NYS Grades 9-12 School Growth Scores: From MGP and GRE to HEDI Ratings and Scores 2015-16 August 2016 Disclaimer If there are any discrepancies between.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 New York State Education Department Interpreting and Using Your New York State-Provided Growth Scores August 2012.
Advertisements

A quick review of z-scores and how to understand them August 26, 2011
New York State’s Teacher and Principal Evaluation System VOLUME I: NYSED APPR PLAN SUBMISSION “TIPS”
LCSD APPR Introduction: NYS Teaching Standards and the Framework for Teaching Rubric Welcome! Please be seated in the color-coded area (marked off by colored.
Chapter 7 Estimation Procedures. Chapter Outline  A Summary of the Computation of Confidence Intervals  Controlling the Width of Interval Estimates.
1. Statistics 2. Frequency Table 3. Graphical Representations  Bar Chart, Pie Chart, and Histogram 4. Median and Quartiles 5. Box Plots 6. Interquartile.
Week 7: Means, SDs & z-scores problem sheet (answers)
1 New York State Education Department Using Growth Measures for Educator Evaluation August 2012.
Student Learning Objectives SLOs TST BOCES January 6, 2012.
Using VAM Data to Determine Points (50 % of the Total) toward Unified Single Rating Draft Procedures 11/21/2012 DRAFT DOCUMENT.
1 New York State Growth Model for Educator Evaluation 2011–12 July 2012 PRESENTATION as of 7/9/12.
Review Measures of central tendency
Standard Scores Dr. Richard Jackson © Mercer University 2005 All Rights Reserved.
New York State Scores 2011—2012 School Year. Growth Ratings and Score Ranges Growth RatingDescriptionGrowth Score Range (2011–12) Highly EffectiveWell.
Western Suffolk BOCES Boot Camp Emma Klimek Eastern Suffolk BOCES 2012.
 z – Score  Percentiles  Quartiles  A standardized value  A number of standard deviations a given value, x, is above or below the mean  z = (score.
A tour of fundamental statistics introducing Basic Statistics.
© 2007 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, on behalf of the WIDA Consortium WIDA Focus on Growth H Gary Cook, Ph.D. WIDA.
NH Commissioner’s Task Force Meeting September 21, 2010 NH DOE 1 Commissioner's Task Force Meeting: September 21, 2010.
Measures of Variability Percentile Rank. Comparison of averages is not enough. Consider a class with the following marks 80%, 80%, 80%, 90%, 20%, 70%,
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics February 21, 2013.
3 common measures of dispersion or variability Range Range Variance Variance Standard Deviation Standard Deviation.
IE(DS)1 Many of the measures that are of interest in psychology are distributed in the following manner: 1) the majority of scores are near the mean 2)
1 New York State Growth Model for Educator Evaluation 2011–12 July 2012 PRESENTATION as of 7/9/12.
APPR: Ready or Not Joan Townley & Andy Greene October 20 and 21, 2011.
Teacher Scores from the State
