G. Trad on the behalf of the BSRT team Emittance meeting 04/11/2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
Advertisements

BSRT Optics Design BI Days 24 th November 2011 Aurélie Rabiller BE-BI-PM.
The 2nd Tevatron Electron Lens and tests of a new electron gun in the framework of Beam-Beam Compensation project Yu. Alexahin, V. Kamerdzhiev, G. Kuznetsov,
Matching and Synchrotron Light Diagnostics F.Roncarolo, E.Bravin, S.Burger, A.Goldblatt, G.Trad.
S. White, LBS 17 May Van Der Meer Scans: Preliminary Observations.
AGS pp Status Feb. 20, 2015 RSC Meeting Haixin Huang.
D EDICATED S PECTROPHOTOMETER F OR L OCALIZED T RANSMITTANCE A ND R EFLECTANCE M EASUREMENTS Laetitia ABEL-TIBERINI, Frédéric LEMARQUIS, Michel LEQUIME.
Beam Commissioning Workshop, 19th January Luminosity Optimization S. White, H. Burkhardt.
STATUS REPORT OF FPC SPICA Task Force Meeting March 29, 2010 MATSUMOTO, Toshio (SNU)
Recent Progress in X-ray Emittance Diagnostics at SPring-8 S. Takano, M. Masaki, and H. Sumitomo * JASRI/SPring-8, Hyogo, Japan SES, Hyogo, Japan *
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES BIW ’ 06 Lepton Beam Emittance Instrumentation Igor Pinayev National Synchrotron Light Source BNL, Upton, NY.
LHC First LHC Emittance Measurements at 6.5 TeV IBIC15 Melbourne, Australia 2015 Maria Kuhn 1,2 – September 16, 2015 F. Antoniou 2, E. Bravin 2, B. Dehning.
SPS Synchrotron Light Monitor -BSR- Status G. TRAD E. Bravin, A. Goldblatt, F. Roncarolo.
05/05/2004Cyrille Thomas DIAMOND Storage Ring Optical and X-ray Diagnostics.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
September 16, 2008LSST Camera F2F1 Camera Calibration Optical Configurations and Calculations Keith Bechtol Andy Scacco Allesandro Sonnenfeld.
Beam Commissioning WG, 10 August Luminosity Scans in the LHC S. White.
Developments of Photon Beam Monitors in NSRRC (TLS) J.R. Chen, C.K. Kuan, T.C. Tseng, and G.Y. Hsiung National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center XBPM.
T E C H N I C A L B A C K G R O U N D 2. IR CORRECTIVE LENS.
C. Fischer – LHC Instrumentation Review – 19-20/11/2001 Gas Monitors for Transverse Distribution Studies in the LHC LHC Instrumentation Review Workshop.
Machine development - results and plans – critical results, what’s to be done? R. Assmann 15/07/2011 R. Assmann for the LHC MD coordination team (R. Assmann,
BSRT CALIBRATION MD SUMMARY LSWG #6-15/09/2015 BSRT TEAM.
CLIC Decelerator Instrumentation - Ideas and outlooks – non exhaustive - Erik Adli, July 9, 2008.
G. Trad on the behalf of the BSRT team LHC BI 2015 summary 13/11/2015.
1 Experience at CERN with luminosity monitoring and calibration, ISR, SPS proton antiproton collider, LEP, and comments for LHC… Werner Herr and Rüdiger.
First Collision of BEPCII C.H. Yu May 10, Methods of collision tuning Procedures and data analysis Luminosity and background Summary.
ICCD of HERD Le WANG, XIOPM , XI’AN The 3 rd HERD Workshop.
Beam-beam compensation at RHIC LARP Proposal Tanaji Sen, Wolfram Fischer Thanks to Jean-Pierre Koutchouk, Frank Zimmermann.
February 5, 2005D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c Status -Operations/Luminosity -Machine studies -Simulation and modeling -4.1GeV.
14/1/2011 LHC Lumi days - J. Wenninger 1 IP positions and angles, knowledge and correction Acknowledgments: W. White, E. Calvo J. Wenninger BE-OP-LHC.
ATF2 beam operation status Toshiyuki OKUGI, KEK The 9 th TB&SGC meeting KEK, 3-gokan Seminar Hall 2009/ 12/ 16.
SL/BI 16/05/1999DIPAC’99 -- JJ Gras -- CERN SL/BI -- Adaptive Optics for the LEP 2 SR Monitors G. Burtin, R.J. Colchester, G. Ferioli, J.J. Gras, R. Jung,
BSRT UPDATE LMC 02-OCT-2012 F.Roncarolo on behalf of the BSRT team W.Andreazza, E.Bravin, A.Boccardi, J-J.Gras, A.Goldblatt, M.Hamani, T.Lefevre, R.Jones,
LHC Scrubbing Run 1 Day 3 (27/06/2015) Scrubbing team 28/06/2015.
Progress with Beam Report to LMC, Machine Coordination W10: Mike Lamont – Ralph Assmann Thanks to other machine coordinators, EIC’s, operators,
BI MD# BSRT Measurements Beam 1 and 3.5 TeV 2 bunches with different emittances Bumps: -4, -2,0,2,4 mm Results: 3.5TeV.
BPM and BSM Tune Measurements August 2, 2007 B. Cerio, R. Holtzapple.
RF measurements during floating MD in Week 40 3 rd of October 2012 LIU-SPS BD WG 25/10/2012 Participants: T. Argyropoulos, H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, J. Esteban.
Crossing Schemes Considerations and Beam-Beam Work plan T. Pieloni, J. Barranco, X. Buffat, W. Herr.
Summary of ions measurements in 2015 and priorities for 2016 studies E. Shaposhnikova 3/02/2016 Based on input from H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, B. Goddard, V.
(Towards a) Luminosity model for LHC and HL-LHC F. Antoniou, M. Hostettler, Y. Papaphilippou, G. Papotti Acknowledgements: Beam-Beam and Luminosity studies.
Benchmarking Headtail with e-cloud observations with LHC 25ns beam H. Bartosik, W. Höfle, G. Iadarola, Y. Papaphilippou, G. Rumolo.
SL_THOMSON C. Vaccarezza on behalf of the SL_Thomson team.
LHC LHC Wire Scanners: Updates on Measurement Accuracy Emittance Meeting 18 November 2015 Maria Kuhn – 18 November 2015 Many thanks to G. Baud, E. Bravin,
Requirements from BI and new instruments after LS1 LHC Optics Measurement and Correction Review; B.Dehning 1 Bernd Dehning CERN BE/BI
Digital Light Sources First introduced in 2001.
Y.Papaphilippou Thanks to
LHC Wire Scanner Calibration
Beam instrumentation MDs
Beam Gas Imaging Kick-off meeting 30-Oct-2012
Summary of SPARC first-phase operations
M.Fitterer, A.Patapenka, A.Valishev (FNAL)
Cryo Problem MD Planning Tue (1.11.) C B Day Time MD MP Tue 01:00
MD2243: Coronagraph commissioning at 6.5 TeV
Slice Parameter Measurements at the SwissFEL Injector Test Facility
E. Bravin, A. Goldblatt, S. Mazzoni, F. Roncarolo, M. Palm
Summary of experience with Tevatron synchrotron light diagnostics
Saturday 21st April 00:33 Interlock during ramp on BLM HV
Lebanese Teacher Programme 18/04/2017
OTR based measurements for ELI-NP Gamma Beam Source
Follow-up of HL-LHC Annual meeting
Friday 07:00 Power glitch on the EDF network. Point 8 affected.
LHC Emittance Measurements and Preservation
Fill 1410 revisited Peak luminosity 1.4e32 Beam current 2.68/2.65 e13
Proton Beam Diagnostics
Slope measurements from test-beam irradiations
Head-Tail Monitor for CC Diagnostics
Measurement of the beam (transverse) emittances
LHC BIF test setup - update
Monday 152 bunch operation summary
Presentation transcript:

