Robust Process to Establish Validity and Reliability Developing Materials to Assess Process Skills in an Active Learning Classroom Suzanne M. Ruder 1,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Advertisements

SENIOR SEMINARS Specifics & Example Performances CEPR Center for Educational Policy Research.
Teaching Methods Related to Student Progress in Lower-level STEM Courses Steve Benton, Ph.D. Senior Research Officer IDEA Emeritus Professor, Kansas State.
Maria Teresa M. Capiral Lubang Integrated School Lubang, Occ. Mindoro on.
NETS Meets Common Core Teresa Knapp Gordon, NBCT
CHAPTER 3 ~~~~~ INFORMAL ASSESSMENT: SELECTING, SCORING, REPORTING.
Using Peer Tutors to Support Learning Focus on Teaching and Technology Conference November 1-2, 2007 Co-presenters: Keith Stine, Department of Chemistry.
PPA Advisory Board Meeting, May 12, 2006 Assessment Summary.
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS AND READING K-5 Curriculum Overview.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Educator Effectiveness Academy STEM Follow-Up Webinar December 2011.
Comp 20 - Training & Instructional Design Unit 6 - Assessment This material was developed by Columbia University, funded by the Department of Health and.
Introducing the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS)
Communication & Collaboration Communicate Clearly  Articulate thoughts and ideas effectively using oral, written and nonverbal communication skills in.
Source : The Problem Learning and innovation skills increasingly are being recognized as the skills that separate students who are.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
Science Notebooks Research-Based Strategies on how to implement them in today's science classroom by Karen Shepherd.
Relationships in the 21 st Century Parent Teachers Students Association (PTSA) Goals, Membership, Participation.
Adjunct Faculty (New/Returning) August 11, 2011 Yuba College Jan Ponticelli, Ph.D.
Introduction to Supporting Science. What Does Science Involve? Identifying a question to investigate Forming hypotheses Collecting data Interpreting data.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
1 Embracing Math Standards: Our Journey and Beyond 2008.
Making an Excellent School More Excellent: Weston High School’s 21st Century Learning Expectations and Goals
Common Core.  Find your group assignment.  As a group, read over the descriptors for mastery of this standard. (The writing standards apply to more.
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
National Educational Technology Standards For Students.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Principal’s Coffee Weston High School’s 21st Century Learning Expectations.
8/23/ th ACS National Meeting, Boston, MA POGIL as a model for general education in chemistry Scott E. Van Bramer Widener University.
Standard One: Engaging & Supporting All Students in Learning
Module 1: Overview of the Framework for K–12 Science Education
CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study
Center for Assessment and Improvement of Learning
What Is This Intentional Learning Thing?
Heidi Manning, Susan Larson and Bethany Leraas
INTRODUCTION TO THE ELPAC
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
D2L Refresher Upload content into the Content section in a D2L course
M-LANG project  Ref. n NO01-KA Interactive Exchange Workshop on how to use response systems and ICT tools for creating interactive learning.
Lakeland Middle School Professional Learning Communities (PLC)
TEACHING MATHEMATICS Through Problem Solving
MODULE 2 – UNDERSTANDING LEADERSHIP
Using Technology to Help Students Develop Science Skills
ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING
General Education Distribution
Project-Based Learning
Understanding by Design
Parent Involvement Committee EQAO Presentation
21st Century Skills The 4 C’s
Assessment Directors WebEx March 29, :00-3:00 pm ET
Meet the Teacher Information Session
Discovery Presentations
COMMUNICATOR Applies effective reading skills to acquire knowledge and broaden perspectives Employs active listening strategies to advance understanding.
Student Assessment and Evaluation
Adapt – Adopt Module 7 Activity Overview Approximate Time: ___ minutes
Spatial STEM - C Evaluation of a Model Spatial Thinking Curriculum for Building Computational Skills in Elementary Grades K-5 A collaboratvive project.
A Research Companion to Principles and Standards
Engineering Science Program School of Engineering Technology Fall 2015 Assessment Report
Comparison of Learning Paradigms: Learner-Centered vs
Jeanie Behrend, FAST Coordinator Janine Quisenberry, FAST Assistant
Industrial Technology Management Program Canino School of Engineering Technology Fall 2015 Assessment Report Curriculum Coordinator: Eric Y. Cheng Date.
