Application to Participate Webinar February 2012

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Investing in local implementation capacity: Statewide scale up a multi-tiered school reform model for fidelity and sustainability Kim St. Martin Assistant.
Advertisements

Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk –
C3 – Applying Implementation Science to State & District Level PBIS Systems Steve Goodman, Michigan's Integrated Behavior & Learning Support Initiative.
Missouri Schoolwide Positive Behavior Support (MO SW-PBS) Implementation Mary Richter MO SW-PBS State Coordinator.
Kalamazoo Regional Educational Service Agency 2012 Administrator Academy June , 2012 Steve Goodman
Ingham RtI District Leadership Team November 4, 2009.
Braiding Initiatives Steve Goodman, Michigan’s Integrated Behavior and Learning Initiative (MiBLSi) April 16, :00PM – 3:30PM
John Carter Project Coordinator PBIS Idaho: Menu button: Idaho PBIS Presentations and Webinars.
MTSS Maryland: Shift Happens Creating Positive Conditions for Learning through Coordinated Multi-Tiered Systems of Support Maryland State Department of.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Healthy North Carolina 2020 and EBS/EBI 101 Joanne Rinker MS, RD, CDE, LDN Center for Healthy North Carolina Director of Training and Technical Assistance.
Evaluation in Michigan’s Model Steve Goodman National PBIS Leadership Forum October, 2010
Rob Horner University of Oregon Implementation of Evidence-based practices School-wide behavior support Scaling evidence-based practices.
District-level Adoption: The Engine to Drive Sustainable Change Steve Goodman miblsi.cenmi.org Missouri SW-PBS Summer Institute June.
Support systems and sustained implementation of a data-driven, problem-solving model Margie McGlinchey MAASE Summer Institute August 11, 2009 Steve Goodman.
Continuing QIAT Conversations Planning For Success Joan Breslin Larson Third webinar in a series of three follow up webinars for.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 Improving Student Outcomes: Using Technical Assistance.
A District Model for Integrated RtI Systems Dawn Miller Shawnee Mission School District Shawnee Mission, KS Steve Goodman Michigan’s.
Scaling-Up Within a Statewide Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) Kim St. Martin March, 2013.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Implementing School-wide PBIS Pennsylvania PBIS Implementer’s Forum Rob Horner University of Oregon.
SYSTEMS COACHING AND BUILDING LOCAL CAPACITY Utah Multi-Tiered System of Supports SPDG, 2014.
1 Development of Local Implementation Teams Kim St. Martin Assistant Director, MiBLSi Steve Goodman Director, MiBLSi
The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education, #H323A However, these contents do not necessarily.
Coaching for Competence Margie McGlinchey SPDG Regional Mtg. October 1, 2009 Steve Goodman Margie McGlinchey Kathryn Schallmo Co-Directors.
Connecting with the SPP/APR Kansas State Personnel Development Grant.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
Scaling-Up Within a Statewide Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) SPDG National Meeting miblsi.cenmi.org.
Unpacking the Infrastructures and Roles for Effective MTSS Implementation Ingham ISD September, 2012.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM BOB ALGOZZINE AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, Illinois October 14, 2010.
Using the WIKI to Support Training and Technical Assistance October 27, 2011 Susan Barrett Implementer Partner, Center on PBIS Sheppard Pratt Health System.
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Office of Special Education January 20, 2016.
Leadership Teams Implementing PBIS Module 14. Objectives Define role and function of PBIS Leadership Teams Define Leadership Team’s impact on PBIS implementation.
Coaching Within a Statewide Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) Steve Goodman miblsi.cenmi.org December 6, 2010.
PBIS District Leadership Team Overview Administrative Team Meeting August 13, 2008.
MDE Office of Special Education Teri L. Chapman, Ed.S., Director February 17, 2016 MAASE.
BoQ Critical Element: Faculty Commitment. Critical Element: Faculty Commitment 4. Faculty are aware of behavior problems across campus (regular data sharing)
District Implementation of PBIS C-1 Rob Horner Brian Megert University of Oregon Springfield School District.
Coaching at the District Level “Paving the Road for Smooth Implementation ” MiBLSi Coaches’ Conference November 2013.
Introduction to the Grant August-September, 2012 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) project.
Exploration and Readiness Work for a Collaborative Partnership: Session 3 Trainer Name January, 2013.
Min.cenmi.org Michigan Implementation Network Providing Support through District Leadership and Implementation Team April 29, 2010 Michigan Implementation.
Stages of Implementation: Initial Implementation
RtI Coordination to Support Coaching Kim St. Martin November 3, 2011
1 Steve Goodman Director, MiBLSi July 2015
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports District-wide Implementation: Ensuring Success Kentucky Center for Instructional Discipline.
Stages of ImplementationFocusStageDescription Exploration/Ado ption Develop commitment at ISD and LEA level InstallationEstablish ISD leadership team,
SAM (Self-Assessment of MTSS Implementation) ADMINISTRATION TRAINING
RDQ 5 District Coaching Capacity Discussion Leader: George Sugai, University of Connecticut.
Application to Participate in LEA and MIBLSI Partnership
District Leadership Team Sustainability Susan Barrett Director, Mid-Atlantic PBIS Network Sheppard Pratt Health.
RtI Coordinator Conference Kim St. Martin November 3, 2011
PBIS: Intensive Support Project for Intermediate School Districts
Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) Current Project Status and Future Directions Steve Goodman March 12, 2013.
Interconnected Systems Framework PA PBS Network Professional Learning Community Webinar #2 April 11, 2017.
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
RtI Innovations: Evaluation Anna Harms & Jose Castillo
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
How…? Implementation Science
Miblsi.cenmi.org Helping Students Become Better Readers with Social Skills Necessary for Success Steve Goodman Funded through OSEP.
Introduction to Coaching
RtI Coordination: Supporting Training
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
Overview of the Kansas Technical Assistance System Network: Using Technical Assistance to Facilitate Implementation of Evidence-based Practices Kerry.
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS)
Implementing, Sustaining and Scaling-Up High Quality Inclusive Preschool Policies and Practices: Application for Intensive TA September 10, 2019 Lise.
Presentation transcript:

