David V. Stark In collaboration with: Sheila Kannappan, Kathleen Eckert, Jonathan Florez, Kirsten Hall, Linda Watson, Erik Hoversten, Joseph Burchett,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A simple model to explain the high gas content of galaxy UGC 8802 Ruixiang Chang Shanghai Astronomical Observatory Collaborators: Jinliang Hou Shiyin Shen.
Advertisements

Metals at Highish Redshift And Large Scale Structures From DLAs to Underdense Regions Patrick Petitjean Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris B. Aracil R.
Chemical Cartography with SDSS/APOGEE Michael Hayden (NMSU), Jo Bovy (IAS), Steve Majewski (UVa), Jennifer Johnson (OSU), Gail Zasowski (JHU), Leo Girardi.
Observations of the evolution of HI in galaxies across different environments. D.J. Pisano (West Virginia University)
Formation of Globular Clusters in  CDM Cosmology Oleg Gnedin (University of Michigan)
Simulating the joint evolution of quasars, galaxies and their large-scale distribution Springel et al., 2005 Presented by Eve LoCastro October 1, 2009.
HI Gas as Function of Environment When and where do galaxies stop accreting cool gas? How do they loose the cool gas? When do they stop forming stars?
Astro-2: History of the Universe Lecture 4; April
Dark Halos of Fossil Groups and Clusters Observations and Simulations Ali Dariush, Trevor Ponman Graham Smith University of Birmingham, UK Frazer Pearce.
Early Evolution of Massive Galaxies Romeel Davé Kristian Finlator Ben D. Oppenheimer University of Arizona.
Multivariate Properties of Galaxies at Low Redshift.
Dark Matter and Galaxy Formation Section 4: Semi-Analytic Models of Galaxy Formation Joel R. Primack 2009, eprint arXiv: Presented by: Michael.
AGN in Clusters of Galaxies Paul Martini The Ohio State University J.S. Mulchaey, D.D. Kelson (OCIW) E. Kim (CfA), A. Athey (OCIW)
Merger Histories of LCDM Galaxies: Disk Survivability and the Deposition of Cold Gas via Mergers Kyle Stewart AAS Dissertation Talk 213 th AAS Meeting.
Dark Matter and Galaxy Formation (Section 3: Galaxy Data vs. Simulations) Joel R. Primack 2009, eprint arXiv: Presented by: Michael Solway.
Supermassive Black Holes and their Environments Jörg M. Colberg with Tiziana Di Matteo Carnegie-Mellon University.
Cosmological formation of elliptical galaxies * Thorsten Naab & Jeremiah P. Ostriker (Munich, Princeton) T.Naab (USM), P. Johannson (USM), J.P. Ostriker.
I N T R O D U C T I O N The mechanism of galaxy formation involves the cooling and condensation of baryons inside the gravitational potential well provided.
Galactic Metamorphoses: Role of Structure Christopher J. Conselice.
Galaxy groups Michael Balogh Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Waterloo.
Dwarf LSB galaxies in the Virgo cluster Jonathan Davies.
Understanding formation of galaxies from their environments Yipeng Jing Shanghai Astronomical Observatory.
After decoupling, overdense regions collapse IF Collapse timefor all sizes. More small ripples than large waves. --> Universe dominated by globular clusters.
Galaxy Growth: The role of environment Simone Weinmann (MPA Garching) Collaborators: Guinevere Kauffmann, Frank van den Bosch, Anna Pasquali, Dan McIntosh,
Linking Galaxies’ Gas Content to their Metallicity Gradients Sean Moran Johns Hopkins University & The GASS Team.
The coordinated growth of stars, haloes and large-scale structure since z=1 Michael Balogh Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Waterloo.
The Environmental Effect on the UV Color-Magnitude Relation of Early-type Galaxies Hwihyun Kim Journal Club 10/24/2008 Schawinski et al. 2007, ApJS 173,
Faint Low Surface Brightness Galaxies in the Virgo Cluster Jonathan Davies, Sabina Sabatini and Sarah Roberts SAO September 2009.
Modeling the dependence of galaxy clustering on stellar mass and SEDs Lan Wang Collaborators: Guinevere Kauffmann (MPA) Cheng Li (MPA/SHAO, USTC) Gabriella.
Baryon content of galaxy groups Ming Sun (University of Virginia) ‏ M. Voit, M. Donahue (MSU) A. Vikhlinin, W. Forman, C. Jones (CfA) N. Sehgal (KIPAC)
MNRAS, submitted. Galaxy evolution Evolution in global properties reasonably well established What drives this evolution? How does it depend on environment?
The GEMS Project and Collapsed Groups Duncan Forbes Swinburne University.
Zheng Dept. of Astronomy, Ohio State University David Weinberg (Advisor, Ohio State) Andreas Berlind (NYU) Josh Frieman (Chicago) Jeremy Tinker (Ohio State)
The Role of Galaxy Mergers in Forming the Red-Sequence Galaxies
The dynamics of the gas regulator model and the implied cosmic sSFR-history Yingjie Peng Cambridge Roberto Maiolino, Simon J. Lilly, Alvio Renzini.
Cool Halo Gas in a Cosmological Context Kyle Stewart “Team Irvine” UC Santa Cruz Galaxy Formation Workshop Kyle Stewart “Team Irvine” UC Santa.
Feedback Observations and Simulations of Elliptical Galaxies –Daniel Wang, Shikui Tang, Yu Lu, Houjun Mo (UMASS) –Mordecai Mac-Low (AMNH) –Ryan Joung (Princeton)
Gas Accretion and Secular Processes 1  How much mass assembled in mergers?  How much through gas accretion and secular evolution? Keres et al 2005, Dekel.
Semi-analytical model of galaxy formation Xi Kang Purple Mountain Observatory, CAS.
联 合 天 体 物 理 中 心 Joint Center for Astrophysics The half-light radius distribution of LBGs and their stellar mass function Chenggang Shu Joint Center for.
Recent Progress in Understanding X-ray Emission From Early-type Galaxies: The Hot Gas Component Jimmy A. Irwin University of Michigan X-rays From Nearby.
Present-Day Descendants of z=3.1 Ly  Emitting (LAE) Galaxies in the Millennium-II Halo Merger Trees Jean P. Walker Soler – Rutgers University Eric Gawiser.
Mass and environment quenching  (Peng et al 2010, 2012) from Peng et al (2012) centrals satellites Two “separable effects” Mass-quenching: Depends on.
KASI Galaxy Evolution Journal Club A Massive Protocluster of Galaxies at a Redshift of z ~ P. L. Capak et al. 2011, Nature, in press (arXive: )
Interpreting the relationship between galaxy luminosity, color, and environment. Andreas Berlind (NYU, CCPP) SPH predictions: Michael Blanton (NYU) David.
BULGE FRACTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF STAR FORMATION IN SAMI GALAXIES Greg Goldstein PhD student, Dept of Physics and Astronomy, Macquarie University Supervisors:
Julia Bryant HECTOR project scientist Australian Astronomical Observatory University of Sydney CAASTRO With Joss Bland-Hawthorn, Jon Lawrence, Scott Croom.
Towards Realistic Modeling of Massive Star Clusters Oleg Gnedin (University of Michigan) graduate student Hui Li.
On the Origin of Galaxy Morphology in a Hierarchical Universe
Jesper Rasmussen (Univ. of Birmingham)
Genevieve J. Graves University of California, Santa Cruz
Disturbed Things Come in small packages
The morphology and angular momentum of simulated galaxy populations
Neutral Hydrogen in Galaxy Groups
The formation and dynamical state of the brightest cluster galaxies
Extragalactic Archaeology
Satellite Quenching and Structural Change
Signposts of massive star formation
Exploring Galactic Scaling Relations with Numerical Simulations
Jessica L. Rosenberg George Mason University
HUBBLE DEEP FIELD:.
High Resolution Spectroscopy of the IGM: How High
Quenching of the star formation activity in cluster galaxies
Modeling the dependence of galaxy clustering on stellar mass and SEDs
SDSS-IV MaNGA: The Spatial Distribution of Star Formation and its Dependence on Mass, Structure and Environment (arXiv: v1) 胡 宁
Galactic Astronomy 銀河物理学特論 I Lecture 3-3: Stellar mass function of galaxies Seminar: Perez-Gonzalez et al. 2008, ApJ, 675, 234 Lecture: 2012/01/16.
Modeling Star Formation and Chemical Evolution in the Local Group dwarfs Oleg Gnedin University of Michigan.
Galaxy evolution in group environments: The role of preprocessing
Mass Loss and Preprocessing of Galaxies Traversing Group Environments
Borislav Nedelchev et al. 2019
Presentation transcript:

