BLACK - GROUP. Step 1 subscribe on VoiceThread Step 2 accept the invitation sent by Professor Elenise to participate in Forum Step 3 Listening and reading.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Christopher Graham Garnet Education UK. I dont do rhetorical questions !
Advertisements

How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School John D. Bransford, Ann L. Brown, and Rodney R. Cocking, editors.
Using Wikispaces for Collaborative Knowledge Construction in a Masters-Level Course Cheryl A. Stevens, Professor Recreation & Leisure Studies College of.
Engaging Students in Online Discussion
Department of Mathematics and Science
Assessment Professional Learning Module 4: Assessment AS Learning.
Team Task Choose 1 Progression to READ: Number and Operations--Fractions Ratios and Proportional Relationships Develop “Content” Knowledge.
Checking For Understanding
Implementing RtI 2 Douglas Fisher
Looking at Texts from a Reader’s Point of View
LECTURER OF THE 2010 FIRST-YEAR STUDENT: How can the lecturer help? February 2010.
Copyright © 2008 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Innovative Schools toolkit Strategic Workshop 3 - Exploring good practice case studies.
Socratic Seminars The Power of Questions. What is Socratic Seminar A teaching strategy to encourage students to engage in critical thinking, listening,
T 7.0 Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Central concepts:  Questioning stimulates and guides inquiry  Teachers use.
SOCRATIC SEMINARS An Inquiry Strategy. Socratic Seminar Vision  Socrates believed that enabling students to think for themselves was more important than.
The Socratic Seminar: A Student-Centered Approach to Inquiry-Based Discussion Elizabeth Smith English Language Fellow.
Copyright © 2009 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
The Socratic Seminar 1. Socrates Socrates was a famous Greek philosopher. His focus was the development of the human character. His method of teaching.
Inquiry-based Learning Linking Teaching with Learning.
A grassroots demonstration by Nokwanda Mbusi. Features  A method of communication with students.  Allows interaction between lecturer and students and.
1 This resource contains example(s) of linking theory, research policy, and practice in Education-related disciplines. Follow the steps below to customise.
Copyright © 2009 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
“THE UNEXAMINED LIFE IS NOT WORTH LIVING…”
BECOMING CRITICAL THINKERS: Four strategies to use in the classroom.
AVID Program Advancement Via Individual Determination [L. avidus]: eager for knowledge.
Identifying Assessments
Socratic Seminar. What is a Socratic Seminar? In a Socratic Seminar participants seek deeper understanding of complex ideas through thoughtful dialogue.
Globalization An Inevitable Curse or a Blessing in Disguise? Karen, Brea, Sophie, Phil and Maurice.
Making the Web Work for You: Blogging HCPS What is blogging? Blogs or Web Logs are one of the most widely used Web 2.0 tools. A blog can be described.
Copyright © 2009 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
Common Core.  Find your group assignment.  As a group, read over the descriptors for mastery of this standard. (The writing standards apply to more.
1 Assessment Professional Learning Module 4: Assessment AS Learning.
thinking is not driven by answers but by questions
King’s College London Pre-Sessional Programme
Thinking with Technology Course Module 9
The Learner Centered Classroom
Developing Thinking Thinking Skills for 21st century learners
Literacy: AVID Writing PD
Why bother – is this not the English Department’s job?
Reading Between the Lines
Making thinking Visible
Deliberate Practice PGP
Microsoft in Education Virtual Forum- Latin America & Caribbean
Foundation of Socratic Seminars
2007 AP Synthesis—MakinG the sources talk to each other
Socratic Seminars.
“THE UNEXAMINED LIFE IS NOT WORTH LIVING…”
Socratic Seminar This PowerPoint is meant to be used with either teachers or students schoolwide to assist in implementing Socratic Seminar. It is written.
Where questions, not answers, are the driving force in thinking.
Socratic Seminar By participating in
Intro to Socratic Seminars
Lesson 13 I can participate in collaborative discussion and support my analysis of a text with evidence.
Socratic Seminar *I can balance listening with speaking.
The Socratic Seminar.
LANGUAGE TEACHING MODELS
Small Group Discussions
“THE UNEXAMINED LIFE IS NOT WORTH LIVING…”
Expectations for a successful discussion
Thursday Seminars Guidelines & Grades.
6th Grade Unit 4 Spread of Culture and Religion
SUBSTITUTION 6th Grade Unit 2
[Type The Title Of The Persuasive Speech Here]
Philosophical Chairs.
The Assessing Cycle Module 1 Assessment Assessment Accountability Data
“Let Your Students Be Heard”
Socratic Seminars.
Evaluation Measures, Ongoing Improvements and Enhancement
The resources for this candidate support has been created and provided by CERRA utilizing materials from the National Board of Professional Teaching Standards.
Presentation transcript:

BLACK - GROUP

Step 1 subscribe on VoiceThread Step 2 accept the invitation sent by Professor Elenise to participate in Forum Step 3 Listening and reading comments from colleagues Step 4 record and write their comments and responses Step 5-produce a slide with the main arguments used by his group Step 6 evaluate the performance of a colleague from another group (each assesses a person) Tool of collaborative learning activity- Voice Thread Rules for students to use Voice Thread

Screen – first – VOICE THREAD Project in development

Shared link for divulgation

Clarifications for all 1 Your position for or against the claim of the author is an exercise in argumentation and debate. The groups were randomly assembled and you should "wear" the shirt of the group, even if in their hearts, do not accept that position. 2 Try using arguments and evidence to help colleagues in the other group to understand their reasoning and even change their minds. Try! Will be very productive. 3 Use the Socratic questions to ask the colleague of another group and try to encourage as much as possible the most elaborate and justify the position of colleague on the subject answers 4 Use socratic questions in any order and time 5-Choose one of the peers to review and send in your Moodle assessment as the rubric or criteria below. Rules for students to use Voice Thread

Example the argument for group 1: Group 1: against the author's statement Argument: I believe that the work of the tutor is not isolated, instead, he shares with students and with the teacher throughout the process of construction of new knowledge and concepts. Example the argument for group 2 Group 2 in favor of the author's statement Counter-argument: But in practice, tutors often do not receive teacher feedback necessary and timely to clarify some time. Thus, it must alone to respond to the student. Rules for students to use Voice Thread

Theme of discussion: Labor of teacher and tutor or facilitator and teacher The author's statement Viana Neves to be considered in this first moment of the debate is: "In this painting there is still debate about what being a teacher and tutor in distance education. These two categories of professionals clearly demonstrate the fragmented work process in this mode, with huge similarity to taylor-Fordist model, and that brings in the post modern discourse shape the conceptual ideas of autonomy, decision making, teamwork and flexible work through technologies, which in reality little is configured in the specific activity of the virtual teaching, since there is a fragmentation of work, with virtually no autonomy of the tutor, and isolated work. " acess: QuartaTema3Artigo7.pdf

Rules of discussion The discussion of the subject should happen in Voice from the invitation sent to all students (yellow tulips) Follow the prompts to post your comment in spoken Forum: 1 file in Yellow Tulips, between the slide 5- Dynamics debate- and record their first participation positioning themselves for or against the statement of the author of the text base 2 everyone should leave recorded its position and listen to the message of other colleagues, your group and the group "adversary." To listen to the message, enter the colleague's profile (click on the figures located around the slide 5) 3 to make a replica and argue more with colleague in the other group, go to slide 6 If you record again on slide 5, your previous message is deleted Obs. Space (MyVoice) allows you to do special tests, or to discuss with your group the arguments to be used in the debate against the other group. For everyone to see your test remember to send an invite and share..

Evaluation discussion for peer and facilitator evaluation criteria: 1-quality of Answers to questions and organization of arguments 2-Knowledge and familiarity with the topic and confidence in the answers 3-critical positioning 4-Vocabulary appropriate responses ratter/scale: Likert (excelent, good, regular, failing, very failing) Rules for students to use Voice Thread