G. Trad on the behalf of the BSRT team Emittance meeting 04/11/2015

2 G. Trad- BSRT status- Emittance Meeting  Introduction  Heating of the extraction system  BSRT optical systems  Calibration techniques  Results  BSRT in operation  Miscellaneous  Conclusions and Outlook

3 G. Trad- BSRT status- Emittance Meeting Bunch Length Evolution : 1.3 ns -> 0.8 ns bunches Total intensity: 2.3.e14 =>Maximum Temperature excursion 3 o C Fill 4538 (24.4 h SB) ~ 3 o C

4 G. Trad- BSRT status- Emittance Meeting BSRT optics consist in 2 stages imaging system B1 & B2 At injection 2 Lenses optimized for imaging at λ=500 -> 600 nm (L1: φ=76 mm, f~4800 mm ; L2: φ=25 mm, f~300 mm ) Source Undulator SR light is available only in the aforementioned range B1 Additional system used for interferometry R&D, optimized for λ=550 nm (L1: φ=100 mm, f~816 mm ; L2: φ=25 mm, f~18 mm ) In absence of slits, this could be used as an imaging line featuring new optical properties (f#...) At FlatTop 2 Lenses optimized for imaging at λ=250 nm (L1: φ=76 mm, f~4800 mm ; L2: φ=25 mm, f~300 mm ) Source D3 dipole SR light is broadband, the choice of the lower wavelength in the visible range (NUV) aims to reduce the effect of diffraction

5 G. Trad- BSRT status- Emittance Meeting By design, BSRT measurement should be calibrated w.r.t. WS => BSRT emittance measurements accuracy is dictated by WS precision and accuracy SR imaging technique: SR Optical System (Magnification, resolution) Optical System (Magnification, resolution) Detector Profile on Camera -> Gaussian Fit -> σ meas in the image plane -> Normalizing by the optical system magnification -> σ meas in the object plane -> Correcting by the optical resolution -> σ BSRT at the SR source location -> Using the machine optics parameter -> Emittance calculation

6 G. Trad- BSRT status- Emittance Meeting MODE A: Calibration using BPM & WS data Bumps in IR 4 + BPM data Obtained from WS meas. Magnification SR image centroid shift on the camera is proportional to the SR source displacement (beam orbit bumps). We apply local Bumps around IR4, the BPMs are used to calculate the beam displacement (4 BPMs around IR4 are used) N.B: For every optical system configuration (lens position focusing on a different point in the source plane) this exercise should be repeated. LSF Once the beam size in the object (SR source) plane is obtained, A correction factor is applied to the BSRT measurement such as the inferred emittance is the same at both instruments.

7 G. Trad- BSRT status- Emittance Meeting MODE A: Calibration using BPM & WS data

8 G. Trad- BSRT status- Emittance Meeting MODE B: Calibration based only on WS data % ---> MAGNIFICATION = sqrt(betaRatio/slope); % ---> LSF = sqrt(intercept*slope/betaRatio); Y slope X intercept Deconvolution assuming Gaussian beam profile and Gaussian LSF

9 G. Trad- BSRT status- Emittance Meeting MODE B: Calibration based only on WS data

10 G. Trad- BSRT status- Emittance Meeting CALIBRATION Based on WSCALIBRATION Based on BPM B1 Hor B1 Ver B2 Hor B2 Ver MAG : 68.8 µm/px LSF : µm MAG : 76.4 µm/px LSF : 228 µm MAG : 65.4 µm/px LSF : 345 µm MAG : 70 µm/px LSF : 283 µm MAG : 77.4 µm/px LSF : 370 µm MAG : 83.5 µm/px LSF : 310 µm MAG : 67.4 µm/px LSF : 370 µm MAG : 74.8 µm/px LSF : 390 µm *1.068 *1.03 *1.092 *1.125 Significant difference reaching even 12% in some cases BSRT scale from BPM is always greater then when calculated from WS Error could originate from BPM scaling factors WS scaling conversion factors from ADC steps to mm.

G. Trad- BSRT status- Emittance Meeting Using WS data for magnification 11

12 G. Trad- BSRT status- Emittance Meeting Using BPM data for magnification

13 G. Trad- BSRT status- Emittance Meeting  BSRT is reliably operational in 2015 Has been crucial for beam-beam, instabilities and EC studies Crosschecked with independent measurement (op scans)  Several challenges in Run II, mainly the increasing number of bunches (limited time at injection and limited acquisition speed) Detector lifetime (clear dependence of the beam size on the spot position)  The Server is continuously being upgraded by Enrico to optimize the system (priority scanning for freshly injected beams, Off-centring the beam spot, Compensating eventual camera loss of sensitivity, investigating effects of non Gaussian resolution)  Logging of beam profile on request is available (LOW dynamic range, interpretation very challenging especially at FT)

14 G. Trad- BSRT status- Emittance Meeting  Comparing BSRT optical system vs BSRI optical system (in imaging) N.B: BSRI system could be further optimized finding an optimum focusing point. However it requests additional calibration time Vertical Spread reflects the instrument precision

15 G. Trad- BSRT status- Emittance Meeting  Comparing BSRT optical system vs BSRI optical system (in imaging) N.B: BSRI system could be further optimized finding an optimum focusing point. However it requests additional calibration time BSRT BSRI H MAG:68.8 µm/px 10.9 µm/px LSF: µm 348 µm V MAG:76.4 µm/px 10.7 µm/px LSF: 228 µm 293 µm This week an MD will be carried out to compare the performance of the NUV vs visible BSRT imaging systems. This will allow investigating the benefits of an optical system with shorter focal lengths

16 G. Trad- BSRT status- Emittance Meeting  Vertical beam size measurement by interferometry Bunch 0 Bunch 1785 Data acquired at the end calibration studies (F-4513), with a small emittance bunch (0) and a blown up bunch (1785) Slit scan from D=3mm to D=21 mm

17 G. Trad- BSRT status- Emittance Meeting  Vertical beam size measurement by interferometry σ = 185/200 µm Instead of σ = 320/450 µm !!!

18 G. Trad- BSRT status- Emittance Meeting  BSRT is operational and very well calibrated to WS  Investigations still take place for improving the cross calibration by reducing the uncertainties on WS measurements (noise studies).  Profit from MDs parasitically for interferometry system calibration.  New acquisition card will be deployed during winter shutdown that will fasten the acquisitions to a max of 50 fps, reducing the total time of beam scan.  For BSRT consolidation new digital cameras will be installed to further fasten the acquisition to some 100s fps. New intensifiers will also be installed featuring higher sensitivity, better profile and higher SNR (~summer 2016).  A beam halo monitoring system will be installed in B2 during winter shutdown.