Samcef ROTORS versus ANSYS V14.0 Patrick Morelle – 4/6/2012 5nd floor, Hanho Building, 90-14 SamSung-1 Dong, KangNam-Gu, Seoul,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Modeling Electrical Systems With EMTP-RV
Advertisements

Solutions for Prestressed Reinforced Concrete Structures
GTStrudl Damping Models for Dynamic Analysis
Beams and Frames.
Finite Element Model Generation Model size Element class – Element type, Number of dimensions, Size – Plane stress & Plane strain – Higher order elements.
MAGSEAL 101. Rotary face seal that utilizes magnetic attraction force to positively mate the optically flat seal faces. Magnetic attraction force variation.
Lect.2 Modeling in The Frequency Domain Basil Hamed
1 TRC 2008 The Effect of (Nonlinear) Pivot Stiffness on Tilting Pad Bearing Dynamic Force Coefficients – Analysis Jared Goldsmith Research Assistant Dr.
Copyright 2001, J.E. Akin. All rights reserved. CAD and Finite Element Analysis Most ME CAD applications require a FEA in one or more areas: –Stress Analysis.
1 Modeling and Control of Magnetic Bearing Systems Zongli Lin Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Virginia U.S.A. ICCA ’02.
Lect.2 Modeling in The Frequency Domain Basil Hamed
Streamlined Process for Soil-Structure Interaction Analysis of Nuclear Facilities Utilizing GTSTRUDL and MTR/SASSI Wei Li, Michael Perez, Mansour Tabatabaie,
FLIGHT DYNAMICS OF THE FLEXIBLE AIRCRAFT INCLUDING UNSTEADY AERODYNAMIC EFFECTS Grégori Pogorzelski (1,2), Roberto G. A. da Silva (1) and Pedro Paglione.
LIGO-G D 1 25-May-02 Advanced LIGO Suspension Model in Mathematica Gravitational Wave Advanced Detector Workshop Elba - May 2002 Mark Barton.
S1-1 ADM703, Section 1, August 2005 Copyright  2005 MSC.Software Corporation PART 1 ADVANCED MODELING AND BEST PRACTICES.
Static Pushover Analysis
Feedback Control Systems (FCS) Dr. Imtiaz Hussain URL :
/171 VIBRATIONS OF A SHORT SPAN, COMPARISON BETWEEN MODELIZATION AND MEASUREMENTS PERFORMED ON A LABORATORY TEST SPAN S. Guérard (ULg) J.L. Lilien (ULg)
Copyright © 2010 Altair Engineering, Inc. All rights reserved.Altair Proprietary and Confidential Information Section 18 Set Creation & Solver Interface.
Copyright © 2010 Altair Engineering, Inc. All rights reserved.Altair Proprietary and Confidential Information Section 16 Rigid Connections.
REDUCTION OF TEETER ANGLE EXCURSIONS FOR A TWO-BLADED DOWNWIND ROTOR USING CYCLIC PITCH CONTROL Torben Juul Larsen, Helge Aagaard Madsen, Kenneth Thomsen,
A PPLIED M ECHANICS Lecture 06 Slovak University of Technology Faculty of Material Science and Technology in Trnava.
Progress in identification of damping: Energy-based method with incomplete and noisy data Marco Prandina University of Liverpool.
EWEC 2006, AthensMartin Geyler 1 Hardware-in-the-Loop Development and Testing of New Pitch Control Algorithms EWEC 2006 Athens Martin Geyler, Jochen Giebhardt,
EWEC 2007, MilanoMartin Geyler 1 Individual Blade Pitch Control Design for Load Reduction on Large Wind Turbines EWEC 2007 Milano, 7-10 May 2007 Martin.
An Introduction to Rotorcraft Dynamics
*Man-Cheol Kim, Hyung-Jo Jung and In-Won Lee *Man-Cheol Kim, Hyung-Jo Jung and In-Won Lee Structural Dynamics & Vibration Control Lab. Structural Dynamics.
BAR ELEMENT IN 2D (TRUSS, LINK)
Advanced Simulation Techniques for the coupled Fatigue and NVH Optimization of Engines. K+P Software, Schönbrunngasse 24, A Graz / Austria Tel.:
MOTOR SET 200,000 RPM TITANIUM ROTOR. Finite Element Rotordynamics Model_1 (Schematic) With Ceramic Ball Bearings This is a schematic of the FE rotordynamics.
Lecture 6: Time Response 1.Time response determination Review of differential equation approach Introduce transfer function approach 2.MATLAB commands.
An Approach to Properly Account for Structural Damping, Frequency- Dependent Stiffness/Damping, and to Use Complex Matrices in Transient Response By Ted.
Modal Dynamics of Wind Turbines with Anisotropic Rotors Peter F
DEWEK 2004 Lecture by Aero Dynamik Consult GmbH, Dipl. Ing. Stefan Kleinhansl ADCoS – A Nonlinear Aeroelastic Code for the Complete Dynamic Simulation.
Dr. Tamer Samy Gaafar Lec. 3 Mathematical Modeling of Dynamic System.
Samcef ROTORS versus MSC NASTRAN V**
Bird Strike on Jet Fan. Introduction Modelling of Bird Strike using EUROPLEXUS Full Lagrangian Approach Bird modelled by SPH elements (porous gelatine.
Rotordynamic Forces Acting on a Centrifugal Open Impeller in Whirling Motion by Using Active Magnetic Bearing July 7, 2011 Eucass 2011 in St Petersburg.
The Mechanical Simulation Engine library An Introduction and a Tutorial G. Cella.
CAD and Finite Element Analysis Most ME CAD applications require a FEA in one or more areas: –Stress Analysis –Thermal Analysis –Structural Dynamics –Computational.
Mode Superposition Module 7. Training Manual January 30, 2001 Inventory # Module 7 Mode Superposition A. Define mode superposition. B. Learn.
Purdue Aeroelasticity
UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF DR. P. V. MOHANRAM MR. C. SHANMUGAM ANALYSIS AND ISOLATION OF VIBRATION CHARACTERISTICS IN RECIPROCATING COMPRESSOR by N. Gopiselvam.
Object Oriented Modelling for Rotor Dynamics Analysis RomaxDynamic s.
30/06/04, Page 1 This document is the property of SAMTECH S.A. SAMCEF for Engines Engine Dynamics SL/04/SAM/MKG_ppt/34an_a.
20-21 October 2004, Page 1 SAMCEF for Wind Turbines SL/04/SAM/MKG_ppt/37an_a.
Flexible gear dynamics modeling in multi-body analysis Alberto Cardona Cimec-Intec (UNL/Conicet) and UTN-FRSF, Santa Fe, Argentina and Didier Granville.
SECTION 3 Components part 2. DIFFERENTIALS Adams/Driveline has two differential related components –Entire Differential Unit (Differential Assembly) ●
SECTION 2 Components part 1.
Deep Foundation Institute Bay Area Rapid Force Pulse Seminar
Course Outline Course Outline Exam topics MATLAB tutorial
ME375 System Modeling and Analysis
Rotordynamics with ANSYS Mechanical Solutions
CHAPTER 2 - EXPLICIT TRANSIENT DYNAMIC ANALYSYS
Dynamic Response of MDOF Structures
Structural damping - an energy dissipation mechanism
Date of download: 11/11/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
CAD and Finite Element Analysis
Bridge modelling with CSI software.
Modeling tools for Rotordynamics and Bearings Tribodays 2017, Älvkarleby Niklas Rom, PhD © Copyright 2016 COMSOL. Any of.
Lecture 4: Modeling Mechanical Systems
Dr-Ing Asrat Worku, AAIT
1C9 Design for seismic and climate changes
Automobile Engineering
An Example for Engineering Problem on Finding Roots of
Beam Analysis with ANSYS
ME321 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machines
High Speed Balancing in the Service Industry – Deformed Rotors
MULTI DEGREE OF FREEDOM (M-DOF)
Presentation transcript:

Samcef ROTORS versus ANSYS V14.0 Patrick Morelle – 4/6/ nd floor, Hanho Building, SamSung-1 Dong, KangNam-Gu, Seoul, Korea Republic of TEL: 02) FAX: 02) ableMAX

LMS Samtech Division Copyright LMS International Comparison S4R - ANSYSS4R ANSYS  Dedicated GUI and integrated solution for rotor dynamics  Improved conical beam element (degenerated shell, better taking into account conical shafts)  2D Fourier models without limitations in the number of harmonics (0, 1 and higher orders). Possibility to use them for composite materials.  2D Fourier Lagrangian and Eulerian approach  No specific GUI. Rotor dynamics capabilities as part of Work Bench, but needs lots of “epilogue”/scripts (users are complaining), including for the display of results  Classical beam element  2D axisym (but with limited number of harmonics).  Only 2D Lagrangian approach

LMS Samtech Division Copyright LMS International Comparison S4R - ANSYSS4R ANSYS  1D, 2D, 3D, cyclic symmetry, multi stage cyclic symmetry, all exhibiting gyroscopic effect, and possibility to combine all of them  Superelement technique for rotating parts AND non rotating parts. The rotating superelement include reduced stiffness, mass, damping, gyroscopic and circulatory forces matrices  Specific manoeuver loads available (non rotating)  General gear element allowing to take into account coupling between axial, bending and torsion modes  NO multi stage cyclic symmetry, no combinations between different types of models  Superelement technique ONLY for non rotating parts in inertial frame  Only rotating (synchronous or asynchronous) forces  No gear

LMS Samtech Division Copyright LMS International Comparison S4R - ANSYSS4R ANSYS  Large library of specialized bearings (hydrodynamic bearing, rolling element bearing, squeeze-film damper, added mass effect fluid elements), prototype BEARING module for hydrodynamic bearings (normal and thrust)  Bearing element with 6X6 matrices (stiffness, damping (viscous or hysteretical), mass) The coefficients are either constant or variables with rotational speed, frequency or time  Bi-variable (rotational speed and frequency) bearing element with 6X6 matrices (stiffness, damping, mass)  very limited library of bearings (monoaxial spring/damper, general stiffness/damping matrix, 2D spring damper, multi point constraint)  General stiffness/Damping matrix (MATRIX27) CONSTANT (no dependency of the speed of rotation)  Only constant matrices

LMS Samtech Division Copyright LMS International Comparison S4R - ANSYSS4RANSYS  Possibility to model transfer function for magnetic bearings including control  Local non linearities are taken into account in the frequency domain ( non linear harmonic balance method). Available : bushing (clearances), rolling element bearing, squeeze-film damper, friction element  Improved integration schemes in time domain, and on non linear elements available : bushing (clearances), rolling element bearing, squeeze-film damper, friction element, hydrodynamic bearing element  No transfer function available for rotor dynamics models  Only classical harmonic analysis  No specific integration scheme and no specific non linear elements

LMS Samtech Division Copyright LMS International Comparison S4R - ANSYSS4R ANSYS  Specialized and advanced post- processing included in the GUI  Automatic 3D recombination of 2D and cyclic symmetry models including multi stage cyclic symmetry  Campbell diagram available for problems in inertial AND rotating frame. Very performant mode tracking process.  No specific GUI, use command language to post-process rotor model  No automatic 3D recombination  No Campbell diagram available for problems in rotating frame. Classical mode tracking process.