Status of the DHCAL Simulation Jan Blaha Laboratoire d'Annecy-le-Vieux de Physique des Particules MicroMegas Physics Meeting LAPP, 16 Mars 2009 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2 Oct 2003 UCL 2nd Year Talk 1 Crosstalk Removal to Improve Muon dE/dX Measurements Leo Jenner, UCL.
Advertisements

NDVCS measurement with BoNuS RTPC M. Osipenko December 2, 2009, CLAS12 Central Detector Collaboration meeting.
5/2/  Online  Offline 5/2/20072  Online  Raw data : within the DAQ monitoring framework  Reconstructed data : with the HLT monitoring framework.
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
HiT – Higgs and Top (Thursday, June 22, 2000) 1.News - Boaz/Meenakshi 2.Trigger Simulator Status – who?? 3.Proposal for a HiT workshop – Meenakshi/Boaz.
GLAST LAT Project Test Beam Meeting, June 6, 2006 S. Funk 1/6 PS Positron Simulations Stefan Funk June 6, 2006.
1/9/2003 UTA-GEM Simulation Report Venkatesh Kaushik 1 Simulation Study of Digital Hadron Calorimeter Using GEM Venkatesh Kaushik* University of Texas.
Micromegas for a DHCAL LAPP, Annecy Catherine Adloff Jan Blaha Sébastien Cap Maximilien Chefdeville Alexandre Dalmaz Cyril Drancourt Ambroise Espagilière.
Using ROOT geometry for FVTX reconstruction Zhengyun You Peking University Los Alamos National Lab Jan 22, 2007.
Computing plans for the post DBD phase Akiya Miyamoto KEK ILD Session ECFA May 2013.
Monte Carlo Comparison of RPCs and Liquid Scintillator R. Ray 5/14/04  RPCs with 1-dimensional readout (generated by RR) and liquid scintillator with.
PHOS calibration in CDB framework M.Bogolyubsky, Y.Kharlov B.Polichtchouk, S.Sadovsky IHEP, Protvino ALICE off-line week 3 October 2005.
26 Jan, MEG Software Status Framework for MEG MC, Unification of LargePrototype/beam test, Schedule and DC reconstruction MEG Software Group.
Framework for Raw Data Thomas Kuhr Offline Week 29/06/2004.
BESIII MC Release notes & planned development Dengzy, Hem, Liuhm, Youzy, Yuany Nov. 23, 2005.
M. Chefdeville LAPP, Annecy, France. Introduction  Motivations for a Digital hadronic calorimeter Count hits instead of measuring energy deposits Reduce.
LOGO Development of the distributed computing system for the MPD at the NICA collider, analytical estimations Mathematical Modeling and Computational Physics.
1 Calorimeter in G4MICE Berkeley 10 Feb 2005 Rikard Sandström Geneva University.
1 Using Jupiter and Satellites Akiya Miyamoto KEK Jan 2006.
5/2/  Online  Offline 5/2/20072  Online  Raw data : within the DAQ monitoring framework  Reconstructed data : with the HLT monitoring framework.
UTA GEM DHCAL Simulation Jae Yu * UTA DoE Site Visit Nov. 13, 2003 (*On behalf of the UTA team; A. Brandt, K. De, S. Habib, V. Kaushik, J. Li, M. Sosebee,
ALICE Offline Week, CERN, Andrea Dainese 1 Primary vertex with TPC-only tracks Andrea Dainese INFN Legnaro Motivation: TPC stand-alone analyses.
05/04/06Predrag Krstonosic - Cambridge True particle flow and performance of recent particle flow algorithms.
Linda R. Coney – 5 November 2009 Online Reconstruction Linda R. Coney 5 November 2009.
John MarshallPandora Development1 J.S. Marshall University of Cambridge.
The MEG Offline Project General Architecture Offline Organization Responsibilities Milestones PSI 2/7/2004Corrado Gatto INFN.
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting U.C. Irvine Monday 21 st August 2006 M. Ellis & A. Bross.
STAR Simulation. Status and plans V. Perevoztchikov Brookhaven National Laboratory,USA.
Overview of EMU Software Rick Wilkinson. Slice Test DAQ We succeeded in using Slice Test DAQ code to take test beam data, combining chamber and trigger.
Pixel Offline Study Jianchun Wang. 2 Data Transfer  Anonymous FTP to fnppd is allowed, but only to limited locations.  Script cp2fnppd FTP files from.
1 SLAC simulation workshop, May 2003 Ties Behnke Mokka and LCDG4 Ties Behnke, DESY and SLAC MOKKA: european (france) developed GEANT4 based simulation.
1 Simulations Purpose of the simulation codes Structure of the E866 simulation codes Issues of simulations for E906 Jen-Chieh Peng University of Illinois.
4 Dec., 2001 Software Week Data flow in the LArG Reconstruction software chain Updated status for various reconstruction algorithm LAr Converters and miscellaneous.
MAUS Status A. Dobbs CM43 29 th October Contents MAUS Overview Infrastructure Geometry and CDB Detector Updates CKOV EMR KL TOF Tracker Global Tracking.
HYDRA Framework. Setup of software environment Setup of software environment Using the documentation Using the documentation How to compile a program.
Status of Sirene Maarten de Jong. What?  Sirene is a program that simulates the detector response to muons and showers  It is based on the formalism.
Monthly video-conference, 18/12/2003 P.Hristov1 Preparation for physics data challenge'04 P.Hristov Alice monthly off-line video-conference December 18,
Physics performance of a DHCAL with various absorber materials Jan BLAHA CALICE Meeting, 16 – 18 Sep. 2009, Lyon, France.
January 2009 offline detector review - 2 nd go 1 ● Offline – Geometry – Material budget – Simulation – Raw data – OCDB parameters – Reconstruction ● Calibration.
IPHC, Strasbourg / GSI, Darmstadt
The MiniBooNE Little Muon Counter Detector
GEANT4 for Future Linear Colliders
SLAC: SiD AHCAL Status and Update Ross McCoy, Andrew Myers, Andy White.
SM Direct Photons meeting
Geant4-based Simulation Status and Plans
Simulation for DayaBay Detectors
Muon stopping target optimization
slicPandora: slic + pandoraPFANew
AliRoot status and PDC’04
ALICE Offline Week, CERN
Analysis framework - status
OO Muon Reconstruction in ATLAS
TPC status - Offline Q&A
Prepared By M. A. Allosh, SVU, Egypt
Study of energy shower profile and 1m3 energy resolution Jan Blaha Laboratoire d'Annecy-le-Vieux de Physique des Particules MicroMegas Physics.
Simulations of the response of the KLOE electromagnetic
Vincenzo Innocente CERN/EP/CMC
Individual Particle Reconstruction
Test Beam Measurements october – november, 2016
Silicon Tracking with GENFIT
Preliminary Results on Non-Projective HCal Simulations
Update on LHCb Level-1 trigger
Jupiter and Satellites
Geant4 in HARP V.Ivanchenko For the HARP Collaboration
MUC simulation and reconstruction
Major Design Criteria Clear separation between “data” and “algorithms”
Geant4 Activities at NICADD / NIU
for the trigger subsystem working group:
BES III Software: Short-term Plan ( )
Presentation transcript:

