COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS VEHICLES FOR THE CITY OF MILWAUKEE'S DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS: A COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS Erika Cheng, Lael Grigg Erika Jones, and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Commitment to Responsible Fleet Operation 1997 Joins Cities for Climate Protection 1999 One of the founding members of Ann Arbor Clean Cities Coalition.
Advertisements

OHIO ENERGY POLICY PROGRESS & REVIEW UCEAO 6 th Annual Conference Securing Ohio’s Energy and Economic Future THE BEST OF TIMES, THE WORST OF TIMES: ADVANCED.
Cuba’s Future Development Needs, Funding Models, and Alternatives. A Perspective of the Operation of a Cuban Water & Sewer Utility. Eduardo Vega-Llort,
Energy Efficiency and Arizona’s Energy Future Jeff Schlegel Southwest Energy Efficiency Project (SWEEP) April
Feasibility of Wedge Options Team Simple Green January 27, 2009.
Connecticut’s Energy Future Removing Barriers to Promote Energy Sustainability: Public Policy and Financing December 2, 2004 Legislative Office Building.
Current U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Renewable Fuels Activities September 2006.
The UK Climate Change Levy and Ecological Tax Reform Professor Stephen Smith Department of Economics University College London.
CITY FURNITURE - CNG CONVERSION May 13, BACKGROUND INFORMATION.
Performance Contracting The Honeywell One Source Solution.
SUMMARY OF BENEFITS AND RETURN ON INVESTMENT GPS FLEET TRACKING.
Dependence, Consumption, Reserves, and Security. US OIL Consumption Ninety-five percent of transportation fuels are derived from petroleum, the majority.
Moving Efficiently: Improving How We Transport Goods in America Glen P. Kedzie Vice President, Energy & Environmental Counsel American Trucking Associations.
Sohail Ghanchi Energy Technology and Policy The University of Texas at Austin.
Hydrogen Workshop for Fleet Operators. Module 8, “Hydrogen Lifecycle Costs, Training & Useful Information”
Clean Cities Funding Workshop 2015 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA CLEAN CITIES FUNDING WORKSHOP BAY AREA AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES Thursday,
1 U.S. Department of Energy Overview of the Clean Cities Program Patricia Passarella U.S. Department of Energy December 13, 2004.
Public Transit Department Bus and Fuel Procurement Strategy AzTA/ADOT Transit Conference April 2013.
Funding the Future of Our Transportation Infrastructure Juva Barber Executive Director.
Cleaning Up School Bus Fleets: Less Fumes, Same Zoom… A presentation of the Southeastern Pennsylvania Clean School Bus Coalition. Eric Cheung, Clean Air.
2014 Budget Department Presentations Infrastructure Funding Options.
Transportation Funding Act HB Up date Radney Simpson, Assistant State Transportation Planning Administrator Presented to Georgia Association of Metropolitan.
Alternative Fuel Readiness Plan for San Mateo County Overview of AFRP Presented to RMCP Meeting January 21, 2015.
PUBLIC WORKSHOP DIESEL ENGINE IDLE REDUCTION STANDARD March 19, 2008 Department of Environmental Protection Division of Air Resource Management.
Clean Cities / 1 COALITION NAME Clean Cities Web-Based Tools & Resources Name Contact Information Date.
Quantifying Transportation Needs and Assessing Revenue Options: The Texas Experience presented to The Arkansas Blue Ribbon Committee on Highway Finance.
LONG TERM ELECTRICAL SUPPLY PLAN STAFF RESPONSE TO QUESTIONS, ISSUES, AND RECOMMENDATIONS MADE IN NOVEMBER 2004 Presentation to the Gainesville City Commission.
EFarmer.us Biodiesel Types, properties, performance, benefits, maintenance December 2008 copyright eStudy.us 2008
1 UTA & Alternative Fuel Vehicles GOVERNOR’S ENERGY DEVELOPMENT SUMMIT JUNE 2014.
HOW WILL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS BE TRANSFORMED IN OUR ENERGY FUTURE? GEORGE A. HUME April 28, 2006 Reference was made to the following internet sites in.
BIODIESEL FLEET in PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS NASSAU COUNTY DEPT OF PUBLIC WORKS THOMAS R SUOZZI COUNTY EXECUTIVE RAY RIBEIRO, P.E. COMMISSIONER.
Yellow Wood Associates, Inc. 228 North Main Street St. Albans, Vermont (802) (802) Fax
The Status and Future of Transportation Fuel Technologies for Wisconsin Maria Redmond Wisconsin State Energy Office 2013 Sustainability Summit and Exposition.
2015 Financial Plan. PROCESS Staff began work on this budget in September 4 meetings including today are scheduled – Jan 26, 28 and Feb 2 and further.
Investigating Performance Improvements and True Costs of Alternative Fuel Buses in Florida Alexander Kolpakov Research Associate Center for Urban Transportation.
The Chicago Transit Authority Sustainability Initiatives.
U.S. Climate Policy Prospects in Wake of COP15 Henry Lee Princeton University February 9, 2010.
Green Fleets The Mission Through implementation of this Green Fleets policy, all Service Units that own/operate vehicles and fuel-using equipment shall.
Retrofitting And Weatherization Of Buildings To Reduce Carbon Footprints By Johnson Esenowo Environmental Economics – Econ 2505 Prof. S. MacDonald and.
1 Mobile Sources Work Group Final Report - PM 2.5 SIP Brian Newbacher Dir. of Public Affairs, AAA Chair, Mobile Sources Work Group June 12, 2007 NOACA.
True-Up Service Fee Adjustment with OMI/Thames January 10, 2006.
Assessment of the Economic Impact of Greening Vehicular Transport in Barbados Winston Moore (PhD) and Stacia Howard Antilles Economics November 2015.
Show Me The Money: Federal NGV Incentives 2007 Louisiana Statewide Clean Cities Conference January 26, 2007.
Slide 1 American Recovery & Reinvestment Act (Recovery Act) Dan Beckley Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy U.S. Department of Energy Tennessee.
1 Some Modeling Results for the Low Carbon Fuel Standard International Energy Workshop Venice, June 19, 2009 Carmen Difiglio, Ph.D. Deputy Assistant Secretary.
PADEP 5/001 AFV MARKET AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT PA’s Alternative Fuels Incentive Grant Program Susan K. Summers Program Manager Dept. of Environmental.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
Striving for Sustainability Alternative Vehicles Effect on Luther’s Carbon Footprint November 10, 2008 Rich Tenneson, Facilities Services.
APTA Sustainability Workshop 2016
Andrew Burnham Principal Environmental Scientist
Guaranteed Energy Savings Performance Contracting
The Florida Energy and Climate Commission (FECC)
Energy Services Company Models: Opportunities for Transit
Tulsa Gas Technologies, Inc.
A CNG Overview Justin Stiff Sales Staff Consultant January 13, 2014.
CR&R Anaerobic Digestion Facility
Kristen Grill Erik Larson Timothy Steiner
APTA Sustainability Workshop 2016
Energy Services Company Models: Opportunities for Transit
University of Arizona Garage/Motor Pool
Environmental Policy & Outlook Conference
What is Sea-Tac Doing To Create a Green Curb Airport Ground Transportation Association Conference Introduction of Sea-Tac and Elizabeth/Paul September.
Island Energy Advisory Committee Board
University of Arizona Garage/Motor Pool
Tracey Thurman, Director Division of Waste Management
BUDGET WORKSHOP February 15, 2017.
Sacramento Clean Cities Coalition September 20, 2018
Environment Committee November 29, 2016
Anna Garcia Air Innovations Conference August 2004
Should the U.S. Government Financially Support Energy Research?
Presentation transcript:

COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS VEHICLES FOR THE CITY OF MILWAUKEE'S DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS: A COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS Erika Cheng, Lael Grigg Erika Jones, and Adam Smith May 9, 2011

Overview  Project Scope – Erika Jones  Cost-Benefit Analysis – Erika Cheng  Model, Analysis and Results – Adam Smith  Conclusions and Recommendations – Lael Grigg

Problem Statement  Challenges  Cost-effective service delivery  Fluctuating fuel costs  Environmental emissions  Opportunities  CMAQ funding  Green the Fleet while reducing costs

Research Question  Focus on Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)  Cost-Benefit Analysis:  What are the marginal costs associated with purchasing CNG fueled refuse packers?

Natural Gas  Natural gas most feasible, available option  Lower carbon content, clean-burning  Compressed versus liquefied natural gas

DPW Fleet Services Vehicles  In 2010:  705 on-road vehicles using diesel  966,700 gallons of fuel consumed  $2.8 million spent on fuel  Per vehicle, diesel vehicles are most costly

DPW Refuse Packers  Account for roughly 5 percent of fleet  In 2010, 127 standard diesel refuse packers  30 percent more than ten years old  Ideal vehicle life eleven years

Assumptions  Section maintains current fleet size  Packers replaced after twelve year life  Ten new packers purchased in 2012  Packers used until 2023

Cost-Benefit Analysis  Compare costs of CNG and diesel packers between 2012 and 2023  Estimate Net Present Value of choosing CNG

Factors Considered  Vehicle Purchase Price  Fuel Costs and Fuel Economy  Tax Credits, Incentives, and Reimbursements  Environmental Emissions  Health Impacts  Project Life and Salvage Value  Energy Dependence  Garage Facilities  Fuel Safety  Fueling Stations  Labor and Training  Maintenance and Operations Included in ModelNot Included in Model

Factors Included in Model  Vehicle Purchase Price  Fuel Costs and Fuel Economy  Tax Credits, Incentives, and Reimbursements  Alternative Fuel Infrastructure Tax Credit  CNG and Diesel Fuel Excise Tax Credits  Federal CNG Vehicle Tax Incentive  Environmental Emissions and Health Impacts  CO 2 and PM 10

