Improving Austin Streams: An Implementation Plan for Total Maximum Daily Load Allocations in 4 Austin Watersheds Chris Herrington, PE Manager, Water Resource.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
(your state) Master Farmer Program
Advertisements

ALLEN BERTHOLD TEXAS WATER RESOURCES INSTITUTE Water Quality and Copano Bay Watershed Efforts.
Presented by Melanie Williams. Plan Schedule Water Quality Status Trends Chain of Lakes Basinwide Issues Recommendations & goals Public Review Comments.
What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
Agua Hedionda Watershed Management Plan Copyright © 2005 Kenneth & Gabrielle Adelman. All rights reserved.
O Adopted in 1972, the CWA is known mostly to the public by its mandate for “swimmable and fishable” waterways. o With the CWA, states evaluate all of.
Watershed Monitoring and Assessment: Federal Regulations and Local Processes Seth Mason.
Fecal Coliform “Hot Spots” Monitoring Stacie Greco Senior Environmental Specialist Alachua County Environmental Protection Department.
TMDL Development Upper Kanawha River Watershed August 18, 2011 WV DEP WV DEP Dave Montali.
Leona River Potential Loads and Sources for Bacteria and Nitrates Texas Institute for Applied Environmental Research Stephenville, Texas June 4, 2013.
7:00 pmWelcome and introductions 7:05pmHLWD planning overview Plan update process 7:25 pmStakeholder involvement Watershed problems 7:40 pmPublic comment.
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
Nelly Smith EPA Region 6. - Develop or revise bacteria reduction program for consistency with new TMDL requirements and allocations - Develop or revise.
Bureau of Water Program Overview Local Government Interest.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
Joanne Hild Friends of Deer Creek Nevada City, California Improving Watershed Health using Citizen Monitoring, Bioassessment and Water Quality Data in.
Allen Berthold Texas Water Resources Institute. Review: Clean Water Act Goal of CWA is to restore and maintain water quality suitable for the “protection.
Improving Austin Streams Developing an implementation plan for four streams: Walnut Creek Waller Creek (abv. 15 th St) Spicewood Trib. To Shoal Crk Taylor.
Approaches to Addressing Bacteria Impairments Kevin Wagner Texas Water Resources Institute.
David Ward Loudoun Watershed Watch/Loudoun Wildlife Conservancy July 27, 2009.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Watershed Assessment 2015 Strategic Monitoring in the Florida Keys DEAR- Water Quality Assessment Program.
Improving Austin Streams Making Progress with Bacteria.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Presented by Insert your name, title, and district Lower Hudson Coalition of Conservation Districts Volunteer Streamwalk Program Developed by the Westchester.
Marin County Watershed Stewardship Plan
Georgia Adopt-A-Stream Introduction Georgia Adopt-A-Stream 2 Martin Luther King Jr. Dr. SW Suite 1462 East Atlanta, Georgia
Catoctin Creek: A Stream in Distress Catoctin Watershed Project A Partnership of County and Citizen Organizations.
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
Rules Overview: Why Do We Do What We Do Alisa Max, P.E. Harris County Alisa Max, P.E. Harris County.
TMDLs on the Clearwater River Fecal Coliform Impairment of the Trout Stream Portion of the Clearwater River By Corey Hanson Water Quality Coordinator Red.
Watershed Planning: Current Status and Next Steps
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS.
Citizen Outreach in Loudoun County, Virginia Source Water Protection Webcast Communication, Regulatory, and Non- Regulatory Tools March 22, 2006 Presented.
Redwood River TMDL Critique David De Paz, Alana Bartolai, Lydia Karlheim.
Catoctin Creek TMDL Implementation Plan Development June 24, 2004.
Understanding the TMDL and I-Plan process Austin’s water quality & possible solutions Improving Austin Streams process and your involvement Welcome!
TMDLs on the Clearwater River Fecal Coliform Impairment of the Trout Stream Portion of the Clearwater River By Corey Hanson Water Quality Coordinator Red.
Critique of North Branch of Sunrise River TMDL Nate Topie and Taylor Hoffman.
Stormwater Management William Taylor New Hampshire Wastewater Control Association June 13, 2013.
Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) in 4 Austin Watersheds Presented to the City of Austin Environmental Board November 7, 2012.
Leona River SELECT Modeling and Potential Bacteria Sources Texas Institute for Applied Environmental Research Stephenville, Texas January 24,
STREAM MONITORING CASE STUDY. Agenda  Monitoring Requirements  TMDL Requirements  OCEA Initial Monitoring Program  Selection of Parameters  Data.
Water Quality Investigations How Does Land-Use Impact Water Quality? Mitigating Water Quality – Current Issues July 9, 2015 Jim Kipp, Associate Director.
ORSANCO’s FY16 Technical Program. WQ Monitoring Programs Bimonthly & Clean Metals Sampling – Metals & traditional 15 mainstem, 14 tribs,
Commonwealth of Virginia TMDL Program Update Citizen for Water Quality Annual Summit September 22, 2001.
Water Quality in Shoal Creek Andrew Clamann March 22, 2016 City of Austin Watershed Protection Department Environmental Resource Management Andrew Clamann.
Integrated Watershed Management
Arkansas Dept. of Environmental Quality Regulation No
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS Four Mile Run Bacteria TMDL March 25, 2002
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
Elm Creek Watershed TMDL E. coli TMDL – Review of Preliminary Findings
NH MS4 Stormwater Permit -- Guidance for NHDES related provisions
Total Maximum Daily Loads Development for Holdens Creek and Tributaries, and Pettit Branch Public Meeting March 26, 2008.
Total Maximum Daily Load Program
Water Quality Improvement Through Implementation of a Watershed Protection Plan in the Leon River Watershed Lower Rio Grande Valley Stormwater Conference.
Drww general membership meeting
Mulberry Watershed Management Plan
Total Maximum Daily Loads of Fecal Coliform for the Restricted Shellfish Harvesting/Growing Areas of the Pocomoke River in the Lower Pocomoke River Basin.
The Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program in Illinois
Bacteria Loadings Watershed Model:
Watershed Management Plan Citizens Advisory Committee April 18, 2011
John Tinger U.S. EPA Region IX
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program
Nonpoint Source Program
Marco island water quality monitoring
Vineyards and Water Quality
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
SHOAL CREEK WATERSHED ACTION PLAN Stakeholder Meeting: August 15, 2019
SHOAL CREEK WATERSHED ACTION PLAN
Presentation transcript:

Improving Austin Streams: An Implementation Plan for Total Maximum Daily Load Allocations in 4 Austin Watersheds Chris Herrington, PE Manager, Water Resource Evaluation Section

E. coli as a fecal indicator Measure potential for fecal contamination, not actual presence of pathogens Long-term measure of conditions, not an assessment of human risk Contact Recreation Standard set by Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, primary standard is 126 mpn/dL Assessed using geometric mean over 5+ year period

Taylor Slough South (2002) E. coli: 545 mpn/dL Spicewood Trib to Shoal (2002) E. coli: 786 mpn/dL Waller Creek (2004) E. coli: 183 – 1,015 mpn/dL Walnut Creek (2006) E. coli: 902 mpn/dL

Austin’s Options to Address Impairments OptionImplication for Austin Do nothingExposes citywide stormwater MS4 permit to modification, does not protect citizens Find the problem, fix it, monitor for at least 2 years Distributed sources extremely difficult to find, leaves MS4 permit exposed to modification Change designated use with Use Attainability Analysis Will not fix all the problems, leaves MS4 permit exposed to modification Watershed Protection PlanSignificantly more complicated public process, no guarantee of protection for MS4 permit Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)Removes liability from MS4, voluntarily, changeable, no penalty for failure

TMDL/I-Plan Process TCEQ develops TMDL –how much bacteria needs to be reduced Stakeholders develop Implementation Plan –who will do what to reduce bacteria –developed by “coordinating committee” –facilitated by paid TCEQ contractor –5 year planning period –voluntary, no penalty if bacteria are not reduced –may be developed in parallel with TMDL

TMDL = ΣWLA + ΣLA + ΣFG + MOS

Load Duration Curve

Sources of Fecal Contamination Domestic pets (dogs, cats) Leaking City wastewater infrastructure Wildlife (deer, bird, racoon, etc.) Humans defecating in creeks Individual homeowner septic tanks

I-Plan Coordinating Committee Austin Water Utility, Watershed Protection Department Austin Environmental Board University of Texas Travis County TxDOT PODER Sierra Club Austin Neighborhood Council Shoal Creek/Pease Park Conservancy Friends of Austin Dog Parks Austin Chamber of Commerce Home Builders Association/Real Estate Council of Austin Developed I-Plan from 02/ /2013:

Management Measures Riparian Zone Restoration Wastewater Infrastructure Maintenance Domestic Pet Waste Education Resident Outreach Stormwater Treatment Ʃ TMDL limit = 2.2x10 11 mpn/day Ʃ I-Plan reduction = 3.7x10 16 mpn/day

Preserve and Restore Riparian Zones austintexas.gov/blog/grow-zones

TMDL/I-Plan Timeline 08/2010: Austin completes 2 years of verification monitoring 03/2012: Austin asks TCEQ to initiate TMDL 10/2012: TCEQ selects I-Plan contractor 10/2012: First of 2 public meetings to create coordinating committee 02/2013: Coordinating committee starts work on I-Plan 12/2013: I-Plan draft approved 04/2014: TCEQ publishes TMDL, I-Plan for public comment 09/2014: TCEQ adopts TMDL, approves I-Plan

Austin’s Environmental Integrity Index 120 sites in 50 watersheds sampled quarterly on biennial basis –Water Quality (bacteria, nutrients, solids, physical) –Sediment (metals, pesticides, PAH, PCB) –Biology (macroinvertebrates, diatoms) –Habitat –Aesthetics $45,000 in annual analytical costs and 112 person-days in field labor austintexas.gov/department/environmental-integrity-index

Individual Action Impacts Creeks

For More Information Chris Herrington, City of Austin Direct: (512) hour Environmental Hotline (512) austintexas.gov/department/watershed-protection