SpecimenCTCTissue MarkerAntibodySourceAntibodySource ER monoclonal murine ER- 119.3 Janssen Diagnostics, LLC monoclonal murine, clone 1D5, 1:50, high pH.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1Kitasato-Harvard Symposium 10/03/2002 New Monoclonal Antibody Approved for Advanced Breast Cancer Shin-ichi Nihira, Ph.D. Dept. Clinical Research 3 Chugai.
Advertisements

“Learning curve” group= 10 pts with mBrCa (ER+ or ER-) who are beginning a new therapy ~5 pts with ≥5CTC/7.5 ml Group 1 5 CTC evaluable pts* with ER+ mBrCa.
 2013 Genentech USA, Inc. All rights reserved. Disclosure/Disclaimer The Molecular Biomarkers in Cancer (MBiC) slide presentation is not an independent.
Biomarker studies in advanced breast cancer Dr Phil Murray (CHUFT) & Dr Dawn Farrar (UOE)
Discordance in Hormone Receptor and HER2 Status in Breast Cancer during Tumor Progression Lindstrom LS et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract S3-5.
Circulating Tumor Cells Minetta C. Liu, MD Associate Professor of Medicine and Oncology Director, Translational Breast Cancer Research Lombardi Comprehensive.
Predictors of HER2 FISH amplification in immunohistochemistry score 2+ infiltrating breast cancer: a single institution analysis Maria Vittoria Dieci 1,
update in metastatic breast cancer
Trastuzumab [Genentech Inc.] Labeling Supplement to Include FISH Testing as a Method to Select Patients for Treatment FDA Clinical Review December 5, 2001.
Metastatic Breast Cancer: One Size Does Not Fit All Clifford Hudis, M.D. Chief, Breast Cancer Medicine Service MSKCC.
Supplementary Figure 1. Supplementary Figure 2 All patients CharacteristicN% Median Age of patients 58 yrs ER Positive Negative PR Positive.
White blood cells & the immune system What does it mean to be immune to something? Leucocyte (WBC) Phagocytes (engulf & destroy) = Inflammation Lymphocytes.
Eleni Galani Medical Oncologist
Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in blood of breast cancer patients: Cytological detection and technical characterization Enrica Bresaola, Mara Jo Miller,
Van Cutsem E et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract LBA4509. (Oral Presentation)
Tumor markers Present; by Dr. Andalib Isfahan Medical School
When will the diagnosis of Circulating tumor cells (CTC) help to patients? Martin Pešta, Ondřej Topolčan Department of Internal Medicine II, Faculty of.
Changes in Breast Cancer Reports After Second Opinion Dr. Vicente Marco Department of Pathology Hospital Quiron Barcelona. Spain.
Primary Mets Node Patient 1Patient 2Patient 3 Primary Mets Node Patient 1Patient 2Patient 3 Primary Mets Node Patient 1Patient 2Patient 3 Primary Mets.
Topoisomerase-II  a Predictive Molecular Marker in Breast Cancer: Konecny G, Jakobson K, Pegram M, Pauletti G, Dandekar U, Morisson J Ramos L. He-Jing.
Prognostic and Predictive Factors: Current Evidence for Individualized Therapy Predictive Molecular Markers: Hormone Receptor Status Presented by Kathleen.
Prognostic Value of Genomic Analysis After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Mayer EL et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
Blood and Tissue Based Molecular Signatures in Predicting Prostate Cancer Progression Tarek A. Bismar, MD Professor, University of Calgary Departments.
B Lymphocytes The response of B lymphocytes to a foreign antigen, clonal selection and the release of monoclonal antibodies (the humoral response). Definition.
S1207: Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Use of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy +/- One Year of Everolimus in Patients.
“Isolation of rare circulating tumour cells in cancer patients by microchip technology” Nagrath et al. Nature 2007 Peter Bojo.
Supplementary Table 1: Clinicopathologic characteristics of 100 patients with invasive breast cancer Clinical characteristicsNumber of cases (%) Median.
Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer Slideset on: Piccart-Gebhart M, Procter M, Leyland- Jones B, et al. Trastuzumab.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY 2012; vol 30 Thomas Bachelot, Ce´line Bourgier, Claire Cropet, Isabelle Ray-Coquard, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Gilles Freyer, Sophie.
Treatment for Cancer. Surgery Treatment and prognosis depend on severity and spread of the cancer Treatment and prognosis depend on severity and spread.
Circulating tumor cell monitoring, isolation and culture from a patient with metastatic triple negative breast cancer for drug screening and creation of.
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2016)
Treatment with ipilimumab
Training Set Clinicopathological parameters of the training set
Volume 97, Pages (December 2016)
Mammograms and Breast Exams: When to start /stop mammograms
Wijendra Senarathne1, Peggy Gates1, Semir Vranic2, Zoran Gatalica1
TBCRC (the translational breast cancer research consortium) 005 Prospective study
Prognostic and Predictive Value of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay in Postmenopausal Women with Node-Positive, Estrogen- Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.
Volume 65, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Individualizing Treatment Options in Advanced ER-Positive Breast Cancer.
Presented By Luca Malorni at 2017 ASCO Annual Meeting
S1207: Phase III randomized, placebo-controlled trial adding 1 year of everolimus to adjuvant endocrine therapy for patients with high-risk, HR+, HER2-
Supplementary Table 1. (A) S100β Validation set (n=76 ER-positive and ER-negative patients). (B) S100β Validation set (n=59 ER-positive patients). Association.
Treatment with ipilimumab
Expanding Horizons in the Clinical Care of ER-Positive, HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Ospedale Misericordia, Grosseto
EBV DNA: a Hodgkin lymphoma biomarker?
Volume 65, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Krop I et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 5090.
Optimizing Targeted Therapy for HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer: First-line Considerations.
CD30 and Lymphoma: Pathology in Practice
A subgroup analysis of a large multicenter study
Intrinsic and acquired trastuzumab resistance.
Breast Cancer Statistics
CDK4/6 Biomarkers: Issues and Opportunities
Immunological Technique
Handling and Evaluation of Breast Cancer Biopsy
Targeting T Cell Co-receptors for Cancer Therapy
Optimizing Targeted Therapy for HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer: Considerations for Previously Treated Disease.
Preliminary Investigation of the Clinical Significance of Detecting Circulating Tumor Cells Enriched from Lung Cancer Patients  Chi Wu, MD, Huaijie Hao,
PROSTATE CANCER CIRCULATING BIOMARKER CONSENSUS STATEMENT QUESTIONS
Optimizing Front-Line Endocrine Therapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer
20-Year Risks of Breast-Cancer Recurrence
(Handling and Evaluation of Breast Cancer Biopsy)
Direct recognition of MHC II/TARP14-27 on tumor cells by HTL
MYC–HOXB7–HER2 predicts clinical outcome in breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen. MYC–HOXB7–HER2 predicts clinical outcome in breast cancer patients.
Location of the ER mutations and frequencies per cohort.
Correlation of PTEN loss in melanoma cells with an immune resistance phenotype. Correlation of PTEN loss in melanoma cells with an immune resistance phenotype.
Presentation transcript:

SpecimenCTCTissue MarkerAntibodySourceAntibodySource ER monoclonal murine ER Janssen Diagnostics, LLC monoclonal murine, clone 1D5, 1:50, high pH epitope retrieval solution DAKO BCL-2 monoclonal murine monoclonal BCL-2/ (100) BD Pharmingen rabbit polyclonal antibody, 1:100, no antigen retrival, Envision+ detection system DAKO HER2 monoclonal murine Her81 Janssen Diagnostics, LLC monoclonal murine monoclonal, Clone 124, 1:100, low pH epitope retrieval solution, LSAB+ detection system DAKO Ki67monoclonal murine B56 BD Pharmingen monoclonal murine, clone MIB-1, 1:100, high pH epitope retrieval solution, LSAB+ detection system DAKO Table S1. Antibodies used for CTC and tissue studies.

Group Stop for success Continue to next group Stop for failure 150 – 4N/A 26 – 104 – 50 – 3 39 – 15N/A4 – 8 Table S2. Stage 2 stopping rules for the cumulative number of successfully assayed patients

Low (Favorable) Intermediate High (Unfavorable) Number of CTC/7.5mL (mean of 4 aliquots)<55-10> 10 CTC-Enumeration Points012 Presumed Prediction of Response to ET Favorable Intermediate Unfavorable % CTC positive Assigned Bio-Points % CTC positive Assigned Bio-Points % CTC positive Assigned Bio-Points ER>10%01-10% b 20% b 6b6b BCL-2>10%01-10%10%2 HER20%01-10%1>10%2 Ki670%01-10%1>10%2 Table S3. B. CTC-Bio-Points a a Only aliquots with CTC ≥5/7.5 ml WB evaluated b Low or negative ER expression is weighed more than BCL-2, HER2, and Ki67 due to its fundamental role in endocrine responsiveness. A. CTC-Enumeration Points based on CTC Enumeration

