MM-DD.
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1079r0 September 2013 Joseph Levy, InterDigital Communications Inc.Slide 1 Outdoor Stadium Simulation Details Discussion Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0161r1 Submission doc.: IEEE /1031r0 Measurement results for OBSS in home network scenarios Date: September 2009.
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Doc.: IEEE /1392r5 SubmissionSuhwook Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Simulation results for Box 5 calibration Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE /0871r1 Jul Jiyong Pang, et. al. Huawei Further Calibration Results towards Integrated System Level Simulation Date:
Simulation results for spatial reuse in 11ax
Performance Evaluation for 11ac
Month Year doc.: IEEE /0552r1 November 2015
Considerations on HEW Evaluation Methodology
HEW SG Evaluation Methodology Overview
Considerations on down-clocking ratio
TGad interference modeling for MAC simulations
WF on scenarios and evaluation assumptions for flexible duplex
Evaluation Model for LTE-Advanced
Preliminary 11ax PAR Verification
Simulation results for
Preliminary 11ax PAR Verification
5G Micro Cell Deployment in Coexistence with Fixed Service
Box 5 Calibration Results
HEW Outdoor Channel Model Discussions
11ax PAR Verification through OFDMA
Multi-User MIMO Channel Measurements
Box 5 Calibration Results
Box 5 Calibration Results
Preliminary 11ax PAR Verification
Power Save Simulation Results
Simulation Results for Box 5 Calibration
Simulation Results for Box5
Joint submission for Box 5 calibration
Marvell Semiconductor
Simulation results for
OBSS Preamble Detection
Box5 Calibration Results
Box5 Results of 11ac SS6 Date: Authors: Jan 2015 Sept 2014
Performance Gains from CCA Optimization
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
Box 5 Calibration Result
11ax PAR Verification through OFDMA
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
Simulation results for
Simulation results for
System Level Simulator Evaluation with/without Capture Effect
TG ax Scenarios Proposed additions for frequency re-use
DSC Calibration Result
Consideration on System Level Simulation
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
Presentation transcript:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1383r0 November 2013 Wookbong Lee, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 System Level Simulation Parameters Date: Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1383r0 Introduction In evaluation methodology document [1], three tools are defined to enable the assessment of proposed HEW techniques performance and gain relative to 11ac; ‒ PER Simulation ‒ PHY System Simulation ‒ MAC System Simulation In channel model document [2], following channel models are proposed to used for HEW evaluation; ‒ Indoor channel model: TGn/TGac channel model [5], [6] ‒ Outdoor channel model: ITU Channel [4] HEW design shall ensure that Wi-Fi works well under UMi HEW design should ensure that Wi-Fi still works under UMa (connection is supported but reduced performance is possible) In this contribution, we provide parameters/models need to be defined especially for system level simulation based on simulation scenario document [3] and ITU document [4]. Slide 2Wookbong Lee, LG Electronics November 2013

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1383r0 Basic Parameters Based on [3], [4] Topology Description ‒ Include inter-cell(?) distance for scenario 3 and 4 AP location, AP antenna height STA location Minimum distance between STA and serving AP ‒ For 0dBi antenna gain AP, we may not need this parameter. Number of STA and STA type ‒ Portion of indoor Users when AP is in outdoor (O-to-I): Simulation Scenario 4 only (Note that in UMi channel model, this is 50%) Center Frequency and BW Traffic Model ‒ Traffic type, data size, data arrival time, outage condition, … Thermal noise level Cable Loss Slide 3Wookbong Lee, LG Electronics November 2013

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1383r0 Slide 4Wookbong Lee, LG Electronics November 2013 ResidentialEnterpriseIndoor Small BSSsOutdoor Large BSS Topology Description Multi-floor building 5 floors, 3 m height in eac h floor 2x10 rooms in each floor Room size:10m x 10m x 3 m Office floor configuration ( see Figure 1) a. 8 offices b. 64 cubicles per office c. Each cubicle has 4 STAs BSSs are placed in a regula r and symmetric grid as in F igure 5. Each BSS in Figure 5 has th e following configuration : BSS radius: R meters (7m [ #1248] / 12m [Stadium, #7 22,#1079] TBD) Inter-cell distance (ICD): 2 *h meters h=sqrt(R 2 -R 2 /4) Outdoor street deployment Overlap of 3 operators BSS layout configuration Planned deployment: 19 he xagonal grid as in Figure 8. With ICD: 2*h meters (130 m, TBD) h=sqrt(R 2 -R 2 /4) R meters defined as the dist ance for MCS0 sensitivity APs location, AP antenna heights One AP per apartment, in ra ndom location (in three dim entional? Or in two dimenti onal while fixed z location? ) within the apartment Each AP is located at the ce nter of the office Installed on the ceiling at (x =10,y=10,z=3) AP is placed at the center of the cell with antenna height TBD m. Place APs on the center of t he each BSS, +/- an offset with TBD standard deviatio n with antenna height TBD m. STAs location In each room that has an AP, place N+M STAs in rando m xy-locations (uniform dis tribution) at 1.5m above the floor level. Placed randomly in a cubicl e (x,y,z=1) (In the figure 4, x and y are 2.) STA1: laptop STA2: monitor STA3: smartphone or tablet STA4: Hard disk Keyboard/mouse (TBR) 30 [#1248] -72 [Stadium, # 722,#1079] (TBD) STAs are placed randomly #1248 / in a regular grid (#7 22,#1079) in a BSS “50-100” STAs are placed r andomly in a BSS. Note: Black text is from [3]. Red text is proposed modification/addition

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1383r0 Slide 5Wookbong Lee, LG Electronics November 2013 ResidentialEnterpriseIndoor Small BSSsOutdoor Large BSS Minimum distanc e between STA an d serving AP (? TBD) TBD m Number of STA and STAs type N STAs in each room. STA_1 to STA_{N-M}: HE W STA_{N-M+1} to STA_{N } : non-HEW (N = TBD, M = TBD) HEW Non-HEW? TBD N STAs in each cubicle. ST A_1 to STA_{N-M}: HEW STA_{N-M+1} to STA_{N } : non-HEW (N = TBD, M = TBD) {STAs 1 to N: HEW STAs} [STAs N+1 to TBD: non-H EW STAs] N STAs in each BSS. STA_ 1 to STA_{N-M}: HEW STA_{N-M+1} to STA_{N } : non-HEW (N = 30 [#1248] -72 [Stadiu m, #722,#1079] (TBD), M = TBD) {STAs 1 to N: HEW STAs} [STAs N+1 to TBD: non-H EW STAs] N STAs in each BSS. TBD % of users are indoor users. (Note that in UMi channel model, this value is 50%.) STA_1 to STA_{N-M}: HE W STA_{N-M+1} to STA_{N } : non-HEW (N= TBD, M = TB D) Center frequency and BW [20MHz BSS at 2.4GHz, 80 MHz BSS at 5GHz] {20MHz at 2.4GHz, 80 MH z at 5GHz} Thermal Noise Level -174 dBm/Hz Cable LossTBD dB Note: Black text is from [3]. Red text is proposed modification/addition

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1383r0 Channel Related Parameters [4] Channel model for ‒ AP-STA ‒ STA-STA (Interference channel, May be long distance as well) ‒ AP-AP (Interference channel) ‒ STA-STA (P2P Link, Probably short distance) For each channel model, we may need to define ‒ Delay Spread, AoA, AoD, Number of cluster, Cluster ASD, Cluster ASA, Per cluster shadowing std. ‒ Correlation distance ‒ K factor, LoS Probability Pathloss for ‒ AP-STA ‒ STA-STA ‒ AP-AP (Interference channel) Shadowing Penetration Loss (Building, Car, …) Slide 6Wookbong Lee, LG Electronics November 2013

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1383r0 Slide 7Wookbong Lee, LG Electronics November 2013 ResidentialEnterpriseIndoor Small BSSsOutdoor Large BSS Channel Model for AP-STA TGn channel model BTGn channel model D Large open space with smal l BSSs {Outdoor, ITU micro} {UMi}, [UMa] Channel Model for STA-STA (inte rference channel) TBD (Simple channel mode l is preferred) Channel Model for AP-AP (interfe rence channel) Same as "Channel Model fo r AP-STA"? TBD Channel Model for STA-STA (P2P Link) Same as "Channel Model fo r AP-STA"? TBD Pathloss for AP-STA Based on Channel Model fo r AP-STA Pathloss for AP-AP (interferen ce channel) Same as "Pathloss for AP-S TA"? TBD Pathloss for STA-STA (P2P Li nk) Same as "Pathloss for AP-S TA"? TBD Shadowing Based on Channel Model fo r AP-STA Penentration Loss es TBD between apartments TBD between floors TBD None None Based on Channel Model fo r AP-STA

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1383r0 AP Related Parameters [3], [4] Number of AP antenna elements, antenna type (uniform linear array, cross polarization, etc…) and antenna spacing ‒ Number of transmit antennas ‒ Number of receive antennas AP antenna gain (boresight) AP antenna pattern and antenna orientation ‒ Only when AP antenna gain is above 0dBi Maximum AP transmit power AP noise figure Slide 8Wookbong Lee, LG Electronics November 2013

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1383r0 STA Related Parameters [3], [4] Maximum STA transmit power Number of STA antenna elements ‒ Number of transmit antennas ‒ Number of receive antennas STA mobility model? ‒ Only for handover related simulation STA speeds ‒ Including environment change STA noise figure STA antenna gain (boresight) Slide 9Wookbong Lee, LG Electronics November 2013

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1383r0 Slide 10Wookbong Lee, LG Electronics November 2013 ResidentialEnterpriseIndoor Small BSSsOutdoor Large BSS AP # of TX anten nas, antenna type and antenna spacing {4}, ULA, 4 lambda? {2, 4}, ULA, 4 lambda? AP # of RX anten nas {4} {2, 4} AP Antenna Gain and Pattern 0 dBi (Omni Directional) (Maximum) AP T X Power {23}dBm[24dBm] [max 17dBm][30dBm] AP Noise Figure5dB? (Maximum) STA TX power {17}dBm[21dBm] [max 15dBm] [max 19dBm ] [15dBm] STA # of TX ante nnas, antenna type and antenna spaci ng {1, 2}, ULA, 0.5 lambda? STA # of RX ante nnas {1, 2} STA speeds (inclu ding environment change) 3km/h {3km/h}, [30km/h] STA Noise Figure7dB STA Antenna Gai n and Pattern 0 dBi (Omni Directional)

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1383r0 Additional Parameters [3] MCS GI Data Preamble Primary Channels Aggregation Maximum number of retries CTS/RTS Rate adaptation method MIMO Receiver type: MMSE, ML, etc Scheduling (Can be defined in evaluation document) EVM (error vector magnitude): 30dB? … Slide 11Wookbong Lee, LG Electronics November 2013

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1383r0 Reference [1] 11-13/1051r1, “Evaluation Methodology ” [2] 11-13/1135r4, “Summary On HEW Channel Models” [3] 11-13/1001r4, “HEW SG Simulation Scenarios” [4] Report ITU-R M , “Guidelines for evaluation of radio interface technologies for IMT-Advanced” [5] 11-03/0904r4, “TGn Channel Models” [6] 11-09/0308r12, “TGac Channel Model Addendum” Slide 12Wookbong Lee, LG Electronics November 2013