Using Data for Decision-making Rob Horner, Anne Todd, Steve Newton, Bob Algozzine, Kate Algozzine.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Simulations Trevor Test Middle School Phoenix Elementary Langley Elementary Sandhill High School Problem Solving Foundations Newton, J. S., Todd, A. W.,
Advertisements

Goals for Session Define the role of data-based decision-making with the School-wide PBS approach. Propose features of Office Discipline Referral data.
Trevor Test Middle School 565 students Grades 6,7,8.
Why acknowledge desired behavior? Turn the behavior into a habit!!
Role of Health Care Professionals in Team-based Problem Solving for Children with Chronic Behavioral Needs Rob Horner University of Oregon
TIPS: Team Initiated Problem Solving 1. The Pennsylvania Positive Behavior Support Network The mission of the Pennsylvania Positive Behavior Support Network.
From the work of: Rob Horner, Steve Newton, & Anne Todd, University of Oregon Bob Algozzine & Kate Algozzine, University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
Using Data to Make Precision Statements Effective Schoolwide Discipline Implementers’ Forum Cathy Shwaery July 29, 2008.
Using Data: Building Precision Statements Based on Team Initiated Problem Solving  Rob Horner  Anne Todd  Steve Newton  Bob Algozzine  Kate Algozzine.
Using ODR Data for Decision ‐ Making. Questions to Ask Is there a problem? If so, define the problem with precision: o What areas/systems are involved?
S-RIP Coach Meeting September 26, 2013 Char Ryan Linda Watson Bob Braun Katie Schmitt.
Using Data for Effective Team Meetings within PB4L Rob Horner University of Oregon
PBIS Coaches Institute Placer County Office of Education
Brief Introduction to Team-Initiated Problem Solving (TIPS) Anne Todd, Steve Newton, & Rob Horner, University of Oregon Kate Algozzine & Bob Algozzine,
A PBIS Quick Refresher: Team Initiated Problem Solving
National Leadership Forum Chicago, Illinois October 2010 presented by Anne Todd, UO Developed by Steve Newton, Anne Todd, Rob Horner, UO Bob Algozzine,
Using ODR Data for Decision Making Rob Horner, George Sugai, Anne Todd, Teri Lewis-Palmer Marilyn Nersesian, Jim Watson.
Evaluation Tools, On-Line Systems, and Data-Based Decision Making Version 3.0, Rev  This is a presentation of the Illinois PBIS Network. All.
4.0 Behavior Data Review and Action Planning WINTER 2012.
The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development.
Tier 1/Universal Training The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support.
Newton, J.S., Todd, A. W., Horner, R.H., Algozzine, B., & Algozzine K., 2010 PBIS Team Initiated Problem Solving (TIPS) Day 2 pbis.sccoe.org.
The District Role in Implementing and Sustaining PBIS
Creative ways to use data: A toolkit for schools Susan Barrett
Cohorts 2-8 Coaches’ Meeting October 1 or 2, M-RIP Cohorts 2-8 Coaches' Mtg Oct 1 or 2, 2013.
Data-based Decision Making and Problem Solving in PBIS Schools VTPBiS Leadership Forum October 7, 2014.
Using Data for Decision-making Rob Horner, Anne Todd, Steve Newton, Bob Algozzine, Kate Algozzine.
Discipline Referrals, Data Analysis, SWPBIS Rollout SWPBS Day 4: Universal Curriculum.
Team Initiated Problem Solving Workbook Cabarrus County 2013.
Sample PBIS Problem Identification and Solution Finding Adapted from TIPS.
1. Learn how data tools can be used to: ◦ help staff get started with School-wide PBIS ◦ check implementation fidelity ◦ monitor progress and establish.
January Data Day: 1.0 Introduction WINTER Opening Activity:  Talk to your neighbor about successes and challenges you experienced when using PBIS.
Wisconsin PBIS External Coach Forum On-line meeting January 24, 2013.
D. Data Entry & Analysis Plan Established. Critical Element PBIS Implementation Goal D. Data Entry & Analysis Plan Established 13. Data system is used.
Defining Behaviors and Establishing a Data System for Behavior SWPBIS Day 3: Universal Curriculum.
Establishing Multi-tiered Behavior Support Frameworks to Achieve Positive School-wide Climate George Sugai Tim Lewis Rob Horner University of Connecticut,
Mining Date: Using Data for Decision-making Rob Horner, Anne Todd, Steve Newton, Bob Algozzine, Kate Algozzine.
Revisit TIPS team minute form titled Problem Solving Action Plan? Teams need a review on: getting to a precision problem statement deciding what their.
November External Coaches Meeting. Agenda Precision Statements District Discipline Data System (DDDS) Web Back Pack Roles and Responsibilities.
Module 3: Introduction to Outcome Data-Based Decision-Making Using Office Discipline Referrals Phase I Session II Team Training Presented by the MBI Consultants.
Systems Review: Schoolwide Behavior Support Cohort 5: Elementary Schools Winter, 2009.
Detroit Public Schools Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Behavior Spring
Using SWIS: A Tool for Guiding Data-Based Decision Making Jen Freeman Instructional Consultant RSU 14 SWIS Facilitator.
Data-based Decision Making and Problem Solving in PBIS Schools VTPBiS Leadership Forum October 9, 2015.
Evaluation Tools and On-Line Systems Adapted from the Illinois PBIS Network.
Data-based Decision Making and Problem Solving in PBIS Schools Resources 1.
PAPBS Network Coaches Day January 28, Team-Initiated Problem Solving II (TIPS II) Model.
Module 3: Data-Based Decision-Making Using Outcome Data Session III Team Training Presented by the MBI Consultants.
Data Driven Decisions: Using the Tools Susan Barrett, Jerry Bloom PBIS Maryland Coaches Meeting October 2007
Module 3: Introduction to Outcome Data-Based Decision-Making Using Office Discipline Referrals Phase I Session II Team Training Presented by the MBI Consultants.
Phoenix Elementary 265 Students K-5. Phoenix Elementary 265/100 = x.34 = Newton, J. S., Todd, A. W., Algozzine, K., Horner, R. H., & Algozzine,
Creative ways to use data: A toolkit for schools Melissa Leahy, Ph.D. Kimberly Muniz, M.A./CAS, NCSP Carroll County Public Schools Maryland.
Navigating SWIS School- Wide Information System. Navigating SWIS Data Team Meeting Process: TIPS Sharing Data with Staff Q & A & Resources Agenda:
PBIS Team Initiated Problem Solving (TIPS) Year 2 Day 2 pbis.sccoe.org
PBIS Tier I Review & Team Initiated Problem Solving (TIPS)
Community of Practice #4 Data-based Decision Making”
Case Study.
Data-based Decision Making and Problem Solving in PBIS Schools
Team-Initiated Problem Solving (TIPS)
TIPS: Team Initiated Problem Solving
Data Collection Eric Landers, Ph.D. © E. Landers Consulting Inc, 2017.
Using Data for Decision-making
Using Data for On-going Problem Solving
Facilitating Data Days A Webinar for VTPBIS Schools and SUs/SDs
Brief Introduction to Team-Initiated Problem Solving (TIPS)
Sample PBIS Problem Identification and Solution Finding
D. Data Entry & Analysis Plan Established
Effective Team Meetings
Looking for a Data Protocol? Consider Using TIPS:
Using Data for Decision Making within a PBIS Framework
Presentation transcript:

