Presented by Janitra Venkatesan March 15, 2012 Family Health International

Global Development Health and Nutrition Education Economic Development and Civil Society Research Environment 1. FHI 360. About Us. From

Mission “Advancing integrated, locally driven solutions for human development” 1. FHI 360. Values and Mission. From

1971: The International Fertility Research Program 1982: Officially known as FHI 1. Wikipedia. Family Health International. From

: AIDSTECH 2010: CAPRISA 004, FHI Wikipedia. Family Health International. From

Locations 1. FHI 360. News: Media Kit – Where We Work. From

Financial Summary - Revenue 1. FHI 360. (2010) FHI Annual Report 2010.

Financial Summary – Expenses 1. FHI 360. (2010) FHI Annual Report 2010.

Financial Summary – Expenses 1. FHI 360. (2010) FHI Annual Report 2010.

FHI In Research

HIVNET 012

1. Guay, L.A. et al. (1999) Lancet, 354, Retrieved from

“Proportion not HIV-infected” “Proportion with HIV-1 free survival”

“sound and fully supportable” “presented in a balanced manner and can be relied upon for scientific and policy-making purposes. ” 1. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Reviewing the HIVNET 012 Perinatal HIV Prevention Study. Review of the HIVNET 012 Perinatal HIV Prevention Study. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2005.

CAPRISA 004

1. Karim, Q.A. et al. (2010) Science, 329.

FHI & Program Implementation

11,000+ Tested for HIV/AIDS per day 320+ Started ARV treatment daily 120+ HIV+ pregnant women started ARV treatment per day 870,000+ Received clinical, preventive and support services daily FHI &HIV in FHI 360. (2010) FHI Annual Report 2010.

1. WHO. HIV/AIDS Data and Statistics. From

320 people started treatment per day x 365 days = Of the newly infected population, 116,800 people started treatment under FHI ~4% of the newly infected population impacted by FHI 1. WHO. HIV/AIDS Data and Statistics. From

Of the ~14 million eligible to receive ARV therapy, 116,800 started therapy under FHI FHI impacted less than 1% of the population (Compared to WHO’s 47%) 1. WHO. HIV/AIDS Data and Statistics. From

120 pregnant women started treatment per day x 365 days = Of ~1.5 million pregnant women in need, 43,800 pregnant women started treatment under FHI 1. WHO. HIV/AIDS Data and Statistics. From

That’s only 2.9% of pregnant women in need Compared to WHO’s 48%

Total Revenue Expenses for Health Related Programs and Research WHO~$2.3 billion~$1.5 billion FHI~$350 million~$301 million That’s 5 times as much 1.FHI 360. (2010) FHI Annual Report WHO. (2010) WHO 2010 Annual Finance Report. 3.WHO. (2010) WHO Programme Budget.

Total Revenue Expenses for Health Related Programs and Research Amount for HIV Percent of Pregnant Women Affected WHO~$2.3 billion~$1.5 billion~$200 million*48% FHI~$350 million~$301 million?3% * = Estimated, $600 million on HIV/TB/Malaria 1.FHI 360. (2010) FHI Annual Report WHO. (2010) WHO 2010 Annual Finance Report. 3.WHO. (2010) WHO Programme Budget. Specifically, how are they spending their money?

Total Revenue Amount for Health Related Programs and Research Amount for HIV Percent of Pregnant Women Affected Expense for 1% WHO~$2.3 billion~$1.5 billion ~$200 million* 48%~$4 million FHI ~$350 million ~$301 million ~$39 million** 3%~$13 million * = Estimated, ~13% ** = To make a fair comparison, 13% 1.FHI 360. (2010) FHI Annual Report WHO. (2010) WHO 2010 Annual Finance Report. 3.WHO. (2010) WHO Programme Budget. For example, if they were spending money in a similar manner on pregnant women getting ARV treatments….

Concluding Remarks 1. The Global Journal. The Top 100 Selection Process. From