TFE 3/2/2004 – Fuel retention in JET - J. Bucalossi / T. Loarer Assessment of fuel retention in JET : Contingency – 2 shifts on 6 th of february E. Tsitrone.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

How to do wall conditioning in ITER ? # B tor cycles is limited GDC inefficient in B Drawbacks of ECWC, Taylor Ion cyclotron wall conditioning (ICWC) J.

Advertisements

Th Loarer - SEWG on Fuel retention – JET, July Th Loarer with special thanks to S Brezinsek, J Bucalossi, I Coffey, G Esser, S Gruenhagen.

Joint SEWGs-TFE meeting S. Brezinsek22/07/2008 TF E Impact of N 2 on carbon chemistry in JET S. Brezinsek, Y. Corre and TFE.

V.Philipps, SEWG Gas balance and fuel removal, JET, , Association EURATOM – FZJ Effect of disruptions on fuel release from JET walls V. Philipps,

1E. TsitronePWI TF meeting 17-19/10/2005 Euratom Plasma Wall Interactions : Tore Supra recent results E. Tsitrone for Tore Supra team With special thanks.

TFE Th Loarer – SEWG – 12 September Euratom Th Loarer V Philipps 2, J Bucalossi 1, D Brennan 3, J Brzozowski 4, N Balshaw 3, R Clarke 3, G Esser.

1B. PégouriéDITS progress report 27/04/07 Euratom EXPERIMENTAL CAMPAIGN No reliable estimation of the wall inventory WI ~ ??? D atoms (Tsitrone,

J. Roth, EU PWI TF, SEWG Fuel Retention, Garching, July 19, 2010 Report on: WP10-PWI /IPP/PS Multi machine scaling of fuel retention for ITER Validation.

6 th EU PWI TF Meeting Madrid, Oct Tritium Inventory in ITER: Laboratory data and extrapolation from tokamaks Th Loarer, J Roth, S Brezinsek, A.

Physics Basis of FIRE Next Step Burning Plasma Experiment Charles Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory U.S.-Japan Workshop on Fusion Power Plant.

Trilateral Euregio Cluster Session plan for E Intrinsic hydrocarbon yields and photon efficiencies Motivation Shot list (i) setup pulses (ii) C.

1 DIII-D Edge physics overview A.Leonard for the Plasma Boundary Interface Group Presented at the PFC Meeting UCLA, August 4-6, 2010.

R Felton 1 (22) Session Leader Training November 2010 Plasma Density Control R Felton Session Leader Training November 2010 Torus radius 3.1 m Vacuum vessel.

Y. Sakamoto JAEA Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants and Related Technologies with participations from China and Korea February 26-28, 2013 at Kyoto.

Recent JET Experiments and Science Issues Jim Strachan PPPL Students seminar Feb. 14, 2005 JET is presently world’s largest tokamak, being ½ linear dimension.

1Th LoarerGas balance and fuel retention – IAEA Chengdu – 18 October 2006 TEC Euratom Th Loarer with contributions from C. Brosset 1, J. Bucalossi 1, P.

Valisa et al C-mod Ideas Forum, 8 April Electron heating and Ni / Mo Pump Out L Carraro, I Predebon, ME Puiatti, M Valisa ( Consorzio RFX Padova)

ITPA - IOS st Oct Kyoto E. Joffrin JET programme with the ILW in and relations with the IOS Joint experiments.

ASIPP EAST Overview Of The EAST In Vessel Components Upgraded Presented by Damao Yao.

ASIPP In-time retention evaluation by particle balance analysis on HT-7 Y. YANG*, and HT-7 team Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

ASIPP HT-7/ EAST Overview of PSI activities at ASIPP G. –N. Luo, J. G. Li, and PSI Group Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences P. O.

US ITER UFA Meeting APS-DPP Savannah, GA Ned Sauthoff (presented by Dale Meade) November 15, 2004 US In-kind Contributions and Starting Burning Plasma.

V. A. Soukhanovskii NSTX Team XP Review 31 January 2006 Princeton, NJ Supported by Office of Science Divertor heat flux reduction and detachment in lower.

Discussions and Summary for Session 1 ‘Transport and Confinement in Burning Plasmas’ Yukitoshi MIURA JAERI Naka IEA Large Tokamak Workshop (W60) Burning.

Transport of deuterium - tritium neutrals in ITER divertor M. Z. Tokar and V.Kotov Plasma and neutral gas in ITER divertor will be mixed of deuterium and.

OPERATIONAL SCENARIO of KTM Dokuka V.N., Khayrutdinov R.R. TRINITI, Russia O u t l i n e Goal of the work The DINA code capabilities Formulation of the.

