Recent Studies on Electron Cloud at KEKB 1.EC studies at KEKB 2.Recent results –Clearing Electrode –Groove surface –EC measurement in Q and solenoid field.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
KEK Update on the status of the electron cloud studies at KEKB Contents Brief review of our studies Updates Clearing electrode Groove structure SEY measurement.
Advertisements

2006/9/25-26 ILCDR06, Cornell University 1 DESIGN STUDY OF A MOVABLE COLLIMATOR WITH LOW BEAM IMPEDANCE Yusuke Suetsugu*, Kyo Shibata KEKB Vac. Group Introduction.
Upgrade Plan of KEKB Vacuum system Pre-kickoff KEK1 Y. Suetsugu KEKB Vacuum Group Contents Challenges for vacuum system Designs for.
Study of a Clearing Electrode at KEKB - First beam test - Y. Suetsugu, H. Fukuma (KEK), M. Pivi, W. Lanfa (SLAC) 2008/3/3-61TLC08 Sendai.
R&D Plan on Clearing Electrode using the KEKB LER Y. Suetsugu and H. Fukuma, KEKB M. Pivi and L. Wang, SLAC at KEK.
KEK Recent results of beam tests on clearing electrode and grooves 2010/1/191ILC DR WebEx Meeting Y. Suetsugu, KEK.
Review of Electron Cloud R&D at KEKB 1.Diagnostics 1.Beam Size Blow-up 2.Beam Instabilities 3.Electron Density 4.SEY (Secondary Electron Yield) 2.Mitigation.
2006/09/25-28 ILCDR06, Cornell University 1 Experimental Study on Suppression of Electron Cloud Effect at the KEKB Positron Ring Contents Introduction.
Damping ring K. Ohmi LC Layout Single tunnel Circumference 6.7 km Energy 5 GeV 2 km 35 km.
Electron Clouds at SLAC Johnny Ng ILC Damping Rings Collaboration Meeting March 4, 2009.
Updates of Electron Cloud Studies at KEKB Topics in 2008 Measurement of electron density in solenoid and Q field Mitigation using clearing electrode in.
ILC damping ring Workshop, Dec 19, 2007, KEK, L. WANG Ecloud simulation 2007 ILC Damping Rings Mini-Workshop December, 2007 Lanfa Wang, SLAC.
SuperKEKB Vacuum System - for the positron ring - Y. Suetsugu KEKB Vacuum Group Outline Design and production status of key components Beam pipes for arc.
Electron cloud simulations for SuperKEKB Y.Susaki,KEK-ACCL 9 Feb, 2010 KEK seminar.
1 Flux concentrator for SuperKEKB Kamitani Takuya IWLC October.20.
ILC08 Chicago November 2008 Summary of Recent Results from SLAC M. Pivi, J. Ng, D. Arnett, G. Collet, T. Markiewicz, D. Kharakh, R. Kirby, F. Cooper,
Electron cloud in the wigglers of ILC Damping Rings L. Wang SLAC ILC Damping Rings R&D Workshop - ILCDR06 September 26-28, 2006 Cornell University.
CesrTA EC Build-Up and Mitigation Program - Introduction Mark Palmer June 25, 2009.
1 Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility M. Palmer & D.Rubin November 8, 2005.
Study Plan of Clearing Electrode at KEKB Y. Suetsugu, H. Fukuma (KEK), M. Pivi, W. Lanfa (SLAC) 2007/12/191 ILC DR Mini Work Shop (KEK) Dec.
E-cloud studies at LNF T. Demma INFN-LNF. Plan of talk Introduction New feedback system to suppress horizontal coupled-bunch instability. Preliminary.
2008/7/281 ILCDR08 Report - Electron Cloud Session – Univ. Y. Suetsugu, KEK.
Electron Cloud Mitigation Studies at CesrTA Joseph Calvey 10/1/2009.
Compare options: simulations recent history Cloud density near (r=1mm) beam (m -3 ) before bunch passage, values are taken at a cloud equilibrium density.
Compare options: simulations recent history Cloud density near (r=1mm) beam (m -3 ) before bunch passage, values are taken at a cloud equilibrium density.
ILC DR Workshop - KEK December, A new resonance in wiggler simulations: Christine Celata Use POSINST code.
Motivation and Overview David Rubin Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
The SPS as a Damping Ring Test Facility for CLIC March 6 th, 2013 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN CLIC Collaboration Working meeting.
Nov 17, 2009 Webex Assessing the 3.2 km Ring feasibility: Simulation parameters for electron cloud Build-up and Instability estimation LC DR Electron Cloud.