Average CTC Counts CTC- Enumer ation Points Marke r CTC-Bio-Points Potential CTC-ETI Score (sum of CTC Assigned and Bio- Points) Low Intermedi ate High CTC <50 N/A 0000 CTC ER BCL HER2 012 Ki CTC >102 ER BCL HER2 012 Ki C. Calculation of CTC-ETI Scores. CategoryCTC-ETI Presumed Outcome for Patient with ER Positive MBC starting new ET Presumed Clinical Action Low0-3 Favorable; respond to ET and/or indolent disease; long time to progression Treat with ET Intermediate4-6 Probably respond or moderately indolent disease; modest time to progression Treat with ET High7-14Poor; Resistant to ET, rapid progression Treat as ER negative with chemotherapy D. CTC-ETI Categories Abbreviations: CTC= circulating tumor cells; ER = estrogen receptor; ET= Endocrine Therapy; MBC = metastatic breast cancer; ET= endocrine therapy.

Table S4. CTC-ETI determination in cultured human breast cancer cell lines spiked into normal human blood and evaluated by the CellSearch ® system. Cell lines % ER+ Bio- Points % BCL-2+ Bio- Points % HER2+ Bio- Points % Ki67+ Bio- Points Total Bio- Score CTC- ETI MCF-7 (hormone depleted) >10%0 01%1>10%23LOW Sk-Br-30%602>10%2 212HIGH MDA-MB-2310%61-10%10%0>10%29HIGH

Table S5. Examples of low, intermediate, and high CTC-ETI from patient samples. A.LOW CTC-ETI CTC Enumeration CTC-Biomarker Determination # of CTC/7.5 ml WB Mean CTC/7.5 ml WB CTC- Enumeration Points % of CTC positive Assigned Bio-Points Bio- Score CTC- ETI score ER %0 2 3 LOW BCL-2560%0 HER26 0%0 Ki67812%2 Patient # 5 (Primary Tissue: ER 90% positive, HER2 negative by FISH; Metastatic tissue: ER positive, HER2 negative by FISH)* B. INTERMEDIATE CTC-ETI Patient #4 (Primary Tissue: ER ≥95% positive, HER2 0 by IHC; Metastatic tissue: insufficient tissue to evaluate ER and HER2)* CTC Enumeration CTC-Biomarker Determination # of CTC/ 7.5 ml WB Mean CTC/7.5 ml WB CTC - Enumeration Points % of CTC positive Assigned Bio- Points Bio- Score CTC- ETI score ER %0 2 4 INT BCL %0 HER2838 0%0 Ki %2 *ER and HER2 as per initial clinical laboratory using the laboratory’s criteria for positivity or negativity. CTC Enumeration CTC-Biomarker Determination # of CTC/7.5 ml WB Mean CTC/7.5 ml CTC- Enumeration Assigned Points % of CTC positive Assigned Bio- Points Bio- Score CTC- ETI score ER % HIGH BCL-21560%0 HER217 0%0 Ki671414%2 C. HIGH CTC-ETI Patient # 3 (Primary Tissue: ER 60% positive, HER2 1+/2+ by IHC; Metastatic tissue: ER 75% positive; HER2 1+ by IHC)*

Table S6. CTC-ETI for each patient. Pat. Num. Average CTC/7.5 ml Assigned CTC Points based on CTC Enumeration Assigned CTC-Bio-Points CTC-ETI CTC-ETI Category 11Screen Failure 100NA LOW 620NA LOW 740NA LOW 930NA LOW 1800NA LOW 2140NA LOW 2200NA LOW 2500NA LOW 2600NA LOW 2700NA LOW 3200NA LOW 3700NA LOW 3900NA LOW 4200NA LOW 5100NA LOW LOW LOW INT INT INT INT INT INT INT INT INT 28167HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH 108NA AF a 177NA AF a 198NA AF a 298NA AF a 1567NA TF b 2013NA TF b a AF =Analytical Failure (CTC<5 in 1 of 4 aliquots, while the other 3 aliquots had ≥5 CTC/7.5mL and the average was ≥5 CTC/7.5mL); b TF=Technical Failure (Machine failure in at least one of 4 aliquots)

Table S7. Concordance between biomarkers in primary and metastatic tissues and CTC. Kappa Score a MarkerPrimaryMetastatic ER0-0.1 BCL HER Ki a Kappa score for concordance between CTC and tissue biomarker for respective biomarker.