Molecular Mechanisms of Goss’s Wilt Samuel Eastman 1, Guangyong Li 2,3, Fan Yang 2,3, Josh Herr 2,3 and James R. Alfano 1,2,3 1 UNL Undergraduate Microbiology,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
T-DNA Mutagenesis Purpose: Determine gene function to produce better plants for society.
Advertisements

PCR, Viral and Bacterial Genetics
Mechanisms of U(VI) Reduction and Sediment Growth in Desulfovibrio Lee Krumholz Department of Botany and Microbiology.
Recombinant DNA technology
What are the Methods and Approaches Used to Identify and Study Arabidopsis Seed Knock- Out Mutations? Eric Newton Garen Polatoglu Rena Schweizer.
Key Area : Genetic Control of Metabolism in Micro-organisms Unit 2: Metabolism and Survival.
FAAS Agricultural microbiology research team Polymorphism of Ralstonia solanacearum and it’s plant vaccin development Prof. Dr. Liu Bo Agricultural.
General Microbiology (Micr300) Lecture 10 Microbial Genetics (Text Chapter: ; )
Microbial Genetics (Micr340)
Biotechnology and Recombinant DNA
The Maize ropD Gene Christine Neou Dr. John Fowler Botany and Plant Pathology.
Medical Technology Department, Faculty of Science, Islamic University-Gaza MB M ICRO B IOLOGY Dr. Abdelraouf A. Elmanama Ph. D Microbiology 2008 Chapter.
Purification of a Secreted Agrobacterium rhizogenes Protein(GALLS) Required for Gene Transfer to Plants Josh Cuperus, Larry Hodges, Dr. Walt Ream Department.
13–2Manipulating DNA A.The Tools of Molecular Biology 1.DNA Extraction Homogenization: Cell walls, membranes, and nuclear material are broken Emulsification:
T-DNA Mutagenesis and Plant Genetic Engineering Purpose: Determine gene function to produce better plants for society.
Advanced Microbial Physiology
Plasmid purification lab
1 Review Describe the process scientists use to copy DNA Use Analogies How is genetic engineering like computer programming 2 Review What is a transgenic.
Genetic exchange Mutations Genetic exchange: three mechanisms
Trends in Biotechnology
1 Genetics Faculty of Agriculture Instructor: Dr. Jihad Abdallah Topic 13:Recombinant DNA Technology.
Biotechnology and Recombinant DNA
15.2 Recombinant DNA Or How to Mess with DNA for Fun and Profit.
Chapter 16 Gene Technology. Focus of Chapter u An introduction to the methods and developments in: u Recombinant DNA u Genetic Engineering u Biotechnology.
What do these terms mean to you? You have 5 min to discuss possible meanings and examples with your group! DNA sequencing DNA profiling/fingerprinting.
FAAS Agricultural microbiology research team Polymorphism of Ralstonia solanacearum and it’s plant vaccin development Prof. Dr. Liu Bo Agricultural.
Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering. Human Cloning-The Science In The News.
Chapter 9 Biotechnology and Recombinant DNA Biotechnology: The use of microorganisms, cells, or cell components to make a product Foods, antibiotics, vitamins,
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Lectures prepared by Christine L. Case Chapter 9 Biotechnology and Recombinant DNA.
Uses of DNA technology You will need to convince a grant committee to fund further research into your area of application of DNA technology Read your assigned.
Chapter 12 Lecture Outline Molecular Techniques and Biotechnology.
RECOMBINANT DNA TECHNOLOGY PART 2 Quiz Essay 2 Topics Molecular Topics: 35 points Emphasis: data interpretation, critical thinking with a short answer.
Proteomics, the next step What does each protein do? Where is each protein located? What does each protein interact with, if anything? What role does it.
Plasmid Isolation Prepared by Latifa Aljebali Office: Building 5, 3 rd floor, 5T250.
Genetics and Genomics Forward genetics Reverse genetics
Cosegregation of CAPS with Disease Phenotypes in Barley Abstract This project was designed to identify cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence (CAPS) markers.
