The Medicines Transparency Alliance Saul Walker Senior Policy Advisor, Access to Medicines Health Services Team.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Saul Walker Policy and Research Division, DFID Jordan 4 December, 2007 Medicines Transparency Alliance (MeTA)
Advertisements

Technical cooperation with countries Technical Cooperation for essential drugs and traditional medicines September 2005.
The Rhode Island Chronic Care Sustainability Initiative: Building a Patient-Centered Medical Home Pilot in Rhode Island.
First Evaluation of Good Governance for Medicines Programme Brief Summary of Findings.
Presented to CSO workshops in Kabwe on 18 July 2014, Livingstone on 28 July 2014 and Lusaka on 27 August 2014.
Medicines Transparency Alliance (MeTA) Presented to CSO workshops during 2013 in SOLWEZI AUGUST 27 NDOLA AUGUST 29 LUSAKA OCTOBER 22.
Medicines Transparency Alliance Presented by Deirdre Dimancesco Department of Essential Medicines and Health Products, WHO at the Technical Briefing Seminar.
Strategic Directions for Pharmaceutical Sector Work Andreas Seiter July 2008 First Draft for Review.
Birgit Kerstens 1, Samia Saad 2, Wilbert Bannenberg 1,2 1 Health Research for Action (HERA), Belgium; 2 Medicines Transparency Alliance (MeTA) Pilot, United.
MeTA Jordan Executive Summary Baseline data is an important source for policy makers to diagnose the pharmaceutical and health sector situation in order.
Medicines Transparency Alliance05/09/2015 Medicine Promotion Robert Louie P. So, MD Program Manager DOH - National Center for Pharmaceutical Access and.
A Global Transparency Program for the Construction Sector Christiaan Poortman Chairman, CoST International Advisory Group 7 October, 2010.
Medicines Transparency Alliance13/09/ MeTA Uganda Country Overview Public Sector Private Sector Civil Society.
MULTI-STAKEHOLDER COLLABORATION: CAN IT IMPROVE TRANSPARENCY, DISCLOSURE AND ACCESS TO MEDICINES? EXPERIENCES FROM 7 META PILOT COUNTRIES Wilbert Bannenberg.
Wilbert Bannenberg, Technical Director MeTA International Secretariat IACC 14 Bangkok, 13 November 2010 MeTA multi-stakeholder process – a way to improve.
Wilbert Bannenberg SARPAM
The new EITI Rules (2011 Edition). Background New edition of the EITI Rules agreed on 16 February 2011 Follows extensive consultation process, incorporating.
Medicines Transparency Alliance01/10/2015 Availability of Medicines Anita Wagner Harvard Medical School & WHO Collaborating Center in Pharmaceutical Policy.
Data Disclosure: An Ongoing Progress Towards Transparency Abeer Rabayah B.Sc Pharmacy -MBA /Marketing MeTA National Coordinator.
Medicines Transparency Alliance03/10/ MeTA Zambia Violet Kabwe MeTA Zambia Consultant.
Trade-related policies and access to medicines ICTSD Consultation on trade policy coherence and access to medicines Geneva November 7 th 2006,
The promise of public-private partnerships in health Elizabeth Macgregor-Skinner, Abt Associates June 10, 2011.
Contact Monitoring Regional Network (CMKN). Why procurement It is estimated that an effective public procurement system could save as much as 25% of government.
1 Towards a Medicines Transparency Alliance (MeTA) Richard Laing and Ali Cameron with slides prepared by Michael Borowitz, DfID WHO Technical Briefing.
4 th - 18 November 2011 ICIUM 2011 Conference Antalya, Turkey 16/10/2015.
Samia Saad 1, Birgit Kerstens 2, Wilbert Bannenberg 1,2 1 Medicines Transparency Alliance (MeTA) Pilot, United Kingdom; 2 Health Research for Action (HERA),
VPA Impact Monitoring. an “evidence-based policy cycle” reiterative/adjustable to steer by based on reality checks to show if implementation leads to.
Medicines Transparency Alliance - Zambia Billy Mweetwa Country Medicines Advisor – Zambia.
Slide 1 Win-Win or Lose-Lose? Why is multi-stakeholder involvement essential? Saul Walker Senior Health Advisor UK Department for International Development.
Policy track summary ICIUM 2011 – 18 Nov Policy track topics 1.The pharmaceutical policy process 2.Quality and safety of medicines in LMIC 3.Policy.
Medicines Transparency Alliance27/10/ MeTA Ghana Augustina Koduah (Mrs) Country Coordinator.
MeTA Medicines Transparency Alliance: Under New Management Dr Tim Reed Director, Health Action International (Global) International MeTA Secretariat.
Objective the aim of this project was directly addressing a major health problem for Jordan by producing a guideline as a pilot in which the strengths.
META PHILIPPINES WORKPLAN : EARLY ACCOMPLISHMENTS IN THE PILOT PHASE.
Medicines systems: Convergence for access Dr Socorro Escalante WHO Country Office for Viet Nam 1.
WHO-Technical Briefing Seminar | October-November 2012 Dr Cécile Macé 1 |1 | Good Governance for Medicines Programme Dr Cécile Macé EMP/MPC.
IFMIS RELATED ISSUES in AFRICAN COUNTRIES. List of Anglophone countries currently developing, implementing IFMIS, and/or those in pipeline. Uganda, Tanzania,
Medicines Transparency Alliance Presented by Gilles Forte Department of Essential Medicines and Health Products, WHO On behalf of WHO and HAI Technical.
Medicines Transparency Alliance16/12/2015 Pricing: Observations Nazeem Mohamed Chairman, Uganda Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (UPMA) C.E.O.
Medicines Transparency Alliance18/12/ Country overview MeTA Kyrgyzstan Mariam Djankorozova MeTA Country coordinator.
CoST Construction Sector Transparency Initiative (CoST) Bethan Grillo, CoST international secretariat IACC, 1 November 2008.
Medicines Transparency Alliance31/01/ MeTA Uganda Jacqueline Idusso Secretariat Coordinator.
Ethiopian Team Progress Made in Action Planning and Immediate next steps.
Wilbert Bannenberg & Elodie Brandamir Technical & Operational Directors MeTA International Secretariat MeTA Kyrgyzstan Forum Bishkek, 16 April 2009 Medicines.
Wilbert Bannenberg Technical Director, Intl MeTA Secretariat 28 April 2010, IPC meeting, Copenhagen Medicines Transparency Alliance: improving people’s.
Overview  What is the Global Partnership for Education?  Background on Strategic Plan  GPE’s Proposed Principles and Values  Proposed GPE Strategic.
CDP-GIZ research project – Paris Workshop Gesellschaft für internationale Zusammenarbeit GmbH André Lammerding, Head of Programme International Water Stewardship.
Medicines Transparency Alliance12/06/ MeTA Peru Germán Rojas, Technical Secretary Leda M. Perez, Consultant to MeTA in Peru.
MeTA Phase I: Where are we? MeTA18/06/ MeTA2 The MeTA Phase I Proposal Purpose To pilot a new multi-stakeholder approach towards increasing transparency.
Why does it matter? What do we mean by Open Contracting?
UHC 2030 CSO engagement mechanism Bruno Rivalan IHP+ Northern CSO Representative IHP+ Steering committee 21 th June 2016.
Engaging CSOs in UHC 2030 Bruno Rivalan IHP+ Northern CSO Representative IHP+ Steering committee 21 th June 2016.
Wilbert Bannenberg SARPAM
PFM Reform Programmes Presentation by Mary Betley
Implementing the guideline
WHO Medicines Work in Countries: The Kenya Example
Trade-related policies and access to medicines
Budget Transparency The New Global Toolkit
IMPROVING JSR PRACTICES AT COUNTRY LEVEL: ACHIEVEMENTS AND GAPS
The SWA Collaborative Behaviors
GIFT and IBP Pilot PROJECT on PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Session 3 The monitoring framework
سياسة الإفصاح والشفافية ببنك التنمية الصناعية
The Status of Open Contracting in the Construction Sector in Malawi Presented by Joe Ching’ani-MSG Chairperson, CoST Malawi Construction Sector Transparency.
GLOBAL PREVENTION COALITION
MeTA Philippines Roberto M. Pagdanganan
Why does WWF engage with civil society?
Primary Health Care Improvement Global Stakeholder Meting, Geneva
Karen Ignagni President & CEO America’s Health Insurance Plans
PRSPs and National Information Systems: Challenges and Opportunities
Presentation transcript:

The Medicines Transparency Alliance Saul Walker Senior Policy Advisor, Access to Medicines Health Services Team

Page 2 Pharmaceutical markets Public and private International and local interactions Information asymmetry Manufacturer/(regulator)/purchaser Wholesaler/Retailer Prescriber/(Dispenser)/Patient Lack of information Irrational – unaligned incentives

Page 3 The hypothesis … Transparency Mutual Accountability Efficiency (public/private) Multi-stakeholder disclosure & scrutiny Better policies, improved business practice & stronger implementation Validated Information & Appropriate Disclosure

7 countries committed to work across government, private sector and civil society to disclose data on medicines price, quality, availability and promotion Medicines Transparency Alliance

Page 5 Country Priorities Commit to disclosure and multi- stakeholder approach Must include CSOs and private sector Decide where to locate secretariat and stakeholder group Agree priority areas and work plan Guidance on disclosure from International Secretariat Methodologies and technical support

Page 6 The Pilot New validated data on pharmaceutical sector Disclosure of data and scrutiny by multi- stakeholder group Development of policy options Policy change and implementation Changes in drug prices, availability, quality and/or promotion Improved information for management Improved processes. New validated data on pharmaceutical sector New validated data on pharmaceutical sector Disclosure of data and scrutiny by multi- stakeholder group Development of policy options Policy change and implementation Changes in drug prices, availability, quality and/or promotion Changes in drug prices, availability, quality and/or promotion Improved information for management Improved processes. Pilot ££, toolkit & technical support Policy research, shared learning Sector plans, domestic and CPs

Page 7 Priorities chosen by countries

Page 8 Data disclosure (in addition to baseline) Pricing (Peru and Uganda) Availability and promotion (Jordan and Zambia); Transparency and accountability (Philippines - GGM) Quality (Kyrgyzstan and Ghana); Health insurance data mining (Ghana) RUM (Uganda and Jordan)

Page 9 Progress and Next Steps All countries have agreed work plans – took longer than we expected Implementation now underway – focus on newly disclosing & using information Baseline surveys underway Sector scan, availability, multi-stakeholder working – significant new data resources Process evaluation 1Q10 – inform decisions and design for post-pilot

Page 10 Questions Disclosure – what, when and to whom? Multi-stakeholder approach or multi- stakeholder analysis? Catalysing support from others? Adding value or adding confusion?

Page 11