Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation
Advertisements

PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
McRel’s Evaluation System Training Session 1 May 14, 2013 Herbert Hoover Middle School.
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Lee County Schools New Hire Training
Teacher Evaluation Process Component 1: Training Before participating in the evaluation process, all teachers, principals and peer evaluators must complete.
Differentiated Supervision
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Rubric
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
NC PROFESSIONAL TEACHING STANDARDS AND EVALUATION PROCESS.
NC Educator Evaluation System Training for New Administrators Mary Keel, Ed.D Tara Patterson, MSA Robin Loflin Smith, Ed.D.
ADMN 6130 Class 5 The faithful teacher is eager to find out every imperfection in the instruction, always on the alert for improvement, dissatisfied with.
TCS Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide the.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
State Board Mission, Goals, and Policies
NC Educator Evaluation System Overview Jessica Garner Professional Development Lead Region 6
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
N.C. Educator Evaluation System (NCEES) Teacher Evaluation Process January 28, 2013.
Standards IV and VI. Possible Artifacts:  School Improvement Plan  School Improvement Team  North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey  Student.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Teacher Leadership Specialist Standards and Evaluation Process Overview.
Using the Online Evaluation Tool with Fidelity Mary Keel, Ed.D. Robin Loflin Smith, Ed.D. Region 2 Professional Development Leads.
STANDARD V AND WRAP-UP: NC TEACHER CANDIDATE EVALUATION TRAINING GWU TRAINING SESSION.
Principals and Assistant Principals New to the NCEES Process September 28, 2012 North Carolina Educator Evaluation System.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS TRAINING Teacher Training Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools Spring 2010.
Evaluating the 21 st Century Educator with Fidelity School Executive Training Beaufort County Schools April 19, 2012.
NCEES Train the Trainer September 25, 2012 North Carolina Educator Evaluation System.
Beginning Teacher Support Program Charter Schools New Principal Institute June 2015.
1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT: PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction.
HARDING UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL TRANSFORMATION “RAM STYLE”
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System Jessica Garner
Performance Evaluation for Occupational Therapists and Physical Therapists North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Exceptional Children Division.
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS REVIEW Welcome Introductions Agenda.
Page 1 Teacher Evaluation Process & Instrument Dale Ellis Bill Long Jed Stus.
Process for Evaluating Teachers. Principal’s Responsibility ManageKnowIdentifyEnsureSupervise.
Iredell-Statesville Schools Orientation to the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Instrument & Process
What it means for New Teachers
Avon Grove School District October 2009
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Evaluations All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. The most important.
Teacher Evaluation Process
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards
What component is the greatest barrier for you as an evaluator?
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
NC Educator Evaluation System Overview
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System
Supporting Beginning Teachers
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Teacher Evaluation Process
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Pike County Schools Certified Evaluation Annual Training
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
21st Century Teaching Standards and Student Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1

2 Overview of the Teacher Instrument WELCOME

3 The Rubric and Rating Scale Performance Descriptors 1. Developing – Demonstrated adequate growth during the period of performance, but did not demonstrate competence on standard(s) of performance 2. Proficient – Demonstrated desired basic competence on standards of performance 3. Accomplished – Exceeded desired basic competence on standards for performance most of the time and shared competence with peers

4 Performance Descriptors 4. Distinguished – Consistently and significantly exceeded desired basic competence on standards of performance and conducted workshops sharing best practices outside of LEA 5. Not Demonstrated – Did not demonstrate competence on, or adequate growth toward, achieving standard(s) of performance [NOTE: If the “Not Demonstrated” rating is used, the evaluator must provide a comment about why it was used.]

