A Compositional Constructional Analysis of ‘Hitting’ Verb Argument Realization Patterns and Their Meanings Ellen K. Dodge International Computer Science.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CSCTR Session 8 Dana Retová. group at UC Berkeley & Uni of Hawaii Nancy Chang Benjamin Bergen Jerome Feldman, … General assumption Semantic relations.
Advertisements

Database Systems: Design, Implementation, and Management Tenth Edition
Syntax-Semantics Mapping Rajat Kumar Mohanty CFILT.
What does language do? “Harry walked to the cafe.” “Harry walked into the cafe.” A sentence can evoke an imagined scene and resulting inferences : CAFE.
Projecting Grammatical Features in Nominals: 23 March 2010 Jerry T. Ball Senior Research Psychologist 711 th HPW / RHAC Air Force Research Laboratory DISTRIBUTION.
Theeraporn Ratitamkul, University of Illinois and Adele E. Goldberg, Princeton University Introduction How do young children learn verb meanings? Scene.
Constructions at Work The Nature of Generalization in Language
Lectures I. Overview 2. Simulation Semantics 3. ECG and Best-fit Analysis 4. Compositionality 5. Simulation, Counterfactuals, and Inference Constructions.
Embodied Compositional Semantics Ellen Dodge
Steven Schoonover.  What is VerbNet?  Levin Classification  In-depth look at VerbNet  Evolution of VerbNet  What is FrameNet?  Applications.
 Christel Kemke 2007/08 COMP 4060 Natural Language Processing Semantics.
 Christel Kemke 2007/08 COMP 4060 Natural Language Processing Feature Structures and Unification.
Object-Oriented Analysis and Design
Regier Model Lecture Jerome A. Feldman February 28, 2006 With help from Matt Gedigian.
NLP and Speech 2004 Feature Structures Feature Structures and Unification.
Unified Cognitive Science Neurobiology Psychology Computer Science Linguistics Philosophy Social Sciences Experience Take all the Findings and Constraints.
The Neural Basis of Thought and Language Final Review Session.
Artificial Intelligence 2005/06 From Syntax to Semantics.
CS 182 Sections slides created by: Eva Mok modified by jgm April 26, 2006.
CS 182 Sections Eva Mok April 21, 2004.
1 CSC 594 Topics in AI – Applied Natural Language Processing Fall 2009/ Outline of English Syntax.
Artificial Intelligence Research Centre Program Systems Institute Russian Academy of Science Pereslavl-Zalessky Russia.
Jerome Feldman Simulation Semantics, Embodied Construction Grammar, and the Language of Actions and Events Jerome Feldman
35 years of Cognitive Linguistics Session 8: Cognitive Grammar
NTL – Converging Constraints Basic concepts and words derive their meaning from embodied experience. Abstract and theoretical concepts derive their meaning.
Syntax Lecture 8: Verb Types 1. Introduction We have seen: – The subject starts off close to the verb, but moves to specifier of IP – The verb starts.
1 The Interaction Between Verbs And Constructions Lucas Champollion Oct 18 th, 2004 Goldberg, Adele E. (1995): Constructions. Ch. 2.
Database Systems: Design, Implementation, and Management Ninth Edition
Simulation-based language understanding “Harry walked to the cafe.” SchemaTrajectorGoal walkHarrycafe Analysis Process Simulation Specification Utterance.
Susanne Borgwaldt 1 & John Newman 2 1 Technical University Braunschweig 2 University of Alberta In Search of Possession: From Concept to Inflection.
Introduction to Embodied Construction Grammar March 4, 2003 Ben Bergen
9-1 © Prentice Hall, 2007 Chapter 9: Analysis Classes Object-Oriented Systems Analysis and Design Joey F. George, Dinesh Batra, Joseph S. Valacich, Jeffrey.
Embodiment & Compositionality Two fundamental, but unreconciled, aspects of human language: embodiment and compositionality Embodiment – the realization.
1 Introduction to Computational Linguistics Eleni Miltsakaki AUTH Spring 2006-Lecture 2.
SYNTAX.
7-1 © Prentice Hall, 2007 Topic 7: Analysis Classes Object-Oriented Systems Analysis and Design Joey F. George, Dinesh Batra, Joseph S. Valacich, Jeffrey.
◦ Process of describing the structure of phrases and sentences Chapter 8 - Phrases and sentences: grammar1.
NLP. Introduction to NLP (U)nderstanding and (G)eneration Language Computer (U) Language (G)
An Introduction to Semantic Parts of Speech Rajat Kumar Mohanty rkm[AT]cse[DOT]iitb[DOT]ac[DOT]in Centre for Indian Language Technology Department of Computer.
Figure and Ground Part 2 APLNG 597C LEJIAO WANG 03/16/2015.
SYNTAX.
Getting From the Utterance to the SemSpec Johno Bryant Need a grammar formalism –Embodied Construction Grammar (Bergen & Chang 2002) Need new models for.
The Neural Basis of Thought and Language Final Review Session.
The Neural Basis of Thought and Language Week 14.
CS 182 Sections Leon Barrett with slides inspired by Eva Mok and Joe Makin April 18, 2007.
The Neural Basis of Thought and Language Week 14.
Knowledge Representation Part I Ontology Jan Pettersen Nytun Knowledge Representation Part I, JPN, UiA1.
The Neural Basis of Thought and Language Week 12 Metaphor and Automatic Reasoning, plus Grammars.
CS 182 Sections slide credit to Eva Mok and Joe Makin Updated by Leon Barrett April 25, 2007.
Language = Syntax + Semantics + Vocabulary
Database Systems: Design, Implementation, and Management Tenth Edition
Analysis Classes Unit 5.
Grammar Grammar analysis.
Cognitive Language Processing for Rosie
INTRODUCTION TO PHONETICS AND PHONOLOGY
An Introduction to the Government and Binding Theory
Syntax Lecture 9: Verb Types 1.
ME886.3 Topic 1: System and System Design (II)
Representation of Actions as an Interlingua
Strong Slot-and-Filler Structures
Nonlinguistic Representations
The Extensible Tool-chain for Evaluation of Architectural Models
By Dr. lubna Riyadh Abdul Jabber
CSC 594 Topics in AI – Applied Natural Language Processing
Cognitive Language Comprehension in Rosie
Introduction to Computational Linguistics
Strong Slot-and-Filler Structures
Nonlinguistic Representations
Some thing about Nouns in WordNet
Structure of a Lexicon Debasri Chakrabarti 13-May-19.
Presentation transcript:

A Compositional Constructional Analysis of ‘Hitting’ Verb Argument Realization Patterns and Their Meanings Ellen K. Dodge International Computer Science Institute, Berkeley June 27, 2013

‘Hitting’ verbs ‘Hitting’ verbs: E.g.: hit, slap, kick, punch, pat, tap, whack, etc. semantically similar exhibit a wide range of similar argument realization patterns different patterns describe different situations

Argument Realization Patterns 1.She slapped/kicked/punched the box off the table –actor causes motion of another entity 2.She slapped her hand on / kicked her foot against the table –actor moves body part, contacts another entity 3.She slapped him on the back / across the face. –actor affects person via contact at specific body location

Road Map Argument Structure Constructions (Goldberg 1995, 2010) Embodied Construction Grammar (ECG) (Feldman, Dodge, and Bryant, 2010) Analysis : –Meaning –Verb and A-S Constructions –Sentence examples

Argument Structure Constructions Verb: Slap A-S: Cause Motion meaning: syntax: Subj DirObj PrepObj She slapped the block into the box

Argument Structure Constructions Verb: Slap A-S: Cause Motion meaning: syntax: Subj DirObj PrepObj She slapped the block into the box

Argument Structure Constructions Verb: Slap A-S: MoveBodyPart meaning: syntax: Subj DirObj PrepObj She slapped her hand on the block

Argument Structure Constructions Verb: Slap A-S: PartPossessor meaning: syntax: Subj DirObj PrepObj She slapped him on the arm

Argument Structure Constructions Need to identify and represent: –Semantic commonalities that motivate different patterns of integration of verb, A-S construction, and nominal meanings –Complex meanings that arise from this integration –Relevant constraints that enable us to distinguish between different patterns

Embodied Construction Grammar Construction grammar in which embodied semantics are central Simulation semantics -- understanding a description of an event involves activation of the same/similar neural structure as is active for other experiences of that event

Language Understanding Model Analysis: –Determination of which constructions in a grammar “best-fit” a given utterance –Unification of instantiated constructions produces semantic specification (Semspec) Simulation: –Enactment of the situation specified in the Semspec. –May allow understander to draw further inferences.

Embodied Construction Grammar ECG formalism enables precise, consistent representations of constructions and meanings Supports computational implementations: –ECG Workbench -- view, write and test grammars –Constructional Analyzer (Bryant 2008) – analyzes sentence examples, produces semantic specifications

Meaning Represented using schemas Consistent with simulation semantics Meanings of verb and A-S constructions are represented using some of the same or schemas

Motor Control Schema schema Process roles protatgonist x-net schema MotorControl subcase of Process roles effector effort routine constraints actor ↔ protagonist routine ↔ x-net

schema MotorControl subcase of Process roles actor: animateEntity effector effort routine constraints actor ↔ protagonist routine ↔ x-net schema ForceTransfer evokes Contact as c roles supplier recipient forceAmount constraints supplier ↔ c.entity1 recipient ↔ c.entity2 schema ForceApplication subcase of MotorControl evokes ForceTransfer as ft roles actor acted Upon effector constraints actor ↔ ft.supplier acted Upon↔ ft.recipient effort ↔ ft.forceAmount e.g. squeeze, press Force Application

ForcefulMotionAction schema ForceApplication schema SourcePathGoal subcase of TrajectorLandmark roles landmark trajector source path goal schema ForcefulMotionAction subcase of ForceApplication evokes SourcePathGoal as spg roles actor acted Upon effector constraints acted Upon↔ spg.landmark effector ↔ spg.trajector e.g. slap, kick, punch, etc.

schema CauseEffectAction subcase of ComplexProcess roles causalProcess: ForceApplication effectProcess: Process causer affected constraints process1.actedUpon ↔ affected CauseEffectAction schema ForceApplication subcase of MotorControl evokes ForceTransfer as ft roles actor acted Upon constraints actor ↔ ft.supplier acted Upon↔ ft.recipient effort ↔ ft.forceAmount schema Process roles protatgonist x-net Many transitive A-cxns

schema CauseMotion subcase of ComplexProcess roles causalProcess: ForceApplication effectProcess: MotionAlongAPath causer affected Cause Motion schema ForceApplication subcase of MotorControl evokes ForceTransfer as ft roles actor acted Upon constraints actor ↔ ft.supplier acted Upon↔ ft.recipient effort ↔ ft.forceAmount schema MotionAlongAPath subcase of Motion evokes SPG as spg roles constraints mover ↔ spg.trajector e.g. throwing, dragging CauseMotion A-S cxn

Process schema lattice MotorControl Motion SPG Effector Motion Effector MotionPath ForceTransfer ForceApplication CauseEffect Contact ForcefulMotionAction Process ComplexProcess MotionAlongAPath

Constructions A given sentence instantiates many constructions For She slapped the block into the box: · Lexical constructions: She, slapped, the, block, into, box · PastTense cxn · Phrasal cxns: the block, into the box · Argument Structure Cxn: CauseEffect · Clause cxn: Declarative