Recent Electron-Cloud Mitigation Studies at KEK E-cloud mitigation mini-workshop on November at CERN Kyo Shibata (for KEKB Group)
SKEKB Mini Work SKEKB Vacuum System – Arc Section – Contents Y.Suetsugu KEKB Vacuum Group 1.Beam Chambers 2.Pumps: Pump, Pressure,
Highlights from the ILCDR08 Workshop (Cornell, 8-11 July 2008) report by S. Calatroni and G. Rumolo, in CLIC Meeting Goals of the workshop:
CesrTA Vacuum System Conversion and Operational Experiences Yulin Li for the CesrTA Team Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based ScienceS and Education.
Electron cloud measurement in Cu/Al chambers with/without TiN coating at KEKB positron ring ILC DR Working Group Meeting Kyo Shibata (KEK)
Comparison of stainless steel and enamel clearing electrodes E. Mahner, F. Caspers, T. Kroyer Acknowledgements to G. Arduini, H. Damerau, S. Hancock, B.
Electron cloud study for ILC damping ring at KEKB and CESR K. Ohmi (KEK) ILC damping ring workshop KEK, Dec , 2007.
Updates of EC Studies at KEKB 1.EC studies at KEKB 2.Recent results 1.Clearing Electrode 2.Groove surface 3.TiN coating 4.Measurement of EC in solenoid.
3 February 2010 ILC Damping Ring electron cloud WG effort Mauro Pivi SLAC on behalf of ILC DR working group on e- cloud ILC DR Webex Meeting Jan 3, 2010.
Measurement of the Electron Cloud Density in a Solenoid Field and a Quadrupole Field K. Kanazawa and H. Fukuma KEK June 2009 CTA09 1.
Recent ECLOUD07 Workshop in Daegu, S. Korea (~50 participants) –Highlights: Measurements of the surface Secondary Electron Yield (SEY) of samples inserted.
ECLOUD’12 (the 5 th electron-cloud workshop) Kyo Shibata (on behalf of KEKB Vacuum Group) SuperKEKB Vacuum System KEK Tsukuba site SuperKEKB Linac.
Electron Cloud Studies at DAFNE Theo Demma INFN-LNF Frascati.
2008/12/10 INFN R&D on Low Impedance Beam Chamber and Components Y. Suetsugu, for KEKB Vacuum Group Contents Introduction Beam Chamber Components Connection.
Electron cloud measurements in Cesr-TA during the July-August run for the SPSU Study Team, report by S. Calatroni and G. Rumolo thanks to J.
Electron Cloud in the International Linear Collider ILC Mauro Pivi work performed while at SLAC and the ILC Damping Ring Working Group High.
2007/03/1-2 ECL2, CERN 1 SEY and Clearing Studies at KEKB Contents Contents Introduction Studies Beam duct with Ante-chambers Coatings with Low SEY Clearing.
Coupled bunch Instabilities at ILC Damping Rings L. Wang SLAC ILC Damping Rings R&D Workshop - ILCDR06 September 26-28, 2006 Cornell University Refer to.
CesrTA E-cloud Activities (Jan. 2009) J.W. Flanagan, KEK.
International Linear Collider R&D on electron cloud (SLAC)
Groove Mitigation and Plans
Electron Cloud Effects in SuperB
Electron Cloud and Ion Experimental Program
Electron Cloud R&D at Cornell ILCDR08--7/8/08
Observations and Predictions for DAFNE and SuperB
8-12 October 2010 at Cornell University
Measurement of Electron Cloud in KEKB LER with RFA
ILCDR08 10 July 2008 Plan of measuring cloud density in the solenoid field and in the quadrupole field K. Kanazawa (KEK)
Electron cloud and collective effects in the FCC-ee Interaction Region
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN MODELING
FCC-ee: coupling impedances and collective effects
J.A.Crittenden, Y.Li, X.Liu, M.A.Palmer, J.P.Sikora (Cornell)
SuperB General Meeting June , Perugia (Italy)
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
CesrTA Experimental Schedule and Priorities
Electron cloud studies at CESR
ILC Damping Ring electron cloud WG effort
Electron Clouds at SLAC
CesrTA Wiggler RFA Measurements
R&D GOALS AND MILESTONES TOWARDS A TECHNICAL DESIGN REPORT TDR (2008)
Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility
Presentation transcript:

