Micro TPC – simple simulation. Simple model (CST EM Studio) ground Isolator (FR4) mesh Guard ring X axis Top view (without cage) mesh – square,14x14 mm,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IK March 1st 2012 Slide 0 EMMA: Update on BPM modelling and mapping March 1 st 2012 Ian Kirkman.
Advertisements

TPC meeting, CERN, 7-8 October 2003Børge Svane Nielsen, NBI1 Status of laser system TPC meeting, CERN, 7-8 October 2003 Børge Svane Nielsen, Niels Lindegaard,
Field Cage Simulation Study for Prototype Cherenkov TPC Michael Phipps, Bob Azmoun, and Craig Woody.
Electric field calculation for the neutron EDM SNS experiment. Septimiu Balascuta Ricardo Alarcon ASU, 02/07/2008.
PHY132 Introduction to Physics II Class 10 – Outline:
Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct Dipole magnet for CBM: current status P.G. Akishin, A.V. Alfeev, V.S. Alfeev, V.V. Borisov,
1 Sep. 19, 2006Changguo Lu, Princeton University Induced signal in RPC, Configuration of the double gap RPC and Grouping of the strips Changguo Lu Princeton.
E-field calculations for the TPC/HBD N. Smirnov Upgrade Working Group Meeting 05/13/03, BNL.
Lecture 3 Jack Tanabe Old Dominion University Hampton, VA January 2011 Conformal Mapping.
PSSC Space Instrument Laboratory Plasma instrument calibration system provides an ion beam of energy range up to 130keV/charge in a clean room To develop.
Prototype TPC Tests C. Lu 12/9/98 V = 0. Gas gain test for the low pressure chamber The chamber is constructed with the following parameters: D anode.
THE WAFER- FOCUS RING GAP*
 -strips detectors: caracterización y simulación Mercedes 15-Febrero-2008.
Electricity and Magnetism
Lecture 5 Method of images Energy stored in an electric field Principle of virtual work 1.
Design and Miniaturization of an RFID Tag Using a Simple Rectangular Patch Antenna for Metallic Object Identification Mun Leng Ng Auto-ID Adelaide.
SC dipole magnet for CBM E.A.Matyushevskiy, P.G. Akishin, A.V. Alfeev, V.S. Alfeev, V.V. Ivanov, E.I. Litvinenko, A.I. Malakhov JINR, Dubna CBM Collaboration.
Chapter 25 Capacitance-II In the last lecture: we calculated the capacitance C of a system of two isolated conductors. We also calculated the capacitance.
論文研討 : MinSeok Han and Jaehoon Choi “Compact Multiband MIMO Antenna for Next Generation USB Dongle Application” 報告人 : 碩研電子一甲 MA 蘇暐倫.
Measurements of several parameters of plasma panels October 2011.
2016/6/4 Taka Kondo (KEK) 1 Issues of the SCT Digitization model 2 nd meeting of SCT Digitization TF Taka Kondo (KEK) 1.Current SCT digitization.
Calculation of the beam dynamics of RIKEN AVF Cyclotron E.E. Perepelkin JINR, Dubna 4 March 2008.
Day 4: Electric Field Calculations for Continuous Charge Distributions A Uniform Distribution of Surface charge A Ring of Continuous Charge A Long Line.
Status of PSB Impedance calculations: Inconel undulated chambers C. Zannini, G. Rumolo, B. Salvant Thanks to: E. Benedetto, J. Borburgh.
ASSIGNMENT QUESTIONS Answers to Questions. Some of the Boundary Conditions and other details is missing! All assignments are general RF/MW engineering.
O.Bezshyyko, 2-nd French-Ukrainian workshop on the instrumentation developments for HEP, October 1-3, Orsay Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv.
Silicon sensors for LumiCal Two possible options Wojciech Wierba Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN Cracow.
Ilmenauer MHD-Woche - vom 20. bis 24. September th MHD-Days ( September 2004) Numerical modelling of an MHD flow in the presence of transverse.
Simulations of various aspects of the PPS Various members of the collaboration, to be enumerated later.
A.Ochi*, Y.Homma, T.Dohmae, H.Kanoh, T.Keika, S.Kobayashi, Y.Kojima, S.Matsuda, K.Moriya, A.Tanabe, K.Yoshida Kobe University PSD8 Glasgow1st September.
Designing a Magnetron Injection Gun and magnetic field to confine the electron beam. Jayakrishnan A. Karakkad, Brian L.Beaudoin, Thomas M.Antonsen Jr.
Optimization of planar pixel detector. T. Habermann Planar pixel detectors L W H ground U.
Electric field calculation for the neutron EDM SNS experiment. Septimiu Balascuta Ricardo Alarcon ASU, 02/07/2008.
Werner Riegler, CERN1 Electric fields, weighting fields, signals and charge diffusion in detectors including resistive materials W. Riegler, RD51 meeting,
Electrostatic FEA of the Ground Plane Features Bo Yu Sept. 14, 2015.
Li-Lens length options for pion yield (OptiM tracking) V.Nagaslaev.
1 June 29, 2004, SCT Week SCT Simulation for CTB2004 Zdenka Broklova, Peter Kodys, Carlos Escobar Special thanks to Thijs Cornelissen, Grant Gorfine, Pavel.
Grid Pix Field Simulations and precision needed for a module Peter Kluit, Jan Timmermans Prepared 16 May 2016.
Electrostatic FEA on Field Cage Profile Configurations Bo Yu.
Development of Large-Area Photo-detectors: MCP development S. Antipov, Z. Insepov, V. Ivanov Abstract Electric field inside high gain microchannel plate.
NSCL Proton Detector David Perez Loureiro September 14 th 2015.
ELEC 3105 Basic EM and Power Engineering
Date of download: 10/3/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Timepix+GEM project Field cage simulations
Grid Pix Field Simulations and precision needed for a module
Date of download: 11/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Mircomegas - Gas gain simulation studies -
Numerical simulations on single mask conical GEMs
Numerical simulations on single mask conical GEMs
ELECTRIC FIELD ELECTRIC FLUX Lectures 3, 4 & 5 a a R 2R
ELECTRIC FIELD ELECTRIC FLUX Lectures 3, 4 & 5 a a R 2R
Triple junction 'shed' optimization for the 200kv CEBAF gun upgrade
Development of Large-Area Photo-detectors:
G. Palacios 02/25/18 E_y field as a function of anode vertical position for 200kV CEBAF gun upgrade G. Palacios 02/25/18.
Graphic Communication
Numerical Calculations of Field Enhancements due to Small Grooves
Impedance & Bandwidth Measurements of '2-strip anode test plate'
200 kV gun CST microwave studio simulations Shield modifications
Impedance & Bandwidth Measurements of '2-strip anode test plate'
Numerical simulations on single mask conical GEMs
Impedance & Bandwidth Measurements of '2-strip anode test plate'
200 kV gun CST microwave studio simulations Shield modifications
Lecture 3 Jack Tanabe Old Dominion University Hampton, VA January 2011
Chapter 25 Capacitance-II
Cut inflector electrodes for 14N5+ ion
Electric field of distributed charges
Ch. 6 Looking Through the Viewfinder
On this basis, a new geometry with silicon short strip sensors (strixels) is proposed. In order to understand the behaviour of such devices, test geometries.
Physics 122B Electricity and Magnetism
EM Simulation of wakes in BSRT beampipe with extraction mirror
Presentation transcript:

Micro TPC – simple simulation

Simple model (CST EM Studio) ground Isolator (FR4) mesh Guard ring X axis Top view (without cage) mesh – square,14x14 mm, 50 μm width and gap guard ring - with window мм (14 мм due construction restrictions) 1 mm 0.5 mm

Upper electrode – Uupe=-2800V First strip – Ufs=-600V(-800V; -1100V) Mesh – Um=-350V Conclusions: 1) Uniformity of electric field is better (in comparison with geometry without guard ring), but far not ideal; 2) Main contribution due nonuniformity near ground SET 1 Guard ring – Us=-350V

Upper electrode – Uupe=-2800V First strip – Ufs=-600V Mesh – Um=-350V Conclusions: 1) Uniformity of electric field is better (in comparison with geometry without guard ring), but far not ideal; 2) Main contribution due nonuniformity near ground SET 1 Garfield++ calculation with test electrons (on Z=5 mm level) Guard ring – Us=-350V

Upper electrode – Uupe=-2800V First strip – Ufs=-800V Mesh – Um=-350V SET 1 Guard ring – Us=-350V

Upper electrode – Uupe=-2800V First strip – Ufs=-800V Mesh – Um=-350V SET 1 Guard ring – Us=-350V

Upper electrode – Uupe=-2800V Mesh – Um=-350V SET 1 (Comparison with experiment data) Guard ring – Us=-350V First strip – Ufs=-800V First strip – Ufs=-600V First strip – Ufs=-1100V

Upper electrode – Uupe=-2800V Mesh – Um=-350V SET 1 (Comparison with experiment data) Guard ring – Us=-350V First strip – Ufs=-800V

Upper electrode – Uupe=-2800V First strip – Ufs=-600V(-800V; -1100V) Mesh – Um=-350V SET 1 Guard ring – Us=-350V Influence of Ufs change (-600V;-800V; -1100V) is minor (adjusting of Us is better)

SET 2 (optimal Us for better field uniformity) Upper electrode – Uupe=-2800V First strip – Ufs=-800V Mesh – Um=-350V Guard ring – Us=-430V better field uniformity

SET 2 (optimal Us for better field uniformity) Upper electrode – Uupe=-2800V First strip – Ufs=-800V Mesh – Um=-350V Guard ring – Us=-430V Conclusion: better field uniformity in the center but weak influence near the mesh edges

SET 2 (optimal Us for better field uniformity) Upper electrode – Uupe=-2800V First strip – Ufs=-800V Mesh – Um=-350V Guard ring – Us=-430V Conclusion: better field uniformity in the center but weak influence near the mesh edges (area covering is better)

SET 3 (addition of mesh “wings” (edges 1 mm) - attempt to obtain uniform field near mesh edges) Upper electrode – Uupe=-2800V First strip – Ufs=-800V Mesh – Um=-350V Guard ring – Us=-430V Conclusion: Very good result but question about constructive restrictions 1 mm X axis

SET 3 (addition of mesh “wings” (edges 1 mm) - attempt to obtain uniform field near mesh edges) Upper electrode – Uupe=-2800V First strip – Ufs=-800V Mesh – Um=-350V Guard ring – Us=-430V Conclusion: Very good result but question about constructive restrictions 1 mm

SET 3 (addition of mesh “wings” (edges 1 mm) - attempt to obtain uniform field near mesh edges) Upper electrode – Uupe=-2800V First strip – Ufs=-800V Mesh – Um=-350V Guard ring – Us=-430V 1 mm Y axis

SET 4 (addition of side screening electrode - attempt to obtain uniform field near mesh edges) Upper electrode – Uupe=-2800V First strip – Ufs=-800V Mesh – Um=-350V Guard ring – Us=-430V Conclusion: Not bad result but question about constructive restrictions side screening electrode X axis Side screening electrode Uss=Um