Opportunities to Utilize ESSA to Fund District and University Leadership Opportunities.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Definitions Innovation Reform Improvement Change.
Advertisements

1 Improving School Leadership - Guidelines for Country Background Reports - Education and Training Policy Division Directorate of Education.
Center of Excellence in Leadership of Learning October 5, 2010.
TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Principals and Teachers Effectiveness and Evaluation NSBA’s Federal Relations Network Conference February
Project Team MSBA – local school board members MASA – local school superintendents and other stakeholders MSBA/MASA.
1 Marie Izquierdo & Pablo G. Ortiz. Prioritizing Tiered Support to Schools schools defined as “persistently low- achieving” by the requirements.
FY 2012 SIG 1003G LEAD PARTNER REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL (RFSP) BIDDERS’ CONFERENCE February 7, 2011.
Computing Leadership Summit STEM Education Steve Robinson U.S. Department of Education White House Domestic Policy Council February 22, 2010.
1 Presentation to USED Review Panel August 10, 2010 North Carolina Race to the Top Proposal R e d a c t e d.
Education Leadership How districts can grow and support a pipeline of highly effective leaders Presentation to: SREB Leadership Forum Jody Spiro Senior.
LEADERSHIP LEADERSHIP Rock Solid Leadership, Simple Truths, 2006 Long Term Vision Excellence Advance Planning Discipline, Drive & Determination Enthusiasm.
Closing the Achievement Gap in Minnesota: Making a Difference through Leadership April 24, 2013.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
1 Council of the Great City Schools October 27, 2012 Succession Planning and Leadership Development.
Succession Planning Hosted By: John Nori NASSP Consultant.
Understanding Stimulus Funding and Leveraging Philanthropy to Support Long-Term Education Goals A Webinar for the Foundation Community February 16, 2010.
Elementary and Secondary Education (ESEA) Law NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND.
Massie Ritsch U.S. Department of Education ESEA REAUTHORIZATION.
Education Leadership Lessons Learned by The Wallace Foundation Presentation to: CCSSO National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Jody Spiro Senior Program.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
The policy environment around employment is changing. Employment First efforts have reinforced the belief that integrated employment is the first and most.
Texas Science Technology Engineering and Math (T-STEM) Initiative Robin Gelinas—Texas Education Agency Director of Policy Initiatives.
REPORT ON THE OHIO CLINICAL ALLIANCE OCTEO CONFERENCE DUBLIN, OHIO MARCH 6, 2015.
1 Duval County Public Schools Summer Learning. Turnaround in Action District tiered model of clustering schools for lower performing schools; Additional.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
IDAHO STATE TEACHER ADVANCEMENT AND RECOGNITION SYSTEM.
Learning Together to Develop More Effective Principal Supervisors Will Miller President, The Wallace Foundation Principal Supervisor Initiative Bidders’
By: Becky Chopp.  Teacher quality is important and matters. It is the most important school-related factor influencing student achievement.  Having.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
Discussion with USDoED on prioritizing leadership in ESSA regulations and guidance January 19, 2016.
Principal Supervision and Support Hosted By: John Nori Associate Director of Program Development, NASSP.
February 2016 Overview of the Every Student Succeeds Act.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Strategies for Promoting Equity with Diverse Student Populations: Students in Rural Communities 1.
A Policy-oriented Board of Trustees A Review of Selected Research.
SEA Strategies for Promoting Equity: SEA/IHE Collaboration on Teacher Preparation Lynn Holdheide, Center on Great Teachers and Leaders & Collaboration.
Gary Kipp, Executive Director Association of Washington School Principals Dr. Michael Starosky, Asst. Superintendent, Chief of Schools Seattle School District.
DO PRINCIPAL SUPERVISORS MATTER? BUILDING THE CAPACITY OF AREA SUPERINTENDENTS National Principal Supervisor Summit May 2016.
Grant Activities, Needs Assessments And other SPDG application Issues to Consider.
1 Monitoring and Revising the Title I, Part A, Schoolwide Plan Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title.
Redefining Leadership for Inclusive Instructional Leadership: The Role of Higher Education Brian A McNulty Ph. D.
Every Student Succeeds Act 101 Regional Educational Laboratory Northeast and Islands Governing Board Meeting May 2016.
ESSA and the Changing Education Landscape
Performance Management - Principals
Effective factors that increase academic achievement among low SES youth Alex Anley November 30, 2016.
Selection & Deployment - Principals
Annual Title I Parent Orientation Meeting
District Leadership Team Sustainability Susan Barrett Director, Mid-Atlantic PBIS Network Sheppard Pratt Health.
A Policy-oriented Board of Trustees
RECOGNIZING educator EXCELLENCE
Southern Regional Education Board Annual Leadership Forum
Building a Quality Pool - Principals
Agenda for today’s discussion
School Redesign and SRCL Implementation
The Wallace Foundation July 2012
Otis J. Brock, III Elementary School
ESSA Implementation: Evidence on Supporting School Leaders
Why some schools succeed ?
Beth Joseph Angela Landry
Oregon Team : Carla Wade : Jan McCoy :Dave Cook : Jennifer Arns
Principal Realities One-fourth of the country’s principals leave their schools each year 50% of new principals quit during their third year in the role.
Otis J. Brock, III Elementary School
Title II Preparing, Training, and Recruiting High Quality Teachers and Principals Ismail Ardahanli.
Ms. Kim Adkins, Chair July 26, 2018
Evidence-Based Practices Under ESSA for Title II, Part A
Principal Pipelines: A Major Strategy to Improve Student Achievement Districtwide April 8, 2019.
Introduction Introduction
Introductions Introduction
Annual Title I Parent Orientation Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Opportunities to Utilize ESSA to Fund District and University Leadership Opportunities

