Beach Modelling: Lessons Learnt from Past Scheme Performance Project: SC110004/S Guidance on approach to beach modelling.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Aged Care Standards and Accreditation Agency Ltd Continuous Improvement in Residential Aged Care.
Advertisements

Page 1 Capability Business Benefit Business Risk KEYBA Capabilities: Benefits V Risks Facilitation of Decision making Getting the right people together.
A2 Unit 4A Geography fieldwork investigation Candidates taking Unit 4A have, in section A, the opportunity to extend an area of the subject content into.
Michelle O’Reilly. Quantitative research is outcomes driven Qualitative research is process driven Please offer up your definitions.
Task Force on National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Tier 3 Approaches, Complex Models or Direct Measurements, in Greenhouse Gas Inventories Report of the.
The Calibration Process
Monitoring Evaluation Impact Assessment Objectives Be able to n explain basic monitoring and evaluation theory in relation to accountability n Identify.
AICT5 – eProject Project Planning for ICT. Process Centre receives Scenario Group Work Scenario on website in October Assessment Window Individual Work.
Introduction to ISO New and modified requirements.
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PLAN REVIEW (SMP2) South Devon and Dorset Coastal Authorities Group SDADCAG.
Slide 1 D2.TCS.CL5.04. Subject Elements This unit comprises five Elements: 1.Define the need for tourism product research 2.Develop the research to be.
Project Evaluation Report (Indigo Project Solutions)
The aim / learning outcome of this module is to understand how to gather and use data effectively to plan the development of recycling and composting.
For ABA Importance of Individual Subjects Enables applied behavior analysts to discover and refine effective interventions for socially significant behaviors.
SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Assessment of Technology Options 1 Naomi Radke, seecon international GmbH.
Forecasting for Water Resources Planning. Learning Objective(s):  The student will:  Understand the need for forecasts.  Be able to describe what a.
URBAN STREAM REHABILITATION. The URBEM Framework.
Organizations of all types and sizes face a range of risks that can affect the achievement of their objectives. Organization's activities Strategic initiatives.
Beach Modelling: Lessons Learnt from Past Scheme Performance Project: SC110004/S Specific Modelling Tools & Techniques.
Consultation on Guidance for (Re)Insurance undertakings on the Head of Actuarial Function Role (CP 103) Presentation to Society of Actuaries in Ireland.
Mitigation, Enhancement and Monitoring Session 9 Health in SEA.
Beach Modelling: Lessons Learnt from Past Scheme Performance Project: SC110004/S Project Summary.
Applied Analytics in Business Plans Lessons learnt during the SRC15 business planning process Robert Murray – Scottish Water Analytics Team Leader – 27th.
New NSW Geography syllabus 7-10
How to show your social value – reporting outcomes & impact
Technical Business Consultancy Project
Forming a Strategy for your Business.
EIA approval process, Management plan and Monitoring
GENDER TOOLS FOR ENERGY PROJECTS Module 2 Unit 2
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 8 – How to Evaluate
Overview – Financial Analysis
Literature review Methods
Scenario 12: Giving instructions
DSS & Warehousing Systems
Our Understanding of Institution/Capacity Building
Tool WE-1: Mathematics in the world of work
The Calibration Process
Unit 5 Management Accounting Aim The overall aim of this unit is to introduce the fundamentals of management accounting which apply to the wider business.
ITPD ISSUE MANAGEMENT PROCESS SEPTEMBER 5, 2008
THE BUSINESS ANALYSIS PROCESS MODEL
Overview – Financial Analysis
Self-Critical Writing:
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 8 – How to Evaluate
This presentation document has been prepared by Vault Intelligence Limited (“Vault") and is intended for off line demonstration, presentation and educational.
Alignment of Part 4B with ISAE 3000
Foundation Degree IT Project
Risk and Decision Making
Introduction to Systems Analysis and Design
Unit 6: Application Development
Understanding Marketing Objectives
AQA GCSE Design & Technology Controlled Assessment Marksheet
URBAN STREAM REHABILITATION
Chapter 13 Quality Management
WJEC GCE Geography Guidance for Teachers: Assessment at AS/A level.
Problem 5: Network Simulation
Role of Internal Auditors in Actuarial Valuations
UAL level 3 Diploma Print & Journalism
Considerations in Development of the SBSTA Five Year Programme of Work on Adaptation Thank Mr. Chairman. Canada appreciates this opportunity to share.
Briefing on EWP assignment
RESEARCH BASICS What is research?.
Why should the public sector want to innovate?
Building Valid, Credible, and Appropriately Detailed Simulation Models
UAL level 3 Diploma Print & Journalism
AICT5 – eProject Project Planning for ICT
FrAmework for Multi-agency Environments
Tool WE-1: World of work tasks in mathematics
Guidelines to translate the intercalibration results into the national classification systems and to derive reference conditions Presented by Wouter.
What to look at in fire engineering analysis
Role of the Internal Verifier
Presentation transcript:

Beach Modelling: Lessons Learnt from Past Scheme Performance Project: SC110004/S Guidance on approach to beach modelling

Guidance - Background  Environment Agency commissioned study  The project examined the behaviour of beaches on eleven sites  Compared actual behaviour with the expected performance from the original modelling and design.  A range of findings have been captured and used to develop guidance for future modelling of schemes  Published 2 nd May  Documents are on the Defra/EA R&D website and GOV.UK Defra/EA R&D website GOV.UK

Guidance - Audience  Guidance is aimed at coastal practitioners and those in commissioning organisations who may not have detailed technical knowledge of beach modelling.  Specifically it identifies points for them to be critically aware of when beach modelling is being contemplated or carried out.  It should also help the reader gain a better understanding of the approach to modelling, decisions that need to be taken along the way and the outputs from it.

Guidance - Contents  Final guidance provided in Beach modelling; lessons learnt from past scheme performance  Contents: –Section 1: Introduction –Section 2: Summary findings –Section 3: Comparative analysis sites –Section 4: Approach to beach modelling –Sections 5 to 9: Specific model tools and techniques detail –Section 10: Waves for beach modelling –Appendix – Comparative analysis summaries

Guidance – How to use it Understand the wider coastal process system and the data available (Section 4.1.2) Identify the Objective(s) of beach modelling in the context of overall beach management objectives (Section 4.1.1) Define ‘the problem’ (Section 4.2.1) Decide the modelling approach (Section 4.2.2, Section and Section 4.2.4) Set up and calibrate the beach model (Section 4.3) Undertake modelling (Sections 5 to 10) Analyse and interpret outputs to inform design (Section 4.4.1, Section 4.4.2, Section and Section 4.5.1) Further use of modelling to support ongoing beach management (Section 4.4.4, Section and Section 4.5.2)

Taking the Right Approach

Taking the right approach What is the objective?  Begin by establishing the ultimate outcome being sought (not just the modelling outcome) and the questions that the modelling needs to try to answer  Commissioning organisations are likely to get more benefit from stating what questions they want answered, rather than specifying what modelling they expect is required.

Taking the right approach What factors will determine the approach?  Important to know the driving factors along that coast, and the key aspects and variables for data inputs, by establishing: 1.the domain in which the problem belongs (long-shore / cross-shore); 2.the time scale and spatial scale in which the problem occurs; 3.which physical processes are important; and, 4.the combination and significance of variables.  Quality and amount of information available is also critical to making the choice.

Taking the right approach Understand potential limitations of different approaches  Uncertainties associated with using models and techniques to predict beach behaviour are inevitable. –Some are quantifiable, some unquantifiable.  Models are sometimes run outside of their range of validity –Need to considering the implications of doing so (degree of certainty in the outputs).  In some circumstances models are just not good enough to represent reality due to limitations or simplifications in the underlying processes represented. –Might still use, but apply a simplified representation only and recognise limitations on outputs

Taking the right approach Choosing the right models?  a range of approaches and tools are available to use in beach design and beach maintenance planning  Different approaches are applicable for different situations – a solution will often involve the use of more than one approach and a healthy dose of expertise in interpretation.  REMEMBER, modelling always produces an approximation of beach responses. Best value may therefore be obtained from relative assessments of alternative scenarios and different schemes rather than absolute outputs.

Undertaking Beach Modelling

Undertaking beach modelling Setting up Beach Models  Input data quality – models generally very sensitive to parameters used.  Important to define input variables at the outset: –Beach material grain size to be modelled –Beach contour(s) and/or profile(s) –Waves and water levels –Structure geometry  Boundary conditions –need to understand any influences from, and impacts on, neighbouring frontages and offshore.

Undertaking beach modelling Assumptions on beach sediment grading  Recognise that the beach model will have theoretical limits on its applicability relating the range of sediment sizes. Models are likely to: –assume that the beach sediment is uniform (e.g. a single D50 value); –assume uniformity in beach sediment cross shore, along shore and at depth; –assume that the threshold of motion is defined by the uniform particle size used; –assume full availability of sediment for transport and derive potential transport, erosion and accretion rather than actual.  Using outside these limits can be necessary and indeed still prove useful, but understand those limitations and use the outputs appropriately

Undertaking beach modelling Model calibration  Undertaken to demonstrate model represents behaviour of existing beach when results compared to actual data.  Problematic when changing the fundamental characteristics of a beach - as many schemes do! –Altering beach material size –Introducing or modifying control structures  Availability of data for calibration used to be an issue but situation improved considerably with monitoring programmes in place.

Sensitivity modelling  Should be used pro-actively to assess potential variations in outcomes to limitations/variability in input parameters  Use to inform selection of the preferred scheme  Sensitivity to certain parameters can produce not just a difference in rate of change, but alter the overall behaviour of that beach. Undertaking beach modelling

Accommodating uncertainty and changes  Adjusting the Design – to account for differences in the site or input conditions between when modelling originally done and implementation actually takes place.  Revisiting Modelling – particularly to assess how to respond to changes in behaviour rather than a trial and error adjustment to management regime.  Scenario Assessment – model different scenarios, e.g. changes in management regime or implementation details, to inform likely response to any such changes.

Understanding Beach Modelling Outputs

Beach modelling outputs – interpretation  Models are only one part of the design toolkit  Suitable expertise should be applied to interpret the results and identify any potential anomalies or spurious results  Certainty is often demanded (and is sometimes offered) – need to be realistic and recognise any limitations in the outputs, which need to be carried through to decisions based upon them.

 Document the approach taken to modelling –ensure others in future can use the outputs appropriately  Highlight limitations in the modelling outputs at the time of design development –convey uncertainties Beach modelling outputs - documenting the approach

Beach modelling outputs – management of the beach  Also document what management has occurred post- scheme to aid understanding of performance compared to pre-scheme predictions.  Information that should be recorded in association with beach management includes: –Date, volumes and locations of material placement. –Dates locations and details of structure modification. –Locations of borrow sites and volumes extracted for recycling.

Summary

 It is the appropriate application and interpretation of beach models that is key to successful scheme design. –Define the problem and the questions that need to be answered by modelling. Engage expertise early to establish how to address these questions. –Don’t overcomplicate. Recognise limitations and capabilities of models - model accordingly and deal with uncertainty appropriately –Maintain an auditable trail from model to design to management –Recognise that models are just part of the toolkit and they do not provide the definitive picture ….. but the outputs from these models are invaluable for the design and management of beach schemes Summary on Approach to Beach Modelling

Beach Modelling: Lessons Learnt from Past Scheme Performance Project: SC110004/S Guidance on approach to beach modelling