Curriculum Coordinator: Kathleen Mahoney
Student Assessment and Evaluation
Engaged Plenary Patricia McGee.
Curriculum Coordinator: Janet Parcell Mitchell January 2016
Approaches to Learning (ATL)
NextGen STEM Teacher Preparation in WA State
Curriculum Coordinator: Patrick LaPierre February 3, 2017
We Have a Mission, a Goal and Objectives… What’s Next?
Connecting NGSS to independent research September 21, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Robust Process to Establish Validity and Reliability Developing Materials to Assess Process Skills in an Active Learning Classroom Suzanne M. Ruder 1, Renee S. Cole 2 and Juliette Lantz 3 1 Virginia Commonwealth University, 2 University of Iowa, 3 Drew University Targeted Process Skills and Definitions Rubric Design Process - an Iterative Approach ELIPSS Strategy for Cohesive Development Student Interaction RubricsELIPSS Project Overview ELIPSS Project Team Primary Collaboration Team Chris Bauer, Chemistry Teresa Bixby, Chemistry Patrick Brown, Biology Caryl Fish, Chemistry/Environ. Jill Guerra, Math Stanley Lo, Biology Chris Mayfield, Computer Science Eunice Yang, Engineering Graduate Students Jennifer Schmidt-McCormack Gilbert Reynders Student Product Rubrics Workshops Student Interaction Rubrics Student Product Rubrics Implementation Guide Do rubric descriptors look appropriate? Face Validity Does rubric measure what it is intended to measure? Construct Validity Can different people use rubric to get consistent results? Reliability Can rubric be used in multiple disciplines, environments, and student populations? Generalizability Can the rubric be used effectively by instructors and students? Utility Problem Solving Critical Thinking Information Processing Written Communication Assessment Metacognition IUSE Collaborative grant: # # # Interested in using the rubrics go to: Look for future website at ELIPSS.com Process skills are frequently cited as critical components of a successful education. Assessing process skill development and providing feedback to students and instructors is a key component for enhancing these skills in STEM programs. This project involves the development of resources to provide feedback to students, and to inform instructors as to the effectiveness of their instructional strategies in supporting process skill development. This feedback may ultimately result in increasing adoption of evidence-based pedagogical strategies that foster process skill development. Summary Refinement of process skill definitions aided in development of rubrics that are applicable to a broad STEM audience Primary Collaboration Team assembled for continuing rubric testing for reliability, validity and utility Materials Developed: Student interaction rubrics (4 + 2 drafts) Student product rubrics (1 + 2 drafts) Workshop piloted – “Enhancing Learning by Assessing Process Skills: Group Interaction Rubrics” Student Product Rubrics Student Interaction Rubrics IP PS IP PS CT OC M TW VALIDITY RELIABILITY UTILITY Appropriate Tasks CT Generate “anchor” examples Construct preliminary rubric SkillDefinition A Assessment (Self & Peer) Gathering information and reflecting on experiences to improve subsequent learning and performance. OC WC Communication Oral - Exchanging information and understanding through speaking, listening and non-verbal behaviors. Written - Conveying information and understanding to an intended audience through written materials (paper, electronic, etc.) CTCritical Thinking Analyzing, evaluating or synthesizing relevant information to form an argument or reach a conclusion supported with evidence. IP Information Processing Evaluating, interpreting, manipulating or transforming information MManagement Planning, organizing, directing and coordinating one’s own and others’ efforts to accomplish a goal. MCMetacognition Thinking/reflecting about one’s thinking and how one learns, and being aware of one’s knowledge. PSProblem Solving Identifying, planning and executing a strategy that goes beyond routine action to find a solution to a situation or question. TWTeamwork Interacting with others and building on each other’s individual strengths and skills, working towards a common goal. Tested with STEM faculty in: Biology Chemistry Computer Science Engineering Environmental Science Mathematics Designed to use on student written work (projects, quizzes, exams, lab reports) to assess process skills. Designed to use during group work in the classroom, to observe process skills in action. Data currently being gathered at 11 institutions. Enhancing Learning by Improving Process Skills in STEM