Using Data for Decision-making Rob Horner, Anne Todd, Steve Newton, Bob Algozzine, Kate Algozzine

Main Ideas  Decisions are more likely to be effective and efficient when they are based on data.  The quality of decision-making depends most on the first step (defining the problem to be solved)  Define problems with precision and clarity

Main Ideas  Data help us ask the right questions…they do not provide the answers: Use data to Identify problems Refine problems Define the questions that lead to solutions  Data help place the “problem” in the context rather than in the students.

Main Idea  The process a team uses to problem solve is important: Roles : Facilitator; Recorder; Data analyst; Active member Organization Agenda; Old business (did we do what we said we would do); New business; Action plan for decisions. What happens BEFORE a meeting What happens DURING a meeting What happen AFTER a meeting

Main Ideas  Build “decision systems” not “data systems”  Use data in “decision layers” Is there a problem? (overall rate of ODR) Localize the problem (location, problem behavior, students, time of day) Get specific  Don’t drown in the data  It’s “OK” to be doing well  Be efficient

Using Data  Do we have a problem?  Refine the description of the problem?  What behavior, Who, Where, When, Why  Test hypotheses  “I think the problem on the playground is due to Eric”  “ We think the lunch period is too long”  “We believe the end of ‘block schedule” is used poorly”  Define how to monitor if solution is effective

Collect and Use and UseData Review Status and Identify Problems Develop and Refine Hypotheses Discuss and Select Solutions Develop and Implement Action Plan Evaluate and Revise Action Plan Problem Solving Foundations Team Initiated Problem Solving (TIPS) Model

Identifying problems/issues  What data to monitor ODR per day per month OSS, ISS, Attendance, Teacher report Team Checklist/ SET (are we doing what we planned to do?)  What question to answer Do we have a problem?  What questions to ask of Level, Trend, Peaks How do our data compare with last year? How do our data compare with national/regional norms? How do our data compare with our preferred/expected status?  If a problem is identified, then ask What are the data we need to make a good decision?