Model Specifications and Analysis  Four specifications  Results based on static point estimates  Results based on parameter ranges, random sampling Incentives Not Renewed Incentives Renewed Emissions Excluded 12 Emissions Included 34 NotesModel Specifications

Results Based on Point Estimates Incentives Not Renewed Incentives Renewed Emissions Excluded $34,000$449,000 Emissions Included $47,000$462,000  2010 dollars  Positive net present values  Large impacts of incentives  343 tons of avoided CO 2 emissions Net Present Value of 2012 CNG Refuse Packer Purchases Notes

Results Based on Parameter Ranges Incentives Not Renewed Incentives Renewed Emissions Excluded $54,000$455,000 Emissions Included $101,000$501,000  2010 dollars  Positive net present values  Negative ranges Mean Net Present Value of 2012 Refuse Packer Purchases Notes

Results, Continued Incentives Not Renewed Incentives Renewed Emissions Excluded 71%100% Emissions Included 85%100% Probability of Positive Net Benefits Probability of Net Loss Greater than $100,000 Incentives Not Renewed Incentives Renewed Emissions Excluded 4.6%0% Emissions Included 1.7%0%

Conclusions  Large impact of incentives  Modest impact of environmental benefits  Also found three very influential factors  Vehicle purchase price  Fuel cost  Fuel economy

Conclusions  Relative vehicle purchase price CNG initial vehicle price will likely decrease Diesel vehicle cost may increase The difference in up front costs significantly impacts our Net Present Value estimates

Conclusions  Relative fuel cost Fuel costs are not stable Diesel prices change over time, sometimes from day to day CNG prices also fluctuate

Conclusions  Relative fuel economy CNG fuel economy for refuse packers may increase

Recommendations  Purchase ten CNG refuse packers in 2012  Monitor vehicle performance and fuel costs  Continue pursuing grant opportunities and other incentives

Special Thanks To the City of Milwaukee staff for their guidance and interest in alternative fuel vehicles. In particular, we thank Thomas Bell, Budget and Management Special Assistant; Michael O’Donnell, Quality Assurance Coordinator; Paul Klajbor, Administrative Services Manager; Jeffrey A. Tews, CPFP, Fleet Operations Manager. Professor Andrew Reschovsky The LaFollette faculty and staff Stephen Collins, Peter Dermody, Sarah Hurley, Emily Ley, and Ted Schuster

Questions?

Hydraulic Fracturing  Process for recovering natural gas from shale  Wastewater contains known carcinogens  Exempt from Clean Water and Clean Air Acts  2009 bills (HR 2766 and S 1215) introduced to remove exemption and protect groundwater

Parameter Name Point Estimate (Range or Standard Deviation) Source(s) Alternative Fuel Additional Tax Credit0.55U.S. DOE EERE, n.d.b. Annual CNG Use (DGE)3648Average VMT/CNG Fuel Economy Annual Diesel Use (Gallons)3105Average VMT/Diesel Fuel Economy Average Vehicle Miles Travelled*6,675 (6,475 to 6,875)DPW Data and Jeffrey Tews CNG CO 2 Emissions7773U.S. EPA, n.d.b. CNG Fuel Excise Tax Credit0.202U.S. Internal Revenue Service, 2009 CNG Maintenance Costs2.03DPW Data, Johnson, 2010 CNG PM 10 Emissions0.015Lyford-Pike, 2003 Diesel CO 2 Emissions9,966U.S. EPA, n.d.a. Diesel Fuel Excise Tax Credit0.244U.S. Internal Revenue Service, 2009 Diesel Maintenance Costs2.03DPW Data Diesel PM 10 Emissions0.24Lyford-Pike, 2003 Discount Rate*0.035 (0.03 to 0.04)Thomas Bell Federal CNG Vehicle Tax Incentive0.80 up to $32,000Johnson, 2010 Fuel Economy CNG (mpDGE)** 1.83 (0.0485)DPW Data and Jeffrey Tews, Authors Fuel Economy Diesel (gallons)** 2.15 (0.025)DPW Data and Jeffrey Tews, Authors Growth Rate for CNG** (0.0106)AEO 2011 estimate, Authors, NWC Growth Rate for Diesel** ( )AEO 2011 estimate, Authors, NWC Additional Cost of CNG Packer*37,000 (30,000 to 40,000)Jeffrey Tews Price of CNG1.68AEO 2011 for year 2012 Price of Diesel2.96AEO 2011 for year 2012 Shadow Price Avoided CO 2 ($/ton)*3 (3 to 20)Matthews and Lave, 2000 Shadow Price of Avoided PM 10 ($/ton)*1500 (1500 to 6700)Matthews and Lave, 2000 Total Vehicles Purchased in Authors Useful Vehicle Life (years)12Jeffrey Tews *Variables assume a uniform distribution; **Variables assume a normal distribution