Unit-Specific Deployment based on Modified Generic Cost Presented at WMS December 15, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OCTOBER 8, 2014 Bob Laurita INTERNAL MARKET MONITORING New Import Capacity Resource FCM Market Power Mitigation Order to Show Cause Compliance Filing.
Advertisements

1 November 2013 Enhancing Coal Production – Advent of Real Competition.
1 Generation Adequacy Task Force Report to TAC April 7, 2005.
Enhancing Interruptible Rates Through MISO Demand Response: WIEG Annual Meeting June 19, 2008 Presented by: Kavita Maini, Principal KM Energy Consulting,
Loads Acting as a Resource Relationships with QSEs and LSEs
Lecture 16 Economic Dispatch Professor Tom Overbye Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ECE 476 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS.
Financial energy futures. Future contract is a contract (liabilities of the parties) at a specified future date at a price and contract volume fixed at.
FAST Procurement and Pricing May 28, 2015 TAC Meeting 1.
Alternative Fuel Survey Results Reliability and Operations Subcommittee Report December 15th, 2004 Presented by ERCOT Client Relations.
December 2, 2011 QMWG Summary of Potential Issues with NPRR385 Price Floor ERCOT.
Overview of FIP Issues in the RUC, Verifiable Cost, and other Nodal Market Processes January 28, 2009 WMS Meeting.
BAL-001-TRE-1 Primary Frequency Response in the ERCOT Region
1 Settlement Changes R5 (SEP 2015) and R5.5 (OCT 2015) Blake Holt ERCOT COPS 9/14/2015.
Guidelines for Verification of Resource Specific Fuel Adders RCWG Paul Vinson.
Market Mitigation Concept Group Update Jim Galvin April 26, 2004.
WMS Subgroup – CRR Credit 3.Review of CRR margining methodology for PTP Obligations in Nodal Protocols 4.Potential credit margin alternatives Cheryl Yager.
Mitigated Offer Cap Presented to: NATF Date: September 29, 2009 By: Mark Patterson, Manager Market Operations Support (ERCOT) 1September 29 NATF Meeting.
Grabbing Balancing Up Load (BUL) by the Horns December 2006.
Quick Start Resource – Payment for Start-Up at less than LSL Current NPRR language: ( 8) If a QSGR comes On-Line as a result of a Base Point less than.
Wholesale Market Subcommittee Texas Interconnection Long-Term Study Update Warren P. Lasher April 8, 2011.
1 Reliability Deployment Task Force (RDTF Meeting) December 20 th 2011 December 20, 2011.
1 IMM Pricing Concerns with PFR and FFR Proposed pricing structure provides incentive for FFR to offer at less than cost. Dual clearing price pricing structure.
Updated Cost/Benefit Analysis for PRR 567 Multi-Part A/S Bidding PRS January Meeting January 19, 2006.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Day-Ahead CRR Settlements Business Requirements TPTF Presentation ERCOT Settlements.
Alternative Fuel Survey Results Technical Advisory Committee Meeting December 2 nd, 2004 Reliability and Operations Subcommittee Report Presented by ERCOT.
DAM Overview: Processes & Tools in the DAM Shams Siddiqi, Ph.D. Crescent Power, Inc. (512) April 2, 2008.
Unit-Specific Bid Limits based on Modified Generic Cost.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Nodal Verifiable Costs Process WMS Meeting May 15, 2007 Ino.
01/17/ CP Discussion October 16,2002 Retail Market Subcommittee Austin, Texas.
Floyd Trefny, P.E. Director of Wholesale Market Design Nodal Market Tools to Manage Wind Generation January 29, 2009 Presentation to the Renewables Technology.
Generation Costs. Fuel InputProcess (Generating station) Electrical Energy output Cost of Electrical energy = Cost of fuel + processing cost.
Overview of Governing Document for Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Stakeholder Workshop Mark Patterson, ERCOT Staff March 1, 2013.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Verifiable Costs for Nodal WMS Meeting.
ERCOT Public 1 AS Demand Curves for Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services.
Appeal of Proposed Real Time Market Mitigation Measures Texas Nodal Market May 18, 2004.
Overview of FIP Issues in the RUC, Verifiable Cost, and other Nodal Market Processes November 12, 2008 VCWG Meeting.
AcF 214 Tutorial Week 5. Question 1. a) Average return:
RMS Update to TAC June 7, RMS Activity Summary RMGRR052 File Naming Convention for Customer Billing Contact Information URGENT (Vote) RMS Procedures:
Day Ahead Market QSE’s Credit Requirements Concerns and Solutions August 14, 2008.
Use of ONTEST Resource Status over Telemetry: – ERCOT protocol permits the use of telemetered Resource Status code “ONTEST” during periods of start-up.
General Trends and Summary New gas generation is presently increasing faster than supply. However a slowing economy and less rapid demand in the industrial.
Initial Estimated Liability (IEL)
Announcements Please read Chapter 7 HW 6 is due today
Estimating the resource adequacy value of demand response in the German electricity market Hamid Aghaie Research Scientist in Energy Economics, AIT Austrian.
Principal Load Profiling and Modeling
“Other” Cost Estimates
Carbon Free Energy with Storage 2017 JOINT REQUEST FOR OFFERS
Distributed Generation Task Force
Exceptional Fuel Costs in LMP
NPRRs 815NPRR Revise the Limitation of Load Resources Providing Responsive Reserve (RRS) Service.  This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) revises.
Verifiable Cost Working Group (VCWG) Update
General Overview Of Resource Costs
ERCOT Pilot Project for Fast Responding Regulation Service (FRRS)
ERS Procurement Methodology
Ancillary Service Trades and Ancillary Service Settlement
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services
Resource Cost Working Group
Alternative Approach for Loads in SCED v.2
Chapter 2 Pricing of Bonds
Energy day July 3th, 2012.
NPRR829 Incorporate Real-Time Telemetered Net Generation for Non-Modeled Generation into the Real-Time Liability Estimate ERCOT PRS Meeting May 11, 2017.
Flexible Forward Contracts for Renewable Energy Generators
ECEN 460 Power System Operation and Control
CHAPTER 7 Money Markets.
Accounting, Fifth Edition
Generation Expansion Daniel Kirschen
State Allocation Board Hearing Solar Energy and Energy Efficiency Project Options for California Schools Mark Johnson, Energy Solutions Manager - Schools.
Changing Market Dispatch
Franchise Agreements: An Opportunity to Promote Clean Energy in Illinois Alexis Cain USEPA, Region 5.
Progress on the Renewable Energy IPP Procurement Programme
Presentation transcript:

Unit-Specific Deployment based on Modified Generic Cost Presented at WMS December 15, 2003

Present Generic Compensation for Gas-Steam = 14.5 HR Present Generic Compensation for Combined Cycle = 9.0 HR Compensation from ERCOT 9.0 HR* $4.50 gas = $40.50 Compensation from ERCOT 14.5 HR * $4.50 gas = $65.25 Unit-Specific Deployment based on Generic Cost ($4.10 margin/revenue*) * Typical debt service on new assets See next slide ($12.65 margin) $0 debt on assets Creates incentive to operate inefficient units Combine CycleGas - Steam Marginal Cost (7.2 HR * $4.50) +$4.00VOM= $36.40 Marginal Cost (10.8 HR * $4.50) +$4.00VOM= $52.60

Investment New unit construction $4.00/kw $400,000 cost to build 1 MW 8,760 hrs/year * 7 years = 61,320 hrs $400,000/61,320 = $6.52 At a minimum, $6.52/MWh revenue needed to pay down debt on construction costs only Conservative estimate, does not include cost of borrowing money, time value of money, cost of Letters of Credit to trade power, Letters of Credit to purchase gas, transaction capturing systems, IT infrastructure, labor, etc …………………………..

10.0 HR + (Inc. HR inefficiency >7.2) = ( (10.8 – 7.2)) = 13.6 HR 9.0 Generic HR = 10.0 HR Modified Compensation by ERCOT 10.0 HR* $4.50 gas = $45.00 Previously ($40.50) Modified Compensation by ERCOT 13.6 HR * $4.50 gas = $61.20 Previously ($65.25) ($8.60 revenue/margin*) * High debt on assets ($8.60 margin) * $0 debt on assets Develop a method that compensates for increased costs, but does not reward for being inefficient Unit-Specific Deployment based on Modified Generic Cost Equalizes compensation to all Market Participants Combine Cycle Gas - Steam Marginal Cost (7.2 HR * $4.50) +$4.00VOM= $36.40 Marginal Cost (10.8 HR * $4.50) +$4.00VOM= $52.60

Up Deployments As part of the submittal of the Resource Plan, QSEs will specify bid premiums by Resource using the following formula: Gas = FIP * [10.0 HR + ( Registered HeatRate – 7.2 HR)] QSEs requesting compensation above the 10.0 HR level, must register documentation once a year, with ERCOT and the PUCT, attesting to the unit specific HR that will be used to calculate the bid premium. For Nuclear, Hydro, Coal and Lignite, Diesel, Block Load Transfer, and Renewable, the Modified Generic Price will remain the same as the present Generic Price as follows: Nuclear = $15.00/MWH Hydro = $10.00/MWh Coal and Lignite = $18.00/MWh Diesel = FIP * 16 MMBtu/MWh Block Load Transfer = FIP * MMBtu/MWh Renewable = $0/MWh

Down Deployments As part of the submittal of the Resource Plan, QSEs will specify bid premiums by Resource using the following formula: Gas = FIP * 7 MMBtu/MWh (Presently 5 to 12 HR * FIP) Diesel = FIP * 7 MMBtu/MWh (Presently 12 HR * FIP) For Nuclear, Hydro, Coal and Lignite, Block Load Transfer, and Renewable, the Modified Generic Price will remain the same as the present Generic Price as follows: Nuclear = $0.00/MWH Hydro = $0.00/MWh Coal and Lignite = $3.00/MWh Block Load Transfer = Not Applicable Renewable = $0/MWh

Level Playing Field Modified Generic Cost Method equalizes compensation, above costs, for all market participants Equalizing revenues among all units, removes the incentive to freeze efficient units below their maximum capabilities and forcing ERCOT to deploy other inefficient units in the area that provide higher revenues Modified Generic Cost Method compensates for increase costs, but does not reward inefficiency Premiums based on settlement compensation assures deployment in the most efficient manner