Recent Studies on Electron Cloud at KEKB 1.EC studies at KEKB 2.Recent results –Clearing Electrode –Groove surface –EC measurement in Q and solenoid field 3.Summary Y. Suetsugu for KEKB Group 2016/9/302008/12/10 INFN 1

EC studies at KEKB 2016/9/302008/12/10 INFN 2 Various kind of EC studies have been made using KEKB positron ring. –Diagnostics of instabilities –Beam size, synchro-betatron sidebands –EC measurement –Electron monitor with RFA –SEY estimation and measurement –In ring, at laboratory –Mitigation techniques –Solenoid (drift space) –Beam duct with antechamber –Surface to reduce SEY (TiN or NEG coating, etc)

Recent Results 2016/9/302008/12/10 INFN 3 Several new studies have started this year. Mitigation: –Clearing Electrode Mitigation in magnets –Groove structure Mitigation in magnets –TiN coating (continued) Coating in KEK, and combination with antechamber Measurement of EC –Measurement in solenoid and Q-magnet Newly developed electron monitor

EC studies at KEKB 2016/9/302008/12/10 INFN 4 KEKB positron ring Basic parameters Energy 3.5 GeV Circumference m Nominal bunch current1~1.3 mA Nominal bunch charge10~13 nC Nominal bunch spacing6~8 ns Harmonic number5120 RMS beam size (x/y)0.42/0.06 mm Betatron tune45.51/43.57 RF voltage8 MV Synchrotron tune0.024 Radiation damping time40 ms

Clearing Electrode 2016/9/302008/12/10 INFN 5 R-pipe=38mm bunch intensity=9.36e Bunch Spacing B = 0.75 T  max = 1.4 Electron Density in magnetic field Two peaks Electrode (+) L. Wang et al, EPAC2006, p.1489 Electrons decrease drastically! Very effective in simulations

Clearing Electrode New strip-line type electrode was developed. –Very thin electrode and insulator; Electrode: ~0.1 mm, Tungsten, by thermal spray. Insulator: ~0.2 mm, Al 2 O 3, by thermal spray. –Low beam impedance, high thermal conductivity (reported in ILCDR08 and ILCWS08) 2016/9/302008/12/10 INFN 6 Stainless steel Tungsten Al 2 O 3 40 mm 440 mm

Clearing Electrode Properties 2016/9/302008/12/10 INFN mm electrode 0.2 mm Al 2 O 3 Z // ~ a few Ohm, R/Q ~ 0.1 Z // reduced to ~1/5 compared to the case of 1 mm thick. k ~1.5x10 10 V/C Dissipated power is ~ 120 W A,1585 bunches) Impedance (Z // ) [  ] Frequency [Hz] 31.2  C (  T = 6  C) Stainless steel Tungsten Al 2 O 3 28  C (  T = 3  C) Cooling water 0.5 mm electrode 1.0 mm Al 2 O 3 Longitudinal impedanceTemperature of electrode Input power = 100 W DT ~ 6  C owing to good thermal conductivity between the electrode and chamber.

