SWG Infrastructure Standards © 2007 IBM Corporation IMPACT 2011.odp OASIS Cloud Symposium 2011 Interop Scenario

SWG Infrastructure Standards © 2007 IBM Corporation Scenario Intent  Interaction – Multiple standards and specifications being used together – The Open Group Open SOA Integration Maturity Model – The Open Group SOA Reference Architecture – The Open Group SOA Governance Framework – The Open Group SOA Ontology – IETF ATOM Publishing Protocol – OASIS SOA Repository Artifact Model & Protocol  Interoperability – Live demonstration with multiple companies – Shows standards and specifications in action – SOA Ontology, ATOM, S-RAMP

SWG Infrastructure Standards © 2007 IBM Corporation Proposed Scenario – Based on Dursley Drill Bits (DDB) History  Formed in 1882  Success due to:- Quality of products Patented Processes  Global growth by acquisition of similar companies  Semi-autonomous operation Current Status  Produces hi-tech drill bits, cutters, routers, grinders and millers  Customers are manufactures, users and spares wholesalers  Preferred supplier to major machine tool manufacturers  Products only manufactured against verified orders  Rationalized order and production management  Rationalized financial control The Business Challenge  United front to customer  Establish global branding  Reduce administrative overhead  Preserve specialist production processes  Rationalization of post production processes ● DDB Group – Overall look at their business and their challenges

SWG Infrastructure Standards © 2007 IBM Corporation

SWG Infrastructure Standards © 2007 IBM Corporation Proposed Scenario (cont.)  Demo environment – Client is an IBM early implementation of S-RAMP available on alphaWorks – Repository 1 is an implementation of S-RAMP on WSRR available on alphaWorks – Repository 2 is an WSO2 implementation of S-RAMP on WSO2 Governance Registry S-RAMP Client Repository queries and creation of artifacts via ATOM Publishing S-RAMP Enabled Repository 1 S-RAMP Enabled Repository 2 Note: showing only two repositories, but there will be multiple

SWG Infrastructure Standards © 2007 IBM Corporation Proposed Scenario (cont.)  Define the service model in terms of the SOA Ontology  Search the repositories for the DDB Group Organization and expand it out to evaluate what needs to be implemented – Confirm that we need to add the Cancel Delivery Service and the Delivery Feedback Service  Add CancelDelivery Service – Search both repositories, unable to find it in either repository so create it – Set a property uniqueService to indicate that the Governance Board needs to review the service and approve it – Explanation that WSRR and its Governance process actually facilitates the governance of the service. S-RAMP is only a view into the governance  Use DeliveryFeedback Service – Search repository 1 and find that one does not exist – Search repository 2 and find that it does exist and the uniqueService property has been set to “approved” – Discuss that the governance was done out of band and that again S-RAMP Client is only a view of the results of the governance process – Implement the service by creating a relationship to the approved service  Monitor Service Reuse to enable Vitality process – Query the repository looking for excessive number of services that have a uniqueService set to null (indicates rogue services) or to exceptionGranted (indicates that governance process needs tuning) – Discuss that different repositories implement governance differently. Because of heterogeneous environments users may need to augment their services with properties to help with the governance of services – Also discuss that the use of this property is in no way suggesting a change to the S-RAMP data model

SWG Infrastructure Standards © 2007 IBM Corporation Demo realized in S-RAMP client