Educator Evaluation Summative Evaluation March 28 th, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
Advertisements

Educator Evaluation On-line Systems Training Webinar February 7 th, 2013.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
District Level of Implementation of UMTSS… The First Year Tooele County School District UMTSS Conference June 12, 2013.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 4 Component Five – Student Improvement.
RESA Standards 2015 Revised Standards for District and School Effectiveness.
Develop an Action Plan and Plan to Assess Progress Dec. 12, 2006.
Today’s website:
Educator Evaluation Goal Setting Webinar March 14, 2013.
LCSD APPR: Overview Review and Focus on the 60 points December 3, 2012.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
West Virginia Educator Evaluation Pilot Participant Update Division of Educator Quality and System Support West Virginia Department of Education Webinar.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Evidence-Based Observations Training for Observers of Teachers Module 5 Dr. Marijo Pearson Dr. Mike Doughty Mr. John Schiess Spring 2012.
Teacher Evaluation Wednesday, July 24, :30 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
Educator Evaluation Summative Evaluation March 28 th, 2013.
Educator Effectiveness: State Frameworks and Local Practice(??) CCSSO Annual Conference, June 2012 Juan M. D’Brot Executive Director of Assessment and.
School Improvement through Data and Best Practices Anytown Middle School Best Practice Audit Report.
Educator Evaluation Self-Reflection and Evidence Webinar February 28 th, 2013.
Educator Evaluation On-line Systems Training. History of the Evaluation System In , the new Evaluation System was piloted in 25 schools. In 2012,
Educator Evaluation RESA Training July and August 2012.
Educator Evaluation Summative Evaluation March 28 th, 2013.
Educator Evaluation RESA Training July and August 2012.
TESS & LEADS Implementation Awareness for End-of-Year Success Office of Educator Effectiveness Arkansas Department of Education Spring, 2016.
Ohio Principal Evaluation System Pike County Joint Vocational School March 7,
Draft – March Check for Updates to this Presentationhttp://
EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
August 5-12, 2011 EDUCATOR EVALUATION PILOT. Overview The “Big Picture” – Where are we headed? – Where have we been? – How will we get there? Previewing.
Developed by the Southern Alberta Professional Development Consortium (SAPDC) as a result of a grant from Alberta Education to support implementation of.
Mason County Schools Policy 5310 August 11, 2016.
Utilizing the Evaluation System to Improve Student Growth
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Educator Evaluation Self-Reflection and Evidence
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
Evaluation Updates.
Changes to the Educator Evaluation System
Preston County Schools
Year-End Documentation of School Counselor Evaluation
Teacher Evaluation Training
Overview This presentation provides information on how districts compile evaluation ratings for principals, assistant principals (APs), and vice principals.
ESEA Flexibility Package
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Educator Evaluation Self-Reflection and Evidence Webinar February 28th, 2013 [LISA / ROBERT] Thank you for joining us for the second in a series of webinars.
Federal Program Directors Spring Meeting
Educator Evaluation Summative Evaluation March 28th, 2013
Ongoing Lead Evaluator
Partnering for Success: Using Research to Improve the Lowest Performing Schools June 26, 2018 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.
Evaluating Principals Making a Fuzzy Process More Clear
Mason County Schools Policy 5310 August 11, 2016.
Educator Evaluation Summative Evaluation
Teacher Effectiveness and Support for Growth
State Board of Education Progress Update
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND APPRAISAL SYSTEM (PDAS) TEACHER ORIENTATION This orientation provides an overview of the elements of the PDAS system and.
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Anita Smith Program Assessment Specialist South Region Chris LeMieux
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Introduction to TDES for Recalled Teachers
Educator Evaluation Self-Reflection and Evidence Webinar February 28th, 2013 [LISA / ROBERT] Thank you for joining us for the second in a series of webinars.
Teacher Evaluator Student Growth Retraining Academy
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Presentation transcript:

Educator Evaluation Summative Evaluation March 28 th, 2013

Four Performance Levels Distinguished Accomplished Emerging Unsatisfactory Evaluation System for Teachers Advanced Progression 6+ years Intermediate Progression 4-5 years Initial Progression 1-3 years Al;ksdjf Summative Conference/Evaluation by June 1 Nov. 1 Oct. 1

Overview Standard Setting Results – Juan D’Brot and Michele Blatt How to have a good Summative Conference – Advice to Principals Brad Simmons-East Hardy High School Advice from the Field – Brad Simmons-East Hardy High School

Standard 2 Element 2.1 Element 2.2 Element 2.3 Adding up the pieces… A break down of the Elements. StandardRating Standard 1 Element 1.1 Element 1.2 Element 1.3 The preponderance of evidence points to an overall rating of accomplished The intent of providing standard ratings at both the standard and element level is to help one identify areas of best practice and need! Emerging Accomplished Emerging

An Overview of the System How the Pieces Add Up… Elements 5.1 Element 5.1 Elements 2.1 Element 2.1 Elements 1.1 Element 1.1 Elements 3.1 Element 3.1 Elements 4.1 Element 4.1 Standard 6 Standard 1 Standard 2 Standard 3 Standard 4 Standard 5 Standard 7 Overall Rating R/LA School Growth Score Student Learning Goal Math School Growth Score Student Learning Goal

Weighting Overview Element RatingStandard RatingFirst Rating Element 1.1 Standard 1 Rating (average) 80% of the Overall Rating Element 1.2 Element 1.3 Element 2.1 Standard 2 Rating (average) Element 2.2 Element 2.3 Element 3.1 Standard 3 Rating (average) Element 3.2 Element 3.3 Element 4.1 Standard 4 Rating (average) Element 4.2 Element 5.1 Standard 5 Rating (average) Element 5.2 Element 5.3

Weighting Overview Element RatingStandard RatingStudent outcome Ratings Student Learning Goal Student Learning Goal Rating 1 15% of the Overall Rating Student Learning Goal Student Learning Goal Rating 2 Schoolwide Growth for Math Student Learning Growth Rating 1 5% of the Overall Rating Schoolwide Growth for ELA Student Learning Growth Rating 2

Standard Setting Results Multiple standards are considered as part of a larger system Cut points: RatingCut Score UnsatisfactoryN/A Emerging30 Accomplished Distinguished

Weighting Example StandardScoreRatingWeightFinal Rating Standard 12Accomplished8/15 pts43.8 pts Standard 22Accomplished Standard 31Emerging Standard 41Emerging Standard 52Accomplished Standard Emerging2/6 points5 pts Standard Emerging Schoolwide Growth in Math 2Accomplished3/6 points2.5 pts Schoolwide Growth in RLA 1Emerging Emerging Emerging

How to have a good conference….it is a process, not an event. -keep it positive/constructive, it is not a "gotcha" meeting -communication goes both ways, don't monopolize the conversation -develop trust, be a good listener -be detailed with your recommendations/comments

Work Smarter- Not Harder Use the tools already available, the data is in the system. – Rubric – Self reflection – Observations – Evidence – Goals

Remember… Be honest Take responsibility for student learning Make sure conversation is focused, specific, and constructive The evaluator has the final say

Final Rating of Standards

Evaluating Student Learning Goals

Determining Progress…

School Growth

Standard 7 Professional Conduct

Advice from the Field…How will the evaluation impact your school?  Teachers will realize ownership in their evaluation.  Gives administrator a great starting point for collaborative conversations  Holds ALL teachers accountable for ALL students  It will make you a better instructional leader

Helpful Hints from the Field Use your leadership team Be a cheerleader…Take the lead! Take full advantage of trainings by the WVDE and the WVCPD

RESA Trainings RESA RESPONSEDate 1R LewisOne day trainingJuly 31, August 1, D CockrilleTwo days dividing counties into 2 groupsMay K Watts Two days WVDE training followed by extra days of RESA training using template April 24, 29, 30, May 1 4AJ RogersRESA will provide ½ day training for administratorsN/A 5R BoardOne day training6-Aug 6N Zervos RESA 6 has done 2 PRIs. Most counties will do their own. Hancock – will follow up separately N/A 7J LacariaDividing the counties for multiple day trainingJune 24-26, J LynchBerkeley, Hampshire, Morgan, Mineral – 1 day5-Aug

Accessing Evaluation Site

Questions / Comments / Concerns Contact Information: Trent J. Danowski Teacher Quality Coordinator / WVDE