Application to Participate Webinar February

Presentation Overview This presentation will provide an overview of the application process to participate with MiBLSi for the school year.

Agenda 1.What is MiBLSi 2.Benefits of MiBLSi participation 3.Participation requirements 4.Funding

What is MiBLSi? A statewide structure to create capacity for an integrated Behavior and Reading Multi- Tiered System of Support (MTSS) that can be implemented with fidelity, is sustainable over time and utilizes data-based decision making at all levels of implementation support

Logic of MiBLSi Emphasis is on developing local implementation capacity Partnership between ISD and Local School District focuses on shared ownership and accountability around implementation of an integrated MTSS model Schools/Districts will be supported through stages of implementation rather than through a training sequence Goal: Schools/Districts implement MTSS practices with fidelity supported by infrastructure the promotes continuous improvement and sustainability

Research Base Supporting MiBLSi Model Positive Behavior and Intervention Supports (PBIS) is developed from the scientific research base of Applied Behavior Analysis Schoolwide Reading is developed from the findings of the National Reading Panel Report, the National Research Council, and the Institute for Educational Science Practice Guides

Two Categories of Work Access to Effective Practices –Ensuring every staff can apply effective practices in an integrated behavior and reading Multi-Tiered System of Supports –Practices are selected based on: Need, Fit, Resource Availability, Evidence, Readiness for Replication, Capacity to Implement Support for the Practices –Ensuring that the interventions are implemented correctly with the “right people”, at the “right time”, in the “right amounts” (Implementation Fidelity)

Unit of implementation is at the schoolwide level Unit of support is at the district level –Training –Coaching –Evaluation –Technical Assistance –Leadership –Tools and Materials

We need to establish host environments that support adoption, sustained use, & expansion of evidence-based practices (Zins & Ponti, 1990)

Develop Organizational Structures Develop Staff Competencies Schools effectively implementation MTSS Practices Successful Student Outcomes Outcomes Inputs Feedback Loops

Benefits of Participation Ongoing technical assistance for planning and evaluating implementation of multi- tiered system of support (MTSS) Support in developing capacity for leading, training, and coaching implementation MiBLSi sharing fiscal responsibility for professional development necessary to support MTSS implementation Evaluation of implementation efforts

Issues that are being addressed through MiBLSi implementation Integration of work within school improvement Address State Board of Education policies on schoolwide positive behavior support strategies, seclusion and restraint Addressing bully prevention Addressing significant disproportionality regarding discipline and race Focus on Superintendent Flanagan’s dropout challenge Professional learning policy (Revision Considerations: State Board of Education 2011) Potential reauthorization of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) to address Multi-Tiered Systems of Support

What does MiBLSi Bring to Partnership with schools and districts? Experience in structuring and supporting implementation of an integrated MTSS model across 10 years and diverse settings Training content and materials that have been tested over many years with diverse schools and continually revised for improvement Linkage of research to practice and integration with priority initiatives Professional networking opportunities at state and national levels

Scaling-Up Structures and Activities Cascading Systems of Support Leadership Team (Cabinet Level) Implementation Team

Provides guidance, visibility, funding, political support for MiBLSiStudentsStudents Building Staff Building Leadership Team LEA District Cabinet and Implementation Team Across State Multiple ISD/LEA Teams All staff All students Multiple schools w/in local district Provides guidance, visibility, funding, political support, and implementation supports Provides coaching and TA for LEA and/or ISD Teams Provides guidance and manages implementation Provides effective practices to support students Improved behavior and reading ISD Cabinet and Implementation Team Regional Technical Assistance Michigan Department of Education/MiBLSi Leadership Michigan Multiple LEAs w/in intermediate district Provides guidance, visibility, funding, political support, and implementation supports MiBLSi Statewide Structure of Support Who is supported? How is support provided?

Leadership Function AND Implementation Supports Function Leadership Provides the foundations needed for practice(s) to “foster and grow” Implementation Support Provides the support to ensure practice(s) are implemented with fidelity 16

Cabinet Level Team Purpose: provide direction/vision for the practices and allocation of resources to enable the Capacity and Competency drivers to be in place. The term leadership refers to the function of leadership rather than an individual’s position within the organization. Membership: Superintendent, Assistant Superintendents, Directors, (those responsible for programming at the building level)

Implementation Team Purpose: The purpose of the Implementation Support Team is to plan for conditions that make implementation of effective practices with fidelity both easy and durable. Membership: Cabinet Liaison, MTSS coordinator, other members who have knowledge and skillsets in both the MTSS practices and implementation supports.

Implementation Team Activities Develop implementation support plan (for districts/schools) Help to “make room” for the practices through braiding of initiatives Coordinate and monitor implementation of plan Create implementation materials Collect and summarize data (share with cabinet team) Identify barriers to implementation (share with cabinet team)

Support Plan for Three Different Categories of Schools These categories describe the general work that takes place in the school and is based on the stages of implementation: “Should we do it?” (Exploration/Adoption Stage) “Work to do it right” (Installation and Initial Implementation Stages) “Work to do it better” (Elaboration and Continuous Improvement/Regeneration Stages)

Stages of ImplementationFocusStageDescription Exploration/Ado ption Decision regarding commitment to adopting the program/practices and supporting successful implementation. InstallationSet up infrastructure so that successful implementation can take place and be supported. Establish team and data systems, conduct audit, develop plan. Initial Implementation Try out the practices, work out details, learn and improve before expanding to other contexts. ElaborationExpand the program/practices to other locations, individuals, times- adjust from learning in initial implementation. Continuous Improvement/R egeneration Make it easier, more efficient. Embed within current practices. Work to do it right! Work to do it better! Should we do it!

The number of schools to be selected for involvement in your training plan will depend on the constant tension of three factors regarding implementation Resource Allocation Implementation Timeframe Implementation Quality

ISD Cabinet ISD Implementation Planning Team Vision Policy Providing for implementation supports (coaching, training, evaluation) Barrier busting Create materials Collect and summarize data Identify barriers to implementation Coordination ISD Liaison ISD MTSS Coordinator LEA Cabinet LEA Implementation Planning Team Vision Policy Providing for implementation supports (coaching, training, evaluation) Barrier busting Create materials Collect and summarize data Identify barriers to implementation Coordination LEA Liaison LEA MTSS Coordinator Implementation Supports Direction Training Coaching Content Expertise Materials Evaluation Implementation Supports Direction Training Coaching Content Expertise Materials Evaluation Schools Implementation Supports

Application Timeline DateActivity Feb 3, 2012Application Released Feb 14, :00pmInformation Webinar Feb 22, :00amInformation Webinar March 9, 2012 – 5:00pmApplication due (online) April 27, 2012Applicants are notified of potential partnerships Aug or Sept 2012Initial meeting with potential partners to discuss next steps

