2016 Edits.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Instructions and Reporting Requirements Module 11 Electronic Reporting For Urology Physician Practices May 2013 North Carolina Central Cancer Registry.
Advertisements

Instructions and Reporting Requirements Module 2 Electronic Reporting For Facilities March 2014 North Carolina Central Cancer Registry State Center for.
Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Neoplasm Project. Acknowledgments American College of Surgeons (ACOS) Commission on Cancer (COC) Canadian Cancer Registries.
Lung “Coding Bootcamp” Nicole Catlett, CTR 2014 Kentucky Cancer Registry Fall Workshop.
STAGING MCR Staff Show Me Healthy Women March 27, 2008 Supported by a Cooperative Agreement between DHSS and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
1 Renal Pelvis, Ureter, Bladder and Other Urinary.
The IASLC Lung Cancer Database Summary of Cases Contributed to Project Total cases submitted 100,869 Excluded from analyses Excluded from analyses19,854.
AJCC TNM Staging 7th Edition Thyroid Case #3
AJCC TNM Staging 7th Edition Colon Case #1
AJCC Staging Moments AJCC TNM Staging 7th Edition Melanoma Case #1 Contributors: Jeffrey E. Gershenwald, MD University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center,
Tumour Matching N.Ireland Experience Colin Fox (IT Manager) Richard Middleton (Data Manager)
Cancer Registry Coding Changes for 2014 Presented by the Kentucky Cancer Registry February, 2014.
RPMS EHR Patient Care Component Set Up. Learning Objectives Review Resource and Patient Management System (RPMS) and Patient Care Component (PCC) configuration.
Cancer Staging. What is cancer staging? Staging describes the severity of a person’s cancer based on the extent of the original (primary) tumor and whether.
TRAM Educational Conference September 19, 2014 Meritus Medical Center 1.
1 Colon MP/H Task Force Multiple Primary Rules Histology Coding Rules 2007.
AJCC Staging Moments AJCC TNM Staging 7th Edition Lung Case #3 Contributors: Valerie W. Rusch, MD Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New.
AJCC TNM Staging 7th Edition Melanoma Case #2
AJCC Staging Moments AJCC TNM Staging 7th Edition Melanoma Case #3 Contributors: Jeffrey E. Gershenwald, MD University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center,
AJCC Staging Moments AJCC TNM Staging 7th Edition Breast Case #2 Contributors: Stephen B. Edge, MD Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York David.
1 LUNG. 2 Equivalent Terms, Def, Charts, Tables, Illustrations.
AJCC Staging Moments AJCC TNM Staging 7th Edition Breast Case #1 Contributors: Stephen B. Edge, MD Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York David.
1 MP/H Coding Rules General Instructions MP/H Task Force Multiple Primary Rules Histology Coding Rules 2007.
From Abstract to Audit and Back Again Nancy Rold Missouri Cancer Registry MoSTRA Annual Meeting 2010 This project was supported in part by a cooperative.
Cancer Staging.
Putting the Puzzle Together: Breast Collaborative Staging Melissa Riddle, RHIT, CTR October 6, 2012.
Head and Neck MP/H Task Force Multiple Primary Rules
Data Quality Toolbox for Registrars MCSS Workshop December 9, 2003 Elaine Collins.
1 Head and Neck. 2 Equivalent Terms, Definitions, Charts, Tables and Illustrations Primary site –Do not code biopsy site.