David V. Stark In collaboration with: Sheila Kannappan, Kathleen Eckert, Jonathan Florez, Kirsten Hall, Linda Watson, Erik Hoversten, Joseph Burchett, David Guynn, Ashley Baker, Amanda Moffett, Mark Norris, Martha Haynes, Riccardo Giovanelli, Andreas Berlind, Adam Leroy, D. J. Pisano, Lisa Wei, Roberto Gonzalez, Victor Calderon Multi-Scale Environmental Influences on Galaxy Gas Content

Environmental processes can influence galaxy gas content “Small” (dark matter halo) scale Gas replenishment cosmological accretion gas-rich mergers Gas removal/exhaustion gas stripping starvation How important are gas removal/consumption processes in low-mass groups? Influence from larger-scale environment? Flyby interactions between halos (e.g. Wetzel+12) Competitive gas accretion (Hearin+15) Ram-pressure stripping of halo gas by IGM (Bahe+13) Variations in IGM temperature/cooling time (Cen+11) Halo assembly bias: earlier halo formation time in overdense regions (Gao+05)

Key Questions Are group-scale processes that lower gas content important in low-mass groups? Is galaxy gas content entirely regulated by the group dark matter halo and its internal environment? Or does larger-scale environment also play a role?

The Survey PI: Sheila Kannappan (UNC) Volume-limited census of mass (stars, gas, dark matter), kinematics, SF, metallicity in closed volume for statistically representative subset of z=0 galaxy population Improved completeness over SDSS Baryonic mass > Stellar mass > ~1500 galaxies

The RESOLVE Atomic Gas (HI) Census Not flux limited Goal: strong detections or upper limits (5-10% of stellar mass) for all galaxies ~95% complete to date (Stark et al., submitted) Original completeness (ALFALFA only) Log baryonic massLog stellar mass Current completeness Full Survey A semester B semester

Environment Metrics 1) Group identifications via friends-of-friends algorithm (FoF) 2) Group dark matter halo mass (M h ) Halo Abundance Matching (HAM) w/ integrated group stellar mass – M ⊙ 3) Relative large-scale structure density (  LSS ) Projected mass density within distance to 3 rd nearest group (not galaxy) 4) Large-scale structure classification FoF on groups + visual classification into filaments, walls, etc.

Filament Wall Blob Cluster (M halo >10 13 ) unclassified RESOLVE-A RESOLVE-B

Influence of dark matter halo G/S = gas-to-stellar mass ratio Satellite gas deficiency in groups down to M ⊙ (MW-sized halos) Smooth relation for centrals, but built in! < 20 points in bin, bootstrapped uncertainties less robust < 20 points in bin, bootstrapped uncertainties less robust Group Halo Mass Log stellar Mass Stellar mass completeness limit Log G/S

HAM w/ baryonic mass (stellar + gas mass) Log stellar Mass Log G/S centrals Log stellar Mass HAM w/ stellar mass satellites Behavior of centrals strongly linked halo abundance matching approach Consistent behavior for satellites independent of approach

Median G/S in large- scale filaments vs. walls Log halo mass M h ≤10 12 : Walls are more gas-poor compared to filaments Log halo mass log G/S

Gas deficiency and large-scale density log LSS densityFraction with G/S < 0.1 All Centrals Filament Centrals Wall Centrals Log Group Halo Mass

Gas deficiency and large-scale density Fraction with G/S < 0.1 All Centrals Filament Centrals Wall Centrals Walls more gas-poor at fixed halo mass and density Many gas-poor galaxies in typically gas-dominated halo mass regime log LSS density Log Group Halo Mass

What drives low gas fractions? Gas deficient centrals typically found close to more massive halos Flyby interactions? Competitive accretion? Mostly found in walls Should we consider these systems satellites? fall within “splashback radius” (More+2015) M halo < M ⊙ centrals Splashback radius? Distance to nearest >10 12 M sun halo (R 200m ) Relative number

Why are our walls more gas poor? Ram pressure stripping by IGM (unknown how this may vary between walls and filaments)? Different gas accretion behavior in walls vs filaments? Our walls are more evolved large-scale structures (assembly bias)? Processes that deplete gas content at work longer? Plus hotter IGM in earlier forming structures (Cen+11)  longer gas cooling times Walls have higher flyby interaction rate? More competitive gas accretion?

Summary Systematic satellite gas deficiency in groups down to M ⊙. Detailed influence of halo mass on central G/S uncertain Below group halo masses of M ⊙ : Wall galaxies systematically more gas-poor than filament galaxies Fraction of gas poor centrals increases with LSS density (strongest dependence in walls, weak in filaments) Unusually gas-poor centrals often found close to much more massive halos gas stripping and/or starvation due to larger group? Distance to nearest >10 12 M sun halo (R 200m ) Log stellar mass G/S Log group halo mass

Halo abundance matching

Fixed “fractional stellar mass growth rate” (like sSFR) FSMGR = “fractional stellar mass growth rate” (Kannappan et al. 2013) FSMGR = M * (formed in last Gyr)/M * (formed before last Gyr)