Chapter 7 Estimation Procedures. Basic Logic  In estimation procedures, statistics calculated from random samples are used to estimate the value of population.
Advanced Math Topics Chapter 3 Review Please round all answers to the nearest hundredth and make an answer column, just like the test tomorrow!
EE459 I ntroduction to Artificial I ntelligence Genetic Algorithms Practical Issues: Selection.
2009 Grade 3-8 Math Additional Slides 1. Math Percentage of Students Statewide Scoring at Levels 3 and 4, Grades The percentage of students.
PRINCIPAL STATE GROWTH SCORES / Principal Performance/Visit= 50 Student Performance=50.
EngageNY.org State-Calculated Growth Measures Overview July 2013 Tracy Rowlands & Deb Duffy.
1 New York State Growth Model for Educator Evaluation June 2012 PRESENTATION as of 6/14/12.
EngageNY.org State-Calculated Growth Measures Overview July 2013 Deb Duffy.
1 NYS Grades 4-8 Teacher Growth Scores: From MGP to HEDI Ratings and Scores August 2016 Disclaimer If there are any discrepancies.
Compensation Structure and Merit Process
Measures of Position – Quartiles and Percentiles
SLOs for Group/Team, School, BOCES Results
Rounding Decimals.
Sage ORS and Data Gateway
Percent of Applicants and Enrollees by Range of Grade Point Averages, 2016 GPA Scores
Student Learning Objectives!
Introductory Statistics
Estimation Procedures
Research Brief: Mapping A Strategy to Attract the Politically Engaged Student to East Evergreen University Consultants: Elizabeth Goff Scott Gravitt Kim.
Laugh, and the world laughs with you. Weep and you weep alone
Introduction to Statistics for the Social Sciences SBS200 - Lecture Section 001, Spring 2017 Room 150 Harvill Building 9:00 - 9:50 Mondays, Wednesdays.
DESCRIBING A POPULATION
The normal distribution
Understanding How Evaluations are Calculated
15.2 Percentiles, Quartiles, & Box-and-Whisker Plots
New York State Education Department Using Growth Measures for Educator Evaluation August 2012.
Data Tables Packet #19.
Measuring Variation – The Five-Number Summary
Valley Central School District
NEWARK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT APPR OVERVIEW
Percent of Applicants and Enrollees by Range of Grade Point Averages, 2017 GPA Scores
Rounded Off Values Upper and Lower Bounds.
Percent of Applicants and Enrollees by Range of Grade Point Averages, 2018 GPA Scores
Central Square School District and CSTA
Homework: pg. 119 #3,4; pg. 122 #6-8 3.) A. Judy’s bone density score is about one and a half standard deviations below the average score for all women.
Functions and Their Properties II
1-4 Quartiles, Percentiles and Box Plots
A class took a quiz. The class was divided into teams of 10
Data Analysis Questions
pencil, red pen, highlighter, notebook, graphing calculator
Unit 2: Descriptive Statistics
Unit 2: Descriptive Statistics
Ch. 12 Vocabulary 15.) quartile 16.) Interquartile range
Scatterplots and Two-Way Tables
Presentation transcript:

NYS Grades 9-12 School Growth Scores: From MGP and GRE to HEDI Ratings and Scores 2015-16 August 2016 Disclaimer If there are any discrepancies between the language in these materials and the Statute, Regulations, or APPR Guidance, the Statute, Regulations, or APPR Guidance prevail. 

How is MGP Classified into 3012-c Growth Rating for Schools of Grades 9-12 in 2015-16? Confidence Range Lower Limit > Mean (Lower Limit > 53) Any Upper Limit < Mean (Upper Limit < 53) Upper Limit (< .75 SD below mean) (Upper Limit < 47) Growth Rating Yes No Notes: SD = Standard Deviation Values are rounded to the nearest whole number. Highly Effective Well above state average for similar students (18-20 points) Effective Equal to state average for similar students (9-17 points) Developing Below average for similar students (3-8 points) Ineffective Well below average for similar students (0-2 points) MGP ≥ 1.5 SD above mean (MGPs of 65 or higher) MGP > 1 SD below mean and MGP < 1.5 SD above mean (MGPs of 46 thru 64) MGP > 1.5 SD below mean and MGP ≤ 1 SD below mean (MGPs of 43 thru 45) MGP ≤ 1.5 SD below mean (MGPs of 42 or lower)

How are 3012-c Growth Score Points How are 3012-c Growth Score Points* for Schools of Grades 9-12 Assigned in 2015-16? HEDI Points* Min MGP Max MGP 19.5 37 1 37.5 40.5 2 41 42 3 33.5 41.5 4 42.5 5 43 6 43.5 44 7 44.5 8 45 9 47 10 47.5 49 11 49.5 51 12 51.5 52.5 13 53 54.5 14 55 56.5 15 57 58 16 58.5 60.5 17 61 64.5 18 65 65.5 19 66 68.5 20 69 89 Ineffective Well below average for similar students (0-2 points) Point value of 3 includes schools with MGPs in the Ineffective category but confidence ranges of 47 or above Developing Below average for similar students (3-8 points) Point value of 9 includes schools with MGPs in the Developing category but confidence ranges above state average Effective Equal to state average for similar students (9-17 points) Point value of 17 includes schools with MGPs in the Highly Effective category but confidence ranges below state average Highly Effective Well above state average for similar students (18-20 points) * Based on the arguments presented in the NYC arbitration proceeding held on May 30 and 31, 2013 and pursuant to his authority in Education Law §3012-c(2)(a), the Commissioner imposed new proportional scoring ranges for use in NYC for the 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16 and 2016-17 school years. Please see the following link for a description of these scoring ranges: http://usny.nysed.gov/rttt/teachers-leaders/plans/docs/new-york-city/new-york-city-appr-plan-060113.pdf.

How is GRE Classified into 3012-c Growth Rating for Schools of Grades 9-12 in 2015-16? Confidence Range Lower Limit > Mean (Lower Limit > 0.13) Any Upper Limit < Mean (Upper Limit < 0.13) Upper Limit (< .75 SD below mean) (Upper Limit < -0.04) Growth Rating Yes No Notes: SD = Standard Deviation Values are rounded to the nearest whole number. Highly Effective Well above state average for similar students (18-20 points) Effective Equal to state average for similar students (9-17 points) Developing Below average for similar students (3-8 points) Ineffective Well below average for similar students (0-2 points) GRE ≥ 1.5 SD above mean (GREs of 0.46 or higher) GRE > 1 SD below mean and GRE < 1.5 SD above mean (GREs of -0.09 thru 0.45) GRE > 1.5 SD below mean and GRE ≤ 1 SD below mean (GREs of -0.20 thru -0.10) GRE ≤ 1.5 SD below mean (GREs of -0.21 or lower)

How are 3012-c Growth Score Points How are 3012-c Growth Score Points* for Schools of Grades 9-12 Assigned in 2015-16? HEDI Points* Min GRE Max GRE -1.31 -0.38 1 -0.36 -0.27 2 -0.26 -0.21 3 -0.34 4 -0.20 -0.19 5 -0.18 -0.17 6 -0.16 -0.14 7 -0.13 -0.12 8 -0.11 -0.10 9 -0.03 10 -0.02 0.04 11 0.05 0.08 12 0.09 0.14 13 0.15 0.18 14 0.19 0.23 15 0.24 0.28 16 0.29 0.34 17 0.35 0.45 18 0.46 0.49 19 0.50 0.58 20 0.59 1.29 Ineffective Well below average for similar students (0-2 points) Point value of 3 includes schools with GREs in the Ineffective category but confidence ranges of -.04 or above Developing Below average for similar students (3-8 points) Point value of 9 includes schools with GREs in the Developing category but confidence ranges above state average Effective Equal to state average for similar students (9-17 points) Point value of 17 includes schools with GREs in the Highly Effective category but confidence ranges below state average Highly Effective Well above state average for similar students (18-20 points) * Based on the arguments presented in the NYC arbitration proceeding held on May 30 and 31, 2013 and pursuant to his authority in Education Law §3012-c(2)(a), the Commissioner imposed new proportional scoring ranges for use in NYC for the 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16 and 2016-17 school years. Please see the following link for a description of these scoring ranges: http://usny.nysed.gov/rttt/teachers-leaders/plans/docs/new-york-city/new-york-city-appr-plan-060113.pdf.