Leadership Matters Effective school leadership is second only to teaching among school-related factors in improving student achievement, explaining about one quarter of the variation in student outcomes compared to more than one-third for teachers (Kenneth Leithwood et al., 2004) Principals are multipliers of effective teaching (Paul Manna, 2015) Effective school leadership has a particularly significant impact on high-poverty schools by helping these schools to attract and retain good teachers (Karen Seashore Louis et al., 2010)

Leadership Often Neglected However, while Title II and other parts of ESEA have traditionally allowed attention and funding to go towards both teachers and leaders, leadership is often not at the core of state and district plans and strategies (Manna, 2015)

Requesting Guidance on Leadership Through ESSA 4

Leadership and ESSA New state plans under ESSA include evidence-based preparation programs and on-the-job support for principals New state guidance for local plans under ESSA includes local attention to advance leadership at the school level New state and local plans for school improvement in the lowest-performing schools under Title I focus on improving school leadership Total dollars spent on evidence-based preparation and support of principals goes up

Funding Opportunities - ESSA Formula programs Title I school improvement Title II including set asides for state efforts to improve teacher and leader quality The new express authority for states to set aside 3% of Title II funds for activities focused on leadership. Competitive programs: the Teacher and School Leader Incentive Fund the School Leader Recruitment and Support fund the Supporting Effective Educator Development fund the Education Innovation and Research fund

ESSA funding streams for school leadership School improvement efforts Title I School leader pipeline improvement activities Title II, Part A (Supporting Effective Instruction) Performance-based incentives Effective educators High need schools Title II, Part B (National Activities)

ESSA Act and Evidence of Effectiveness To qualify for some funding programs under the new Every Student Succeeds Act, activities need to provide some evidence of effectiveness The new Every Student Succeeds Act defines four “tiers” of evidence of effectiveness for certain funded activities; some funding is available only for activities in the top three. A RAND report identifies 19 school leadership research studies that meet the top levels of effectiveness evidence required for funding under the Every Student Succeeds Act.

Qualifying Leadership Interventions Under ESSA 9

Focus of RAND Paper How can ESSA be used to support evidence-based school leadership interventions? What supports for school leadership can be provided through ESSA? What are the ESSA evidence requirements for funding? What is the evidence—meeting ESSA requirements—for school leadership supports?

Tiers of evidence in ESSA At least one well-designed and well- implemented experimental study (RCT) Tier I (Strong) At least one well-designed and well- implemented quasi-experimental design (QED) Tier II (Moderate) At least one well-designed and well- implemented correlational study controlling for selection bias Tier III (Promising) High-quality research suggesting activity is likely to improve student or other relevant outcomes Requires ongoing evaluation Tier IV 11

Evidence review findings Type of ActivityEvidence Base (# of studies) Findings Leader-evaluation systemTier IVPending Principal preparation programsTier II (1) Tier III (3) Tier IV Student-achievement gains Pending Strategic staff managementTier III (4) Tier IV Neutral or negative findings Pending Professional learningTier I (1) Tier II (2) Tier IV Positive or no effect on student achievement; reduced staff turnover Pending Working conditions and autonomyTier II (2) Tier IV Mixed effects Pending Working conditions and financial incentivesTier IVPending School reform modelsTier I (1) Tiers I & 2 (2) Tier II (3) Tier IV Positive effects on student achievement Pending

Evidence-Based Principal Development Programs: Tiers I-III ActivityStudyESSA Tier Findings Principal preparation programs: Usually include classroom-based education, school-based internship, and advanced degree or certification Fuller et al., 2011 Tier IIIPositive association between some characteristics of principal preparation programs (such as being housed at research or doctoral institutions) and improvements in the qualifications of teachers New Leaders: Prepares principals to address the achievement gap and related challenges in high-need, urban schools. Three core elements: selective recruitment and admissions, training, and endorsement and support for principals early in their tenures Gates, Hamilton, et al., 2014 Tier IIGenerally larger student-achievement gains in math and reading than in comparable schools, with differing effects across districts

Professional learning: Tiers I-III ActivityStudyESSA TierFindings McREL Balanced Leadership Program: Professional development Jacob et al., 2014 Tier INo impact on student achievement or teacher- reported instructional climate; lower staff turnover in treatment schools NISL Executive Development Program: Professional development Nunnery et al., 2011 Tier IIPositive effects on reading and math achievement Nunnery, Ross, and Yen, 2010 Tier IIStatistically significantly higher achievement gains in reading and math

Specifying Tier IV Evidence-based but not yet proven The elements, but not the coherent model, have been demonstrated effective Causal-chain effectiveness The activity affects an intermediate outcome, believed to affect student, other relevant outcomes Implementation effectiveness The activity can be implemented with fidelity, and strong implementation relates to positive outcomes

Sample of Activities Which May Have Tier IV Evidence Cohesive leadership systems Financial incentives Pre-service preparation and internships Principal supervisors Professional development Professional learning communities School Leadership Network Strategic Staffing Initiative Wallace Principal Pipeline Initiative

Ways to Influence ISBE ESSA Web Site: Alliance for Excellent Education Action Academy: ◦Mini-courses with potential to earn badges ◦Federal Flash ◦Ways to take action Center for the Study of Education Policy Web Site: White Papers Exchange Newsletter Facebook Twitter

Questions?