AJCC 6 TH EDITION STAGING OF BREAST CARCINOMA. AJCC NODE STAGING -16 CATEGORIES pNX – 1 option pN0 – 5 options; null,(i-),(i+),(mol-),(mol+) pN1 – 4.
VS. CSv2 Changes CSv2 compared to CSv1 Part 1, Section 1.
2015 CHANGES IN REPORTING REQUIREMENTS AND CANCER CODING INSTRUCTIONS KENTUCKY CANCER REGISTRY SPRING TRAINING 2015 PRESENTED BY FRANCES ROSS.
1 Cutaneous Melanoma MP/H Task Force Multiple Primary Rules Histology Coding Rules 2007.
Colon Cancer. Multihit Concept Clinical Information Clinical Information 1. Patient identification a. Name b. Identification number c. Age (birth date)
NPCR/CDC DATA QUALITY EVALUATION AUDIT
KCR 2014 Spring Training CHANGES IN CODING GRADE.
New Data Items MP/H Task Force Multiple Primary Rules Histology Coding Rules 2007.
National Reminders- Diabetic Microalbumin. Introduction The national reminders are in Patch 1005 of clinical reminders. The site manager should load this.
Tonya Brandenburg, MHA, CTR Kentucky Cancer Registry
ajcc TNM Staging: chapter 1, and Summary stage
Collaborative Staging for Colon Site Specific Factors Tonya Brandenburg, MHA, CTR QA Manager Abstracting and Coding Kentucky Cancer Registry.
Vicki LaRue, CTR KCR Abstractor’s Training February 12,
*Be brief, yet thorough enough to allow recoding of the data fields from the text only! * Use accepted abbreviations from Abstractor’s Manual Appendix.
1 Virginia Cancer Registrars Association and Virginia Cancer Registry Annual Meeting October 3, 2007.
Presented at the NAACCR Annual Conference Quebec City June 22, 2010.
Gary M. Levin, BA, CTR Florida Cancer Data System NAACCR 2008 Annual Conference 2007 Multiple Primary Rules: Impact on Tumor Counts.
Electronic CAP Cancer Checklists and Cancer Registries – A Pilot Project 2009 NAACCR Conference Ken Gerlach, MPH, CTR Castine Verrill, MS, CTR CDC-National.
NPCR Data Completeness and Quality Audits Review of: Collaborative Stage and Surgery Data Mary Lewis, CTR NPCR Program Consultant.
Cancer: Staging and Grading What is meant by the term “biopsy”? How do tumors behave differently from one another ? Examples of the stages of cancer and.
Carcinoma of the urinary bladder in a tertiary care setting in a developing country Farhana Badar, Ambreen Sattar, Fouzia Meerza, Noreen Irfan, Neelam.
The Voyage to Direct Coding of AJCC TNM and How to Get There!! Jayne Holubowsky, CTR Director, Virginia Cancer Registry Division of Population.
Presentation developed by
Kentucky Cancer Registry
LYMPHADENECTOMY IN UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA IN THE RENAL PELVIS AND URETER
Cancer Reporting Changes for 2017 and 2018
Kentucky Cancer Registry
Creating the perfect text…
Tumor Grade.
Reda Wilson Qiming He Cheryll Thomas Jessica King
2018 Updates to ICD-O-3 Histology Coding
What’s New for 8th Edition
Cancer Staging.
Colon AJCC Case Answers
TNM 8 UPDATE Head and Neck SSG March 2018
Neoadjuvant Treatment Results – Only Part of the Story, The Missing Piece Donna M. Gress, RHIT, CTR.
The Progress of npcr audits What have we done, what have we learned, and where are we going now Click to edit subtitle Click to enter your Division Name.
Text Mining for Data Quality Analysis of Melanoma Tumor Depth
NSCLC: Staging and TNM classification
Presentation transcript:

2016 Edits

Choice Lists We are still waiting on NPCR to give us the choice list Until we receive the choice list make sure to look at the appropriate chapters for the site you are abstracting

Edit: Primary Site, AJCC Stage Group 2016 - Ed 7 (COC) E:TNM Clin Stage Group is invalid for site/hist combination Date of Diagnosis (530) = [Y:2016 M:03 D:08] TNM Edition Number (938) = [07] Primary Site (540) = [C443] Histologic Type ICD-O-3 (550) = [8743] CS Site-Specific Factor10 (1030) = [988] CS Site-Specific Factor25 (1075) = [988] Over-ride Site/TNM-StgGrp (1895) = [<BLANK>] Age at Diagnosis (193) = [064] Grade (555) = [9] _ TNM Clin Stage Group (970) = [1] TNM Path Stage Group (952) = [1] This edit is here because melanoma of the skin requires 1a or 1b. This was only staged as a stage 1 It is very important to open your ajcc staging manual to the chapter of the site you are abstracting to find the details of how each site can be staged This edit says that the stage group is not applicable for the site. So for this case we have a melanoma that was given a clinical stage group 1. For melanomas we have to choose whether they are A or B based on ulceration.

Edit: TNM T, N, M , In Situ (CoC) E:Conflict between TNM Path T (pIS) and TNM Clin Stage Group (99) Date of Diagnosis (530) = [Y:2016 M:04 D:21] Primary Site (540) = [C182] Histologic Type ICD-O-3 (550) = [8210] Behavior Code ICD-O-3 (554) = [3] TNM Path T (940) = [pIS] TNM Path N (944) = [p0] Should be [c0] TNM Path M (948) = [c0] TNM Path Stage Group (952) = [0] TNM Clin T (958) = [cX] Should be [pTis] TNM Clin N (962) = [c0] TNM Clin M (966) = [c0] TNM Clin Stage Group (970) = [99] TNM Path Descriptor (956) = [0] In your AJCC Manual on page 12 table 1.8 it states that carcinoma in situ, stage pTis cN0 cM0 as both clinical and pathologic stage(if the case is eligible for pathologic staging) The only instance where you would not use pTis cN0 cM0 pathologic stage 0 is if the patient went to surgery and they found the disease was progressed further than in situ For 2016 cases an insitu cancer should be coded Clinical pTis, cN0, cM0. If the patient goes onto to have a resection and the disease in more than insitu you can then make the case pathologically more. If the disease is insitu pathologically as well then you should put pTis, cN0, cM0 for pathologic staging as well.

Edit: Primary Site, TNM Clin Stage Valid B-Ed 7 (COC) The purpose of this edit is to validate the coded TNM categories, and site-specific staging parameters where used, with the coded Stage Group assignments. The edit is used for site/histology groups in AJCC 7th Edition chapters 29 through 57. Some TNM chapters require elements in addition to T, N, and M categories, such as grade or mitotic rate. for correct stage assignment. In this edit description, these elements are called staging parameters. The edit will not be skipped but will pass if any of TNM Clin N or a required staging parameter is blank. The edit compares the combination of TNM Clin T, TNM Clin N, TNM Clin M categories, and staging parameter where required, with TNM Clin Stage Group. E:Inconsistency between TNM categories TcX Nc0 Mc0 and assigned TNM stage 2 TNM Clin T (958) = [cX] _ _ TNM Clin N (962) = [c0] _ _ TNM Clin M (966) = [c0] _ _ TNM Clin Stage Group (970) = [2] _ Primary Site (540) = [C541] _ _ _ _ Histologic Type ICD-O-3 (550) = [8380] _ _ _ _ Behavior Code ICD-O-3 (554) = [3] _ Date of Diagnosis (530) = [Y:2016 M:03 D:16] _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ You can not give a patient a stage grouping if the required elements aren’t filled out. You can’t give a stage clinical or pathologic without all the elements (t, n, and m) This case should have been clinical stage group 99. The only instances where this would work would be when the x value made no difference in staging. For example, if we have a cancer of the renal pelvis and you had pT4, pNX, and cM0 you could give that a stage IV, because no matter what the N was the cancer would still be staged as a stage IV based on pT4 and cM0.

Edit: TNM Path T, Primary Site, Surgery - Ed 7 (COC) M:TNM Chapter: 045 Date of Diagnosis (530) = [Y:2016 M:03 D:04] Type of Reporting Source (563) = [1] Primary Site (540) = [C679] Histologic Type ICD-O-3 (550) =[8120] Behavior Code ICD-O-3 (554) = [3] TNM Path T (940) = [p2] RX Summ--Surg Prim Site (1567) = [27] A TURBT doesn’t count for pathologic staging criteria for bladder Pathologic staging can only be given if the patient has a cystectomy per chapter 45

Edit: TNM Clin Stage Group, SSF 2 Lymphoma (COC) E:TNM Clin Stage Group (2) and CS Site-Specific Factor 2 (000) conflict TNM Clin Stage Group (970) =[2] CS Site-Specific Factor 2 (1006) =[000] Date of Diagnosis (530) = [Y:2016 M:02 D:24] Histologic Type ICD-O-3 (550) = [9695] Primary Site (540) = [C778] Type of Reporting Source (563) = [1] Behavior Code ICD-O-3 (554) = [3] If TNM Clin Stage Group = 1A, 2A, 3A, or 4A, then CS SSF 2 must = 000 (No B symptoms) or 020 (Pruritis) If TNM Clin Stage Group = 1B, 2B, 3B, or 4B, then CS SSF 2 must = 010 (any B symptoms) or 030 (any B symptoms + pruritis) If TNM Clin Stage Group = 1, 2, 3, or 4 then CS SSF 2 must = 999 (unknown or no information

Edit: TNM T, SSize, Site Spec - Ed 7, ICDO3 (CoC) M:TNM Chapter: 08B Tumor Size Summary (850) = [077] TNM Clin T (958) = [c1A] TNM Path T (940) = [p1A] Date of Diagnosis (530) = [Y:2016 M:02 D:23] Primary Site (540) =[C739] Histologic Type ICD-O-3 (550) =[8260] Behavior Code ICD-O-3 (554) = [3] Make sure you are careful with putting in tumor sizes when the size helps derive the staging This patient had a tumor size of 7.7 mm which should’ve been put in as 008 with rounding