APPR 2.0 (based on CR 3012-d) 2016-2017. NSCSD Goals The NSCSD District Goals Can be evidenced in planning, classroom instruction, assessment and teacher’s.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DPAS II Jessica Baker & Cheryl Cresci MED 7701 Dr. Joseph Massare.
Advertisements

BRISTOL WARREN REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Implementation of RI Educator Evaluation System
Freehold Borough Teacher Evaluation System Freehold Intermediate School Friday – February 15, 2013 Rich Pepe Director of Curriculum & Instruction.
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of % Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures APPR NOTE: All that is left for implementation.
OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of % Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures APPR.
Ramapo Teachers’ Association APPR Contractual Changes.
Annual Professional performance review (APPR overview) Wappingers CSD.
Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) as approved by the Board of Regents, May 2011 NOTE: Reflects guidance through September 13, 2011 UPDATED.
TCRP TEACHER ADVISORY PANEL MEETING December 2011 Derrick Chau, VP Instruction Diane Fiello, TCRP Coach
The New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation System Natick Public Schools.
Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) Evaluation Process for Teachers.
As Adopted by Emergency Action June, 2015 Slides updated
LCSD APPR: Overview Review and Focus on the 60 points December 3, 2012.
* Provide clarity in the purpose and function of the Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) as a part of the APPR system * Describe procedures for using.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
The New Massachusetts Principal Evaluation
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
OCM BOCES SLOs Workshop. Race To The Top: Standards Data Professional Practice Culture APPR.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
APPR:§3012-d A Preview of the changes from :§3012-c Overview.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
Educator Evaluation Information Edward Everett School Laura Miceli, Principal September 24, 2014.
EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS: 1 An Orientation for Teachers.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Sample Science SLO’s Grades Student Growth Goal Setting Process (SLO’s) Y Central School District Science Points Grade Level/Subject.
2011 – 2012 School Year. * Walk-Throughs * Observation(s) * Pre-/Post-Evaluation Form * Year-End Evaluation * Summative Score Report.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
What Does it Mean to Observe Only Observable Elements? Defining Observation for Your District for
Educator Supervision and Evaluation Clarke and Diamond MS September 2013.
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Cohort Training, Phase II November 29 – 30, 2012.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
1 Overview of Teacher Evaluation 60% Multiple Measures of Teacher Performance At least 31 points based on “at least 2” observations At least one observation.
New Teacher Induction.
Evaluation of Teachers & Principals (APPR)
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Teacher Evaluation Timeline
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Licensed Educator Professional Growth and Evaluation Process
Teacher Evaluation System
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
APPR Update School Year.
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Overview This presentation provides information on how districts compile evaluation ratings for principals, assistant principals (APs), and vice principals.
Erie 2 Regional Curriculum Council March 14, 2012
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Ongoing Lead Evaluator
Lead Evaluator for Principals Part I, Series 1
DEAC MEETING AGENDA: AchieveNJ Updates Formal Observations
APPR Overview 3012c Draft Revision March 2012
Understanding How Evaluations are Calculated
Student Learning Objective (SLO) Staff Development
Sachem Central School District Teacher Evaluation Training 2012
APPR Update School Year.
Valley Central School District
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
NEWARK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT APPR OVERVIEW
NEWARK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT APPR/EVALUATION OVERVIEW
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Creating Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Central Square School District and CSTA
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Annual Professional Performance Review APPR
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Presentation transcript:

APPR 2.0 (based on CR 3012-d)

NSCSD Goals The NSCSD District Goals Can be evidenced in planning, classroom instruction, assessment and teacher’s reflective practice. The Teacher Practice Rubric indicators are woven together in that, when one incorporates best practices and research based instruction in planning or teaching, evidence can be gathered and used in multiple ways.

Everyday….In Every Classroom NSCSD High Leverage Themes Student Engagement Questioning Techniques Differentiation Synthesis/Critical Thinking/Problem Solving and Collaboration Formative Assessment and Feedback Technology Integration

APPR Cycle Plan Do Study Act The cycle begins with the Plan step. This involves identifying a goal or purpose, formulating a theory, defining success metrics and putting a plan into action. These activities are followed by the Do step, in which the components of the plan are implemented, such as making a product. Next comes the Study step, where outcomes are monitored to test the validity of the plan for signs of progress and success, or problems and areas for improvement. The Act step closes the cycle, integrating the learning generated by the entire process, which can be used to adjust the goal, change methods or even reformulate a theory altogether. These four steps are repeated over and over as part of a never-ending cycle of continual improvement. ~Dr. W. Edwards Deming

Composite Rating Observation 2014 NYSUT Teacher Practice Rubric The average of 2 unannounced observations* ( Unannounced observations will be no less than 40 minutes, NSEA Contract ) : ✓ 50% Assigned Evaluator Score ranges: Highly Effective3.5 – 4.0 Effective2.5 – 3.49 Developing1.5 – 2.49 Ineffective 0 – 1.49 Generates HEDI Level (H, E, D, I) *Pending approval by NYSED of a hardship waiver to eliminate the use of an independent evaluator. Our NSCSD plan is to assign one evaluator per teacher. Each observation is equally weighted and ratings will come from the same evaluator.

Composite Rating Student Performance District-wide measure Target: 75% of students will score at least 65 on the following assessments: Sci 4, Sci 8, CC Algebra 1, CC ELA, Global History, US History and Living Environment Regents. Score ranges: Generates HEDI Level (H, E, D, I) SLO Summary: 1.If you have more than 50% of your caseload ending in either Regents exam or NYS Science 8 you must develop an SLO. 2.If the above does not pertain to you, you will use (and be scored on) the district wide measure from above. The SLO will be developed for you. 3.Special Education teachers in a self-contained classrooms are unique. They will continue to work with their administrator around SLO needs. Highly Effective 90 – 100%18 – 20 Effective75 – 89%15 – 17 Developing60 – 74%13 – 14 Ineffective0 – 59%0 – 12

An Observation Example: 1. Component #1 – Unannounced Observation #1 (50%) Average rubric score is Component #2 – Unannounced Observation #2 (50%) Average rubric score is 3.6 Weighted Average Calculation: 3.0 *.50 = *.50 = 1.8 Sum total: 3.3 = Effective (within range of 2.5 – 3.49)

A Student Performance Example: Example: Based on the results using the June 2017 Algebra I Regents 80% of students on teacher’s roster scored at least a 65 These results fall in the range of effective ( %) Teacher receives a rating of EFFECTIVE for student performance.

E

A Student Performance Example: Example 2: Based on the results using the June 2017 Global History Regents 72% of students on teacher’s roster scored at least a 65 These results fall in the range of developing ( %) Teacher receives a rating of DEVELOPING for student performance.

E

Components of Observation Score Component #1Component #2 Standards 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7Standards 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Scored Forms: ∙Standards 1 & 2 form (Initial plan submitted on or by Oct 3, Final revisions submitted by May 1, 2017) ∙Unannounced observation #1 ∙Evidence of Student learning (formerly lesson reflection) Scored Forms: ∙PLP (Initial plan submitted on or by Oct 3, Final revisions submitted by May 1, 2017) ∙Unannounced observation #2 ∙Evidence of Student learning (formerly lesson reflection) ∙Professional Responsibilities and Growth (submitted by May 1, 2017) Meetings: ∙PLP conference (optional – prior to 10/3) ∙Post Conference Meetings: ∙Post Conference ∙Culminating Conversation (prior to June 21, 2017) 50% of the overall score

NSCSD APPR Timeline ❑ September 28, 2016 – district half day for APPR & SLO work ❑ By October 3, 2016 – Teacher submits PLP Goal and Standards 1 & 2 form ❑ Unannounced Observation #1 with assigned Evaluator before end of 20 weeks ❑ Teacher submits Evidence of Student Learning (indicators 7.1A, 5.1A, 5.2A) ❑ Ratings - Observers may rate (score) the collected evidence prior to the post conference. These ratings will be provided to the unit member during the post conference or within 5 days after the post conference. ❑ Post-Conference #1 ❑ Unannounced Observation #2 with assigned Evaluator ❑ Teacher submits Evidence of Student Learning (indicators 7.1A, 5.1A, 5.2A) ❑ Ratings - Observers may rate (score) the collected evidence prior to the post conference. These ratings will be provided to the unit member during the post conference or within 5 days after the post conference. ❑ Post-Conference #2 ❑ By May 1, 2017 – Submit Professional Responsibilities & Growth Form (6.2B, 6.2C, 6.3A, 7.1B, 7.2B, 7.3B) ❑ By June 21, Culminating Conversation with assigned Evaluator

Professional Learning Plan (PLP) Professional Learning Plan written as a SMART goal (Initial plan submitted on or by Oct 3, Final revisions submitted by May 1, 2017) (VII.2A, VII.1B). PLP goal may be discussed and updated after unannounced observations.

NSCSD APPR Timeline ❑ September 28, 2016 – district half day for APPR & SLO work ❑ By October 3, 2016 – Teacher submits PLP Goal and Standards 1 & 2 Form ❑ Unannounced Observation #1 with assigned Evaluator before end of 20 weeks ❑ Teacher submits Evidence of Student Learning (indicators 7.1A, 5.1A, 5.2A ) ❑ Ratings - Observers may rate (score) the collected evidence prior to the post conference. These ratings will be provided to the unit member during the post conference or within 5 days after the post conference. ❑ Post-Conference #1 ❑ Unannounced Observation #2 with assigned Evaluator ❑ Teacher submits Evidence of Student Learning (indicators 7.1A, 5.1A, 5.2A) ❑ Ratings - Observers may rate (score) the collected evidence prior to the post conference. These ratings will be provided to the unit member during the post conference or within 5 days after the post conference. ❑ Post-Conference #2 ❑ By May 1, 2017 – Submit Professional Responsibilities & Growth Form (6.2B, 6.2C, 6.3A, 7.1B, 7.2B, 7.3B) ❑ By June 21, Culminating Conversation with assigned Evaluator

Standards 1 and 2 Form Teacher will provide baseline evidence of Standards 1 & 2 which are grouped by the District’s High Leverage Themes. This form is due by October 3, 2016 and may be updated following each unannounced observation. Student Engagement (II.1A, II.4B, II.5B, II.6A) Differentiation (I.1A, I.3A, I.4A, I.5B, II.2A, II.3A, II.5A, II.6B) Synthesis/Critical thinking/Problem Solving and Collaboration (I.6A, II.2B) Formative Assessment and Feedback (V.2A)

NSCSD APPR Timeline ❑ September 28, 2016 – district half day for APPR & SLO work ❑ By October 3, 2016 – Teacher submits PLP Goal and Standards 1 & 2 Form ❑ Unannounced Observation #1 with assigned Evaluator before end of 20 weeks ❑ Teacher submits Evidence of Student Learning (indicators 7.1A, 5.1A, 5.2A) ❑ Ratings - Observers may rate (score) the collected evidence prior to the post conference. These ratings will be provided to the unit member during the post conference or within 5 days after the post conference. ❑ Post-Conference #1 ❑ Unannounced Observation #2 with assigned Evaluator ❑ Teacher submits Evidence of Student Learning (indicators 7.1A, 5.1A, 5.2A) ❑ Ratings - Observers may rate (score) the collected evidence prior to the post conference. These ratings will be provided to the unit member during the post conference or within 5 days after the post conference. ❑ Post-Conference #2 ❑ By May 1, 2017 – Submit Professional Responsibilities & Growth Form (6.2B, 6.2C, 6.3A, 7.1B, 7.2B, 7.3B) ❑ By June 21, Culminating Conversation with assigned Evaluator

Unannounced Observations Evidence will be collected by the assigned evaluator on the NSCSD High Leverage themes. Unannounced observations are at least 40 minutes in length or the duration of the class period. Student Engagement (III.1A, III.2D, III.1B, III.2A, III.2B, III.3A, IV.1C, IV.2A, IV.2B, IV.3A, IV.3B) Questioning Techniques (III.2B, III.2C) Differentiation (III.4A, III.4B, IV.1A, IV.1C, IV.4B) Synthesis/Critical thinking/Problem Solving and Collaboration (III.5A, III.3B) Formative Assessment and Feedback (III.6A, III.6B, V.2B)

NSCSD APPR Timeline ❑ September 28, 2016 – district half day for APPR & SLO work ❑ By October 3, 2016 – Teacher submits PLP Goal and Standards 1 & 2 Form ❑ Unannounced Observation #1 with assigned Evaluator before end of 20 weeks ❑ Teacher submits Evidence of Student Learning (indicators 7.1A, 5.1A, 5.2A) ❑ Ratings - Observers may rate (score) the collected evidence prior to the post conference. These ratings will be provided to the unit member during the post conference or within 5 days after the post conference. ❑ Post-Conference #1 ❑ Unannounced Observation #2 with assigned Evaluator ❑ Teacher submits Evidence of Student Learning (indicators 7.1A, 5.1A, 5.2A) ❑ Ratings - Observers may rate (score) the collected evidence prior to the post conference. These ratings will be provided to the unit member during the post conference or within 5 days after the post conference. ❑ Post-Conference #2 ❑ By May 1, 2017 – Submit Professional Responsibilities & Growth Form (6.2B, 6.2C, 6.3A, 7.1B, 7.2B, 7.3B) ❑ By June 21, Culminating Conversation with assigned Evaluator

Evidence of Student Learning “Evidence of student learning” (formerly the Lesson Reflection form) will be submitted by the teacher after each unannounced observation. Teacher will provide evidence of the following indicators: V.1A, V.2A, VII.1A

NSCSD APPR Timeline ❑ September 28, 2016 – district half day for APPR & SLO work ❑ By October 3, 2016 – Teacher submits PLP Goal and Standards 1 & 2 Form ❑ Unannounced Observation #1 with assigned Evaluator before end of 20 weeks ❑ Teacher submits Evidence of Student Learning (indicators 7.1A, 5.1A, 5.2A) ❑ Ratings - Observers may rate (score) the collected evidence prior to the post conference. These ratings will be provided to the unit member during the post conference or within 5 days after the post conference. ❑ Post-Conference #1 ❑ Unannounced Observation #2 with assigned Evaluator ❑ Teacher submits Evidence of Student Learning (indicators 7.1A, 5.1A, 5.2A) ❑ Ratings - Observers may rate (score) the collected evidence prior to the post conference. These ratings will be provided to the unit member during the post conference or within 5 days after the post conference. ❑ Post-Conference #2 ❑ By May 1, 2017 – Submit Professional Responsibilities & Growth Form (6.2B, 6.2C, 6.3A, 7.1B, 7.2B, 7.3B) ❑ By June 21, Culminating Conversation with assigned Evaluator

Why are we all here? Each of our students deserves our very best - Everyday!

Please submit questions to your building principal!