Mike Kordosky, 3 rd Project X Workshop June 5-6, 2008 MINERvA Mike Kordosky William and Mary High Precision Neutrino Scattering at the Main Injector.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MINERvA Overview MINERvA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: – Study.
Advertisements

Incoming energy crucial for your physics result, but only badly known (~50%) Incoming energy crucial for your physics result, but only badly known (~50%)
How to Build a Neutrino Oscillations Detector - Why MINOS is like it is! Alfons Weber March 2005.
F.Sanchez (UAB/IFAE)ISS Meeting, Detector Parallel Meeting. Jan 2006 Low Energy Neutrino Interactions & Near Detectors F.Sánchez Universitat Autònoma de.
The MINERnA Experiment
The Design of MINER  A Howard Budd University of Rochester August, 2004.
2/21/2008 P5 neutrino session1 Conventional neutrino experiments Heidi Schellman P5 February 21, 2008.
NuMI MINOS The MINOS Far Detector Cosmic Rays and their neutrinos are being collected now. How does this work, and of what use is this data? Alec Habig,
Bari Osmanov University of Florida MINERvA: neutrino cross-sections for the future EPS HEP July, Krakow, Poland Bari Osmanov, University of.
Fancy Rutgers Logo that eats CPU to print was here DNP Oct The MINER A Experiment Ronald Ransome Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Piscataway,
Physics Topics in MINER A David Boehnlein - Fermilab for the MINERvA Collaboration Overview of MINERvA The high intensity of the NuMI beamline at Fermilab.
MINERvA Overview MINERvA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: – Study.
NuMI Near Hall Detectors: MINOS and Beyond Jorge G. Morfín Fermilab NuFact’02 London, July 2002.
1 Overview of the MINER A Experiment Vittorio Paolone(representing the MINER A Collaboration) University of Pittsburgh  Motivation  MINER A Detector.
Measurements of F 2 and R=σ L /σ T on Deuteron and Nuclei in the Nucleon Resonance Region Ya Li January 31, 2009 Jlab E02-109/E (Jan05)
HARP for MiniBooNE Linda R. Coney Columbia University DPF 2004.
The Muon Neutrino Quasi-Elastic Cross Section Measurement on Plastic Scintillator Tammy Walton December 4, 2013 Hampton University Physics Group Meeting.
R. Ransome - PANIC July 26, Charged Current Neutrino Scattering in MINER A Ronald Ransome Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey On behalf.
The fully active scintillator target is surrounded by nuclear targets and calorimeters. Interactions in the scintillator (CH n ) can be compared with interactions.
July 6, INPC 1 The MINER A Experiment R. Ransome Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey for the MINER A collaboration ν Full MINERνA Detector.
Pion Production in MINERνA Brandon Eberly University of Pittsburgh July 27, 2012 On behalf of the MINERνA collaboration MINER ν A 1.
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
Scintillation hodoscope with SiPM readout for the CLAS detector S. Stepanyan (JLAB) IEEE conference, Dresden, October 21, 2008.
THE FORWARD PROTON DETECTOR AT DZERO Gilvan Alves Lafex/CBPF 1) MOTIVATION 2) DETECTOR OPTIONS 3) FPD R&D 4) OUTLOOK Lishep 98 Lafex/CBPF Feb 17, 1998.
The Design and Performance of the MINER A Detector Howard Budd, University of Rochester Technology and Instrumentation in Particle Physics 2011.
Long Baseline Experiments at Fermilab Maury Goodman.
MINER A (FNAL E938) Gabriel Niculescu, JMU MINERA web site: Miner a Main Injector MINOS Near Detector NuMI Beam Where?  FERMILAB.
FNAL User’s Meeting June The MINER A Experiment Ronald Ransome Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Piscataway, NJ For the MINER A Collaboration.
The NOvA Experiment Ji Liu On behalf of the NOvA collaboration College of William and Mary APS April Meeting April 1, 2012.
Teppei Katori Indiana University Rencontres de Moriond EW 2008 La Thuile, Italia, Mar., 05, 08 Neutrino cross section measurements for long-baseline neutrino.
Measurement of F 2 and R=σ L /σ T in Nuclei at Low Q 2 Phase I Ya Li Hampton University January 18, 2008.
Preliminary Results from the MINER A Experiment Deborah Harris Fermilab on behalf of the MINERvA Collaboration.
MINERvA Main INjector ExpeRiment for -A is the symbol for the neutrino. The beam that is sent to MINERvA is made out of neutrinos. In chemistry, an A stands.
The Status of MINOS Mike Kordosky University College London for the collaboration.
Detector Monte-Carlo ● Goal: Develop software tools to: – Model detector performance – Study background issues – Calculate event rates – Determine feasibility.
1 Mike Kordosky – NuFact 06 - Aug 27, 2006 Neutrino Interactions in the MINOS Near Detector Mike Kordosky University College London on behalf of the MINOS.
1 Physics Requirements on Reconstruction and Simulation Software Jorge G. Morfín - Fermilab.
Physics - Detector Optimization Studies NuInt05 Highlights Jorge G. Morfín Fermilab.
Medium baseline neutrino oscillation searches Andrew Bazarko, Princeton University Les Houches, 20 June 2001 LSND: MeVdecay at rest MeVdecay in flight.
Low-Energy -Nucleus Scattering Jorge G. Morfín Fermilab WIN’03 8 October 2003.
1 Constraining ME Flux Using ν + e Elastic Scattering Wenting Tan Hampton University Jaewon Park University of Rochester.
MINER A Main INjector ExpeRiment for v-A Active segmented scintillator detector: 5.87 tons Nuclear targets of C, Fe and Pb, Water, Helium.
D. Harris Fermilab NuFact09 Neutrino Interactions: results by Neutrino 2012 and beyond Deborah Harris Fermilab Neutrino 2010 Athens June 18, 2010 Special.
MINER A Main INjector ExpeRiment for v-A Active segmented scintillator detector: 5.87 tons Nuclear targets of C, Fe and Pb.
T2K Status Report. The Accelerator Complex a Beamline Performance 3 First T2K run completed January to June x protons accumulated.
THE MINERVA EXPERIMENT Heidi Schellman DIS DIS2010.
April 26, McGrew 1 Goals of the Near Detector Complex at T2K Clark McGrew Stony Brook University Road Map The Requirements The Technique.
The MINER A Experiment Sacha Kopp, University of Texas at Austin on behalf of the Minerva Collaboration.
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
P.F.Ermolov SVD-2 status and experimental program VHMP 16 April 2005 SVD-2 status and experimental program 1.SVD history 2.SVD-2 setup 3.Experiment characteristics.
MINER A at the Triple Point: Three Phases at once Deborah Harris AEM August 31, 2009.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
2008 European School of High-Energy Physics - Trest, Czech Republic - 19 August - 1st September Target Tracker Data Analysis In OPERA Experiment S. Dmitrievsky,
The MINERvA Experiment: precision -A cross sections Eric Christy, Hampton University Elba, 2010 (for the MINER A Collaboration) MINERVA.
Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.
 CC QE results from the NOvA prototype detector Jarek Nowak and Minerba Betancourt.
INPC 2013 June 4 th ‘13 Alessandro Bravar for the Miner a Collaboration The MINER A Experiment What is Miner a ? beam and  flux Why Miner a ? / CCQE x-sections.
STATUS OF MINERvA Heidi Schellman DPF DPF09.
MINERνA Overview  MINERνA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei  Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: t Study.
Results from MINER  A Rick Snider Fermilab on behalf of The MINER  A collaboration ICHEP 2012 Melbourne, Australia 7-July-2012.
MINERνA Overview  MINERνA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei  Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: t Study.
Measuring Nuclear Effects with MINERnA APS April Meeting 2011 G. Arturo Fiorentini Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas On behalf of the MINERnA collaboration.
R. Tayloe, Indiana U. DNP06 1 A Search for  → e oscillations with MiniBooNE MiniBooNE does not yet have a result for the  → e oscillation search. The.
5/31/2006Fermilab Users Meeting1 Zelimir Djurcic Physics Department Columbia University MiniBooNE, NO A, MINER A.
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
Chris Smith California Institute of Technology EPS Conference 2003
ScECAL+AHCAL+TCMT Combined Beam FNAL
Fine-Grained Near Detector(s) at JHF: Purpose and Thoughts
Impact of neutrino interaction uncertainties in T2K
High Energy Neutrino Detectors Day 2
Presentation transcript:

Mike Kordosky, 3 rd Project X Workshop June 5-6, 2008 MINERvA Mike Kordosky William and Mary High Precision Neutrino Scattering at the Main Injector

Mike Kordosky, 3 rd Project X Workshop June 5-6, 2008 MINERvA Introduction ● MINERvA: precision n NuMI ● Highly segmented fully active scintillator tracking chamber, surrounded by ECAL, HCAL – Fully reconstruced exculsive final states ● Emphasis on tried and true technology ● Nuclear targets for A dependence ● Upstream of MINOS (muon spectrometer)

Mike Kordosky, 3 rd Project X Workshop June 5-6, 2008 Motivation for MINERvA ● Entering a precision era in neutrino physics ● Our tool: n scattering on few GeV – Knowledge anchored to bubble chamber data – Nuclear targets add significant complication – Exclusive final states important ● APS Multi-Divisional Study on the Physics of Neutrinos: “determination of the neutrino reaction and production cross sections required for a precise understanding of neutrino-oscillation physics and the neutrino astronomy of astrophysical and cosmological sources. Our broad and exacting program of neutrino physics is built upon precise knowledge of how neutrinos interact with matter.”

Mike Kordosky, 3 rd Project X Workshop June 5-6, 2008 Energy Coverage MINOS DuselCNGS T2 K Boone s Nov a NuSONG n n → m p 0 p H. Gallagher

Mike Kordosky, 3 rd Project X Workshop June 5-6, 2008 Example: DUSEL n 300kt Water Cerenkov n Backgrounds from NC p 0 production feed down Study above assumes 5% knowledge of background Basic cross-sections have large uncertainties (30-100%) Note: MiniBoone coherent / all p 0 = /- 1 GeV arXiv: arXiv:

Mike Kordosky, 3 rd Project X Workshop June 5-6, 2008 MINERvA Institutions MINOS T2K NOVA Nuclear Theory Irvine Tufts William & Mary FNAL Duluth Texas Athens Pitt Rochester Hampton James Madison Rutgers Jefferson Lab Dortmund INR, Moscow Northwestern MCLA (Mass.) UNI (Peru) PUCP (Peru) CBPF (Brazil) Guanajuato (Mex)

Mike Kordosky, 3 rd Project X Workshop June 5-6, 2008 MINERvA Detector MINOS near detector (muon spectrometer) Fully Active Scintillator Target Region 8.3 tons (~3 tons fiducial) Veto Wall NuMI Beam Liquid He 0.25ton Nuclear Target Region with Pb, Fe, C 6.2 tons (including 40% Scintillator) ECA L HCA L

Mike Kordosky, 3 rd Project X Workshop June 5-6, 2008 Detector Components Scintillator Plane 64 Anode PMT PMT Box & ODU Trip-t ASIC Clear Optical Fibers Scintillator Strips and WLS

Mike Kordosky, 3 rd Project X Workshop June 5-6, 2008 U/XU/X V/XV/X To M64 PMTs Scintillator Strips 16.7mm 17mm Incoming Neutrino Beam's Eye View Side View Simulated Single pion Production nmnm

Mike Kordosky, 3 rd Project X Workshop June 5-6, 2008 U/XU/X V/XV/X Incoming Neutrino Simulated NC p 0 production nmnm X View V View U View 3D event reconstruction g g

Mike Kordosky, 3 rd Project X Workshop June 5-6, 2008 Event Yields ● Assume 4yr run 4e20 POT LE beam 12e20 POT ME beam ● Yield: ~14M events NuMI Low Energy Beam Quasi-elastic Resonance production Resonance to DIS transition region DIS Low Q 2 region and structure functions Coherent Pion Production charm / strange production 0.8 M 1.7 M 2.1 M 4.3 M CC 89k, NC 44k 230 k Nuclear Targets He C Fe Pb 0.6M 0.4M 2.0M 2.5M

Mike Kordosky, 3 rd Project X Workshop June 5-6, 2008 Physics Example n m + n → m + p Pre-Minerva (sans MiniBoone, K2K) Post MINERvA (stat errors only) “Best understood” channel ~ 15% uncertainty Quasi-elastic

Mike Kordosky, 3 rd Project X Workshop June 5-6, 2008 Current Status ● Obtained CD 3b in Nov 2007 and currently under construction ● Building MINERvA tracking prototype (20 modules) for advanced system integration, cosmic rays – If detector performs well, perhaps NuMI running (autumn 08) ● Test beam detector under construction for operation in Mtest (fall 08). – Benchmark energy scale, tune MC ● Installation/commissioning: end 2009

Mike Kordosky, 3 rd Project X Workshop June 5-6, 2008 Backups

Mike Kordosky, 3 rd Project X Workshop June 5-6, 2008 Test Beam Detector MTest Hall ● Scaled down version of MINERvA ● Benchmark detector response to single particles ● To be operated in MTest Hall, fall 2008 ● New tertiary beam to get down to 200 MeV/c ● Reconfigurable Sci, Fe, Pb modules to emulate different detector sections Test Beam Det. Nuclear Targets LI system funded by NSF U/X V/X as in main Detector

Mike Kordosky, 3 rd Project X Workshop June 5-6, 2008 Neutral Pions ● Photons cleanly identified and tracked – π 0 energy res.: 6%/√E (GeV) ● For coherent pion production, the angular distribution is dominated by physics not resolution  

Mike Kordosky, 3 rd Project X Workshop June 5-6, 2008 MINERvA and Oscillations- How much is the improvement: Nuclear Effects on MINOS Final State Interactions  Intranuclear rescattering  Energy loss and/or absorption  Change in direction MINERvA: measurements with high-A targets and high-statistics Before MINER A  stat ~  syst ( rescattering only) After MINER A:  stat >>  syst ( rescattering only )

Mike Kordosky, 3 rd Project X Workshop June 5-6, 2008 Particle Identification   p X 2 differences between right and best wrong hypothesis ● Particle ID by dE/dx in strips and endpoint activity

Mike Kordosky, 3 rd Project X Workshop June 5-6, 2008 A-dependence in scattering ● A dependence observed in e/  DIS ● Could be different for neutrinos – Presence of axial-vector current. – Different nuclear effects for valence and sea – leads to different shadowing for xF 3 compared to F EMC NMC E139 E665 shadowing EMC effect Fermi motion x sea quark valence quark If we understand at GeV Will that help at 100 GeV? Comparing with JLAB will help.

Mike Kordosky, 3 rd Project X Workshop June 5-6, 2008 Low energy inclusive and exclusive cross sections for neutrino oscillations ● Example:  0 NC important for oscillation experiments VS.

Mike Kordosky, 3 rd Project X Workshop June 5-6, 2008 Coherent Pion Production Rein-Seghal Paschos- Kartavtsev MINER A’s nuclear targets allow the first measurement of the A-dependence of  coh across a wide A range

Mike Kordosky, 3 rd Project X Workshop June 5-6, 2008 Muon Acceptance Study Fiducial Volume Cuts: radius<75cm Look at acceptance for muon – Active Target (>50cm from DS ECAL) – Nuclear Target Region In kinematic extrema of interest : – High x DIS: (x>.7) Analyzed in MINOS: >90% active TGT, >80% nucl target Remainder escape the sides – High Q 2 Quasi-Elastic: Analyzed in MINOS: >99% active TGT, >86% nucl. target

Mike Kordosky, 3 rd Project X Workshop June 5-6, 2008 Tracking Prototype 1.7cm thick scintillator planes 19 TrackerECA L cm scint cm Pb Plan View Not to scale 1 final tracking plane

Mike Kordosky, 3 rd Project X Workshop June 5-6, 2008 Cosmic Ray Rates Trigger Paddles d h m b TP South North Wideband Elevation View 6.6 ° 8.2 ° 7m 68.6 m 3.3m events / sec / 5° b (degree)

Mike Kordosky, 3 rd Project X Workshop June 5-6, 2008 Calibration Scheme 3QADCrawPE normP E mapPE MEUMeV Calibrated Quantity Calibration Stage Legend FEE test bench ● range selection ● elec. linearization ● ped. subtraction ● constant fC/ADC Cosmic Rays raw readout ● Defined quantity ● Strict criteria In-situ LI & PMT test-stand ● PMT gain ● PMT linearity Mapper & Cosmic Rays ● Equalize channel response Mapper & Cosmic Rays ● Correct for attenuation along strip ● Correct for local light output Bethe-Bloch ● Theory/MC give dE/dx ● stoppers or punch-throughs

Mike Kordosky, 3 rd Project X Workshop June 5-6, 2008 Electronics Gain, Linearity Trip-t chip & FEB ● Three Trip-t gain channels – high, medium and low gain ● Bench testing for linearity, range selection ● Relative gain in-situ ● Absolute gain rolled in w/ PMT

Mike Kordosky, 3 rd Project X Workshop June 5-6, 2008 PMT Gain and Xtalk PMT gains from 1PE peak PMT Cross-Talk Illuminated Pixel Xtalk ● Test stands ● In situ Light Injection

Mike Kordosky, 3 rd Project X Workshop June 5-6, 2008 Module Mapper ● Fiber position ● Relative strip response ● Attenuation along strip Stage Movement Sources Scan Cs-137 source

Mike Kordosky, 3 rd Project X Workshop June 5-6, 2008 Tracking and Light Output m ● Signal depends on light output, path-length, muon energy ● Reconstructed position depends on light-sharing, which depends on relative light output and alignments ● Alignments and relative light output from cosmics, mapper Implies Iteration This is likely to be the most challenging calibration task

Mike Kordosky, 3 rd Project X Workshop June 5-6, 2008 Absolute Scale Cosmic Ray ● MeV energy loss / MEU ● Via average signal/plane for through-going muons Muon stopping power Muon flux dE/dx convolution of flux & stopping power

Mike Kordosky, 3 rd Project X Workshop June 5-6, 2008 Trigger Paddles d h m b TP South North Wideband Elevation View 6.6 ° 8.2 ° 7m 68.6 m 3.3m events / sec / 5° b (degree)

Mike Kordosky, 3 rd Project X Workshop June 5-6, 2008 Position Resolution ● Position resolution = 2.5 mm ● Distance between the center of strips is 1.7 cm Vertical Slice Test

Mike Kordosky, 3 rd Project X Workshop June 5-6, 2008 Synergy? Sci. Bars from FNAL Extrusion Facility → Now also used by T2K Sci. Plane Production guided by MINOS Experience Optical cables based on: CDF & CMS M64 PMTs used by MINOS Trip-t ASIC originally designed for DZero → used by T2K Light Injection Hardware Design From MINOS Offline software (GAUDI) also used by LHCb & ATLAS

Mike Kordosky, 3 rd Project X Workshop June 5-6, 2008 Tracking Prototype ● Comprehensive test of – detector design – component production – detector assembly – component integration – calibration chain – event reconstruction – Simulations ● Commissioning now in Wideband – Led by university groups – Twenty-three students coming to the lab this summer

Mike Kordosky, 3 rd Project X Workshop June 5-6, 2008 Now Playing at Wideband Hall Module Mapper PMT readout chain Support Structure Users