How is MGP Classified into 3012-d Growth Rating for Schools of Grades 9-12 in 2015-16? Confidence Range Lower Limit > Mean (Lower Limit > 53) Any Upper Limit < Mean (Upper Limit < 53) Upper Limit (< .75 SD below mean) (Upper Limit < 47) Growth Rating Yes No Notes: SD = Standard Deviation Values are rounded to the nearest whole number. Highly Effective Well above state average for similar students (18-20 points) Effective Equal to state average for similar students (15-17 points) Developing Below average for similar students (13-14 points) Ineffective Well below average for similar students (0-12 points) MGP ≥ 1.5 SD above mean (MGPs of 65 or higher) MGP > 1 SD below mean and MGP < 1.5 SD above mean (MGPs of 46 thru 64) MGP > 1.5 SD below mean and MGP ≤ 1 SD below mean (MGPs of 43 thru 45) MGP ≤ 1.5 SD below mean (MGPs of 42 or lower)

How are 3012-d Growth Score Points How are 3012-d Growth Score Points* for Schools of Grades 9-12 Assigned in 2015-16? HEDI Points* Min MGP Max MGP 19.5 29 1 30 32.5 2 33.5 36 3 36.5 4 37 38 5 38.5 6 39 7 39.5 8 40 9 40.5 10 41 11 41.5 12 42 13 43 14 43.5 45 15 51 16 51.5 56.5 17 57 64.5 18 65 65.5 19 66 68.5 20 69 89 Ineffective Well below average for similar students (0-12 points) Point value of 13 includes schools with MGPs in the Ineffective category but confidence ranges of 47 or above Developing Below average for similar students (13-14 points) Point value of 15 includes schools with MGPs in the Developing category but confidence ranges above state average Effective Equal to state average for similar students (15-17 points) Point value of 17 includes schools with MGPs in the Highly Effective category but confidence ranges below state average Highly Effective Well above state average for similar students (18-20 points)

How is GRE Classified into 3012-d Growth Rating for Schools of Grades 9-12 in 2015-16? Confidence Range Lower Limit > Mean (Lower Limit > 0.13) Any Upper Limit < Mean (Upper Limit < 0.13) Upper Limit (< .75 SD below mean) (Upper Limit < -0.04) Growth Rating Yes No Notes: SD = Standard Deviation Values are rounded to the nearest whole number. Highly Effective Well above state average for similar students (18-20 points) Effective Equal to state average for similar students (15-17 points) Developing Below average for similar students (13-14 points) Ineffective Well below average for similar students (0-12 points) GRE ≥ 1.5 SD above mean (GREs of 0.46 or higher) GRE > 1 SD below mean and GRE < 1.5 SD above mean (GREs of -0.09 thru 0.45) GRE > 1.5 SD below mean and GRE ≤ 1 SD below mean (GREs of -0.20 thru -0.10) GRE ≤ 1.5 SD below mean (GREs of -0.21 or lower)

How are 3012-d Growth Score Points How are 3012-d Growth Score Points* for Schools of Grades 9-12 Assigned in 2015-16? HEDI Points* Min GRE Max GRE -1.31 -0.58 1 -0.56 -0.52 2 -0.50 -0.44 3 -0.42 -0.39 4 -0.38 -0.36 5 -0.35 -0.31 6 -0.30 7 -0.29 -0.28 8 -0.27 -0.26 9 -0.25 10 -0.24 11 -0.23 12 -0.22 -0.21 13 -0.34 -0.17 14 -0.16 -0.10 15 0.08 16 0.09 0.23 17 0.24 0.45 18 0.46 0.49 19 0.50 0.58 20 0.59 1.29 Ineffective Well below average for similar students (0-12 points) Point value of 13 includes schools with GREs in the Ineffective category but confidence ranges of -.04 or above Developing Below average for similar students (13-14 points) Point value of 15 includes schools with GREs in the Developing category but confidence ranges above state average Effective Equal to state average for similar students (15-17 points) Point value of 17 includes schools with GREs in the Highly Effective category but confidence ranges below state average Highly Effective Well above state average for similar students (18-20 points)