Restoring stream physical heterogeneity: effects on benthic macroinvertebrates Francesca Pilotto, Lina E. Polvi, Brendan Mckie, Christer Nilsson SFS, 22.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
David McCormick & Simon Harrison
Advertisements

Effects of Land Use and Associated Factors On Biological Communities of Small Streams in the Illinois River Basin of Arkansas by James C. Petersen, Billy.
Trait-based Analyses for Fishes and Invertebrates in Streams Mark Pyron Stoeckerecological.com.
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
Stream Ecology (NR 280) Chapter 1 – Introduction to Fluvial Systems Basic Concepts.
Reach-scale morphological changes of a braided river following a 15-year flood with multidate airborne LiDAR S. Lallias-Tacon (1,2), F. Liébault (1), H.
Do installed steam logjams increase macroinvertebrate richness and abundance? Seyeon Kim and Ong Xiong with faculty mentor Dr. Todd Wellnitz Biology Department.
Conclusion -Velocity affects the temperature, pH and DO of a stream; the greater the velocity, the greater the water quality -The positive correlation.
Final stuff: n Lab practical –Coleoptera, Hemiptera n Final exam: Fri May 2:15 –Assessment with Invertebrates n Lecture material (IDEM protocol) n.
1 STARMAP: Project 2 Causal Modeling for Aquatic Resources Alix I Gitelman Stephen Jensen Statistics Department Oregon State University August 2003 Corvallis,
Predicting natural channel types in the Columbia River basin Hiroo Imaki 1, Tim Beechie 1, John Buffington 2 1. NOAA, Northwest Fisheries Science Center,
Rapid Bioassessment Protocol (RBP). Background to RBP changes in community/assemblage composition used to evaluate existence and degree of impact.
1 Accounting for Spatial Dependence in Bayesian Belief Networks Alix I Gitelman Statistics Department Oregon State University August 2003 JSM, San Francisco.
Analyzing Stream Condition Using EMAP Algae Data By Nick Paretti ARIZONA PHYCOLOGY ECOL 475.
Watershed Assessment and River Restoration Strategies
Connectivity of River Flow Marisa Hendron Limnology 475/575 Presented November 25, 2009 Prof. Mark Sytsma.
King County Normative Flow Project Parametrix, King County, Herrera, & Foster Wheeler Normative Flow Studies King County Department of Natural Resources.
Hancock Springs A natural lab for studying the roles of physical habitat, nutrient availability, and non-native species to inform river restoration John.
Channel Modification Washington Dept. Forestry, 2004, Channel Modification Techniques Katie Halvorson.
Selection of restoration measures General principles and approaches Potential restoration measures Effects on river morphology and biota Jochem Kail, University.
ARROW: system for the evaluation of the status of waters in the Czech Republic Jiří Jarkovský 1) Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University,
Biological Assessment REFORM Summer School, Wageningen (NL), 28 June 2015 Christian Wolter Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries.
Final stuff: n Lab practical: Apr 29 n Final exam: due Fri May 2:15.
Assessing Linkages between Nearshore Habitat and Estuarine Fish Communities in the Chesapeake Bay Donna Marie Bilkovic*, Carl H. Hershner, Kirk J. Havens,
National Aquatic Resource Surveys Wadeable Streams Assessment Overview November, 2007.
Landscape Ecology: Conclusions and Future Directions.
Integrating Solute Transport, Stream Metabolism and Nutrient Retention, using the Bio-Reactive Tracer Resazurin Ricardo González-Pinzón, Roy Haggerty,
Stream macroinvertebrate responses to landscape variables; an evaluation of rapid bioassessment techniques using a statistical modeling approach. Declan.
STREAM QUALITY in SOUGAHATCHEE CREEK. LEECH CRANE FLY MIDGE STONEFLY CADDISFLY MAYFLY GOOD WATER QUALITY (EPT~10-23) POOR WATER QUALITY (EPT~0-5)
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
Ranking Stressors: Prevalence & Relative Risk Based on work by John Van Sickle US EPA NHEERL Western Ecology Division.
The Biological Condition Gradient and Tiered Aquatic Life Uses: With Applications in the State of Maine United States Environmental Protection Agency Tiered.
Comparison of Benthic Invertebrate Communities Upstream and Downstream of Proposed Culvert Installations in Alabama Amy C. Gill USGS, Alabama Water Science.
National Monitoring Conference May 7-11, 2006
The use of the Pinkham-Pearson index for the comparison of community structure in Biosim2 to identify statistically-valid sectors of taxa By Carlos Pinkham.
Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index Bradley Hansen John Nieber Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering For BBE 4535/5535 Fall 2011.
Middle Fork Project AQ 3 – Macroinvertebrate and Aquatic Mollusk Technical Study Report Overview May 5, 2008.
A Tool to Evaluate the Health of Streams and Rivers within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Katie Foreman 1, Claire Buchanan 2, Adam Griggs 2, Andrea Nagel.
Exam topics. Hoeinghaus et al Which river concept explains energy sources in 10 tribs of Parana’ river? Low-gradient, high gradient, reservoirs.
Record notes in your notebook  Record at least 5 facts/ideas in your notebook.  Write down and answer the following questions:  What are“benthic macroinvertebrates”?
Current And Future Perspectives On The Evaluation, Development And Application Of Benthic Multimetric Indices For Neotropical Savanna Streams Déborah Silva.
Macroinvertebrate responses to flow and thermal variability associated with impoundments James. C. White 1, Paul. J. Wood 1, David. M. Hannah 2 and Andy.
Effects of Stream Restoration: A Comparative Study of Pine Run in Felton, Pennsylvania Luke Mummert, Department of Biological Sciences, York College of.
COMPARING BIOINDICATORS TO MEASURE THE EFFICACY OF RESTORATION IN MIDDLE FORK JOHN DAY RIVER, OR Robin M. Henderson & James R. Pratt.
Watershed Health Indicators
Aquatic, Watershed, and Earth Resources
Lakes Entrance Project School of Applied Sciences
Critical Linkages: Identifying Culvert Replacement Priorities to Maintain Connectivity of Cold Water Streams in the Face of Climate Change Scott Jackson,
WG2: Ecology and Biodiversity Freshwater Ecosystems
Macroinvertebrates as Water Quality Indicators on Mount Mansfield
Frontiers of Biomonitoring
Aquatic ecosystem research and Water in the Environment
Ecological evaluation Urban River Enhancement Scheme
Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30606
J. M. C. K Jayawardhana1, W. D. T. M Gunawardhana 1, E. P
Discover Life in West Virginia ( )
Techniques for restoring biodiversity: What works
Environmental Studies Program
Lotic Communities What is a community? A) The Dictionary B) The Ideal
Collaborative research project:
Butternut Creek Biomonitoring
Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Aquatic Ecosystem and Biodiversity Report Card Assess and rate the ecological condition of creeks and rivers across Adelaide.
Predicting ecological responses to reconnection of the Cache River
Cain, DJ, Carter, JL, Buchwalter, DB, and Luoma, SN
A Comparison of Forest Biodiversity Metrics Using Field Measurements and Aircraft Remote Sensing Kaitlyn Baillargeon Scott Ollinger,
Warmwater Streams Chapter 19
Logjams: A Look at Logjams and Emergent Wood Effects on Insect Emergence in a Small Northern Minnesota Stream Zachary Snobl with Faculty Mentors: Todd.
The Index of Biotic Integrity (the BI or IBI)
CLASSIFICATION TOOLS FOR BENTHIC INVERTEBRATE FAUNA IN COASTAL WATERS
IBI’s: An Introduction
Presentation transcript:

Restoring stream physical heterogeneity: effects on benthic macroinvertebrates Francesca Pilotto, Lina E. Polvi, Brendan Mckie, Christer Nilsson SFS, 22 nd May 2016

2 Physical heterogeneity  biota Application to stream restoration? Introduction – Study area – RQ – Methods – Results – Conclusions

3 Lack of biotic responses to stream restoration Occurrence of other stressors Poor recolonization potential Insufficient restoration measures Inadequate assessments  Planning of new restoration projects and management of restored streams Introduction – Study area – RQ – Methods – Results – Conclusions Physical heterogeneity  biota

Study area: Vindel river catchment Vindel river Sweden Umeå Stockholm Sweden Free-flowing river Length: 450 km Catchment area: 12,654 km 2 Glacial legacy sediments Forested catchment Introduction – Study area – RQ – Methods – Results – Conclusions

Channelization for timber floating Introduction – Study area – RQ – Methods – Results – Conclusions

Rågobäcken – basic restoration (2000s) Basic restoration Introduction – Study area – RQ – Methods – Results – Conclusions

Enhanced restoration (year 2010) Introduction – Study area – RQ – Methods – Results – Conclusions

PC1 (29%) Data from Polvi et al. 2014, Geomorphology Physical complexity Introduction – Study area – RQ – Methods – Results – Conclusions 29 metrics: sediment distribution, longitudinal profile, cross section, planform, instream wood

Research question: Do macroinvertebrate communities respond to increased physical complexity after enhanced stream restoration? Introduction – Study area – RQ – Methods – Results – Conclusions

time Enhanced restoration Methods - Streams with paired reaches with basic (n=4) and enhanced (n=4) restoration - Additional channelized and un-channelized reaches - 4 sampling occasions Introduction – Study area – RQ – Methods – Results – Conclusions

B: basic restoration, E: enhanced restoration, Mean ± S.E., pairwise comparison: n.s. Introduction – Study area – RQ – Methods – Results – Conclusions Taxonomic diversity BeforeAfter

B: basic restoration, E: enhanced restoration, Mean ± S.E., pairwise comparison: *=p ≤ 0.05 Introduction – Study area – RQ – Methods – Results – Conclusions Taxonomic composition

Dispersal traits B: basic restoration, E: enhanced restoration, Mean ± S.E., pairwise comparison: *=p ≤ 0.05 Introduction – Study area – RQ – Methods – Results – Conclusions

Correlation with gradient of physical complexity:

EPT %n.s * Diptera %n.s * Bivalvia %n.s * Xylophages %n.s * Filter feeders %n.s.+0.79*+0.77* Scrapers %n.s * Fast flows %n.s * Aquatic passive %n.s. n.s.(+0.51) Introduction – Study area – RQ – Methods – Results – Conclusions Taxonomic composition Functional composition Correlation with gradient of physical complexity: Pearson´s correlation coefficient, *=p ≤ 0.05

EPT %n.s * Diptera %n.s * Bivalvia %n.s * Xylophages %n.s * Filter feeders %n.s.+0.79*+0.77* Scrapers %n.s * Fast flows %n.s * Aquatic passive %n.s. n.s.(+0.51) Introduction – Study area – RQ – Methods – Results – Conclusions Taxonomic composition Functional composition Correlation with gradient of physical complexity: Pearson´s correlation coefficient, *=p ≤ 0.05

EPT %n.s * Diptera %n.s * Bivalvia %n.s * Xylophages %n.s * Filter feeders %n.s.+0.79*+0.77* Scrapers %n.s * Fast flows %n.s * Aquatic passive %n.s. n.s.(+0.51) Taxonomic composition Functional composition Introduction – Study area – RQ – Methods – Results – Conclusions Correlation with gradient of physical complexity: Pearson´s correlation coefficient, *=p ≤ 0.05

Introduction – Study area – RQ – Methods – Results – Conclusions Conclusions Benthic macroinvertebrates did respond to increased channel physical complexity Taxonomic and functional composition Responses appeared 5 years after restoration Landscape-scale approach Long-term monitoring

BioRest: Local- and landscape-scale effects on biodiversity after stream restoration Acknowledgments Collaborators: Lena Kretz, Cloé Lucas, Jelmer Van Doorn Department of Ecology and Environmental Science Umeå University Umeå, Sweden