Verb Constructions schema ForcefulMotionAction subcase of ForceApplication roles actedUpon effector construction SlapPast subcase of Slap, PastTense form: WordForm constraints self.f.orth  “slapped” meaning: ForcefulMotionAction constraints effector self.m.x-net Other similar verbs: kick effector = foot punch: effector = fist tap: force amount = low whack: force amount = high

Ontology animate sub of entity animal sub of animate person sub of animate bodyPart sub of entity foot sub of bodyPart arm sub of bodyPart leg sub of bodyPart

CauseMotion A-S cxn construction ActiveTransCauseMotion2 subcase of ArgumentStructure constructional constituents v : Verb // inherited np: NP pp: Path-PP form constraints v.f before np.f np.f before pp.f meaning: CauseMotion evokes EventDescriptor as ed evokes ForcefulMotionAction as fma constraints v.m self.m.causalProcess self.m.affected np.m self.m.causer ed.profiledParticipant self.m.effectProcess.spg pp.m schema CauseMotion subcase of ComplexProcess roles causalProcess: ForceApplication effectProcess: MotionAlongAPath causer affected

Cause Motion A-S construction e.g. She slapped the block into the box CAUSE MOTION 2 Constituents: Verb, NP, PP Form: Verb > NP > PP A-S cxn meaning: CauseMotion Verb meaning: ForcefulMotionAction Meaning constraints: verb meaning = CauseMotion.cause profParticipant = causer actor NP = affected actedUpon mover trajector PP.np = landmark

She slapped the block into the box CauseMotionAction cause: ForceApplication effect: MotionPath causer affected landmark ForcefulMotionAction actor actedUpon effector: hand routine: slap RefDescriptor ont-category: person gender: female slappedShe RefDescriptor ont-category: block the block MotionPath mover SPG trajector landmark the box RefDescriptor ont-cat: box into

She slapped the block into the box CauseMotionAction cause: ForceApplication effect: MotionPath causer affected landmark ForcefulMotionAction actor actedUpon effector: hand routine: slap RefDescriptor ont-category: person gender: female slappedShe RefDescriptor ont-category: block the block MotionPath mover SPG trajector landmark the box RefDescriptor ont-cat: box into

She slapped the block into the box CauseMotionAction cause: ForceApplication effect: MotionPath causer affected landmark ForcefulMotionAction actor actedUpon effector: hand routine: slap RefDescriptor ont-category: person gender: female slappedShe RefDescriptor ont-category: block the block MotionPath mover SPG trajector landmark the box RefDescriptor ont-cat: box into

She slapped the block into the box CauseMotionAction cause: ForceApplication effect: MotionPath causer affected landmark ForcefulMotionAction actor actedUpon effector: hand routine: slap RefDescriptor ont-category: person gender: female slappedShe RefDescriptor ont-category: block the block MotionPath mover SPG trajector landmark the box RefDescriptor ont-cat: box into

She slapped the block into the box CauseMotionAction cause: ForceApplication effect: MotionPath causer affected landmark ForcefulMotionAction actor actedUpon effector: hand routine: slap RefDescriptor ont-category: person gender: female slappedShe RefDescriptor ont-category: block the block MotionPath mover SPG trajector landmark the box RefDescriptor ont-cat: box into

EFFECTOR MOTION Constituents: Verb, NP, PP Form: Verb > NP > PP A-S cxn meaning: ForcefulMotionAction Verb meaning: ForcefulMotionAction Meaning Constraints: profParticipant = actor NP = effector trajector PP.np = actedUpon landmark She slapped her hand on the block

ForcefulMotionAction actor actedUpon effector: hand routine: slap She slapped her hand on the block RefDescriptor ont-category: person gender: female slapped She RefDescriptor ont-cat: hand her hand SPG trajector landmark the block RefDescriptor ont-cat: block

ForcefulMotionAction actor actedUpon effector: hand routine: slap She slapped her hand on the block RefDescriptor ont-category: person gender: female slapped She RefDescriptor ont-cat: hand her hand SPG trajector landmark the block RefDescriptor ont-cat: block

ForcefulMotionAction actor actedUpon effector: hand routine: slap She slapped her hand on the block RefDescriptor ont-category: person gender: female slapped She RefDescriptor ont-cat: hand her hand SPG trajector landmark the block RefDescriptor ont-cat: block

PART POSSESSOR Constituents: Verb, NP, PP: BodyPartPP (the+BodyPart) Form: Verb > NP > PP A-S cxn meaning: CauseEffect evokes: Possession Verb meaning: ForcefulMotionAction Meaning Constraints: verb meaning = CauseEffect.cause profParticipant = causer actor NP = affected actedUpon p.posssessor PP.np = p.possessed She slapped him on the hand

Possession Possessor: person Possessed: bodyPart ForcefulMotionAction actor actedUpon effector: hand routine: slap CauseEffect cause: ForcefulMotionAction effect: causer affected She slapped him on the hand RefDescriptor ont-category: person gender: female slapped She RefDescriptor ont-cat: person himthe hand RefDescriptor ont-cat: hand

ForcefulMotionAction actor actedUpon effector: hand routine: slap CauseEffect cause: ForcefulMotionAction effect: causer affected She slapped him on the hand RefDescriptor ont-category: person gender: female slapped She RefDescriptor ont-cat: person him Possession Possessor: person Possessed: bodyPart the hand RefDescriptor ont-cat: hand

Possession Possessor: person Possessed: bodyPart ForcefulMotionAction actor actedUpon effector: hand routine: slap CauseEffect cause: ForcefulMotionAction effect: causer affected She slapped him on the hand RefDescriptor ont-category: person gender: female slapped She RefDescriptor ont-cat: person himthe hand RefDescriptor ont-cat: hand

A-S CxnSubjectDirect ObjectPP-Object CauseMotionCauser Actor Affected ActedUpon Mover Trajector Landmark EffectorMotionActorEffector Trajector ActedUpon Landmark PartPossessorCauser Actor Affected ActedUpon Possessor (person) Possession (body part)

Concluding Remarks Important to recognize and represent: –Inherent complexity of conceptual structure (and participant roles) utilized by linguistic constructions –Importance of inter-related schematic structures for compositional analysis –Use of constraints to support best-fit analysis process ECG formalism facilitates analysis

References Feldman, Jerome, Ellen Dodge, and John Bryant Embodied Construction Grammar. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, edited by B. Heine and N. Heiko. New York: Oxford University Press. Filllmore, Charles The grammar of hitting and breaking. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, edited by R. Jacobs and P. Rosenbaum. Waltham, MA: Ginn and Company. Goldberg, Adele Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ——— Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

SemSpec generated by ECG workbench for analysis of He cut the bread

CauseMotion A-S cxn e.g. She threw the block into the box construction ActiveTransitiveCauseMotion2 subcase of ArgumentStructure constructional constituents v : Verb // inherited np: NP pp: Path-PP form constraints v.f before np.f np.f before pp.f meaning: CauseMotion evokes EventDescriptor as ed evokes ForcefulMotionAction as fma constraints v.m self.m.causalProcess self.m.affected np.m self.m.causer ed.profiledParticipant self.m.effectProcess.spg pp.m CAUSE MOTION 1 Constituents: Verb, NP, PP Form: Verb > NP > PP A-S cxn meaning: CauseMotion Verb meaning: CauseMotion Meaning constraints: affected = np causer = profiledParticipant (subject NP) spg = pp (landmark = pp.np)

Key parts of analysis Argument Structure constructions (A-S cxns) are used to capture different ‘scene’ descriptions associated with different argument realization patterns Meaning of the verb and A-S cxns captures semantic elements that are relevant to these different argument realization patterns Formalization supports a detailed, consistent, [scalable??] computationally implemented analysis

Argument Realization Patterns She slapped/kicked/punched the box –action potentially affects some other entity She slapped him silly / punched him senseless –action results in some specific effect She slapped at his hand / tapped on the table –action is directed at a spatial target