Research 1 Mathematical Terminology Mock Action Research Proposal Presentation Brandy Williams EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Instructor:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Model-Drawing Strategy to Solve Word Problems for Students with LD
Advertisements

Statewide Expectations Presenter: Christine Spear Alabama Department of Education.
Learning Disabilities With an emphasis on math learning disabilities.
Model-Drawing Strategy to Solve Word Problems for Students with LD Dr. Olga Jerman The Frostig Center IARLD Conference Miami, Florida January 14-16, 2010.
Why Teach Reading Comprehension in Math Class? Whose Job Is It? Presentation by Denise Victora University of St. Thomas February 2015 Topics: Content.
Autism and iPads Shauna Huber EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Instructor: Dennis Lawrence May 5, 2014.
BRITTNEY KLAUSER KIMBERLY DEBOTH BALL STATE UNIVERSITY APRIL 23, 2014 Schema Based Math Intervention.
Does the use of math journals improve students retention and recall of math facts and formulas?
Using Videos to Teach Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder Andrea Hammerbacher Stephanie VanHooijdonk Chrissy McHugh Towson University ISTC685 May 2012.
Knowledgebase Effectiveness Luis Calahorrano EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Instructor Frederick Ansoff August 25, 2014.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
Cecile Carlton NH DOE Mathematics Coach. Goals for Math Session Math Content Development/refinement of the Learning Progressions Levels: Emergent, Beginning,
High Quality Math Instruction
Implementing the Nevada Academic Content Standards for Mathematics Talking About Solution Methods and Problem-Solving Strategies Traci Loftin and Rachel.
EDT 500 Session 03. SESSION OVERVIEW Share your Audience homework Audience Analysis Activity Case study activity Presentation fundamentals Share initial.
INACOL Standard D: CLEAR EXPECTATIONS PROMPT RESPONSES REGULAR FEEDBACK.
Technology in Early Childhood and Elementary Education Jessica Gilboy LeKeisha Weimerskirch Laura Windels Stephanie Zimmer.
Barbara Willingham. Area of Focus Statement To find effective tools, methods, and strategies to help improve reading skills, fluency, and comprehension.
Math Intervention Focusing on Interventions in Mathematics.
Specific Learning Disability Proposed regulations.
Title Page and Introduction Gregory A. Thomas, PhD Coe College Action Research I.
PROBLEM-SOLVING WITH GRAPHIC ORGANIZERS Presented by: Kendra Bookout, Math Facilitator.
Presentation to the Faculty of North Surry High School September 11, 2014 Mark Fuhrmann North Surry High School, Mount Airy, NC Participant in the
Sharon Ostendorf EDU 671 Fundamentals of Education Research Instructor: Aaron Deris.
Mock Action Research Proposal Presentation Nena Williams Ashford University May 14, 2015.
Technology Help or Hinderance? DOMINIQUE JOHNSON EDU671: FUNDAMENTALS OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH INSTRUCTOR: FREDERICK ANSOFF 2 JUNE 2014.
Reading Literacy. The purpose of my study will be to describe why young children need to focus on reading in kindergarten and how to improve reaching.
Mock Action Research Proposal Presentation Tara S. Burch EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Professor Kathy Hoover September 3, 2015.
EDU 671 Fundamentals of Educational Research Instructor: Susan Hughes by T. Lee February 7, 2014.
Students Learning Effectively through Creative Resource Classes and Creativity in the Classroom Ashanti Banks Ashford University Professor Miller EDU.
Mock Action Research Presentation Marie Baker EDU 671 Fundamentals of Educational Research Instructor: Kathy Hoover October 15, 2015.
Mock Action Research Proposal Presentation EDU 671 Fundamentals Of Educational Research By Valerie L. Brown.
Action Research Proposal: Improving Confidence in the Workplace Rebecca Jackson EDU 671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Dr. Miller January 21, 2016.
Mock Action Research Proposal Presentation Sharelius Holmes Dr. Miller EDU 671: Fundamental of Educational Research March 3, 2016.
Amanda M Surmann May 5 th 2014 EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research (MRD1413A) Instructor: Dennis Lawrence.
PROJECT BASED LEARNING INCREASING ACADEMICS AND CAREER SKILLS VERNA ROCHON EDU 671 ACTION RESEARCH INSTRUCTOR MILLER.
Mock Action Research Proposal Presentation Claudia S. Herrera EDU671: Fundamentals of Education Research Dr. Newton Miller May 8, 2014.
JUDY CALLOWAY EDU 671 MOCK ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT PRESENTATION MARCH 27, 2014 NEWTON, MILLER.
Allen M. Jackson EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Dr. Anthony Valley June 13, 2016.
Dena D. Johnson Ashford University EDU 671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Instructor: Kathy Hoover September 3, 2015.
Action Research Proposal By: B’Nekia Curtis EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Instructor: Newton Miller.
MOCK ACTION RESEARCH PROPOSAL PRESENTATION Beverly Houston-Stoute Week 5 Discussion 1 ASHFORD UNIVERSITY EDU 671 Dr. Ansoff.
Action Research Proposal LaTrisha Pennington Edu 671: Fundamentals of Education Research Dr. Newton Miller March 14, 2016.
Sheri Milinski Week Five Assignment EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research (NMJ1538A) Instructor: Kathy Hoover 10/15/15 Mock Action Research Proposal.
TEACHING INFANTS PRIMARY COLORS BY: ASHLEY S. HUSER EDU 671:FUNDAMENTALS OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH INSTRUCTOR NEWTON MILLER JANUARY 20, 2016.
Mock Action Research Proposal Presentation Tyra Gunter.
TECHNOLOGY IN THE CLASSROOM Presented by Kerrie N. Berry EDU 671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Instructor N. Miller.
Action Research Mock Proposal TIFFANY DAHER EDU671: FUNDAMENTALS OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH DR. NEWTON MILLER FEBRUARY 8, 2016.
ACTION RESEARCH PROPOSAL PLAN Rachelle Ryan EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Instructor Frederick Ansoff Thursday, February 27, 2014.
Fostering Technology in Classrooms to Increase Student Participation Amanda Sedberry Dr. Kathleen Lunsford-Instructor EDU671 Ashford University May 5,
Shauntel Dorsey EDU 671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Dr. Miller Shauntel Dorsey EDU 671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Dr. Miller.
 The purpose of this study is to determine the best way to deliver instruction to students. I want to find out if whole group instruction or small group.
Area of Focus Statement The purpose of my study is to investigate if students are retaining reading information while listening to music through their.
EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research (MRD1414A) Ashford University Instructor: Dr. Kathleen Lunsford May 1, 2014.
MOCK ACTION RESEARCH PROPOSAL PRESENTATION SHEENA BOTTING EDU 671: FUNDAMENTALS OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH INSTRUCTOR: DOUGLAS GOSS JULY 21, 2016.
Justin Allegra EDU 671 – Fundamentals of Educational Research Dr. Newton Miller Ashford University March 12, 2016 Action Research Proposal Final Project.
Keep the F-U-N In Education. An Action Research Plan On Play Based Education. Tressa Morris EDU 671 Dr. Miller September 8,2016.
Instructional Leadership for a Professional Learning Culture:
The Literature Search and Background of the Problem
Response to Intervention R. E. A. C. H
د.سالم بني عطا استراتيجيات التدريس Teaching Strategies
Do Now 1) t + 3 = – 2 2) 18 – 4v = 42.
What is an equation? An equation is a mathematical statement that two expressions are equal. For example, = 7 is an equation. Note: An equation.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم.
OBJECTIVE: Students will solve multistep equations.
CABS Analysis.
What Do You Teach? I teach mathematics
Unit 4. Day 13..
Assessment In Mathematics
How to Teach Students to Understand Word Problems
Presentation transcript:

Research 1 Mathematical Terminology Mock Action Research Proposal Presentation Brandy Williams EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Instructor: Newton Miller February 5, 2015

Research 2 Area of Focus The area of focus is to find the best solution for teaching and identifying key words in mathematical problem solving to help students properly write an equation to go along with word problems.

Research 3 Problem Students struggle writing math equations Students couldn’t identify key words Lack of understanding of math terminology

Research 4 Variables Focus will be on identifying and applying terminology Demographics Two students both identified at risk in math Three different strategies for teaching Different styles of assessments

Research 5 Research Questions 1.Will the use of the interactive online math software be effective in teaching the students terminology identification as well as writing math equations? 2.Would incorporating terminology and definitions along with each word problem be beneficial in teaching the students to identify and apply mathematical terminology to word problems? 3.Would providing visuals including addition and subtraction signs be more beneficial to teaching students mathematical terminology than interactive software?

Research 6 Prior Interventions  Use of small groups  Use of Visuals  One on one instruction

Research 7 Data Collection  Use of qualitative data > use of student journals > Observations  Quantitative data > online assessments measuring comprehensions and application > post tests using set rubrics  Data will be collected over a period of 2 weeks > unbias data only based on facts > data recorded after each observation or assessment

Research 8 Ethics Signed informed consent forms (Mills, 2014). Explanation of process Coding and categorizing Proper storage to maintain confidentiality

Research 9 Literature Review  Leh, J. M., & Jitendra, A. K. (2013). Effects of Computer-Mediated Versus Teacher-Mediated Instruction on the Mathematical Word Problem-Solving Performance of Third-Grade Students With Mathematical Difficulties. * Academic Journal * Focuses on instruction and teaching for at risk students in math * Use as reference point to assess instruction  Zhang, D., & Xin, Y. P. (2012). A Follow-Up Meta-analysis for Word Problem-Solving Interventions for Students with Mathematics Difficulties. Journal Of Educational Research, 105(5), doi: / * Academic Journal *Documented research on teaching mathematical word problems and success in instruction * Will be used to compare instruction design

Research 10 Sources: Leh, J. M., & Jitendra, A. K. (2013). Effects of Computer-Mediated Versus Teacher-Mediated Instruction on the Mathematical Word Problem-Solving Performance of Third-Grade Students With Mathematical Difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 36(2), doi: / Zhang, D., & Xin, Y. P. (2012). A Follow-Up Meta-analysis for Word- Problem-Solving Interventions for Students with Mathematics Difficulties. Journal Of Educational Research, 105(5), doi: / Miller, M. (2015). The Do's and Dont's of Teaching Problem Solving in Math. Retrieved from Homeschoolmath.net: