20/07/2005 1 Marzio Nessi Agenda For NIKHEF plans for the ATLAS Upgrade. NIKHEF ATLAS upgrade plans and organization DL/NH Potential.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An updated Baseline Design for MICE From proposal to technical reference Paul Drumm, Dec 2003.
Advertisements

Trigger and online software Simon George & Reiner Hauser T/DAQ Phase 1 IDR.
Role of Management and Technical Coordination
ATLAS POH.P, G.D12/5/2009 IBL Update H. Pernegger, G. Darbo (PO 12/5/09) Organization and WG coordinator Schedule Decision Items Organization Tools & Meetings.
12 Dec 2005 J. Schukraft1 ALICE USA ALICE position towards US participation EU participation in emcal Requirements Formal steps & schedule.
Electrical Integration WBS Eric J. Mannel Columbia University Electronics Project Engineer VTX and FVTX.
D. Lissauer, BNL. 1 ATLAS ID Upgrade Scope R&D Plans for ATLAS Tracker First thoughts on Schedule and Cost.
NCSX Management Overview Hutch Neilson, NCSX Project Manager NCSX Conceptual Design Review Princeton, NJ May 23, 2002.
ATTRACT is a proposal for an EU-funded R&D programme as part of H2020 for sensor, imaging and related computing (ICT) development Its purpose is to demonstrate.
M. Gilchriese ATLAS Upgrade Introduction January 2008.
Hydrogen system R&D. R&D programme – general points Hydrogen absorber system incorporates 2 novel aspects Hydrogen storage using a hydride bed Hydrogen.
09/03/2010 ADO-PO section meeting Beam Pipe Extraction/Insertion R. Vuillermet.
CERN, Main challenges for the ATLAS upgrade project in the coming year.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Hall 180 Cryogenic test facility: Project management: Project Change Request, EVM and Interface Sheet L. Serio.
Muon trigger upgrades, missing since not aimed towards DOE funding PHENIX upgrades: view presented to DOE R&D $3.5M Construction $16.6M Au-Au p-p 200 Si-Si.
24-Aug-11 ILCSC -Mumbai Global Design Effort 1 ILC: Future after 2012 preserving GDE assets post-TDR pre-construction program.
Santa Cruz Meeting August 12 th 2008 Layout options & Schedule Issues David Lissauer 8/12/2008 1David Lissuaer, Santa Cruz Meeting.
Review of the operation scenarios and required manning of the activities P. Schnizer and L. Serio.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
IBL - Opening G. Darbo - INFN / Genova AW, 25 February 2009 o IBL Introduction & Project Organization ATLAS Upgrade Week CERN, 25 February 2009 Session:
UCSC August 12, 2008 U.S. Upgrade R&D Meeting: Strip Detector  Seiden.
CLIC Workshop, CERN 1 CLIC/ILC Collaboration Report: Marc Ross (Fermilab); for Nick Walker, Akira Yamamoto Project Managers International Linear.
Detector Cooling CERN, September 28, 2006 Jaak Lippmaa HIP, University of Helsinki.
1 Global Design Effort: Controls & LLRF Controls & LLRF Working Group: Tuesday Session (29 May 07) John Carwardine Kay Rehlich.
Project Organization Chart Roles & Responsibilities Matrix Add Project Name.
R. Boyd 1 February  Dr. M. Saleem  D. Jana  M. R. Meera Labbai  R. Boyd.
Few ideas for the future of the collaboration I.laktineh.
1 Future Circular Collider Study Preparatory Collaboration Board Meeting September 2014 R-D Heuer Global Future Circular Collider (FCC) Study Goals and.
Overview of DT group activities in LHCb LHCb CERN team retreat, Les Houches Burkhard Schmidt, PH-DT January 13, 2016.
TC Straw man for ATLAS ID for SLHC This layout is a result of the discussions in the GENOA ID upgrade workshop. Aim is to evolve this to include list of.
Common R&D projects for the LHC upgrade and plans for irradiation facilities Outline: PH common R&D projects Working Group on future irradiation facilities.
Introdcution to Workpackage/Activity Reflection D. Schulte.
Upgrade PO M. Tyndel, MIWG Review plans p1 Nov 1 st, CERN Module integration Review – Decision process  Information will be gathered for each concept.
Argonne’s Rôle in ZEUS José Repond Argonne National Laboratory DOE Visit, Germantown, March 11 th, 2004.
Proton-Driven Plasma Wakefield Acceleration CERN Project Structure Edda Gschwendtner, CERN Lisbon Meeting, 22 June 2012Edda Gschwendtner, CERN2.
Follow-Ups and Project Structure R2E Meeting September 8th Project / Study Group / RadWG R2E Mitigation Project:  Responsible of development and implementation.
Summary of IAPP scientific activities into 4 years P. Giannetti INFN of Pisa.
Straw man layout for ATLAS ID for SLHC
ITIL: Service Transition
SCT Project Management Issues
Organization and Goals for the Workshop
Detector building Notes of our discussion
ADO-PO section meeting. ADO : Atlas Detector Operation
TC activities.
Completion and Pre-Exploitation Costs for the Initial ATLAS Detector
Some input to the discussion for the design requirements of the GridPixel Tracker and L1thack trigger. Here are some thoughts about possible detector layout.
TDAQ Phase-II kick-off CERN background information
Financing of LHC projects and CMS
June 22, 2017 Burkhard Schmidt for the DT coordination team
CERN R&D plans and Infrastructures
White Paper Theme 3 - WP7 Facilities & component analysis for detector r&d WP7 Meeting #1 Mar CAPEANS CERN PH-DT.
HCAL M&O-B Budget CMS Finance Board
CMS November Upgrade Week
Third Workshop on GEMs for CMS
for the transition region on behalf of the RPC upgrade group
EOB Methodology Overview
Upgrade Strategy for the Experimental Vacuum Systems
EU Institution Board 1 representative of each participating institute
Francesco Forti University and INFN, Pisa
The DBD: Outline and Scope
Project Organization Chart Roles & Responsibilities Matrix
Preparations for a Lehman Review
Benoît DAUDIN (GS-AIS-PM – CERN) 22-March-2012
Update on ATLAS insertable B-layer
A High Intensity Neutrino Oscillation Facility in Europe
Preliminary Project Execution Plan
Executive Project Kickoff
Detector Proto-Technical board Sep 30, 2010
Information system analysis and design
Presentation transcript:

