Origin of Earth and Moon PA STEM monthly meeting CCIU September 15, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Interior structure, origin and evolution of the Moon Key Features of the Moon: pages
Advertisements

Mercury & the Moon Mercury & the Moon. Mercury and the Moon: What can we learn? What do we know? What do we know? Why is it important? Why is it important?
Formation of the Solar System
April 4, 2006Astronomy Chapter 8 Cratered Worlds: The Moon and Mercury The Moon is an object of lore and superstition. The Moon is our nearest neighbor,
8 February 2005AST 2010: Chapter 8 1 The Moon & Mercury.
The Hadean & Archean “It’s the Earth Jim, but not as we know it.”
13 July 2005AST 2010: Chapter 8 1 The Moon & Mercury.
Lecture 5: In the Beginning: Radiometric Dating 1.The Age of the Earth 2.Radiometric dating - early chronology.
1 Lecture #02 - Earth History. 2 The Fine Structure of The Universe : The Elements Elements are a basic building block of molecules, and only 92 natural.
Chapter 8 Welcome to the Solar System. 8.1 The Search for Origins Our goals for learning What properties of our solar system must a formation theory explain?
Lunar Facts The moon ended its formation period approximately 4 billion years ago. After the period of formation, the surface of the moon continued to.
Theories of the Origin of the Moon. Theory One early theory was that the moon is a sister world that formed in orbit around Earth as the Earth formed.
Earth and Moon Statistics By the Lunar and Planetary Institute For use in teacher workshops.
Origin of the Solar System. Stars spew out 1/2 their mass as gas & dust as they die.
Origin of the Solar System. Stars spew out 1/2 their mass as gas & dust as they die.
Earth and Space…7b and c (7)  Earth in space and time. The student knows that scientific dating methods of fossils and rock sequences are used to construct.
The Moon Formation. Lunar Facts The moon ended its formation period approximately 4 billion years ago. After the period of formation, the surface of the.
Absolute Dating Chapter 7 Lesson 2.
Volcanoes, Earthquakes, Tsunamis What do you know? What are some things you want to learn or questions you have?
The Origin of Our Solar System Part 2
Chapter Four The Moon: The Earth’s Closest Neighbor.
Reading: Chapter 4 Lecture 6. Formation of the Moon, Absolute Ages, Radiometric Dating.
Age of the Solar System Evidence of Solar System Origins from Radiometric Dating.
Formation of the Solar System
Chapter 19: Origin of the Solar System
© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 8 Formation of the Solar System.
The Moon and Mercury: Airless Worlds Please take your assigned transmitter And swipe your student ID for attendance tracking.
Absolute Age Dating. Geological Time Absolute time – putting dates on geological events using radiometric dating and other techniques.
Evidence for Evolution I: The Geological Record. How old is the Earth? Creationism: – years Science: 4.54 billion years.
Geologic History. “Big Bang” about 13.7 billion years ago All matter in the universe created made entirely of Hydrogen and Helium ~13 b.y.a. oldest galaxies.
Astronomy 405 Solar System and ISM Lecture 8 The Moon February 1, 2013.
Notes: Earth/Moon Formation 3/11. 1.Explain the three sources of heat that contributed to the high temperature of the newly formed Earth. (p. 688). The.
Homework 1. Is there a good scientific question? 2. Is there a good explanation for why the topic/question is worthy of research? 3. Is there a good hypothesis.
The Moon Several theories have been proposed to explain the origin of the Moon.
Unit 2 Lesson 3 Absolute Dating
Theories of Formation for the Moon
The Origin of Our Solar System Part 2
The Moon.
The Earth as a Terrestrial Planet
Overview of the Solar System
Chapter 6.3 Absolute Dating
Late Heavy Bombardment
Chapter 9.
Absolute Dating.
The Earth as a Terrestrial Planet
Lecture: Planetology Continued (cratering) Part II: Solar System
Meteorites & Birth of the earth
AC Vocabulary Chapter 6 Section 3
How do we know that the earth is 4.6 billion years old?
Radiometrc Dating and Aging our Solar System
Absolute Dating.
Absolute Dating.
Absolute Age Dating Absolute Ages Radiometric Dating
Lunar Oddities and The Origin of the Moon
Learning Objective: I will be able to explain how we use fossils to date rocks.
Unit 2 Lesson 3 Absolute Dating
Absolute Dating.
Absolute Dating.
SATISH PRADHAN DNYANASADHANA COLLEGE,THANE
Thought Question What does the solar system look like as a whole?
Absolute Dating.
NOTES: GEOLOGIC DATING
Absolute Age of Rocks Notes
Absolute Age Dating.
Relative and Absolute Dating
Scientific evidence for accretion theory
Absolute Dating.
Learning Objective: I will be able to explain how we use half lives to determine the age of a rock.
Evolution – Radiometric Dating Evidence
Lunar Oddities and The Origin of the Moon
Presentation transcript:

Origin of Earth and Moon PA STEM monthly meeting CCIU September 15, 2015

High-school standard HS-ESS1-6 focuses on the evidence for Earth’s early history PA STEM Science HS-ESS1-6. Apply scientific reasoning and evidence from ancient Earth materials, meteorites, and other planetary surfaces to construct an account of Earth’s formation and early history. [Clarification Statement: Emphasis is on using available evidence within the solar system to reconstruct the early history of Earth, which formed along with the rest of the solar system 4.6 billion years ago. Examples of evidence include the absolute ages of ancient materials (obtained by radiometric dating of meteorites, moon rocks, and Earth’s oldest minerals), the sizes and compositions of solar system objects, and the impact cratering record of planetary surfaces.] (It’s one of the greatest stories ever told!)

Evidence in science is identified through the process of the scientific method PA STEM Science Observation/ Experiment Hypothesis/ Theory Prediction Induction— guess at a theory Deduction— predict new phenomena Prediction confirmed? If the prediction is false, the hypothesis (or theory) is false!

The approach to understanding Earth’s origin depends on an operational hypothesis PA STEM Science The composition of each celestial body indicates the distribution of elements at its current location when the body formed (unless evidence implies the contrary) Question: What does this hypothesis predict about the compositions of the various planets as a function of their distance from the sun?

Heavy elements like iron and nickel are smoothly distributed throughout the solar system, but predominate close to the sun This smooth distribution supports the operational hypothesis PA STEM Science

Intermediate-mass elements like silicon and oxygen are mostly found farther out, but are also smoothly distributed Earth and nearby planets have similar compositions PA STEM Science

Venus, Earth, and Mars have nearly identical compositions, supporting the idea that they formed in their current positions at the same time PA STEM Science The Moon is very different, indicating formation at another time or place (possibly contradicting the hypothesis)

The mystery of the Moon’s origin might be explained if we can test two hypotheses PA STEM Science The Moon might have formed at another place (where the composition was different—Hypothesis 1) at another time (when the composition had changed—Hypothesis 2) Question: What are some predictions each of these hypotheses imply?

The ages of celestial bodies are determined by two main methods PA STEM Science Age of surface of body—density of craters more craters = older surface → body is older OR less active Age of material in body—radiometric dating more radioactive elements = younger material

Compare the cratering on these surfaces. What does it tell us about the surface? How do you know? PA STEM Science

The Moon’s pattern of cratering is distinctive. Which surface does it most resemble? Is the surface young or old? PA STEM Science

The Moon’s surface is most similar to Mercury’s, which is very old and inactive PA STEM Science  Mercury and the Moon show little evidence of active surface processes  Venus, Earth, and Mars have younger surfaces, but show evidence of surface activity → Evidence from cratering is inconclusive about the relative ages of the bodies

Radiometric dating uses the radioactive decay of heavy nuclei to tell time PA STEM Science Radioactive decay is mostly independent of external influences Decay times span a large range: billions of yrs Heavy elements are found in a wide range of materials

Time of decay is measured by the half-life, which is the time for half of the current radioactive nuclei to change into stable nuclei PA STEM Science # of half-lives parent daughter 1 1/2 1/2 2 1/4 3/4 3 1/8 7/8 4 1/16 15/16 Total number of parent and daughter nuclei remains constant

Let’s do some sample problems to see how radiometric dating works PA STEM Science Carbon 14 nuclei decay into Nitrogen 14 nuclei with a half-life of 5730 years. How old is a sample containing 125 nuclei of C-14 and 375 nuclei of N-14? Another sample begins with 10 g of Carbon 14. After 20,000 years, how much Carbon 14 will remain?

A number of radioactive nuclei have half-lives of use in dating celestial bodies PA STEM Science Parent Half-life (years) Daughter 87 Rb billion 87 Sr Th billion 208 Pb U billion 206 Pb K billion 40 Ar U billion 207 Pb 82

Material from a wide range of celestial bodies has been dated very precisely PA STEM Science Celestial body Source Age (years) Meteorites CAIs, chondrules billion Earth’s surface Zircons (Jack Hills)4.404 billion Mars’ surface Zircons (Black Beauty)4.428 billion Lunar surface Highland samples 4.3 – 4.5 billion The Moon is as old as Earth and Mars →Hypothesis 2 is false !

Four possible hypotheses have been proposed to explain the Moon’s origin PA STEM Science Capture Hypothesis (Hypothesis 1) Condensation Hypothesis Fission Hypothesis Large Impact Hypothesis

The capture hypothesis proposes that the Moon formed elsewhere and was later caught in orbit around Earth PA STEM Science Question: What predictions does this hypothesis make? Prediction 1: Prediction 2:

Though different from Earth as a whole, the Moon’s composition is remarkably similar to Earth’s crust PA STEM Science There is also no evidence of bodies with Moon-like compositions elsewhere in the solar system →Hypothesis 1 is false!

Two other hypotheses fail to make correct predictions PA STEM Science Condensation Hypothesis Moon formed with Earth from the same material Prediction: Fission Hypothesis Moon spun off from molten Earth Prediction:

The Large-Impact Hypothesis says the differentiated Earth (iron sunk to core) was struck by a large body that splashed up debris to form the Moon PA STEM Science Predictions: Moon should lack iron √ Moon similar to Earth’s crust √ Moon made of both Earth and impactor material √ Earth should have more iron and less silicon than Venus and Mars √ Thermal impact should be seen in Earth isotope distribution √ Thermal impact of debris should be seen in asteroids √

Latest research shows that likely debris from the Moon’s creation heated asteroids 4.47 billion years ago PA STEM Science W. F. Bottke et al. Science 348, (2015) Hypothesis is fully supported!