Markers for genetic engineering ALBIO9700/2006JK.
Biotechnology and DNA Technology
Biotechnology.
MICROBIOLOGIA GENERALE
V Cell Transformation Recombinant DNA Host Cell DNA Target gene
Use of CRISPR/Cas to edit the Arabidopsis Na+/H+ Antiporter NHX1
Biotechnology and Recombinant DNA
Goss’s Wilt (Bacterial)
ABSTRACT MATERIALS AND METHODS DISCUSSION BACKGROUND REFERENCES
BIO 244: General Microbiology
Biotechnology and Recombinant DNA
Recombinant DNA Technology I
Genetic Research and Biotechnology Recombinant technology
Unit Genetic Control of Metabolism
GENETIC ENGINEERING Chapter 13.
COURSE OF MICROBIOLOGY
13-3 Cell Transformation Interactive pgs. 329.
Genetic Research and Biotechnology Recombinant technology
The Role of Recombinant DNA Technology in Biotechnology
Chapter 20 Biotechnology.
Recombinant DNA Technology
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Biotechnology and Recombinant DNA
Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall
Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall
1.1.3 MI.
GENETIC EXCHANGE BY NIKAM C.D. ASSISTANT PROFESSOR
Transposable Elements
Genetic Engineering and Cloning
Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall
Cell Transformation.
GENE TECHNOLOGY Chapter 13.
Frontiers of Biotechnology
Presentation transcript:

Molecular Mechanisms of Goss’s Wilt Samuel Eastman 1, Guangyong Li 2,3, Fan Yang 2,3, Josh Herr 2,3 and James R. Alfano 1,2,3 1 UNL Undergraduate Microbiology, 2 Center for Plant Science Innovation and 3 Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln Abstract Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. Nebraskensis (Cmn) is a pathogen responsible for Goss’s Wilt in maize in the high plains. Strains of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. Nebraskensis that are virulent and non-virulent in maize have been isolated, but the mechanism of this differentiation is not understood. Investigation of the genetic differences between virulent and non-virulent strains is providing an explanation as to how Cmn causes disease. Cmn mutants with reduced or removed virulence have been created using Tn5 transposon transformation to randomly knockout virulence factors. Potential effectors have also been identified in a genomic “virulence island” region by using bioinformatics. Gene Knockout using Homologous Recombination Using Homologous Recombination the virulence region described above and all the genes contained within will be knocked out all at once. A specially-prepared version of DNA with identical sequences from up- and down-stream of the virulence region will bind to the genomic DNA and replace the region with a selectable antibiotic marker Reverse Genetics Approach By comparing the sequence of the virulent strain of Cmn to other, avirulent strains, candidate genes for potential effectors were identified. The genes in green are located clustered together with a gene for a Phage integrase protein, suggesting a region of virulence genes (a “virulence island”), responsible for the acquisition of pathogenicity and Goss’s Wilt symptoms. Acknowledgements We appreciate the help of Dr. Bob Harveson and Kathy Nielson for providing heirloom Golden Bantam maize seeds and Cmn strains from their collection, of Dr. Tamra Jackson for providing many base strains of Cmn from her collection, and of Dr. Riekhof for assistance with molecular techniques. This research was supported by a UCARE grant from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Strain-Specific Colony PCR By including strain-specific primers in the PCR reaction, potentially avirulent strains were either identified as arising from