January 27, 2016.  DU’s 2 nd Annual Teaching and Learning Week Teaching for Impact: Conversations about Learning February 8-12, 2016 otl.du.edu.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tuning through Collaboration English Language Arts and Mathematics Model Curriculum Writing Team July 6, 2004.
Advertisements

CLA Curriculum Review. Process Overview Fall 2014: Review the Curriculum November 3 Deadline Submit Recommendations for Curriculum Revision.
Introduction to the Benchmarks of Quality (BoQ) Revised version of the presentation given at the Summer 2012 Minnesota PBIS Institute.
1 As Class Convenes u Pick up your team’s folder; remove disk & Course Activity Impact Matrix material; and sign attendance sheet u Get your notebook and.
Coaching for School Improvement: A Guide for Coaches and Their Supervisors An Overview and Brief Tour Karen Laba Indistar® Summit September 2, 2010.
Common Core Literacy Alignment: Adopt, Adapt, or Do Both?
GST 101 Planning Retreat. Pre-Workshop Evaluation Form.
TIME LINE FOR PROGRAM REVIEWS. BASIC MAP OF PROGRAM REVIEW PROCESSES.
Welcome 3 rd and 4 th year students! Arne Kovac, Director of Undergraduate Studies.
EdTPA: Elementary Literacy
Take Out Planner Science notebook Catalyst sheet Pencil.
Teaching in UNSW Learn HOW TO TEACH in UNSW Aug 5 ~ Aug Curriculum Design and eLearning.
Continuous Improvement in the Education Unit: Closing the Loop of Assessment Assessment Day Christopher Cratsley Nancy Murray Ann M. Hogan January 19,
Some conceptions of curriculum David Baume PhD FSEDA FHEA
Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.
The Achievement Chart Mathematics Grades The primary purpose of assessment and evaluation is to improve student learning.
Jennifer Reeves, Ph.D., Barbara Packer-Muti, Ed.D., & Candace Lacey, Ph.D. Nova Southeastern University Ft Lauderdale, FL.
Promoting Effective Assessment Practices Through Peer Review Claudia J. Stanny Director, Center for University Teaching, Learning, & Assessment Amy Mitchell-Cook.
JROTC Program of Accreditation. Why JPA? We are accredited as a Special Program by AdvancEd Four Standards for Accreditation Purpose and Direction Governance.
Academic Program Review Workshop 2017
Module 6: Coaching System
Online Quality Course Design vs. Quality Teaching:
Dave Wallace ANDREA CHAPPELL IST September 13, 2012
Office of Academic Assessment Update
Assessment Basics PNAIRP Conference Thursday October 6, 2011
Outcomes Assessment Committee
Staff meeting Monday 20th February 2017
Welcome to BUS 365: Business Communication Strategy
Welcome Candidates! Please find a seat in your certificate area.
Supplemental Learning- AIR
NWHPEC Board Meeting January 26, 2017 via Telecom
CTE: WHERE WE’VE BEEN HOW WE’RE GROWING
GENERAL EDUCATION COURSE-BASED ASSESSMENT – IT’S EASIER THAN YOU THINK!
NANC WG: TF Number Assignment Modernization
Component 4: Effective and Reflective Practitioner Session 2
Institutional Effectiveness USF System Office of Decision Support
Introductions Institutional Effectiveness,
ELA Teacher Leader Network Meeting March 29, 2012
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
Advanced Program Learning Assessment
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
Time Line for Program Reviews
Physical Education Standards
FQ: How can I revise my Political Systems Thematic Essay?
Program Review Workshop
WASC Work Session #4 December 14, 2012.
Course Evaluation Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations
Table 2. A Sample Lesson on Teaching Prepositions
Leanne Havis, Ph.D., Neumann University
Creating an Interdisciplinary assessment activity Flex day 1/12/2017
Strategic Policy Overview
Council of Chairs Meeting – Fall 2018
Academic Program Review Comprehensive Report
Implementing the Feedback Protocols
Strategic Planning Final Plan Team Meeting
28 January 2019 Assessments and Half Term Reports
Health and Food Technology Understanding Standards event
Time Line for Program Reviews
High Tech and High Touch: Re-Designing a Large-Enrollment Course
The “Problem” is front-loaded Presentation/Product
District discipline lead spring meeting agenda
Western Association of Schools and Colleges Presentation
Summerour Middle Planning Meeting
NON-ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT REPORTING FY’17
NCATE Standard Five Jim Summerlin Maggie Blair Stephen Emmons
Dean of Engagement Evaluation
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Year 10 & Year 11 Strategies for success in the new Queensland Certificate of Education.
TAPTM System Overview Teacher Excellence Student Achievement
Outputs Estimated Tendering Process Timeline (16 – 31 weeks)
Presentation transcript:

January 27, 2016

 DU’s 2 nd Annual Teaching and Learning Week Teaching for Impact: Conversations about Learning February 8-12, 2016 otl.du.edu

 Lecture portion  Assessment Review Process  Peer Review Process  Assessment Plan Review Feedback Rubric Standards  Recommendations for Action  Questions for clarification  Group Work portion  Peer review of assessment group discussions

 Assessment of student learning is useful for improving educational quality.  Teaching and assessment are part of a common process of creating an effective learning environment.  Effective assessment must be meaningful to, and manageable for, the practitioner.

 Clarification of purpose  Feedback process Every 3 years (or on demand)  No additional paperwork  Does not exempt programs from other assessment tasks  Components  Peer review of assessment Program assessment plans  Consultation  Action plan for improving assessment Drafted by DAA Reported to unit Dean

 Peer group assignments (3-4 programs)  Pre-review – peruse assessment plans  Peer Review –(focus on one program/discipline at a time)  Program rep provides a brief overview Peers ask clarification questions Rep identifies any specific areas of struggle  Peers discuss  Complete Assessment Plan Review Feedback Rubric Consensus should be achieved  Complete Action Items Suggestion Form  Repeat for each program

 Mission/Purpose  Alignment with DU Mission  Student Learning Outcomes  Required Curriculum  Curriculum Alignment  Assessment Plan  Communication, Discussion and Change

 Cosmetic revisions to Assessment Plan  Completeness, clarity, etc.  Substantive revisions to Assessment Plan  Develop/revise outcomes  Add/revise assessments  Note: include suggestions for changes  Other critical tasks  Rubric development  Curriculum review  Include 1-year and 2-year action goals

 Rubric Feedback Sheet  At your table  Qualtrix Survey  In your

?

 Overview from representative  Include areas of struggle  Discussion  Complete Forms  Rubric  Action Plan form  Repeat for all programs  Return completed forms to Rob  Copies will be provided to programs via .  Adjourn when tasks are complete