Clearing Electrode Electron number was measured by a monitor with RFA. –7 strips to measure spatial distribution 2016/9/302008/12/10 INFN 8 Collectors Repeller (Retarding grid) Monitor Holes Shield Applied voltage Collectors: +100V Retarding Grid: 0 ~ -1 kV Measurement: DC mode Monitor holes (  2 mm, 3mm pitch)

Clearing Electrode The electrode and the monitor were set face to face in a test chamber. 2016/9/302008/12/10 INFN 9 R47 Beam 5 [Electrode] [Monitor] Magnetic field Monitor Electrode Al-alloy chamber (Not coated) Cooling water Inside view

Clearing Electrode Test chamber was installed into a wiggler magnet –Beam current (I b ) ~1600 mA –Bunch spacing (B s ) 4 ~16 ns –Wiggler magnet. Magnetic field: 0.77 T Effective length: 346 mm Aperture (height): 110 mm –Placed at the center of pole –SR: 2x10 17 photons/s/m 2016/9/302008/12/10 INFN 10 Test chamber Beam Gate Valve

Clearing Electrode 2016/9/302008/12/10 INFN x x x x #1#2 #3 #4 #5#6#7 I e [A] I b [mA] Collectors V r = 0 V, V elec = 0 V [Linear scale] Electron distribution splits to two peaks at high current. Spatial growth and energy distribution of EC center 4 x x x x Collectors V r [kV] High energy electrons are at the beam position. Center 1585 bunches (B s ~ 6 ns)

V r =  1.0 kV B = 0.77 T [Logarithmic scale] Clearing Electrode Effect of electrode potential –Drastic decrease in electron density was demonstrated by applying positive voltage. 2016/9/302008/12/10 INFN 12 V elec [V] I e [A] Collector s 1585 bunches (B s ~ 6 ns) ~1600 mA V elec = 0 V -500 V +500 V V r = -1 kV ~1x10 12 e - /m 3 Electron density decreased to 1/10 at V elec = ~ 200 V 1/100 at V elec = ~ 400 V ?

Groove structure 2016/9/302008/12/10 INFN 13 Groove structure: reduce the effective SEY geometrically. Effective even in magnet. Grooved structure in magnet (simulation) Lanfa Wang, SLAC

Groove structure 2016/9/302008/12/10 INFN 14 Experiment has just begun under collaboration with SLAC (M. Pivi) Utilize the same set up for clearing electrode. –The same experimental setup as that of electrode Wiggler magnets B = 0.77 T R47 Beam [Groove] [Monitor] Magnetic field

Groove structure 2016/9/302008/12/10 INFN 15 Triangular-type groove structure, with TiN –In a magnetic field of 0.77 T Compared with the data for a flat surface (TiN) and electrode (W, V elec = 0 V) TiN~50 nm SS + TiN coating Designed and manufactured in SLAC M. Pivi

Groove structure 2016/9/302008/12/10 INFN 16 Electron density for groove surface is lower than W surface (electrode) by ~2 orders, and than flat surface by ~ one order. –Aging is proceeding. V r = -1 kV 1585 bunches (B s ~ 6 ns) ~1600 mA Preliminary result

Groove structure 2016/9/302008/12/10 INFN 17 But, density is still higher than the case with clearing electrode of V elec > V by ~ one order. –Now accumulating data. Collector s 1585 bunches (B s ~ 6 ns) ~1600 mA Vr = -1 kV Preliminary result

Measurement of EC in solenoid Installed at a drift region, in a controllable solenoid. Monitor: Without repeller (grid). –Energy is selected by groove geometrically. 2016/9/302008/12/10 INFN 18 Monitor used without solenoid field Monitor used with solenoid field Groove SR Detector 1 Detector 2 y[mm] x[mm] Only these electrons reach the detector. Beam Detector K. Kanazawa B e-

Measurement of EC in solenoid The first attempt so far. Installed into the KEKB positron ring this summer. 2016/9/302008/12/10 INFN 19 Whole view Placed at the center of a coil. Groove

Measurement of EC in solenoid Result –Electron density decreased by 2 orders. 2016/9/302008/12/10 INFN 20 Preliminary result K. Kanazawa –The difference in two detectors may be due to; 1) COD 2) Relative position to the primary SR –The measured current in a solenoid field might have included electrons drifting along the wall.

Measurement of EC Q-magnet Installed into a Q-magnet with wide-aperture Electrons that coming along the magnetic fields are counted by a monitor. 2016/9/302008/12/10 INFN 21 X-axis Detector Detector 2 Detector 1 SR x [mm] y [mm] K. Kanazawa Detector Beam

Measurement of EC Q-magnet Installed this summer 2016/9/302008/12/10 INFN 22 Detector Placed at the end of a yoke. Detector

Measurement of EC Q-magnet Result –Electron density near to that expected by a simulation was obtained. 2016/9/302008/12/10 INFN 23 K. Kanazawa Preliminary result –The difference in two detectors may be due to; 1) COD 2) Relative position to the primary SR. The results will be presented in PAC05 in detail.

Summary Various EC studies are undergoing at KEKB Updates: – Clearing electrode in bending magnetic field was found to be very effective in reducing electron density –Measurement for grooved structure in bending magnetic field has just started. The reduction by one order was observed. –Measurement of electron density in a solenoid field and Q-magnet has just started, and the preliminary values were obtained for the first time. Strategy for KEKB upgrade (at present) –Drift space : Antechamber + Solenoid + TiN coating –In magnets: Antechamber + TiN coating (+  ) 2016/9/302008/12/10 INFN 24

Backup slide 2016/9/302008/12/10 INFN 25

Backup slide Growth of electrons 2016/9/302008/12/10 INFN 26 Flat Groove 1585 bunches (B s ~ 6 ns) Vr = 0V I [mA] Collector No. Ie [A] I [mA]

Backup slide Energy distributions of electrons 2016/9/302008/12/10 INFN 27 Flat Groove 1585 bunches (B s ~ 6 ns) ~1600 mA Vr [V] Collector No. Ie [A]

Backup slide 2016/9/302008/12/10 INFN 28

Clearing Electrode 2016/9/302008/12/10 INFN 29 RF properties (calculation by MAFIA) –Thin electrode and insulator  Low beam impedance 0.2 mm electrode 0.2 mm Al 2 O 3 Z // ~ a few Ohm Z // reduced to ~1/5 compared to the case of 1 mm thick. R/Q ~ 0.1 k ~1.5x10 10 V/C including the connection part (2 electrodes). Dissipated power is ~ 120 W for 1 electrode. A,1585 bunches) Electrode only (2 electrodes). Impedance (Z // ) [  ] Frequency [Hz] Loss Factor [V C -1 ] Thickness of Insulator [mm]

Clearing Electrode 2016/9/302008/12/10 INFN 30 Electric potential by the electrode Potential distribution +500 V +120 V 0 V Similar structure to “Invisible Electrode” by F. Caspers (PAC07). Difference: Electrode is made of pure metal (W). We used pure metal: (1) To avoid Joule loss of the electrode due to high current (2) To reduce voltage drop along the long electrode.

Clearing Electrode Issues to be solved (1) –Simulation of electron behaviors including RFA structure is required to fully understand the observation. 2016/9/302008/12/10 INFN 31 Measurement Simulation (  max = 1.2) Model

Clearing Electrode Issues to be solved (2) –Improvement in the structure of connection is undergoing. –Next electrode will be tested next spring. 2016/9/302008/12/10 INFN 32

Simulation [Preliminary] Trajectory of electrons –In magnetic field, but cyclotron motion was neglected for simplicity. –1/1585/3 (Bs ~ 6 ns) 2016/9/302008/12/10 INFN 33 V elec = 0VV elec = +500 V

Simulation [Preliminary] Spatial distribution of Measured Electron Current (Ie) –Vr = 0 kV, 4/200/3 (Bs = 6 ns) –B=0.75 T 2016/9/302008/12/10 INFN 34 Measurement Simulation (  max = 1.2)

Simulation [Preliminary] Spatial distribution of Measured Electron Current (Ie) –Vr = -0.2 kV, 4/200/3 (Bs = 6 ns) –B=0.75 T 2016/9/302008/12/10 INFN 35 Measurement Simulation (  max = 1.2)

Simulation [Preliminary] Measured Electron Current (Ie) for different fill patterns –Vr = 0 kV –B=0.75 T 2016/9/302008/12/10 INFN 36 Measurement Simulation (  max = 1.2)

Note model 2016/9/302008/12/10 INFN 37 Monitoring Holes (0V) Shielding Grid (0V) Retarding Grid (-1kV) Collector (+100V) High energy e - Acceleration e-e- (-> Interaction with bunches) High energy e - (-> Interaction with bunches)

Note Cal (preliminary) 2016/9/302008/12/10 INFN 38