Total Office Discipline Referrals Total Office Discipline Referrals as of January 10

Using Data to Refine Problem Statement  The statement of a problem is important for team- based problem solving.  Everyone must be working on the same problem with the same assumptions.  Problems often are framed in a “Primary” form, that creates concern, but that is not useful for problem- solving.  Frame primary problems based on initial review of data  Use more detailed review of data to build “Solvable Problem Statements.”

Solvable Problem Statements (What are the data we need for a decision?)  Solvable problem statements include information about the five core “W” questions. What is problem, and how often is it happening Where is it happening Who is engaged in the behavior When the problem is most likely Why the problem is sustaining

Primary versus Precision Statements  Primary Statements Too many referrals September has more suspensions than last year Gang behavior is increasing The cafeteria is out of control Student disrespect is out of control  Precision Statements There are more ODRs for aggression on the playground than last year. These are most likely to occur during first recess, with a large number of students, and the aggression is related to getting access to the new playground equipment.

Primary versus Precision Statements  Primary Statements Too many referrals September has more suspensions than last year Gang behavior is increasing The cafeteria is out of control Student disrespect is out of control  Precision Statements There are more ODRs for aggression on the playground than last year. These are most likely to occur during first recess, with a large number of students, and the aggression is related to getting access to the new playground equipment.

Precise or Primary Statement?  Children are using inappropriate language with a high frequency in the presence of both adults and other children. This is creating a sense of disrespect and incivility in the school  James D. is hitting others in the cafeteria during lunch, and his hitting is maintained by peer attention.

Precise or Primary Statement?  ODRs during December are higher than in any other month.  Minor disrespect and disruption are increasing over time, and are most likely during the last 15 minutes of our block periods when students are engaged in independent seat work. This pattern is most common in 7 th and 8 th grades, involves many students, and appears to be maintained by escape from work (but may also be maintained by peer attention… we are not sure).

Precise or Primary Statement?  Three 5 th grade boys are name calling and touching girls inappropriately during recess in an apparent attempt to obtain attention and possibly unsophisticated sexual expression.  Boys are engaging in sexual harassment

Organizing Data for Decision-making  Compare data across time  Moving from counts to count/month

SWIS summary (Majors Only) 3,410 schools; 1,737,432 students; 1,500,770 ODRs Grade Range Number of Schools Avg. Enrollment per school National Avg. for Major ODRs per 100 students, per school day K-62, = about 1 Major ODR every 3 school days, or about 34 every 100 days = a little less than 1 Major ODR per school day, or about 85 every 100 days = more than 1 Major ODR per school day, or about 127 every 100 days K- (8-12) = about 1 Major ODR per school day, or about 106 every 100 days Newton, J.S., Todd, A.W., Algozzine, K, Horner, R.H. & Algozzine, B. (2009). The Team Initiated Problem Solving (TIPS) Training Manual. Educational and Community Supports, University of Oregon unpublished training manual.

Start with the ODR/Day/Month Graph  Use the information in the data to build a narrative that draws the team into problem solving.  Be descriptive  Link local data to national patterns  Tie the data back to local conditions/events.

Elementary School 465 students (465/ 100 = 4.6 X.34= 1.56) Our rate of problem behavior has been above the national average for schools our size for 9 of 10 months this year. There has been a decreasing trend since Dec.

Elementary School 1000 Students (1000/100 =10 X.34= 3.4) The rate of problem behavior has been at or below the national average schools our size for 6 of 10 months. The past 4 months have been below the national average

Middle School 765 students (765/100 = 7.6 X.85= 6.46) The rate of problem behavior has been at or below the national average schools our size for 9 of 10 months. The past 8 months have been below the national average with a decreasing trend

Describe the narrative for this school

Using Data to Build Precision  Given that we know we have a problem  What problem behaviors  Where are they occurring  When are they occurring  Who is involved  Why do they keep happening

What questions to ask about the patterns of problem behaviors? 1. Do we have one problem behavior situations or more than one? 2. Do we have many problem behaviors or just a few problem behaviors? 3. Do we have clusters of problem behaviors? 4. What school wide expectations do we need to re-teach?