20/07/ Marzio Nessi Agenda For NIKHEF plans for the ATLAS Upgrade. NIKHEF ATLAS upgrade plans and organization DL/NH Potential NIKHEF involvement in the ATLAS upgrade.  What are the plans? Interest? Time line etc. NIKHEF contribution to the Upgrade PO effort.  NeedsDL  Potential ContributionsNIKHEF  Combine Upgrade and Maintenance/OperationSS/DL NIKHEF contributions to general R&D  Updating Activity Matrix – Road to WBS, Schedule  People who might play Key Roles

20/07/2005 David Lissauer ATLAS Technical Coordination ATLAS Project Office ATLAS Upgrade Project Office Organization

20/07/ Marzio Nessi PO organization The Organization of the ATLAS Upgrade is given in: The project office is part of TCn. The PO reports to TC/TMB and the Upgrade Steering Group. (EB when needed) The ATLAS management will define the concept of R&D resources, deliverables, Upgrade common funds etc. in the overall ATLAS concept. The ATLAS resource coordinator, TC and ATLAS Stockperson (s) with the Upgrade PO will develop the MOU for the deliverables of the Upgrade. The PO should have a small core of people to coordinate the effort and will rely on existing TC staff and functions. (i.e. No duplications) A large fraction of the effort will have to come from the collaboration – probably from major labs and universities.

20/07/ Marzio Nessi Project Office - functions  Overall planning (schedule and follow-up office)  Develop and maintain for each upgrade project Schedule.  Ensure that the schedules are coordinated.  Review process  Regular reviews of the upgrade R&D project  Configuration control:  Maintain layout drawings.  Maintain a 3D model of the experiment  ECR’s  Envelope checks – configuration control  Safety organization: deals with materials,structures certification etc.  Maintain existing ATLAS facilities at CERN : (for example SR1), in term of infrastructures and services that will be needed for the upgrade.  Radiation, activation compliance with INB regulation: Access, removal of active components, zoning inside the cavern and traceability

20/07/ Marzio Nessi Project Office functions  Integration:  R&D and construct all major support structure  Construct Installation and access structures.  redesign all services layout, their routing and installation strategies  installation scenario of the detector components and services  Coordinate the R&D and implementation of the next generation of cooling plants  Be a true technical point of contact for the upgrade and facilitate technical collaboration and distributed responsibility within the Collaboration  A forum for technical and engineering discussions of all possible upgrades projects and their interaction with the existing detector. (Complimentary and in coordination with physics simulations)  Layout studies  R&D Monitoring

20/07/ Marzio Nessi R&D Organization “ Directed” / ”Coordinated” R&D: R&D be applicable to the ATLAS upgrade plans. (NOT Generic R&D.) As the number of options are reduced -support for dropped options R&D will be terminated in an orderly fashion. Use the R&D period to foster collaboration and avoid as much as possible “shoot outs”. The PO will take an active part in coordinating and reviewing the R&D proposals. Review Office Identify Person (persons) to lead the review office.  Mechanical/Layout,  Electronics. A review board that will follow the project from the start.

20/07/ Marzio Nessi R&D Program A list of possible R&D programs have been identified in the Activity Matrix. Located Identify the “directed” R&D that are needs to be driven by the PO with the help of the review board /steering group. E.g.  Cooling  Beam Pipes  Gases – ageing studies. (Muons)  Service Integration  Experiment Layouts  Radiation facility Identify items that R&D that are not covered and initiate R&D. R&D scope is large. Has overlap with present detector optimization and long term survival.

