Teaming at Tier 2: Collaborative, Effective, & Efficient Teams September 24, 2013 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

RTI Implementer Webinar Series: Establishing a Screening Process
Dr. Denise P. Gibbs, Director Alabama Scottish Rite Foundation Learning Centers PST RtI STUDENT SUCCESS Christine R. Spear, Education Administrator Alabama.
Policy Considerations and Implementation. Overview Defining RtI Where did it come from and why do we need it? Support for RtI in federal law Core principles.
Response to Intervention (RtI) A Basic Overview. Illinois IDEA 2004 Part Rules Requires: use of a process that determines how the child responds.
Ingham RtI District Leadership Team November 4, 2009.
An Introduction to Response to Intervention MN Response to Intervention Center Ann Casey, Ph.D. Director St. Croix River Ed. District
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
Using Technical Assistance Teams for Tertiary PBS Carol Davis, Ed. D., Ilene S. Schwartz, Ph. D. University of Washington
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is RTI?
Power Pack Click to begin. Click to advance Congratulations! The RtI process has just become much easier. This team member notebook contains all the information.
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Unified Support Services Workgroup recommendations August 2012.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Developing Professional Learning Communities To Promote Response to Intervention Linda Campbell Melissa Nantais.
The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education, #H323A However, these contents do not necessarily.
PBIS Tier 1 Coaches Training
Introduction to Coaching School-Wide PBS:RtIB. 2 Agenda PBS:RtIB Brief Overview Coaching Tier 1 Coaching Skills and Activities Resources and Barriers.
Effective Grade Level Teams Minnesota RtI Center Conference March 26, 2009 Kerry Bollman St Croix River Education District.
PLC & RTI Tammy Rasmussen Southern Oregon RTI Dean Richards Oregon RTI.
Data Driven Decision Making Across All Content Areas WI PBIS Network Summer Leadership Conference Rachel Saladis Lynn Johnson The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
1 Module L R ole of Coaches Coaches’ Monthly Meeting Add DC Name Here.
PLCS & THE CONNECTION TO RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Essentials for Administrators Sept. 27, 2012.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Response to Intervention RTI Teams: Following a Structured Problem- Solving Model Jim Wright
The Individual Education Plan (IEP) Toronto District School Board January 20, 2015.
Anchor Presentation: Inclusive Education for ALL Students Hour 3 Project #H325A Inclusive Service Delivery.
By: Jill Mullins. RtI is… the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time and.
Annie McLaughlin, M.T. Carol Davis, Ed.D. University of Washington
Broward County Public Schools BP #3 Optimal Relationships
Leadership Teams Implementing PBIS Module 14. Objectives Define role and function of PBIS Leadership Teams Define Leadership Team’s impact on PBIS implementation.
Response to Intervention Teaching and Learning February 19, 2015 Michelle Coconate.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Essential Component: Schoolwide, Multi-Level Prevention System Katie Klingler Tackett National Center on.
District Implementation of PBIS C-1 Rob Horner Brian Megert University of Oregon Springfield School District.
Tier 1 Instructional Delivery and Treatment Fidelity Networking Meeting February, 2013 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel.
Team Structure and Function October, 2012 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) project of the.
Introduction to the Grant August-September, 2012 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) project.
Scheduling at Tier 2: How Do We Fit It All In? September 24, 2013 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant.
Effective Meeting Practices November, 2012 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) project of.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
Addressing Assumptions, Beliefs, and Controversial Issues Surrounding RtI/MTSS at Tier 3 October, 2014 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network.
Fidelity: Maximizing the Effectiveness of Tier 2 September 24, 2013 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development.
Data and Assessment-Using the Right Data to Make Better Decisions September 24, 2013 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel.
Tier 1 Positive Behavior Support Response to Intervention for Behavior Faculty Overview.
RTI/MTSS Self-Assessment. RTI Session Objectives -An increase in the understanding of the necessary components of RTI/MTSS -An awareness that each school.
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
Participant Handouts Tier 1 Assessment/Data Systems Tier 1 Grade Level/Department Data Teams For External Coaches The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel.
School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports District-wide Implementation: Ensuring Success Kentucky Center for Instructional Discipline.
Data and Assessment-Using the Right Data to Make Better Decisions September 24, 2013 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel.
S CHOOL -B ASED L EADERSHIP T EAMS 1. COLLABORATIVE CULTURE School Based Leadership Teams… this team really, really matters PRINCIPAL and PS/RtI COACH:
Data and Assessment-Using the Right Data to Make Better Decisions September 24, 2013 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel.
SAM (Self-Assessment of MTSS Implementation) ADMINISTRATION TRAINING
Morgan County Schools Response to Instruction
New Jersey Tiered System of Supports (NJTSS)
Benchmark Lesson #2 Creating Effective Collaborative Teams
The Principles of Data Use in a RtI / 3-Tier Model
Teaching and Learning Educator Support and Development Services
SAPSI-S PEP Overview I-RtI Network December, 2012
Data and Assessment-Using the Right Data to Make Better Decisions
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Response to Instruction and Intervention
Data-Based Decision Making
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Facilitated/Presented by:
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Presentation transcript:

Teaming at Tier 2: Collaborative, Effective, & Efficient Teams September 24, 2013 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) project of the Illinois State Board of Education. All funding (100%) is from federal sources. The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the U.S. Department of Education, #H325A However, those contents do not necessarily represent the policy of the U.S. Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. (OSEP Project Officer: Grace Zamora Durán) I-RtI Network

Learner Outcomes: Participants will: Be able to clearly state the purpose of T2 teams Know the common roles and responsibilities within T2 teams Understand norm development process in decision-making teams Understand typical agenda items (goals) and questions used for T2 decision-making. To be able to evaluate Tier 2 MTSS teams and identify areas for improvement. Performance Objective:

What’s happening in your district? questions do you have? What coaching Ice Breaker Making connections Applying what we’ve learned

B: Describe the difference between a group of athletes and a team of athletes? A: Think of a frustrating Teaming experience. What made it so? What are the characteristics?

PURPOSE OF T2 TEAMS I-RtI Network

1. District Leadership Team 2. School Improvement Team 3. Tier 2 Team with Targeted Supports 4. Individual Problem Solving & Special Ed Decision Making Team District-Level RTI Team District 1.A District-Level RTI Team to Make Things Happen for the District School Improvement Team School 2.A School Improvement Team to Make Things Happen for the School Tier 2 team Groups of Students 3. A Tier 2 team provide Support to Make Things Happen for Groups of Students Problem-Solving Team Individual Students 4. A Problem-Solving Team to Make Things Happen for Individual Students

Tier 3 Teams Tier 1 Teams Tier 2 Teams Using Tier 1 data Using Tier 2 data Two Responsibilities

SAMPLE: Planning Grade/Department level meetings across the year:

TEAM BUILDING I-RtI Network

Essential Knowledge *data interpretation *strategies & programs *standards

Areas of Expertise or Skill Related to RTI and/or Teaming RTI Team Members TSMSKTJWNV Knowledgeable about RTI and/or has expertise with systems- level RTI models and implementation x Expertise in evidence-based instruction and intervention x x x x Expertise in assessment for universal screening & progress monitoring x x x Expertise in data-based decision making and/or problem- solving x x Skilled in creating effective data summaries and displays x x Skilled in interpreting data from various sources x x Skilled/effective meeting facilitator x x Skilled in use of technology x x Detail-oriented x x x x Skilled note taker, communicates effectively in writing x x Taskmaster-keeps people on-task and meetings focused x x x Consensus builder-brings people together for common goal x x x Skilled in coaching, consultation, professional development x x x Other:

Essential Roles FacilitatorRecorder Time- keeper Adminis- trator Data analyst Gate- keeper Who to consider ?

WHO? RoleSkills Tips Time Keeper -Keeps team on track by setting and managing time limits publicly. -Assertive.May have another role. Gate- Keeper -Redirects team to topic. -Provides feedback to improve functioning, ensures all voices are heard. Assertive. Awareness of Problem Solving Process Has clear understanding of team norms and coaching principles. Trusted by members. Data Manager -Creates ‘teacher friendly’ data reports to distribute prior to meeting. -Interprets student data in meaningful ways for team understanding. Organized. Understands basic educational statistics. Has access to district data sources. All Team Members -Participate during meetings. -Data collection and intervention implementation. Trained in Problem Solving Process. Understand team norms Not necessary to know student. Principal -Assure implementation of the Problem Solving Process and importance of initiative. -Resource allocation. -Gives permission. Willing to take risks. Supports team decisions Prioritizes student needs. Models commitment to MTSS principles. May have another role on team. Note-taker -Responsible for documentation standard forms. -Verbally summarizes information for team. Detail and task oriented. Knows the Problem Solving Steps. Uses forms and technology for timely communication Facilitator -Ensures integrity of the process. -Supports effective communication. -Keeps team on track. -Creates and disseminates agenda. Knowledgeable of Problem Solving Process. Assertive, Strong Leader. Not every member makes a good facilitator.

Confidentiality Participation Time ListeningHow to make decisions Expectations Norms are Essential “Can’t we all just get along?”

Team Building Understanding and assessing the process of team development

Guest presentation Development of district teams Secondary: Kristin Sanders (Moline) Elementary: Denise Phelps (Lewistown)

Checklist Activity #1 Review and Reflect on Items 1-6 on Teaming Checklist

TIER 2 TEAMS IN ACTION I-RtI Network

Data Criteria Interventions and resources Agenda Feedback Completed action plan Data Criteria Interventions & Resources Agenda Feedback Action Plan

Agenda

Predictability

Participation

a Accountability

a Communication

Checklist Activity #2 Review and Reflect on Items on Teaming Checklist

TIER 2 AGENDA AND DECISION-MAKING RULES: DEALING WITH DATA I-RtI Network

T2 Teams in Action IMPORTANT: Refer to the following Conference materials: PROBLEM SOLVING PROCESS & DATA ANALYSIS 1) Benchmark meetings: – Review Tier 1 data – Consider any changes to Tier 1 practices – Determine student groupings in need of supplemental supports and match support to those needs. – 3x/year

T2 Teams in Action IMPORTANT: Refer to the following Conference materials: PROBLEM SOLVING PROCESS & DATA ANALYSIS 2) Progress monitoring meetings – Review progress of students receiving supplemental support – Consider student groupings and instructional practices – Monthly

Purpose Grade/Department Level Data Review, Analysis, and Intervention Planning Purpose Grade/Department Level Data Review, Analysis, and Intervention Planning Define Decision Rules & Review Student Outcomes Data Define Decision Rules & Review Student Outcomes Data Group Students According to Needs & Level of Support Group Students According to Needs & Level of Support Review Interventions & Match to Students’ Needs Review Interventions & Match to Students’ Needs Review Resources & Match to Interventions Review Resources & Match to Interventions Create Updated Intervention Plan for Each Group Create Updated Intervention Plan for Each Group Tier 2 Meetings Indian Prairie #204 Review Tier 1 & modify as needed

Sample Agenda: 4 steps of the problem-solving process Does your data meet your expectation? If not, why? – Collect more information to answer this question Develop a plan to improve performance Implement the plan Evaluate the outcome

Sample Agenda:

Grade/Department Level Team(s) (Instructional core Team or PLC Team ) Possible Members: Administrator(s) Psychologist General Education Teachers One of the following: (Speech/Language, OT, PT, Social Worker) Special Education Teacher Support Services, ELL, Reading Support Parents are informed by letter of intervention Collect and analyze Grade/Department level data Tier 1  Determine if at least 80% of our students are meeting Grade/Department level expectations. (triangulate data)  Consider any changes/modifications/ additions to Tier 1 instruction and curriculum  Set goal for next benchmark (e.g., 85% meet Grade/Department level expectation) Tier 2  Students scoring in 10 th to 25 th %tile consider Tier 2  Below 10 th %ile consider Tier 3 (individualized)  Determine student grouping and create instructional plan as group  Set goals for Tier 2 intervention groups  Determine logistics of progress monitoring for targeted students (including consideration of fading or recommending more intense interventions)  Within Tier 2 you may have a student who would need short term individual support  Document/ complete paperwork as necessary Tier 3  Make recommendations for individual problem solving or instruction/intervention (to problem solving team or principal etc.)  Document/complete paperwork as necessary At least 1X per month possibly as much as 1x per week TeamsRoles and Function Suggested meeting frequency Sample: team membership & purpose

SPANISH WritingListeningReadingspeaking student 91% 85%83%80%

Illinois State Board of Education34

studentP.A.1:1L.S.Dev. Spel.WRpassagecompositeFluency rateNWFCBM/WRC

Checklist Activity #3 Review and Reflect on Items on Teaming Checklist

Closing activity: Evaluating your process Establishing Teaming Process Goals Select 1-3 areas for improvement Objectively, explicitly state what you want to have in place (something you can measure) by an end date. Set two benchmark dates and state your intermediate goals.

Implementation Action Planning IMPLEMENTATION: The carrying out or executing a plan and a method for evaluating effectiveness. #1 Goal to Accomplish This Year: Brainstorm Action Steps to Accomplish Goal: How to move forward-Next Step:Timeline:Person Responsible:Evidence of Completion:

Thank You!