T EAM 7 Joel Handy Rob Schugmann Jon Addison S TAR S EARCH C ONTROL S YSTEMS D ESIGN Final Presentation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
From Kinematics to Arm Control a)Calibrating the Kinematics Model b)Arm Motion Selection c)Motor Torque Calculations for a Planetary Robot Arm CS36510.
Advertisements

Automotive Research Center Robotics and Mechatronics A Nonlinear Tracking Controller for a Haptic Interface Steer-by-Wire Systems A Nonlinear Tracking.
Qube-Servo Curriculum Presentation This presentation is intended to provide general content for any relevant presentations The general real-world applications.
Laser Deflection System: Disturbance Correction Final Presentation Team 5 April 23, 2003 By: Tyler Ferman Matt DiLeo Jack Damerji.
Robust and Efficient Control of an Induction Machine for an Electric Vehicle Arbin Ebrahim and Dr. Gregory Murphy University of Alabama.
Servos The material presented is taken from a variety of sources including:
Quantifying Generalization from Trial-by-Trial Behavior in Reaching Movement Dan Liu Natural Computation Group Cognitive Science Department, UCSD March,
Final Demonstration: Dead Reckoning System for Mobile Robots Lee FithianSteven Parkinson Ajay JosephSaba Rizvi.
Computing Movement Geometry A step in Sensory-Motor Transformations Elizabeth Torres & David Zipser.
ME 224 Experimental Engineering: Professor Espinosa 2005 TEAM : Jamie Charles Carlo Niko Javier.
PEG Breakout Mike, Sarah, Thomas, Rob S., Joe, Paul, Luca, Bruno, Alec.
Mechatronics 1 Week 9 & 10. Learning Outcomes By the end of week 9-10 session, students will understand the control system of industrial robots.
3.7. O THER G AME P HYSICS A PPROACHES Overview of other game engine physics approaches.
Definition of an Industrial Robot
3-D Scanning Robot Steve Alexander Jeff Bonham John Johansson Adam Mewha Faculty Advisor: Dr. C. Macnab.
DOUBLE ARM JUGGLING SYSTEM Progress Presentation ECSE-4962 Control Systems Design Group Members: John Kua Trinell Ball Linda Rivera.
Motion Tracking & Position Acquisition Final Design Review Solomon Gates | William K. Grefe | Jay Michael Heidbreder | Jeremy Kolpak.
Optimization-Based Full Body Control for the DARPA Robotics Challenge Siyuan Feng Mar
Ultrasonic Tracking System Group # 4 Bill Harris Sabie Pettengill Enrico Telemaque Eric Zweighaft.
Ultrasonic Tracking System Group # 4 4/22/03 Bill Harris Sabie Pettengill Enrico Telemaque Eric Zweighaft.
Coverage Efficiency in Autonomous Robots With Emphasis on Simultaneous Localization and Mapping Mo Lu Computer Systems Lab Final Version.
Disturbance Correction Final Design Review Team 5 February 25, 2003 By:Tyler Ferman Matt DiLeo Jack Damerji.
System & Control Control theory is an interdisciplinary branch of engineering and mathematics, that deals with the behavior of dynamical systems. The desired.
Disturbance Rejection: Final Presentation Group 2: Nick Fronzo Phil Gaudet Sean Senical Justin Turnier.
DOUBLE ARM JUGGLING SYSTEM
Visual Target Tracking System Final Design February 26, 2003 Chad Helm Matthew Sked James Deloge Tim Bagnull.
Group 6 Target Tracking Spotlight (TTS) Maureen Desi Joel Douglass Rajiv Iyer Dennis Trimarchi.
1 Deadzone Compensation of an XY –Positioning Table Using Fuzzy Logic Adviser : Ying-Shieh Kung Student : Ping-Hung Huang Jun Oh Jang; Industrial Electronics,
Prognosis of Gear Health Using Gaussian Process Model Department of Adaptive systems, Institute of Information Theory and Automation, May 2011, Prague.
Instructor: Irfan Azhar.  Which one is more accurate?  Less sensitive to disturbance noise and variations in environment  Transient response and steady.
Re-commissioning the Student Radio Telescope Michelle Ho Dr. Christopher Groppi.
By: 1- Aws Al-Nabulsi 2- Ibrahim Wahbeh 3- Odai Abdallah Supervised by: Dr. Kamel Saleh.
STEPPER MOTORS Name: Mr.R.Anandaraj Designation: Associate. Professor Department: Electrical and Electronics Engineering Subject code :EC 6252 Year: II.
Target Tracking Spotlight (TTS) Maureen Desi Joel Douglass Rajiv Iyer Dennis Trimarchi Group 6.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 18  Spring 2013 Derek Pesyna, Tim Brown, Evan Foote, Doug Wile.
Introduction to the first laboratory exercise Continuous neural network sliding mode controller DSP2 realization Andreja Rojko
Introduction to Biped Walking
Control systems KON-C2004 Mechatronics Basics Tapio Lantela, Nov 5th, 2015.
Accurate Robot Positioning using Corrective Learning Ram Subramanian ECE 539 Course Project Fall 2003.
National Instruments Autonomous Robotics Competition
MONALISA Compact Straightness Monitor (CSM) simulation and Calibration Summer Project 2008.
Typical DOE environmental management robotics require a highly experienced human operator to remotely guide and control every joint movement. The human.
Disturbance rejection control method
Diagnostics and Optimization Procedures for Beamline Control at BESSY A. Balzer, P. Bischoff, R. Follath, D. Herrendörfer, G. Reichardt, P. Stange.
ECE 477 FINAL PRESENTATION TEAM 6  SPRING OUTLINE  Project overview  Block diagram  Design challenges  Individual contributions  Project demonstration.
Intelligent Robot Lab Pusan National University Intelligent Robot Lab Chapter 7. Forced Response Errors Pusan National University Intelligent Robot Laboratory.
Wireless Bluetooth Controller For DC Motor. Introduction Wireless becoming more and more available and widely used Bluetooth is one of the major players.
Space Robotics Seminar On
DOUBLE ARM JUGGLING SYSTEM Team 1 Proposal Presentation ECSE-4962 Control Systems Design Trinell Ball John Kua Linda Rivera.
University of Pisa Project work for Robotics Prof. Antonio Bicchi Students: Sergio Manca Paolo Viccione WALKING ROBOT.
M ATLAB T UTORIAL Simulink & Control System Design ToolBox and GUIs 1.
Internal CDR meeting December 20th, 2005
Sensors Quadrature Encoders Mike Zook 30-Aug-2016.
What are the key components of your robot?
Sensors Quadrature Encoders Mike Zook 30-Aug-2016.
Servos The material presented is taken from a variety of sources including:
Accurate Robot Positioning using Corrective Learning
3.7. Other Game Physics Approaches
Path Curvature Sensing Methods for a Car-like Robot
Servos The material presented is taken from a variety of sources including:
Cole Perrault Spring 2015 ET 493 Wesley Deneke
SQUIGGLE NANOMANIPULATOR
Factors Influencing Movement
GROpt.m (1) Copy the 7 files from GRopt.zip into one directory.
Vision Tracking System
Overview of Control System
Soft Motion Trajectory Planning for a motor
Project Progress: The Floating Dutchmen
14 Design of Experiments with Several Factors CHAPTER OUTLINE
P16051 – Robotic Eye Motion Simulator
Presentation transcript:

T EAM 7 Joel Handy Rob Schugmann Jon Addison S TAR S EARCH C ONTROL S YSTEMS D ESIGN Final Presentation

Final Presentation Outline Project Overview Objective Review original design Describe project construction and functional tests Discuss successes and challenges Future Development Final Presentation Outline

Project Overview Using a telescope can be entertaining but also frustrating Difficulties include Locating a celestial object Keeping the object within view over time

Project Overview Project Overview Cont These difficulties can be overcome through the design of a motorized telescope that can track a celestial object while remaining resistant to disturbances.

Original Goals Design a self-calibrating computer- positioning telescope Should withstand disturbances and stay centered on the desired object Should be easy to use while remaining relatively cheap to implement

Design Concerns & Specifications Speed Point to point movement and tracking require different speeds Resolution A small change in telescope position yields a large change in the field of view

Speed Specifications for Point to Point Movement 72°.00 / sec Specifications for Tracking Speed 360°/ hrs. 15° / hr. Speed

Resolution Resolution is the smallest movement possible in a system High Resolution Requirements degrees - Half of the field of view at medium magnification - Increase resolution by gearing down the system Resolution

Resolution and Accuracy High Resolution Requirements degrees - Half of the field of view at medium magnification - Increase resolution by gearing down the system Accuracy degrees -Any more error and objects will leave field of view Resolution

Project Development Linear Simulation Motor Selection Non-linear Simulation Experimental Analysis Project Development

Linear Simulation Developed mathematical model of system Used robotic parameters to obtain required torques for a given path Linear Simulation

Torque Constraints

Motor and Gear Selection Motor Selection Motor (Pittman GM8724S016) 19.5:1 internal gear ratio Max continuous torque of.29 N/m Gears External gear ratio of 4:1 Overall gear ratio of 80:1

RLtool Pan Step Response Tilt Step Response

Non-linear w/o Non-linear Simulation

Non-linear w/ Non-linear Simulation Friction Compensation

Testing Procedure Created MATLAB script file -Automated all initialization and operation -Automated data collection Testing Procedure

Experimental Analysis No Trajectory Generation

Trajectory generator Trajectory Generation

Experimental Analysis Trajectory Generation

Slow tracking Slow Tracking

Final results Initial vs Final Specifications Original GoalsFinal Results Speed72 deg/sec36 deg/sec Resolution0.25 deg0.325 deg Accuracy0.25 deg0.57 deg Self PositioningYes Withstands DisturbancesYes Ease of UseYes

Challenges Excessive Speed -Telescope Unsafe -Violent movements Trajectory Generator -Runtime termination -Initial run errors Challenges

Project Cost Components for StarSearch ComponentsManufacturerPart NumberCostQuantityTotal Cost MotorPittmanGM8724S Large GearStock DriveA 6A61-00NF Small GearStock DriveA 6A 6-25DF Timing BeltStock DriveA 6R Project Cost Compass SensorPNI CorpVector-2x Magnetometer501 InclinometerUS DigitalT4701 TelescopeJason304-T1501 Total Cost 556.3

Future Developments Sensor Integration -Greater system autonomy High resolution encoders -Would allow for much greater accuracy Inclusion of Position data -Allow users to target objects by name rather than coordinates Future Developments

Questions? Questions