the original transformed strain, or identified as a contaminant. Clavibacter Virulence Data Virulence readings on over 1000 randomly generated mutants were taken and recorded. Potentially avirulent strains are shown in green to show reduced or absent virulence in the plant. Goss’ Wilt Symptoms Goss’s Wilt is a vascular pathogen that causes tissue necrosis parallel to leaf veins, with characteristic spots of bacterial exudate. Yield loss due to Goss’s Wilt can reach 50% in severely infected fields. Goss’s Wilt is historically a Nebraska pathogen but the range of disease increases during hot, dry years. Inoculated corn symptom comparison The severity of Goss’s Wilt symptoms was recorded in all inoculated plants. Transformed strains that caused significantly reduced or absent symptoms were flagged for analysis and further testing. Laboratory Setup Plants were inoculated by dabbing bacterial solution on a leaf cut. They were then kept for 1 week in a growth chamber at 24 degrees C. Pro. IDGene NameCharacterSize(bp)GC%GC Diff.(-73%) PROKKA_00090hypothetical proteinunknown % PROKKA_00133hypothetical protein % PROKKA_00432Phage_integrase % PROKKA_00434hypothetical proteinunknown % PROKKA_00435hypothetical proteinunknown % PROKKA_00441hypothetical proteinunknown % PROKKA_00442hypothetical proteinunknown % PROKKA_01195 hypothetical proteinunknown % PROKKA_01305hypothetical proteinunknown % PROKKA_01416 BsuMI modification methylase subunit YdiO putative BsuMI modification methylase subunit YdiO % PROKKA_01495hypothetical proteinunknown % PROKKA_01504hypothetical proteinunknown % PROKKA_01554hypothetical proteinunknown % PROKKA_02089hypothetical proteinunknown % PROKKA_02139hypothetical proteinunknown % PROKKA_02246hypothetical proteinunknown % PROKKA_02310hypothetical proteinunknown % PROKKA_02646hypothetical proteinunknown % PROKKA_02648hypothetical proteinunknown % PROKKA_02652hypothetical proteinunknown % PROKKA_02653hypothetical proteinunknown % PROKKA_02654hypothetical proteinunknown % PROKKA_02655hypothetical proteinunknown % PROKKA_02681hypothetical proteinunknown % StrainVirulenceDate InoculatedMutant Type Method of Inoculation Type of CornLocation 511+2/12/16EzTn5 Mutant (2)Nick-DabHeirloom GBGC 512+2/12/16EzTn5 Mutant (2)Nick-DabHeirloom GBGC 513+2/12/16EzTn5 Mutant (2)Nick-DabHeirloom GBGC 514+2/12/16EzTn5 Mutant (2)Nick-DabHeirloom GBGC 515+2/12/16EzTn5 Mutant (2)Nick-DabHeirloom GBGC 516+2/12/16EzTn5 Mutant (2)Nick-DabHeirloom GBGC 517+2/12/16EzTn5 Mutant (2)Nick-DabHeirloom GBGC 518+2/12/16EzTn5 Mutant (2)Nick-DabHeirloom GBGC 519-2/12/16EzTn5 Mutant (2)Nick-DabHeirloom GBGC Tn5 Transposome Random Mutagenesis By transforming Cmn with a transposon carrying a selectable antibiotic- resistance gene, over a thousand random mutants of Cmn were created. The Tn5 transposon inserts randomly into the genome, breaking any gene in which it lands. Ctrl StrainVirulenceDate InoculatedMutant Type Method of Inoculation Type of CornLocation 519-2/12/16EzTn5 Mutant (2)Nick-DabHeirloom GBGC 562-2/12/16EzTn5 Mutant (2)Nick-DabHeirloom GBGC 573-2/12/16EzTn5 Mutant (2)Nick-DabHeirloom GBGC 575-2/12/16EzTn5 Mutant (2)Nick-DabHeirloom GBGC 576-2/12/16EzTn5 Mutant (2)Nick-DabHeirloom GBGC 586-2/12/16EzTn5 Mutant (2)Nick-DabHeirloom GBGC 623-2/19/16EzTn5 Mutant (2)Nick-DabHeirloom GBGC 628-2/19/16EzTn5 Mutant (2)Nick-DabHeirloom GBGC 658-2/19/16EzTn5 Mutant (2)Nick-DabHeirloom GBGC 681-2/19/16EzTn5 Mutant (2)Nick-DabHeirloom GBGC 720-2/26/16EzTn5 Mutant (2)Nick-DabHeirloom GBGC 721-2/26/16EzTn5 Mutant (2)Nick-DabHeirloom GBGC Avirulent Mutants Out of almost 1200 Tn5 mutants, 12 showed no virulences on maize