ARIES-AT Physics Overview presented by S.C. Jardin with input from C. Kessel, T. K. Mau, R. Miller, and the ARIES team US/Japan Workshop on Fusion Power.

EAST Data processing of divertor probes on EAST Jun Wang, Jiafeng Chang, Guosheng Xu, Wei Zhang, Tingfeng Ming, Siye Ding Institute of Plasma Physics,

ASIPP Long pulse and high power LHCD plasmas on HT-7 Xu Qiang.

OPERATIONAL SCENARIO of KTM Dokuka V.N., Khayrutdinov R.R. TRINITI, Russia O u t l i n e Goal of the work The DINA code capabilities Formulation of the.

FOM - Institute for Plasma Physics Rijnhuizen Association Euratom-FOM Diagnostics and Control for Burning Plasmas Discussion All of you.

ASIPP In-time retention evaluation by particle balance analysis on HT-7 Y. YANG*, and HT-7 team Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Background Long term tritium retention is one of the most critical issues for ITER during the tritium phase. It is mandatory to evaluate the long term.

1 Th LoarerFuel retention in tokamaks – PSI Conference May - Toledo Euratom Th Loarer with special thanks to N Bekris, S Brezinsek, C Brosset, J.

Behaviour of Runaway Electrons during Injection of High Z Impurities/Gas Puffing in HT-7 S.Sajjad INSTITUTE OF PLASMA PHYSICS,HEFEI CHINA.

ASIPP HT-7 The effect of alleviating the heat load of the first wall by impurity injection The effect of alleviating the heat load of the first wall by.

T Loarer – TFE meeting – 20 February TORE SUPRA Association Euratom-Cea Gas Balance - fuel retention in JET T Loarer, J Bucalossi, D Brennan*, G.

ITER STEADY-STATE OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS A.R. Polevoi for ITER IT and HT contributors ITER-SS 1.

B WEYSSOW 2009 Coordinated research activities under European Fusion Development Agreement (addressing fuelling) Boris Weyssow EFDA-CSU Garching ITPA 2009.

JT-60U -1- Access to High  p (advanced inductive) and Reversed Shear (steady state) plasmas in JT-60U S. Ide for the JT-60 Team Japan Atomic Energy Agency.

ISM Working Group 1 ITPA meeting 24 th March 2010 Modelling of JET, Tore Supra and Asdex Upgrade current ramp-up experiments F. Imbeaux, F. Köchl, D. Hogeweij,

Steady State Discharge Modeling for KSTAR C. Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory US-Korea Workshop - KSTAR Collaborations, 5/19-20/2004.

T. Bolzonella – 9 February 2011 – RFX-mod programme workshop TF1: Physics integration for high performance RFP Proposals and discussion T. Bolzonella,

Dependence of Pedestal Structure on Ip and Bt A. Diallo, R. Maingi, S. Zweben, B.P. LeBlanc, B. Stratton, J. Menard, S. Gerhardt, J. Canick, A. McClean,

Summary of RF Work To Date G. Taylor NSTX Monday Physics Meeting June 21, 2010 NSTX Supported by 1.

NSTX-U Run Planning Guidance for 2015 NSTX-U Research Forum 1 FY2015 (and 2016) research milestones will guide prioritization of eXperimental Proposal.

ContributorsEuratom Associations L. Carraro, M. Mattioli, M.E. Puiatti, P. Scarin, B. Zaniol Consorzio RFX, Padova, Italy P.DuMortier, A. Messiaen, J OngenaEcole.

Advanced Tokamak Modeling for FIRE C. Kessel, PPPL NSO/PAC Meeting, University of Wisconsin, July 10-11, 2001.

ZHENG Guo-yao, FENG Kai-ming, SHENG Guang-zhao 1) Southwestern Institute of Physics, Chengdu Simulation of plasma parameters for HCSB-DEMO by 1.5D plasma.

Click to edit Master title style Preparing JET for T and DT operation 26 th January 2016 George Sips Presented at: PPPL, Princeton, USA.

Page 1 Alberto Loarte- NSTX Research Forum st - 3 rd December 2009  ELM control by RMP is foreseen in ITER to suppress or reduce size of ELM energy.

1 ASTRA simulations of ITER long pulse scenarios V. Leonov ASTRA simulations of ITER long pulse scenarios V. Leonov Kurchatov Institute, Moscow, Russia.

J. Roth: ITPA SOL/DIV, Avila, Jan Prediction of ITER T retention levels with W PFCs J. Roth, and the SEWG Fuel retention of the EU Task Force on.

