Extra Radiosonde Observations at 06UTC (2PM) in China Mainland and Their Impact Study on Mesoscale Model /Global Model XU Zhifang 1 CAO Yunchang 2 WANG.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Adaptive Estimation and Tuning of Satellite Observation Error in Assimilation Cycle with GRAPES Hua ZHANG, Dehui CHEN, Xueshun SHEN, Jishan XUE, Wei HAN.
Advertisements

Slide 1ECMWF forecast products users meeting – Reading, June 2005 Verification of weather parameters Anna Ghelli, ECMWF.
The development of GRAPES_RAFS and its applications Xu Zhifang Hao Min Zhu Lijuan Gong Jiangdong Chen Dehui National Meteorological Center, CMA Wan Qilin.
Introduction to data assimilation in meteorology Pierre Brousseau, Ludovic Auger ATMO 08,Alghero, september 2008.
Jaekwan Shim, Yoon-Jeong Hwang, Yeon-Hee Kim, Kwan-Young Chung Forecast Research Division, National Institute of Meteorological Research, KMA The Experiments.
5/18/2015 Prediction of the 10 July 2004 Beijing Flood with a High- Resolution NWP model Ying-Hwa Kuo 1 and Yingchun Wang 2 1. National Center for Atmospheric.
The use of the NWCSAF High Resolution Wind product in the mesoscale AROME model at the Hungarian Meteorological Service Máté Mile, Mária Putsay and Márta.
Huang et al: MTG-IRS OSSEMMT, June MTG-IRS OSSE on regional scales Xiang-Yu Huang, Hongli Wang, Yongsheng Chen and Xin Zhang National Center.
Verification of Numerical Weather Prediction systems employed by the Australian Bureau of Meteorology over East Antarctica during the summer season.
COSMO General Meeting Zurich, 2005 Institute of Meteorology and Water Management Warsaw, Poland- 1 - Verification of the LM at IMGW Katarzyna Starosta,
Dr Mark Cresswell Model Assimilation 69EG6517 – Impacts & Models of Climate Change.
Satellite Application on Weather Services in Japan Yasushi SUZUKI Japan Weather Association 12nd. GPM Applications Workshop, June/9-10/2015.
1 Tropical cyclone (TC) trajectory and storm precipitation forecast improvement using SFOV AIRS soundings Jun Tim Schmit &, Hui Liu #, Jinlong Li.
Institute of Heavy Rain, Wuhan, CMA Wang Yehong Cui Chunguang Zhao Yuchun Li Hongli Institute of Heavy Rain, Wuhan, CMA Assimilation of Radar Observations.
Observing Strategy and Observation Targeting for Tropical Cyclones Using Ensemble-Based Sensitivity Analysis and Data Assimilation Chen, Deng-Shun 3 Dec,
ISDA 2014, Feb 24 – 28, Munich 1 Impact of ensemble perturbations provided by convective-scale ensemble data assimilation in the COSMO-DE model Florian.
TECO-2006 Geneva, Dec. 3-5, Improvements in the Upper-Air Observation Systems in Japan M. Ishihara, M. Chiba, Y. Izumikawa, N. Kinoshita, and N.
3DVAR Retrieval of 3D Moisture Field from Slant- path Water Vapor Observations of a High-resolution Hypothetical GPS Network Haixia Liu and Ming Xue Center.
Assimilation of various observational data using JMA meso 4D-VAR and its impact on precipitation forecasts Ko KOIZUMI Numerical Prediction Division Japan.
COSMO General Meeting, Offenbach, 7 – 11 Sept Dependance of bias on initial time of forecasts 1 WG1 Overview
IMPROVING VERY-SHORT-TERM STORM PREDICTIONS BY ASSIMILATING RADAR AND SATELLITE DATA INTO A MESOSCALE NWP MODEL Allen Zhao 1, John Cook 1, Qin Xu 2, and.
30 November December International Workshop on Advancement of Typhoon Track Forecast Technique 11 Observing system experiments using the operational.
Non-hydrostatic Numerical Model Study on Tropical Mesoscale System During SCOUT DARWIN Campaign Wuhu Feng 1 and M.P. Chipperfield 1 IAS, School of Earth.
Latest results in verification over Poland Katarzyna Starosta, Joanna Linkowska Institute of Meteorology and Water Management, Warsaw 9th COSMO General.
Potential Benefits of Multiple-Doppler Radar Data to Quantitative Precipitation Forecasting: Assimilation of Simulated Data Using WRF-3DVAR System Soichiro.
Page 1© Crown copyright Scale selective verification of precipitation forecasts Nigel Roberts and Humphrey Lean.
Development and Testing of a Regional GSI-Based EnKF-Hybrid System for the Rapid Refresh Configuration Yujie Pan 1, Kefeng Zhu 1, Ming Xue 1,2, Xuguang.
A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional Climate and Weather. Zhang, D.-L., W.-Z. Zheng, and Y.-K. Xue, 2003: A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional.
GPS GPS derived integrated water vapor in aLMo: impact study with COST 716 near real time data Jean-Marie Bettems, MeteoSwiss Guergana Guerova, IAP, University.
Impact of FORMOSAT-3 GPS Data Assimilation on WRF model during 2007 Mei-yu season in Taiwan Shyuan-Ru Miaw, Pay-Liam Lin Department of Atmospheric Sciences.
5 th ICMCSDong-Kyou Lee Seoul National University Dong-Kyou Lee, Hyun-Ha Lee, Jo-Han Lee, Joo-Wan Kim Radar Data Assimilation in the Simulation of Mesoscale.
Evaluation of radiance data assimilation impact on Rapid Refresh forecast skill for retrospective and real-time experiments Haidao Lin Steve Weygandt Stan.
Use ensemble error covariance information in GRAPES 3DVAR Jiandong GONG, Ruichun WANG NWP center of CMA Oct 27, 2015.
The Impact of the Reduced Radiosonde Observation in Russia on GRAPES Global Model Weihong Tian, Ruichun Wang, Shiwei Tao, Xiaomin Wan Numerical Prediction.
Preliminary results from assimilation of GPS radio occultation data in WRF using an ensemble filter H. Liu, J. Anderson, B. Kuo, C. Snyder, A. Caya IMAGe.
The Hyperspectral Environmental Suite (HES) and Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) will be flown on the next generation of NOAA Geostationary Operational Environmental.
NCAR April 1 st 2003 Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Data Assimilation in AMPS Dale Barker S. Rizvi, and M. Duda MMM Division, NCAR
Trials of a 1km Version of the Unified Model for Short Range Forecasting of Convective Events Humphrey Lean, Susan Ballard, Peter Clark, Mark Dixon, Zhihong.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2005 DEVELOPMENT OF 1- 4KM RESOLUTION DATA ASSIMILATION FOR NOWCASTING AT THE MET OFFICE Sue Ballard, September 2005 Z. Li, M.
MODIS Winds Assimilation Impact Study with the CMC Operational Forecast System Réal Sarrazin Data Assimilation and Quality Control Canadian Meteorological.
Deutscher Wetterdienst FE VERSUS 2 Priority Project Meeting Langen Use of Feedback Files for Verification at DWD Ulrich Pflüger Deutscher.
Global vs mesoscale ATOVS assimilation at the Met Office Global Large obs error (4 K) NESDIS 1B radiances NOAA-15 & 16 HIRS and AMSU thinned to 154 km.
WRF-based rapid updating cycling system of BMB(BJ-RUC) and its performance during the Olympic Games 2008 Min Chen, Shui-yong Fan, Jiqin Zhong Institute.
ALADIN 3DVAR at the Hungarian Meteorological Service 1 _____________________________________________________________________________________ 27th EWGLAM.
OSEs with HIRLAM and HARMONIE for EUCOS Nils Gustafsson, SMHI Sigurdur Thorsteinsson, IMO John de Vries, KNMI Roger Randriamampianina, met.no.
Slide 1 Investigations on alternative interpretations of AMVs Kirsti Salonen and Niels Bormann 12 th International Winds Workshop, 19 th June 2014.
Numerical Weather Forecast Model (governing equations)
Xiang-Yu Huang, Hongli Wang, Yongsheng Chen
Rapid Update Cycle-RUC
Tadashi Fujita (NPD JMA)
Update on the Northwest Regional Modeling System 2013
Diurnal cycle of warm season precipitation in Hainan Island
Yongqiang Sun, Michael Ying, Shuguang Wang, Fuqing Zhang
WG5-Report from Switzerland: Verification of aLMo in the year 2005
A New Scheme for Chaotic-Attractor-Theory Oriented Data Assimilation
Dr. Randhir Singh Indian Institute of Remote Sensing (IIRS)
Dr. Randhir Singh Indian Institute of Remote Sensing (IIRS)
Stéphane Laroche Judy St-James Iriola Mati Réal Sarrazin
COSMO General Meeting 2009 WG5 Parallel Session 7 September 2009
Verification Overview
Observation uncertainty in verification
Lidia Cucurull, NCEP/JCSDA
Item Taking into account radiosonde position in verification
Assimilation of Global Positioning System Radio Occultation Observations Using an Ensemble Filter in Atmospheric Prediction Models Hui Liu, Jefferey Anderson,
Comparison of different combinations of ensemble-based and variational data assimilation approaches for deterministic NWP Mark Buehner Data Assimilation.
2007 Mei-yu season Chien and Kuo (2009), GPS Solutions
Meteorological Observation Center of CMA
Impact of aircraft data in the MSC forecast systems
Development of Meso-scale Numerical Model System in IHR
Peter M.K. Yau and Badrinath Nagarajan McGill University
Presentation transcript:

Extra Radiosonde Observations at 06UTC (2PM) in China Mainland and Their Impact Study on Mesoscale Model /Global Model XU Zhifang 1 CAO Yunchang 2 WANG Ruiwen 1 WANG Dan 1 GONG JianDong 1 ZHANG Lihong 1,3 TIAN Weihong 1 1 Numerical Weather Prediction Center of CMA 2 Meteorological Observation Center of CMA 3 Chengdu Institute of Plateau Meteorology of CMA SIXTH WMO WORKSHOP ON THE IMPACT OF VARIOUS OBSERVING SYSTEMS ON NWP

Outline Background Meso-scale model impact study –Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSEs) –Observing System Experiments (OSEs) Global model impact study –Radiosonde impact diagnose –OSEs Discussion and conclusion

Beijing Rainfall Tianjing Rainfall Shaoguan Rainfall Lianyungang Rainfall Xiangshui Rainfall Shenyang Convective weather Wuhan Rainfall Guizhou Rainfall Xiangyang rainfall Hazard weather events (strong convective, heavy rainfall etc. ) generally happened in afternoon to mid-night, bring lives and property lost. Met-service demands …, more than “what’s the weather going to be ?

Frequency of short-duration heavy rainfall ≥ 20 mm/h (%). (Chen, 2013) SpringSummerAutumn Samples from April-September Climate background of short-duration heavy rainfall

Diurnal variations of frequencies of Short-duration heavy rainfall ≥20 mm/h (%) BT 08-14BT 14-20BT 20-02BT Diurnal variations of average frequencies of Short-duration heavy rainfall ≥20 mm/h, and temperature of brightness blackbody on cloud top (TBB) ≤ -52 ℃. Short-duration heavy rainfall frequencies are high in the period from afternoon to evening (14BT-20BT) in summer. (Chen, 2013) Diurnal variations of heavy rainfall

key questions in meso-scale model How much benefit can be obtained from extra radiosondes at 14BT (Beijing time) ? How many extra stations are needed? Balance the cost & benefit Radiosonde balloon type Expensive balloon to get observations to 10hpa or cheaper one in lower and middle troposphere Could unconventional observations replace extra radiosondes? eg, GPS/PW + AMVs + others

Exp1: without 06UTC radiosondes Exp2 : with 06UTC 80 stations radiosondes OSSE experiments Distribution of 80 Radiosonde Stations selected by forecasters Nature run from WRF model NCEP FNL for IC & BC Resolution: 10km, 50level Domain : E, 10-70N 12 hour spin-up Simulated observations : TEMP(80), synop, ships, AMVs, GPS/PW, airep, wind-profiler Obs errors: real data obs error No obs bias be considered

24h Accumulated Precipitation (Unit:mm) Nature Run (b) observation (c) Truth(WRF) (d) Truth(WRF) (a) Observation 00UTC UTC 21 June 00UTC UTC 22 June

Mean RMS error of 06UTC analysis (3 days average ) OSSE results

Left: Equal Threat Score (ETS); Right: Bias (initial: 06UTC19, 06UTC 20, 06UTC 21, June 2014) 6hour interval accumulated simulated rainfall (init:06UTC) Precipitation threshold (mm)

Left: Equal Threat Score (ETS);Right: Bias (initial: 12UTC19, 12UTC 20, 12UTC 21) 6hour interval accumulated simulated rainfall (init:12UTC)

Synoptic analysis Analysis of 500hpa geopotential height on 06 UTC 19 June 2014 Truth exp1 exp2

Truth exp1 exp2 Analysis of 700hpa wind field on 06 UTC 19June 2014 False vortex Convergence line

EXP1 EXP2 The 6h Accumulated Precipitation (Unit:mm) Solid line : Truth ; Shaded : simulated

Truthexp1 exp2 06UTC19 12UTC19 18UTC19 pressure longitude

Extra radio-sonde field experiments Period: 1-30 June of 2013, and 1-30 June of 2014 Stations: 120 stations in 2013, and 113 stations in 2014 of China Organization: China Meteorological Administration (CMA) Observing Time: 06UTC (14PM in Beijing time) (balloon released at 05:15 UTC) Observing height: m for P/T/RH, and m for U/V Cost : 1130 RMB per time per station (~US$200)

Schematic of GRAPES_RAFS configuration DATA ASSIMILATION GRAPES_RAFS ( Rapid Analysis & Forecast System ) obs data in 3h window; Basic configuration

OSE Experimenst Design Period:1-15 June 2014 Exp_14 : with 06UTC radiosonde (u,v,p,RH). Exp_no14: without 06UTC radiosonde. Exp_300hPa: with 06UTC radiosonde below 300hPa. Exp_nogps: with 06UTC radiosonde, without unconventional observation ( GPS/PW, AMVs, Radar VAD wind, GNSS/RO retrieval T,q ) Distribution of radiosonde stations Exp_NW: without 06UTC radiosonde at North-West area. Lower frequency for short-duration heavy rainfall Exp_NE: without 06UTC radiosonde at North-East area.

With & W/o 06UTC radiosonde experiment Verification: 12 UTC background VS radiosonde observation The Vertical profiles of RMSE (Red) and Bias(Blue) for background field verified against radiosonde observation at 12UTC P RH U V Solid: Exp_14 Dash: Exp_no14 Exp_14 worse Exp_14 better worse better

6h rainfall verification (against 2400 AWS station) Initialization : 06UTC Initialization : 12UTC ETS ETS

EXP_no14 Exp_14 3h (09UTC-12UTC) accumulated precipitation (Unit:mm) Solid line :observation shaded: simulated Forecast field on 12 UTC 1 June 2014; Shaded: Water vapor content at 850hPa; Solid line: geopotential height at 500hPa ; Wind barb: wind direction and speed at 850hPa Observation EXP_no14 Exp_14

With 06UTC radiosonde & with unconventional obs Verification: 12 UTC background VS radiosonde observation The Vertical profiles of RMSE (Red) and Bias(Blue) for background field verified against radiosonde observation at 12UTC Solid: Exp_nogps Dash: Exp_no14 P RH U V Exp_nogps worse Exp_nogps better Exp_nogps worse

6h rainfall verification Initialization : 06UTC Initialization : 12UTC ETS

P U V ETS Initialization : 06UTC Accumulated 6h simulated rainfall verification Solid: Exp_14 Dash: Exp_300hpa With 06UTC radiosonde (top to 10hpa, or 300hpa) Verification: 12 UTC background VS radiosonde observation Exp-300hpa better Exp-300hpa better

With & W/o 06UTC radiosonde at NW/NE of China Verification: 12 UTC background VS RS observation U U V V P P Solid: Exp_14 Dash: Exp_NW Solid: Exp_14 Dash: Exp_NE The Vertical profiles of RMSE (Red) and Bias(Blue) for background field verified against radiosonde observation at 12UTC

ETS Accumulated 6h simulated rainfall verification Initialization : 06UTC

~14 stations ~81 stations ~16 stations Solar radiation bias estimate O-A (ERA) June-August, 2014, 00/06/12UTC Sippican MK2 (USA) China

GRAPES forecast model Non-hydrostatic equations Terrain-following coordinate Arakawa-C(horizontal) and Charney Phillips(vertical) grid 60levels, model top at 32.5km Resolution 0.5°x 0.5 °. GRAPES-3DVar Observations assimilated : conventional data (radiosondes, synops, ships, AMV and aircraft), GNSS RO, radiances(NOAA15,16,18,19,METOP-A AMSU-A) Incremental digital filter initialization GRAPES (Global/Regional Assimilation PrEdiction System) Experiment Setup Experiment 0012: Control run, with all observations Experiment : Control run + 06UTCC radiosonde Experiment 0006 : 00UTC+06UTC radiosonde Cycling time: 1 st - 30 th, June, 2014 Verified against ERA-Interim and Radiosonde observation

Observation impact on analysis

500hPa 850hPa 700hPa Observations contribution Water vapor content 6h(00-06UTC) observing precipitation

850hPa 500hPa 200hPa 700hPa Observations contribution Wind

850hPa 500hPa 200hPa 700hPa Observations contribution Temperature

GRAPES ANA-ERA in East Asia at 06UTC Temp Heigh

GRAPES ANA-ERA at 500hpa in East Asia at 06UTC

Verificiation: GRAPES ANA-ERA in East Asia at 12 UTC

GRAPES ANA-ERA in East Asia at 18 UTC

B-O Pressure Bias and STD (against GRAPFS Ana) 06UTC 12UTC 18UTC00UTC pressure

GRAPES forecast in East Asia at 12 UTC

Verification CARD (Ref: FNL)

Discussion and conclusions RS data quality is the most important issues. Solar radiation bias is very likely the key reason for weakness of 6UTC radiosonde observation impact. Solar radiation bias correction scheme should rechecked for different RS type, black namelist isneeded. For troposphere, assimilating 06UTC radiosonde observations can improve forecast (eg. higher precipitation score and smaller RMSEs), especially for forecast initial from 06UTC. RS below 300hpa has similar impact for precipitation forecast. Unconventional observation data are not similar as 06UTC radiosonde observations. 06UTC RS need more research on their impact on meso-scale model and global model.

THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION!