Initial Estimated Liability (IEL)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Revisions to M2 and RT Final Component of UFTA CWG/MCWG ERCOT Public January 22, 2014.
Advertisements

1 M1 Calculation Options CWG/MCWG ERCOT Public December 16, 2013.
Emerging Technologies Working Group Discussion: AXRs September 24, Contents I.Ready or Not, Here They Come II.ALRs, the Camel’s Nose III.The Whys.
Credit Updates Vanessa Spells Credit Work Group ERCOT Public
Unresolved Issues in NPRR 555 Texas Steel Companies July 9, 2013.
Automation and Improvements to Default Uplift Methodology (summary/white paper of a draft NPRR)
Seasonal Adjustment Factor Mark Ruane Credit Work Group ERCOT Public July 23, 2014.
Demand Side Working Group Load Resource Performance Subgroup April 9, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
Board of Directors Credit Aspects of Mass Transition.
ERCOT Credit Loss Model Mark Ruane Credit Work Group / Market Credit Work Group ERCOT Public April 22, 2015.
0 The Basics –There are 4 POLR customer classes: Residential, Small Non-Res. (
Grabbing Balancing Up Load (BUL) by the Horns December 2006.
Richard Green © Imperial College Business School Model uncertainty: the Pool 1.
Nodal Credit Monitoring and Management – Business Requirements ERCOT CREDIT Department October 11, 2006.
1 NPRR638 Back-casting Updated Results CWG/MCWG Suresh Pabbisetty, ERP, CQF, CSQA. ERCOT Public April 22, 2015.
Credit Updates Vanessa Spells Credit Work Group ERCOT Public February 18, 2015.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee May 8, 2008.
01/17/ CP Discussion October 16,2002 Retail Market Subcommittee Austin, Texas.
MCWG Update to WMS 11/13/2013. MCWG Update to WMS General Update - October 30 th Joint MCWG/CWG Meeting Review September 25 Meeting Minutes - Approved.
1 Tab X ERCOT Confidential Credit Impact of Increased Caps The credit exposure impact of higher system-wide offer caps was estimated using an internal.
The credit exposure impact of higher system-wide offer caps was estimated using an internal ERCOT model under four scenarios: 1.(Base Case) “Normal” summer.
February 5, 2008 TPTF 168 Hour Test Follow up discussion.
M2:Shortened RTM Settlement Timeline Vanessa Spells CWG/MCWG Meeting April 24, 2013.
Credit Updates Vanessa Spells Credit Work Group ERCOT Public December 16, 2015.
1 Load to Price Correlation CWG/MCWG Suresh Pabbisetty, CQF, CSQA. ERCOT Public February 20, 2014.
Default Uplift Max MWh Activity Total Matthew Tozer Manager, Settlements and Billing WMS 1/8/2014.
Total Potential Exposure (TPE) Overview Credit Work Group May 28, 2008 Cheryl Yager.
October, 2011 MCWG/CWG Review of Abacus Loss Allocation ERCOT Mandy Bauld.
1 Energy Storage Settlements Consistent with PUCT Project & NPRR461 ERCOT Commercial Market Operations June 27, 2012 – ETWG Meeting.
DAM and Nodal Collateral Requirements Concerns and Solutions December 7, 2009.
Nodal Credit Monitoring and Management – Business Requirements ERCOT CREDIT Department September 28, 2006.
1 A Review of Impacts to UFE and Load Ratio Share Based on AV Profile ID Changes Presented by ERCOT Staff to the Profiling Working Group 10/26/2005.
Day-Ahead Market Discussion/Clarification TPTF April 24, 2006.
1 NPRR638 Back-casting Updated and Supplementary Results CWG/MCWG Suresh Pabbisetty, ERP, CQF, CSQA. ERCOT Public May 20, 2015.
Settlement Stability 2015 Q1 Update to COPS- DRAFT Blake Holt ERCOT COPS 07/15/2015.
Credit Working Group Background Information Credit Aspects of Mass Transition Update – February 3, 2006.
1 Energy Storage Settlements Consistent with PUCT Project & NPRR461 ERCOT Commercial Market Operations November 2, 2012 – RCWG Meeting.
Credit Updates Vanessa Spells Credit Work Group ERCOT Public May 18, 2016.
Day Ahead Market QSE’s Credit Requirements Concerns and Solutions August 14, 2008.
Credit Exposure Analysis using ICE Prices Suresh Pabbisetty, FRM, ERP, CQF, CSQA. Lead Technical Analyst, Credit April 11, 2016.
Objective 5 Calculate the acid-test ratio and days’ sales in receivables.
Use of ONTEST Resource Status over Telemetry: – ERCOT protocol permits the use of telemetered Resource Status code “ONTEST” during periods of start-up.
Credit Exposure Analysis using ICE Prices Suresh Pabbisetty, FRM, ERP, CQF, CSQA. Lead Technical Analyst, Credit April 20, 2016.
Unit-Specific Deployment based on Modified Generic Cost Presented at WMS December 15, 2003.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Settlement Statements and Calendar Business Requirements Settlements.
Credit Reports Vanessa Spells COPS Meeting ERCOT Public
2017 Seasonal Adjustment Factors
Protocol Revision Subcommittee
Exceptional Fuel Costs in LMP
Credit Updates Vanessa Spells Credit Work Group ERCOT Public
NPRRs 815NPRR Revise the Limitation of Load Resources Providing Responsive Reserve (RRS) Service.  This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) revises.
Future Credit Exposure (FCE)
Ancillary Service Trades and Ancillary Service Settlement
Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services
RMR Update November 6, /05/2002.
Collateral Documents Vanessa Spells August 17, 2016.
Settlements Analysis due to SFT Deration Issue
Project Update and Summary of Project Priority List (PPL) Activity to Date July 17, 2014.
Loretta Martin LCRA , Chair Josephine Wan AE, Vice Chair 05/07/2014
Annual Review of Credit Parameters
NPRR829 Incorporate Real-Time Telemetered Net Generation for Non-Modeled Generation into the Real-Time Liability Estimate ERCOT PRS Meeting May 11, 2017.
Energy Storage Settlements Consistent with PUCT Project & NPRR461
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Texas Energy Market About ERCOT ERCOT market participants
LESSON 6-3 Estimating the Inventory
SECTION 7-3 Finance Charge: Average-Daily-Balance pp
Texas Energy Market About ERCOT ERCOT market participants
Even More Financial Ratios
SECTION 7-4 Finance Charge: Average-Daily-Balance
SECTION 7-3 Finance Charge: Average-Daily-Balance pp
Presentation transcript:

Initial Estimated Liability (IEL) Vanessa Spells Credit Manager April 16, 2016

Initial Estimated Liability (IEL) For a Counter-Party that is a QSE representing only Load-Serving Entities (LSEs), ERCOT shall calculate the IEL using the following formula: IEL = DEL * Max [0.2, RTEFL] * RTAEP * (M1 + M2) For a Counter-Party that is a QSE representing only Resources, ERCOT shall calculate the IEL using the following formula: IEL = DEG * Max [0.2, RTEFG] * RTAEP * (M1 + M2) For a Counter-Party that is a QSE representing both LSE and Resources, ERCOT shall calculate the Counter-Party’s IEL using the following formula: IEL = DEL * Max [0.1, RTEFL] * RTAEP * (M1 + M2) + DEG * Max [0.1, RTEFG] * RTAEP * (M1 + M2)

The IEL variables are defined as follows: Unit Description IEL $ Initial Estimated Liability - The Counter-Party’s Initial Estimated Liability. DEL MWh Daily Estimated Load  The Counter-Party’s estimated average daily Load as determined by ERCOT based on information provided by the Counter-Party. DEG Daily Estimated Generation - The Counter-Party’s estimated average daily generation as determined by ERCOT based on information provided by the Counter-Party. RTEFL None Real-Time Energy Factor for Load - The ratio of the Counter-Party’s estimated energy purchases in the RTM as determined by ERCOT based on information provided by the Counter-Party, to the Counter-Party’s Daily Estimated Load. RTAEP $/MWh Real-Time Average Energy Price - Average Settlement Point Price for the “ERCOT 345” as defined in Section 3.5.2.5 based upon the previous seven days’ average Real-Time Settlement Point Prices. RTEFG Real-Time Energy Factor for Generation - The ratio of the Counter-Party’s QSE to QSE estimated energy sales in the RTM as determined by ERCOT, based on information provided by the Counter-Party, to the Counter-Party’s Daily Estimated Generation.