Requirements for Participation Cabinet level support with standing agenda to review and improve implementation of MTSS Establish an Implementation Support Team Participate in an integrated reading and behavior MTSS model Include MTSS implementation efforts as a standing agenda item at the cabinet level Allocate resources (funding, time, personnel) to support implementation efforts and long term sustainability that includes the development of a coaching and training infrastructure

Requirements for Participation (cont.) Engage in continuous data-based decision making through the use of both student and process outcome (fidelity) data Collaborate across departments to create efficiencies around resources and align practices and priorities in an ongoing manner Develop feedback loops at multiple levels Establish and participate in ongoing communication loops with all stakeholders Support use of measures (i.e., DIBELS, or AIMSweb, SWIS and SRSS)

Who Should Apply? ISDs/RESAs Local School Districts Charter School Clusters With the capacity to develop organizational structures to provide implementation supports –Leadership –Training –Coaching –Evaluation –Technical Assistance –Tools and Materials

Intermediate School District/ Regional Educational Service Agency The ISD/RESA structure provides a layer of support to local districts that allows for leveraging resources, assistance in developing local capacity for establishing a durable implementation model. MiBLSi recognizes the importance of the ISD/RESA infrastructure and consequently, strongly encourages ISD/RESA’s to apply to collaborate with their constituent districts in implementing a district Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) model. Although constituent districts can choose to apply as a stand alone district without collaborating with their ISD/RESA to implement a district MTSS model, stronger preference will be given to ISD/RESA applications.

Local School District Local districts who wish to apply for participation with MiBLSi are strongly encouraged to contact their ISD/RESA about collaboratively engaging in MTSS implementation efforts. However, there are circumstances that may warrant a district choosing to independently apply for partnership with MiBLSi: –The LEA is ready to move forward with MTSS implementation when the ISD/RESA is not ready. –The LEA differs in philosophical or pedagogical orientation from the ISD/RESA. –The ISD/RESA does not have the capacity to support local district implementation.

Local School District To be considered a “Stand Alone District” (i.e., without ISD partnership) the applicant must communicate how implementation efforts will be includes the functions of: coaching, training, technical assistance, evaluation, and allocation of time/resources. A successful stand alone district application will provide (1) a rationale of why the district would pursue implementation of MiBLSi without ISD/RESA partnership and (2) clear indication of how the support functions will be addressed by the district in schoolwide MTSS implementation. When a small district is limited in providing resources for implementation support capacity, partner with a cluster of other districts for MTSS implementation. If clusters of districts choose to partner with one another in this application, each district would need to complete a separate application. Each small district individual application should indicate the pursuit of a multi-district partnership. Within the application, the districts pursuing a partnership should be identified. A single application submitted that includes multiple districts, will not be accepted.

Charter School Cluster Charter schools who wish to apply for participation with MiBLSi are strongly encouraged to contact their ISD/RESA about collaboratively engaging in MTSS implementation efforts. To be considered a “Stand Alone District” (i.e., without ISD partnership) the applicant must communicate how implementation efforts will be includes the functions of: coaching, training, technical assistance, evaluation, and allocation of time/resources. A successful stand alone district application will provide (1) a rationale of why the district would pursue implementation of MiBLSi without ISD/RESA partnership and (2) clear indication of how the support functions will be addressed by the district in schoolwide MTSS implementation. Charter schools may want to partner with other districts/charter schools for MTSS implementation. If clusters of districts choose to partner with one another in this application, each district would need to complete a separate application. Within the application, the districts pursuing a partnership should be identified. A single application submitted that includes multiple districts, will not be accepted.

Who Should NOT Apply? ISDs that have already been accepted Partnering districts that have already been accepted ISDs/Districts that do not have do not have the capacity to support implementation Individual schools

Completing the Application Download application packet from MiBLSi website Answer the questions in your word processing program Copy and paste your answers into the online application MiBLSi-Application MiBLSi-Application

It is expected that a combination of ten Intermediate School Districts, Local Districts (without ISD partnership), or Charter Schools will be selected for participation with MiBLSi through this application process.

Funding MiBLSi has allocated up to $24,000 for professional development activities per accepted ISD with a successful application. MiBLSi has allocated up to $12,000 for professional development activities per accepted District/Charter school (applying without ISD partnership) with a successful application.

MiBLSi Website

For Further Assistance Contact your Technical Assistance Partner Contact one of the project staff –Contact information can be found on our website: miblsi.cenmi.org