20/07/ Marzio Nessi ATLAS Upgrade Resources R&D Support will have to come mainly from the collaboration.  We are starting to discuss with the collaboration contributions to the PO in term of manpower both physicists and Engineers.  E.g.. We need to find solutions to the ATLAS drawing office – so that it can continue to function after the end of the construction.  Identify designers/Engineers who can work on the layout outside CERN.  Planning officer to help in the Schedule and monitoring of the progress.  Identify people who can coordinate the infrastructure related R&D.  We need to emphasize that the resources for the PO and R&D program will have to come from outside CERN if the Upgrade is to succeed!!!

20/07/ Marzio Nessi Activity Matrix – Level II WBS Activity Matrix developed by the Upgrade Steering group.

20/07/ Marzio Nessi Activity Matrix - ID An example is the ID development. Aim to keep Coherent – not to split too early to Pixel, SS, LS Common solutions!

20/07/ Marzio Nessi Activity Matrix – Integration Exp. Support A lesson from ATLAS – Start on integration issues and global optimization EARLY!!!

20/07/ Marzio Nessi Development of a WBS & Schedule Development of a baseline schedule that can be used as input for the R&D is one of the first items on the agenda At the same time the WBS will be updated. Each deliverable will have:  R&D  Prototypes  Constructions  Integration/Installation (In to the next level)  Installation in ATLAS Challenge to make all of this consistent.

20/07/ Marzio Nessi Cost and Resources Once the WBS and Schedule are progressed we will need to get a cost and develop an upgrade construction model. Expect that it will follow the ATLAS construction model. i.e. Deliverables will be assigned and MOU written. As the cost estimate and resources are still not very well known - ATLAS management, Contact Physicists and funding agencies will have to be involved to make sure that we are staying within reality.

20/07/ Marzio Nessi Review Office A priority for us is to identify a senior physicist who can help in organizing the Review Office. The function of the review office will be to follow the project from the R&D stage to the installation. At the R&D stage the functions will include to review ALL the R&D proposals from submission and follow their progress with regular formal and informal reviews. A critical issue will be the stage at which we discontinue approved R&D project and merging it into a coherent effort. The Review office should have a “standing” review committee who will help in following this effort. At a later stage deputies for electronics/mechanics are envisioned. The Review Office Leader will be part of the Upgrade Steering group.

20/07/ Marzio Nessi Layout Coordinator A layout to coordinate the effort between the engineering effort, R&D efforts, physics and the community. Senior Physicist who is aware of the R&D scope Work with the Simulation group and help in defining the priority for the simulation studies needed. The POL, Review Office and the Layout coordinator will be involved in forcing the convergence of the layout.

20/07/ Marzio Nessi Resources for PO As was mentioned before the manpower for the PO will have to come from the collaboration at large. Preferably from people outside CERN. Key positions will have to be filled by people who are familiar with ATLAS. Expect that a significant amount of effort will be shared between ATLAS upgrade and ATLAS maintenance and Operation. This will be true for both people at CERN and to the experts within the collaborating institutions.  E.g. Some of the people developing the electronics are going to be the “experts” we need for ATLAS running

20/07/ Marzio Nessi Additional manpower - Expertise I Cost and Schedule (Phys./Eng.):  Schedule/WBS/Cost: We need a few people who can help in the development a WBS structure/Schedule and Cost.  Plan to develop calorimeter, ID, Muon and Trigger sch. all in parallel and than merged into the master schedule.  At the same time we need to develop the methodology and cost estimate. Review Officer (Senior Phys) Standing Review Pool of experts:  Mix of Physicists and Engineers  Pool of electronics expert  Pool of Mechanical/System experts Layout Coordinator (Senior Phys.)

20/07/ Marzio Nessi Additional manpower Expertise II Installation Engineers:  Mechanical Installation studies.  Access and Installation tooling. Services  Layout of Services & Optimization  Cables & Connectors Configuration Control  ATLAS is moving to CATIA and we need experts who can help in the transformation of the EUCLID model to CATIA.  Help in monitor the envelopes of new proposals. Mechanical Layout and Calculations:  To work closely with the Layout people. Worry more on interface issues.

20/07/ Marzio Nessi Radiation Studies A program to understand the Radiation levels at SLHC is needed:  This work is coupled to monitoring the radiation levels n ATLAS.  Develop plans for upgrading shielding for Muons and possible improvements in the calorimeter electronics readout and ID regions.  Material Qualifications (Including Gas)  Some of this work has to be done in close collaboration with the people developing specific systems.

20/07/ Marzio Nessi e.g. R&D Issues: Cooling Studies Thermal Control and Modeling  Understand the overall cooling and thermal control in the experiment.  Stringent specifications exists for the absolute temperature from the RPC and local temperature gradient from the MDT.  Understand in detail the Thermal conditions in ATLAS  Develop plans for improvements  Cooling plants etc.  Work in close collaboration with the individual system cooling proposals. The model thus is to try and:  Share expertise between R&D and M&O.  Share expertise and people between PO and M&O.