5 School Improvement Plan School Improvement Team Minutes North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey Data Student Achievement Data (formative and summative) Curriculum Planning Data Lesson Plans/Evidence of Collaborative Planning Student Dropout Data Teacher Retention Data National Board Certification Activities Professional Development Documentation of Professional Learning Communities (PLC) Student Work Evidence of Communication A crosswalk through the artifacts…

Query: What are examples of 21 st century skills and global learning a principal may look for in the classroom or during pre/post conferences? Lesson Plans that include… –Balanced Literacy –differentiated instruction –cooperative learning strategies –CIF (Curriculum Instructional Framework) –incorporation of global issues as appropriate Observable items include… –differentiated leveled groups –evidence of collaboration – students and teachers –effective feedback –facilitation that guides students to elaborate, refine, analyze and evaluate their own ideas

Teacher Evaluation Process 7

NC Standards for Teachers Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership Standard 2: Teachers establish a respectful environment for a diverse population of students Standard 3: Teachers know the content they teach Standard 4: Teachers facilitate learning for their students Standard 5: Teachers reflect on their practice 8

9 Definitions Teachers with less than 3 years– BTs, Lateral Entry, Temporary Contract, VIF, First 3 years with DCS –Comprehensive Evaluation Plan Career Status– Teachers who have been granted Career Status in their district –Abbreviated Evaluation Plan Non-Career Status – Teachers with 4 or more years –Standard Evaluation Plan (Career Status Teachers in renewal June 30, 2017)

10 Definitions School Executives – Principals and assistant principals licensed to work in North Carolina Self-assessment – Personal reflection about one’s professional practice to identify strengths and areas for improvement (conducted w/out input from others) Summary Evaluation Form – A composite assessment of the teacher’s performance based on the evaluation rubric and supporting evidence

11 The Components Component 1: Training A full training on standards and components of the process You must log into system and acknowledge cycle and Orientation by tomorrow afternoon at 4:00! If you need assistance, please see me or Mrs. Hardy Component 2: Orientation Yearly Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day Includes a copy of rubric, policy, deadlines, & notification to Career Status teachers of evaluation year

12 Component 3: Teacher Self-Assessment Uses the rubric Is done by individual (without input from others) Used to develop PDP Used in pre and post conferences Is not collected by principal or evaluator

13 Component 4: Pre- Observation Conference Occurs before any observations happen during the year Discuss the self-assessment, PDP & lesson(s) to be observed Teacher will have written lesson plan available for principal to review **Subsequent observations do not require a pre- observation conference

14 Component 5: Observations BT, Lateral, VIF, First 3 years in DCS Comprehensive Evaluation: 4 Formal Observations: 3 Administrative, 1 Peer Career Status teachers: (in their renewing year of evaluation ending June 30, 2017) Non – Career Status teachers: (Teachers not with Career Status with more than 4 years) Standard Evaluation: 3 Observations: 2 Informal's and 1 Formal Career Tenure Teachers: 2 Abbreviated Observations (Standards 1 and 4)

15 NOTE: Formal observations (one complete lesson or a minimum of 45 minutes) Informal and Abbreviated observations (a minimum of 20 minutes) Any observation may be announced or unannounced Evaluator uses the rubric as a recording tool Artifacts may be necessary when a discrepancy occurs

16 Component 6: Post-Observation Conferences Must occur after each formal observation Must occur no later than 10 school days after the observation Designed for the purpose of identifying areas of strength, those in need of improvement and student academic success Requires review and signature of rubric Component 7: Summary Evaluation Conference Bring self-assessment Review observations and any additional artifacts Sign Summary Rating sheet & Record of Teacher Evaluation Activities Begin discussion for future goals

17 Summary Rating Sheet Every element and every standard is rated Not Demonstrated rating requires comment Ratings are based on everything you know about that teacher, including observations Overall rating for each standard is chosen by the evaluator after reviewing all of the elements within a standard Comments can be added from teacher at end of conference Signature page required

18 Component 8: Professional Development Plans After completing Year 1 of implementation, this is how to determine the level of PDP for a teacher: Teachers who are rated as “Proficient” or higher on all standards will develop an Individual Growth Plan Teachers who are rated as “Developing” on any standard will be placed on a Monitored Growth Plan Teachers who are rated as “Not Demonstrated” on any standard or has a rating of “Developing” for two sequential years will be placed on a Directed Growth Plan Monitored and Directed Plans meet the state guidelines of an “action plan”. Individual districts determine those recommendations

Evaluation Timeline

20