ENERGY DEPOSITION AND TAS DIAMETER

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recap of heat loads and peak doses from HL-LHC Q1 to Q7 L.S. Esposito, F. Cerutti HL-LHC WP3 meeting, 22 May 2014.
Advertisements

FLUKA studies: channeled ions on LHC IP7 L. Lari (CERN & IFIC (CSIC-UV)) D. Mirarchi (CERN & ICL) A. Lechner (CERN) ColUSM#32 December the 6 th,
24/01/08Energy deposition, LIUWG, Elena Wildner1 Upgrade phase 1: Energy deposition in the triplet Elena Wildner Francesco Cerutti Marco Mauri.
F. Savary on behalf of the WP11 team Input from V. Baglin, D. Ramos.
Collimation MDs LHC Study Working Group Daniel Wollmann for the Collimation-Team, BLM-Team, Impedance-Team, … LHC Study Working Group,
ENERGY DEPOSITION IN HYBRID NbTi/Nb 3 Sn TRIPLET CONFIGURATIONS OF THE LHC PHASE I UPGRADE FermilabAccelerator Physics Center Nikolai Mokhov, Fermilab.
Crab Cavities in IR1 and IR5 Some considerations on tunnel integration What will be the situation in the tunnel after the LHC IR Phase-1 Upgrade. What.
Impact of synchrotron radiation in LEPTON COLLIDER arcs
E. Todesco PROPOSAL OF APERTURE FOR THE INNER TRIPLET E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland With relevant inputs from colleagues F. Cerutti, S. Fartoukh,
Beam Background Simulations for HL-LHC at IR1 Regina Kwee-Hinzmann, R.Bruce, A.Lechner, N.V.Shetty, L.S.Esposito, F.Cerutti, G.Bregliozzi, R.Kersevan,
DS Heat Load Scenarios in Collision Points and Cleaning Insertions. Prepared by F. Cerutti, A.Lechner and G. Steele on behalf of the FLUKA team (EN-STI)
1 PAST ESTIMATIONS ON THE ROLE OF PASSIVE ABSORBERS Francesco Cerutti for the team 2012 June 4th.
Review of Quench Limits FermilabAccelerator Physics Center Nikolai Mokhov Fermilab 1 st HiLumi LHC / LARP Collaboration Meeting CERN November 16-18, 2011.
Updates on FLUKA simulations of TCDQ halo loads at IR6 FLUKA team & B. Goddard LHC Collimation Working Group March 5 th, 2007.
Collimator and beamline heating External Review of the LHC Collimation Project CERN Wed 30/6/2004.
1 CONSIDERATIONS ON WARM MAGNET MEASURED DOSES 2012 September 3rd Francesco Cerutti for the team key contributions by TE-MSCDavide Tommasini and Pierre.
LHC-CC Validity Requirements & Tests LHC Crab Cavity Mini Workshop at CERN; 21. August Remarks on using the LHC as a test bed for R&D equipment.
Simulation comparisons to BLM data E.Skordis On behalf of the FLUKA team Tracking for Collimation Workshop 30/10/2015 E. Skordis1.
Heat Deposition Pre-Evaluation In the context of the new cryo-collimator and 11-T dipole projects we present a review of the power deposition studies on.
Beam Induced Quench Session 2: quench test at LHC B. Dehning, C. Bracco.
Case study: Energy deposition in superconducting magnets in IR7 AMT Workshop A.Ferrari, M.Magistris, M.Santana, V.Vlachoudis CERN Fri 4/3/2005.
Shielding the 140 mm option F. Cerutti, L.S. Esposito on behalf of CERN FLUKA team.
NM4SixTrack Implementation of new composite materials for HL-LHC collimator upgrades in SixTrack “Tracking for SixTrack” workshop – CERN, R.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Francesco Cerutti ENERGY DEPOSITION ASPECTS FOR LHCb REQUEST 5th Joint HiLumi LHC - LARP Annual Meeting Oct 29, 2015 through L.S. Esposito’s work and essential.
Energy Deposition Issues in LHC IR Upgrades LHC IR Upgrades Workshop Pheasant Run, St. Charles, IL October 3-4, 2005 Fermilab LHC IR 2005 Nikolai Mokhov,
1 CAN WE KEEP THE CURRENT SYSTEM FOR LIU BEAMS ? Francesco Cerutti, Alessio Mereghetti, Joao Saraiva LIU-SPS Beam Scraping System Review 2013 Jan 22 contributions.
Energy deposition with and without IR3 upgrade Predicted energy deposition with and without IR3 (IR7)dispersion suppressor collimators. Gain from collimators.
A liner in the Corrector package A Cu liner has been inserted in the gap between the CBT and the coil aperture of all the corrector package elements (see.
31/07/08Review new IRs: Energy Deposition1 Energy Deposition in the New IRs Francesco Cerutti, Marco Mauri, Alessio Mereghetti, Ezio Todesco, Elena Wildner.
Integration of forward physics detectors into the LSS of the LHC D. Macina (TS/LEA) Technical Support 2004 Workshop.
MQXF Preliminary Dose Requirement G. Ambrosio, E. Fornasiere, E. Todesco Joint LARP/CM20 HiLumi meeting Napa Valley, CA, USA 8-10 April, 2013 The HiLumi.
R.W. Assmann, V. Boccone, F. Cerutti, M. Huhtinen, A. Mereghetti
Operating IP8 at high luminosity in the HL-LHC era
Francesco Cerutti, Andrea Tsinganis WP10 Energy deposition & R2E
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
On behalf of the FLUKA team
Tracking simulations of protons quench test
TAXS and TAXN ABSORBERS - OVERVIEW
Energy deposition studies on magnets. Aim. First applications
Machine-Experiment Interface
Accelerator and Experiment Interface Session: LS2, LS3
Progress in Collimation study
Review of the MQW and MBW lifetime taking into account results from the reading of the dosimeters collecting data in the 2016 RUN Dosimeter (installation,
Follow-up of HL-LHC Annual meeting
IP7 losses scaling and impact on forecast for HL-LHC era
Energy deposition studies in IR7 for HL-LHC
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
DEBRIS IMPACT IN THE TAS-TRIPLET-D1 REGION
WP3 meeting Aug 21, 2015 V1.1 RECAP Francesco Cerutti.
Beam collimation for SPPC
Status of energy deposition studies in IR3
Interpretation and use of BLM Data
Beam-Induced Energy Deposition Studies in IR Magnets
The 4th International Particle Accelerator Conference, IPAC13
Upgrade phase 1: Energy deposition in the triplet
LHC Collimation Requirements
Optic design and performance evaluation for SPPC collimation systems
1st HiLumi LHC / LARP Collaboration Meeting 2011 Nov 17th
PROPOSAL OF APERTURE FOR THE INNER TRIPLET
Revised estimates of heat loads and radiation damage in the IT and D1
HL-LHC operations with LHCb at high luminosity
Beam Loss Simulations LHC
FLUKA Energy deposition simulations for quench tests
US LHC Accelerator Research Program
A. Tsinganis, F. Cerutti (EN/STI/FDA)
Review of Quench Limits
Large emittance scenario for the Phase II Upgrade of the LHC
LHC Physics Debris Simulation Update
Presentation transcript:

ENERGY DEPOSITION AND TAS DIAMETER 1st WORKSHOP COLLIDER-EXPERIMENT INTERFACE Nov 30, 2012 CERN ENERGY DEPOSITION AND TAS DIAMETER Francesco Cerutti, Luigi S. Esposito, Anton Lechner, Alessio Mereghetti

OUTLINE the TAS role (as intended, imagined, and actual) looking around the present and future triplet up to the TAN and for the matching section see the Stefano’s TCL discussion forward (Dispersion Suppressors and collimator insertions) F. Cerutti Nov 30, 2012 1st Workshop Collider-Experiment Interface CERN

TAS: the experimenT-mAchine interface Symbol [I] [courtesy of F. Butin, EN-MEF] F. Cerutti Nov 30, 2012 1st Workshop Collider-Experiment Interface CERN

TAS: the experimenT-mAchine interface Symbol [II] 34mm aperture who does she/he like the TAS? and why? F. Cerutti Nov 30, 2012 1st Workshop Collider-Experiment Interface CERN

TAS: Target Absorber of Secondaries protects (only) the Q1 from the collision debris protects the experiment (vacuum chamber) from incoming beam missteering (realistic scenario?) role in backscattering? ... conflicting aperture requirements from 2. and optics performance (60mm envisaged for the HL-LHC 150mm triplet coil aperture) irrelevant sensitivity of 1. to TAS aperture F. Cerutti Nov 30, 2012 1st Workshop Collider-Experiment Interface CERN

ABSORBED AND ESCAPING POWER 7 TeV p + 7 TeV p FLUKA-DPMJET beyond the present TAS (absorbing ~150W at L=L0=1034cm-2s-1) about 2.5% of the interaction products and 35% of 14TeV, i.e. 650W at L=L0 [142.5 urad crossing] on each side! with a 50mm aperture TAS (absorbing ~500W at L=5L0) about 3.5% of the interaction products and almost 40% of 14TeV, i.e. 3.5kW at L=5L0 [225 urad crossing] a 60(70)mm aperture TAS would collect ~400(300) W at L=5L0 [295 urad crossing] F. Cerutti Nov 30, 2012 1st Workshop Collider-Experiment Interface CERN

IMPACT ON THE (FUTURE) TRIPLET for increasing TAS aperture, the power no longer intercepted is collected in the triplet (mainly in Q1) but with no impact on the quench risk F. Cerutti Nov 30, 2012 1st Workshop Collider-Experiment Interface CERN

IMPACT ON THE (PRESENT) TRIPLET lost in Q1 present triplet 25MGy/300fb-1 (P1) end of the TAS shadow lost in Q1 F. Cerutti Nov 30, 2012 1st Workshop Collider-Experiment Interface CERN

FROM 2011 TO ... POST-LS1 3.5 TeV p + 3.5 TeV p F. Cerutti Nov 30, 2012 1st Workshop Collider-Experiment Interface CERN

BENCHMARKING IP Q3 BLM response along IR5 triplet BLM dose per collision assuming CMS luminosity measurement and 73.5 mb proton-proton cross-section (from TOTEM) F. Cerutti Nov 30, 2012 1st Workshop Collider-Experiment Interface CERN

CHALLENGING OBSERVATIONS dose measured over the period Jan-Jun 2012 on the D1 return coils – IP1 face, both sides - (TE-MSC, DGS-RP, EN-STI) 289.7 kGy 171.8 kGy 252.7 kGy 26.5 kGy [courtesy of J. Trummer, DGS-RP] F. Cerutti Nov 30, 2012 1st Workshop Collider-Experiment Interface CERN

TAS AND CROSSING ANGLE EFFECT for quench risk for cryogenic load [W] @ L0 crossing angle TAS TAS the TAS has meaning only for (the first half of) of Q1! the crossing angle plays a significant role the TAS absence redoubles (+130%) the Q1 load F. Cerutti Nov 30, 2012 1st Workshop Collider-Experiment Interface CERN

(ITS Nb3Sn 140mm OBSOLETE VERSION) THE HL-LHC TRIPLET (ITS Nb3Sn 140mm OBSOLETE VERSION) TAS Q1 Q2 Q3 C1 C2 600W (60mm aperture) 400W considering the experimental vacuum chamber 800W no beam screen 2012 Jun 7 L. Esposito presentation at the WP’s joint meeting 3.7mm, 10 mm x stainless steel, tungsten 13 peak power profile averaged over the cable radial thickness in the innermost strands F. Cerutti Nov 30, 2012 1st Workshop Collider-Experiment Interface CERN

SHIELDING Beam screen with W absorbers at mid-planes 3.7 mm BP + 2 mm BS + 6 mm W absorbers with 0.5 mm clearance between BP and W 111.6 mm residual aperture at mid-planes for 140mm coil aperture < 50 MGy per 3000 fb-1 to stay below 20MGy, one should envisage 9 mm W absorbers i.e. ~115 mm residual aperture at mid-planes for 150mm coil aperture F. Cerutti Nov 30, 2012 1st Workshop Collider-Experiment Interface CERN

TAN EFFECT 25 W 2.5 W D2 D1 triplet P8 2 1033 cm-2 s-1 without TAN P5 1034 cm-2 s-1 with TAN (190W) 25 W 2.5 W D2 D1 (80 mm) triplet (70 mm) peaks on the horizontal plane despite the vertical external crossing (impact from beam screen orientation) the TAN is clearly essential for the D2 protection above a few 1033 cm-2 s-1 [cf. CERN/TIS-RP/IR/94-17 (1994) and LHC Project Report 633 (2003)] F. Cerutti Nov 30, 2012 1st Workshop Collider-Experiment Interface CERN

TCL EFFECT P5 1034 cm-2 s-1 w/ and w/o TCL Q5 and Q7 require TCL in place [cf. LHC Project Report 398 (2000) and LHC Project Report 633 (2003)] F. Cerutti Nov 30, 2012 1st Workshop Collider-Experiment Interface CERN

DISPERSION SUPPRESSORS TCL4-5 not effective from cell 9 onwards DS.R5 F. Cerutti Nov 30, 2012 1st Workshop Collider-Experiment Interface CERN

COLLIMATOR INSERTIONS IP7 TCP.D C B 6L7.B1 v h s MBW MQW beam 1 TCAP DOSE TO WARM MAGNETS collimator losses scaling with luminosity (elastic from experiments?) assuming a horizontal halo peak dose taking for 4 TeV with tight settings 2 250kGy 0.5 60 kGy for intermediate collimator settings 100-400 kGy 60 kGy one would get by normalizing to 1.4 1015 beam 1 protons lost in P7 measured for 1.15 1016 lost protons per beam projection of 30 MGy on the MBW and 5 MGy on the MQW for 6.5 1016 lost protons (300fb-1), at the levels of the expected failure thresholds F. Cerutti Nov 30, 2012 1st Workshop Collider-Experiment Interface CERN

CONCLUSIONS The TAS aperture is not critical wrt Q1 protection The LHCb luminosity upgrade to 2 1033 cm-2s-1 turns out to be compatible with the present machine layout (a warm protection may be desirable to reduce the load on the D2 due to the TAN absence). An effective cleaning is assured by the TCL(s) in the matching section For the present machine, the P1 and P5 Dispersion Suppressors do not look to be at risk for proton operation (see TCL study with WP5, to be followed up with the ATS optics). Warm magnets in P7 and P3 will hardly survive the radiation dose from collimator losses over the HL-LHC era (tentative lifetime approached after 300fb-1 at 7 TeV beam operation). extended and accurate FLUKA model of the LHC available for secondary particle shower and energy deposition calculations F. Cerutti Nov 30, 2012 1st Workshop Collider-Experiment Interface CERN