Data should allow asking the right question… not supplying the answer.  If many referrals in class  Which classes?  Which students?  When?  If many referrals in cafeteria  Which students?  What times? (beginning or end of lunch period?)  What problem behaviors?

Disrespect is our most frequent problem behavior. We also have incidents of fighting and harassment What are next questions? Who, When, Why?

Our most frequent problem behavior is disrespect, followed by inappropriate language, disruption and tardy What are next questions? Who, When, Why?

We have many instances of disrespect, aggression/fighting. technology violations, tardy, harassment, lying, skipping, and inappropriate language

What questions to ask about Referrals by Location  Where are the problems occurring?  Are there problems in many locations, clusters of locations, or one location?

Many problem behaviors in class Many problem behaviors in unstructured settings (hall, playground, parking lot, bathroom)

Many problems in the cafeteria, hallway, common area, class, bathroom. Where is the ‘unknown’ location?

What questions to ask about Referrals by Time  When are the problem behaviors occurring?  How do those times match with the daily activities?  How does this information match up to Referrals by Location?

Most problems are occurring between 9:45- 10:45. Other problematic times are 8-8:45 and 11:30.

Most problems are occurring at noon

Many problems at 12:15, 7:45-8:30, 10:00-10:45

What questions to ask about Referrals by Student  What proportion of students has 0-1 ODR?  What proportion of students has 2-5 ODRs?  What proportion of students has 6+ ODRs?  Do we have systems of support that increase student success?

Student # 121 needs individualized support. 8 students are likely candidates for some type of Tier II support. 87% of our students have received 0-1 ODR

14 students are likely candidates for some type of Tier II support. Student #119 needs individualized support

We have 11 students who are likely candidates for some type of Tier II support 93% of our students have received no more than one ODR

What questions to ask about Referrals by Perceived Motivation  What is perceived as maintaining the problem behavior?  Are there one or more perceptions?

The problem behaviors are most likely maintained by task avoidance and peer avoidance. We have many incidents with unknown motivation

Problem behaviors appear to be maintained by peer and adult attention

Problem behaviors appear to be maintained by escaping adult attention

Using the TIPS Minutes to guide Problem Solving 1. Write the precision problem statement in the left hand column below 2. Define a goal and write it in the right hand column

Using Data to Build Solutions  Prevention: How can we avoid the problem context? Who, When, Where Schedule change, curriculum change, etc  Teaching: How can we define, teach, and monitor what we want? Teach appropriate behavior Use problem behavior as negative example  Recognition: How can we build in systematic reward for desired behavior?  Extinction: How can we prevent problem behavior from being rewarded?  Consequences: What are efficient, consistent consequences for problem behavior?  How will we collect and use data to evaluate (a) implementation fidelity, and (b) impact on student outcomes?

Solution Development Prevention Teaching Reward Extinction Corrective Consequence Data Collection

Trevor Test Middle School 565 students Grades 6,7,8

Trevor Test Middle School Is there a problem? If so, what is it?

Trevor Test Middle School 11/01/2007 through 01/31/2008 (last 3 mos.)

Precise Problem Statement & Hypothesis Development  Many students from all grade levels are engaging in disruption, inappropriate language and harassment in cafeteria and hallway during lunch, and the behavior is maintained by peer attention  A smaller number of students engage in skipping and noncompliance/defiance in classes, (mostly in rooms 13, 14 and 18), and these behaviors appear to be maintained by escape.

Solution Development Prevention Teaching Reward Extinction Corrective Consequence Data Collection

Solution Development: For disruption in hall and cafeteria Prevention *Teach behavioral expectations in cafeteria *Maintain current lunch schedule, but shift classes to balance numbers. Teaching Reward Establish “Friday Five”: Extra 5 min of lunch on Friday for five good days. Extinction Encourage all students to work for “Friday Five”… make reward for problem behavior less likely Corrective Consequence Active supervision, and continued early consequence (ODR) Data Collection Maintain ODR record and supervisor weekly report

Summary  Establish information systems for decision- making… not data systems for reporting.  Use data to identify problems  Use data to clarify/refine problems  Use knowledge of context and content to build solutions.  Use data to monitor impact of solutions.