Stuart Forrest, Network Planning Manager, Scotia Gas Networks 19 th October 2010 MOD 329 - Review of Industry Charging & Contractual Arrangements in Relation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Review of NTS entry charge setting arrangements - IA 1 July 2010.
Advertisements

Third Energy Package for Change of Supplier 2009/73/EC.
Non-code User Pays. 2 What we will cover Background Current Services Governance Arrangements What is working well What is not working as well.
Application of User Pays Principles to Existing Service Lines 22nd November 2006.
The economic regulation of gas processing services Key issues and initial thoughts Ofgem presentation 18 June 2007.
Mod 0445 – Amendment to the Arrangements for Daily Metered Supply Point Capacity Ofgem Direction to Provide Further Evidence National Grid Distribution.
Capacity trade and transfer mechanism and the next AMSEC auction Nienke Hendriks Head of Gas Transmission Policy, Enforcement and Compliance 9 May 2007.
Industry Dialogue on xoserve Services Progress Report for Ofgem 5 th December 2006.
Draft Review Proposal 175 Encouraging Participation in the elective DM Regime Phil Broom 25 October 2007.
“Introduction of a New Shipper Obligation in Relation to the Procurement of Gas Below the Gas Safety Monitors” Transmission Workstream 4 th Jan 2007 Chris.
Changes to the Network Emergency Co-ordinator (NEC) Safety Case resulting from Exit Reform UNC Workgroup 0412 Meeting – 1 st March 2012.
UNC (Urgent) Modification Proposal 0044: “Revised Emergency Cash-out & Curtailment Arrangements” UNC Transmission Workstream 11 th August 2005.
UNC Proposal 329 – Review of Industry Charging & Contractual Arrangements - DM SHQs and DM SOQs Joel Martin – 21/09/10.
DN Interruption Reform Distribution Workstream 23 rd July 2009.
Force Majeure - Capacity Transmission Workstream 2 July 2009.
Gas Distribution Transportation Charging What are the Risks to Pricing predictability? Stephen Marland Pricing Manager
Emergency Cashout Prices and Emergency Curtailment Quantity (ECQ) Adjustment Ritchard Hewitt Gas Code Development Manager.
1 Review Group 264 Rules & Options Analysis for BSSOQ Methodology Changes Post MOD th September 2009.
Demand Side Investment Planning Transmission Planning Code Workshop 2 1 st May 2008.
Version PNUNC AQ Principles Workgroup Mod 0209 – Rolling AQ Presenter: Steve Nunnington 23 rd March 2010.
Energy Market Issues for Biomethane Projects Workshop - 31 October 2011 RIIO-GD1 Environmental Incentives.
Review Group -140 Thoughts on additional information requirements.
1 UNC Review Group 175 – Encouraging Participation in the Elective Daily Metered Regime 26 th June 2008.
UNC Modification Proposal 0380 Periodic Annual Quantity Calculation Calculation of Daily Supply Point Capacity Alan Raper – DNCMF 26 th September 2011.
DN Interruption Reform (UNC Mod 90) Liz Spierling Commercial Manager, Transportation.
Ofgem’s decision on UNC modification proposal 044 Sonia Brown.
Restricted Invoice Period Criteria Rochelle Hudson.
System Operator information transparency. As Transmission System Transporter National Grid Gas undertakes responsibility for safe, effective and efficient.
Transitional Exit Capacity Proposals -Update Transmission Workstream, 1 Dec Nov 05.
User Pays User Committee 12th November 2013
Background Current balance of LDZ System and Customer charges
Transmission Workstream 7th Dec 2006 Chris Logue
Transitional Exit Capacity Proposals -Update
Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244
Modification Proposal 0283 Update
Transmission Planning Code – Draft Document
Transmission Workgroup 7th July 2011
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals
Transmission Planning Code
Transmission Workstream 4th July 2007
Mod 0621 Amendments to Gas Transmission Charging Regime
SO Incentives from April 2010
CSEP NExA Update Marie Clark ScottishPower 28th September 2006.
Simon Trivella – 22nd May 2008 Distribution Workstream
User Pays – Changed & New Services
The Necessary Criteria for a UNC Modification Proposal
Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244
Joint Office Presentation for Modification 0678
Development of Entry Capacity Substitution
Modification Proposal 0101 – “Amendment to demand forecasting timings in relation to the Gas Balancing Alert”
Review Group 166 End User Perspectives 20 September 2007 Julie Cox.
Mod 0621 Amendments to Gas Transmission Charging Regime
DSR Workgroup 10 September
Review Group /09/2007.
UNC Transmission Workstream 7th December 2006
Proposed Transitional Gas Exit Arrangements
Richard Fairholme E.ON UK
UNC Transmission Workstream 15th June 2005
Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244
Mark Freeman 29th January 2007
Entry Overrun Calculation
Options for the Development of a Demand Side Response Mechanism
Reinstatement of NTS Interruption
GT Response to Action AMR014 Project Nexus AMR Workgroup 20th July | Energy Networks Association.
Open Letter - Summary of Responses
DN Interruption Phase II
195AV “Future work” – system flexibility
Commercial Arrangements For Gas Quality Service – Introduction
Off-peak interruptible service to compliment universal firm/buy-back regime Peter Bolitho.
Presentation transcript:

Stuart Forrest, Network Planning Manager, Scotia Gas Networks 19 th October 2010 MOD Review of Industry Charging & Contractual Arrangements in Relation Supply Point Offtake Rates (SHQs) and Supply Point Capacity (SOQs)

2 March Ofgem published decision letter re SGNs’ application to re-open the current Gas Distribution Price Control. Approval granted to adjustment of the interruption incentive allowance to facilitate reinforcement works resulting from UNC Modification Proposal 090 Decision letter raised concerns re the current incentives placed upon Shippers to provide SHQs which are representative of their usage. This UNC Review to consider the issues raised and ultimately to determine whether any modifications are required to the UNC Background

3 Legislative Requirements The Gas Act and the related GT’s Licence conditions require that DN’s operate a safe and economic gas transportation system. Requirements under the Gas Safety (Management) Regulations (GS(M)R) are to set out arrangements for minimising the risk of a gas supply emergency. DN’s must therefore develop appropriate plans for the safe operation and economic development of systems. Network Planning is a key element in the demonstration to OFGEM and the HSE of the design and management processes and its mechanisms to meet regulatory and legislative obligations.

4 Importance of Network Analysis Network analysis is used to simulate the performance of gas supply networks and enables the effects of alterations to those networks to be anticipated. It provides essential information to support business cases for the operation and design of safe, economic and efficient networks. DNs need to be able to demonstrate that it has robust models and processes in place supporting contractual relationships with customers. It is key to the relationship with Ofgem and the HSE in order to provide confidence in DN’s modelling and assist in fulfilling regulatory obligations

5 Areas Affected Network analysis is used for a number of purposes including: To assess the ability of the network to meet licence obligations To identify system modifications where required to ensure the company continues to meet these obligations To support the provision of quotations for new loads To support strategic planning of the supply system To support the company’s mains replacement programme To support optimum pressure management strategies To support day to day operational activities To assist in the development of emergency planning scenarios To determine pressure reduction station capacity.

6 Security of Supply Analysis The objective is that distribution systems are designed to ensure that safe operating pressures are maintained at the system extremities. The design criteria used for the analysis of networks are consistent with that required by IGE/GL/1 When assessing security of supply The DN is effectively entering into agreement with Shippers and has to be sure that contractual obligations can be met. Any reinforcements and enhancements to meet those obligations are both cost effective and sufficiently robust

7 Key Elements With Models The key data in building an accurate model are Pipe information Governor information Gas flow / Demand information Majority of demands – no SHQ. As a result demand based on range of algorithms converting AQ to SHQ DM sites - considered to be ‘exceptional’. Non standard with disproportionate influence on network. Provision requires to be made in models for SHQ contracted figure provided by shipper

8 Impact of Inaccurate SHQs If SHQ quoted is too high Will Sterilise system capacity May result in unnecessary general reinforcement – unnecessary cost to industry May result in unnecessary specific reinforcement – unnecessary cost to customer If SHQ quoted is too low Capacity may not exist to supply demand May result in genuine security of supply issues ie failure If so, likely to affect customers in area Major safety issue

9 Simple System Capacity of network is 100 units Town on end uses 50 units DM customer uses 40 units Town (50) Factory (contracted SHQ 40) Source Capacity 100 units Total Demand = 90 ok

10 Commercial Implication(i) New request for addition 30 units System fails – reinforcement required Town (50) Factory (Contracted SHQ 40) Source Before Capacity 100 units Total Demand = 120 Fails After With reinforcement Revised capacity = 130 ok New Factory (Contracted SHQ 30)

11 Commercial Implication (ii) Same request for addition 30 units Evidence shows actual SHQ for existing factory is overstated and should be 20 units Reinforcement not required - reduces cost to industry and may avoid unnecessary charge to customer Town (50) Factory (Actual SHQ 20) Source Capacity 100 units Total Demand = 100 ok Reinforcement not required New Factory (Contracted SHQ 30)

12 Safety Implication In this case contracted SHQ understated Pipeline capacity = 100 Demand based on contracted SHQ = 90 True Demand = 110 This is a significant safety issue Town (50) Factory (Contracted SHQ 40) (Actual SHQ 60) Source Capacity 100 units Demand Planned For = 90 OK True Demand = 110 Fail

13 Examples Current Contracted SHQ (KWh) Highest Recorded SHQ (KWh) Site A18,4586,8108,804 Site B23,4388,66715,600 Site C40,00023,68222,947 Site D29,29842,70147,241 Site E 11,244 29,46531,524 Site F8,43022,39622,393

14 Profile

15 Summary DNs use network analysis to ensure compliance with legislative and regulatory requirements Robust demand information is key element to accuracy of models Lack of robust demand information can lead to Inefficient investment Unnecessary costs to industry and to individual end users Unsafe situations DM sites can have disproportionate influence on systems – so particularly important that demand data is robust