Dynamic fuel retention and release under ITER like wall conditions in JET V. Philipps 1, T. Loarer 2, M. Freisinger 1, H.G.Esser 1, S. Vartanian 2, U.

Tuomas Tala 1/16 ITPA TC Meeting, Princeton, USA 5 October – 7 October 2009 T. Tala (JET, DIII-D), W. Solomon (DIII-D, JET, NSTX) and S. Kaye, L.F. Delgado-

High-beta Program 3 June 2002 Objective: Investigate effect of toroidal currents on high-b performance: 1. Low-iota: discharges with current ramp and constant.

Achievements of the first year of plasma operation with the

Major aims of IPP-NIFS collaboration on divertor physics

In-time retention evaluation by particle balance analysis on HT-7

Reduction of ELM energy loss by pellet injection for ELM pacing

Fuel Retention Studies with the ITER-like Wall in JET

A.D. Turnbull, R. Buttery, M. Choi, L.L Lao, S. Smith, H. St John

Toroidal asymmetry of impurity seeding

Investigation of triggering mechanisms for internal transport barriers in Alcator C-Mod K. Zhurovich C. Fiore, D. Ernst, P. Bonoli, M. Greenwald, A. Hubbard,

Appreciate to have the opportunity

NTM Stability at Low Collisionality

Integrated Operation of Steady-state Long Pulse H-mode in EAST

SOL plasma in ITER is dense and hot  thick to gas puff as in C-mod

EX/P3-12 Particle balance investigation with the combination of rate equations of hydrogen state and hydrogen barrier model in long duration discharges.

Modelling of Transitions Between L- and H-Mode

Presentation transcript:

TFE 3/2/2004 – Fuel retention in JET - J. Bucalossi / T. Loarer Assessment of fuel retention in JET : Contingency – 2 shifts on 6 th of february E. Tsitrone for J. Bucalossi and T. Loarer Motivation Previous results Pulse configuration

TFE 3/2/2004 – Fuel retention in JET - J. Bucalossi / T. Loarer Motivation : tritium retention in ITER  need for experimental data Code validation : Underestimation of the JET DTE1 T retention by a factor Nb of ITER pulses T inventory (g) ITER predictions : Codeposition dominates T retention : 1 to 4 g of T per 400s pulse ITER in vessel T inventory limit : 360 g of T  100 to 350 pulses G. Federici, Workshop on In Vessel Tritium Inventory, JET, March 2003

TFE 3/2/2004 – Fuel retention in JET - J. Bucalossi / T. Loarer Previous results : H mode long discharges at JET Integrated particle balance : Long term retention : 10 % of injected gas Particle balance during shot : Dynamic retention :  50 % of injected gas (  TS) Medium Gas Puff 16 s of flat top in H mode Ip = 1 MA, 6 MW of NBI Shot 59197

TFE 3/2/2004 – Fuel retention in JET - J. Bucalossi / T. Loarer Assessment of fuel retention in JET TFE C14 - Feb. 6th Early and Late SCs: J. Bucalossi/T. Loarer SLs: G. Matthews/M. Stamp Aim: perform a gas balance with the maximum accuracy Divertor Cryopump regeneration just before and just after the session (+ gas analysis) no NBI (no LHCD) to avoid NBI Box (LHCD) pumping no disruption high D 2 fuelling rate (in feedback control to avoid disruption) maximum pulse rate Calibration : gas injection w/o B field and w/o div cryopump (to calibrate pressure gauges) dry run with gas puff (to check divertor pumping speed) Scenario: 2MA/2.43T, 5-6MW ICRH, 42 MHz dipole, high density (90fr) ref. pulse #61751… (POG/TTE_CLEANUP/1.3), Gas ~ 6 bar.l combined with QMB available data for divertor configuration choice (DOC L/Vertical/Corner/Horizontal target,4 pulse types ?) 40 pulses at 6 bar.l/pulse  ~ 240 bar.l (reasonable for PCD and GB)

TFE 3/2/2004 – Fuel retention in JET - J. Bucalossi / T. Loarer Typical scenario (from TTE clean-up) JPN Plasma Parameters x Electrons / s Gas Injection mbar Pressure Measurements P divertor /P vessel Z Xp (m) Ip (MA) ne (10 19 m -3 ) RF (MW) sub-div vessel NBI (MW)

TFE 3/2/2004 – Fuel retention in JET - J. Bucalossi / T. Loarer t (s) JPN Retention Tentative particle balance (with 2001 calibrations) “Dynamic” D retention Feb 6 th  in-vessel fuel retention ~ (total gas input – PD Regen.)/total gas input