Status of the DHCAL Simulation Jan Blaha Laboratoire d'Annecy-le-Vieux de Physique des Particules MicroMegas Physics Meeting LAPP, 16 Mars

New detectors 2 Geometries are based on CubNeter2 detector with 80 planes Different absorbers: Steel, Tungstate, Lead: ● CubMeter2_FeAbs ● CubMeter2_WAbs ● CubMeter2_PbAbs Different cell size: CubMeter2_0.5cmRO CubMeter2_2cmRO CubMeter2_4cmRO CubMeter2_8cmRO CubMeter2 with scintillator: CubMeter2Sci_FeAbs CubMeter2Sci_WAbs CubMeter2Sci_PbAbs Directory format: ~$ ls CubMeter2_FeAbs ~$ aida events geom log plots root 17/03/09 J. Blaha

Mass production 3 Automatic mass production works well Data generated for energies: 3, 10, 50, 100, 120, 150, 180, 200 GeV With events/run: 10000, 1000, 1000, 500, 500, 200, 200, 100 events Data storage: How much space can we get and which statistic we need? 17/03/09 J. Blaha

Data analysis 4 Analysis can be run independent of the JAS and results can be stored in root files (interface based on pyROOT written by Peter) → much more efficient and less time consuming Example: 17/03/09 J. Blaha

Charge to DHCal offline software task force 5 17/03/09 J. Blaha 1. Data treatment * What is a reasonable 'calibration and correction' target for DHCal data, which is independent of the technology and of conditional circumstances? Is this level reflected in the current LCIO data model? * What are the general algorithmic steps necessary to reach this level, and are there reasonable technology independent intermediate levels? * What information -beyond hits- needs to be propagated to the level of calibrated information for sensible analysis of the measurements? 2. Simulation * What is a reasonable scheme for data-MC comparison for DHCals? Which are the general steps necessary for MC digitization of the various technologies? 3. Implementation * Identify those processing steps, both for data and simulation handling, which are candidates for common implementation. Propose interfaces between these modules and those which require individual solutions. * Propose a scheme to include non-hit information in the data stream passed to final analysis. * Propose a realistic time line and task sharing for coding of the interfaces and implementation of the common modules. Estimate the human resources needed, and try to identify mile stones.